AMD Federal District Court Decisions

Dickey v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.

Filed: February 8, 2017 as 5:2015cv04922
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Plaintiff: Tony Dickey
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 87 Stipulation Continuing Motion to Dismiss Hearing and Case Management Conference. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/8/2017)

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. et al v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al

Filed: January 30, 2017 as 3:2014cv01012
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: LG Electronics, Inc., LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., LG Electronics Mobilecomm U.S.A., Inc.
Plaintiff: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., ATI Technologies ULC
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER by Judge Susan Illston granting 145 Motion for Pro Hac Vice. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/30/2017)

Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al

Filed: November 19, 2016 as 3:2009cv05659
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: uPI Semiconductor Corporation, Advanced Micro Devices Inc., Sapphire Technology Limited, Diamond Multimedia inc., XFX Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff: Richtek Technology Corporation, Richtek USA, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING SETTLEMENT Final Pretrial Conference set for 12/14/2016 02:00 PM in Courtroom 8, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Jury Selection set for 12/19/2016 07:30 AM in Courtroom 8, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. William Alsup. Jury Trial set for 12/19/2016 07:30 AM in Courtroom 8, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. William Alsup.. Signed by Judge Alsup on 11/19/16. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/19/2016)

Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al

Filed: October 11, 2016 as 3:2009cv05659
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: uPI Semiconductor Corporation, Advanced Micro Devices Inc., Sapphire Technology Limited, Diamond Multimedia inc., XFX Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff: Richtek Technology Corporation, Richtek USA, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

Discovery Order. The court previously devised a process for the use of third parties' CBI produced in the ITC case and set deadlines to file any objections to the parties' review of it as part of their trial preparation. That process req uired notice to the third parties and the ITC and an opportunity to object by October 11 at 3 p.m. No one objected. The court thus vacates the October 13 hearing and orders the following process. For any producing party that has not consented…

Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al

Filed: September 26, 2016 as 3:2009cv05659
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: uPI Semiconductor Corporation, Advanced Micro Devices Inc., Sapphire Technology Limited, Diamond Multimedia inc., XFX Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff: Richtek Technology Corporation, Richtek USA, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER RE STIPULATION REQUESTING EXTENSION OF EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINE by Hon. William Alsup granting 532 Stipulation.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/26/2016)

Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al

Filed: August 16, 2016 as 3:2009cv05659
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: uPI Semiconductor Corporation, Advanced Micro Devices Inc., Sapphire Technology Limited, Diamond Multimedia inc., XFX Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff: Richtek Technology Corporation, Richtek USA, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

CORRECTED ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS AND VACATING HEARING. Signed by Judge Alsup on 8/15/16. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/16/2016)

Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al

Filed: August 15, 2016 as 3:2009cv05659
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: uPI Semiconductor Corporation, Advanced Micro Devices Inc., Sapphire Technology Limited, Diamond Multimedia inc., XFX Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff: Richtek Technology Corporation, Richtek USA, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS AND VACATING HEARING by Hon. William Alsup granting in part and denying in part 511 .(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/15/2016)

Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al

Filed: August 12, 2016 as 3:2009cv05659
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: uPI Semiconductor Corporation, Advanced Micro Devices Inc., Sapphire Technology Limited, Diamond Multimedia inc., XFX Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff: Richtek Technology Corporation, Richtek USA, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

NOTICE RE OPPORTUNITIES FOR YOUNG ATTORNEYS. Signed by Judge Alsup on 8/12/16. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2016)

Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al

Filed: June 6, 2016 as 3:2009cv05659
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: uPI Semiconductor Corporation, Advanced Micro Devices Inc., Sapphire Technology Limited, Diamond Multimedia inc., XFX Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff: Richtek Technology Corporation, Richtek USA, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER RE STIPULATION AND JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE by Hon. William Alsup granting 501 Stipulation.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/6/2016)

Hatamian et al v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. et al

Filed: May 6, 2016 as 4:2014cv00226
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., Rory P. Read, Thomas J. Seifert, Lisa T. Su
Plaintiff: Babak Hatamian, Lussu Dennj Salvatore
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities/Exchanges

ORDER RE: DISCOVERY DISPUTE Re: Dkt. Nos. 182 , 190 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 5/6/2016. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/6/2016)

Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al

Filed: April 22, 2016 as 3:2009cv05659
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: uPI Semiconductor Corporation, Advanced Micro Devices Inc., Sapphire Technology Limited, Diamond Multimedia inc., XFX Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff: Richtek Technology Corporation, Richtek USA, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

NOTICE RE OPPORTUNITIES FOR YOUNG ATTORNEYS. Signed by Judge Alsup on 4/22/16. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2016)

Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al

Filed: April 14, 2016 as 3:2009cv05659
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: uPI Semiconductor Corporation, Advanced Micro Devices Inc., Sapphire Technology Limited, Diamond Multimedia inc., XFX Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff: Richtek Technology Corporation, Richtek USA, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER (AS MODIFIED) granting Defendants Maxchip's and SXC's request to appear by telephone at the Settlement Conference re 477 and 478 Letters. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 4/14/16. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/14/2016)

Hatamian et al v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. et al

Filed: April 13, 2016 as 4:2014cv00226
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., Rory P. Read, Thomas J. Seifert, Lisa T. Su
Plaintiff: Babak Hatamian, Lussu Dennj Salvatore
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities/Exchanges

ORDER RE: DISCOVERY DISPUTE ( 185 Letter filed by KBC Asset Management NV ). Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 4/13/2016. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/13/2016)

Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al

Filed: March 23, 2016 as 3:2009cv05659
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: uPI Semiconductor Corporation, Advanced Micro Devices Inc., Sapphire Technology Limited, Diamond Multimedia inc., XFX Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff: Richtek Technology Corporation, Richtek USA, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE, Motions terminated: 465 Responses due by 3/30/2016. Replies due by 4/6/2016.. Signed by Judge Alsup on 3/23/16. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/23/2016)

Hatamian et al v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. et al

Filed: March 16, 2016 as 4:2014cv00226
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., Rory P. Read, Thomas J. Seifert, Lisa T. Su
Plaintiff: Babak Hatamian, Lussu Dennj Salvatore
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities/Exchanges

ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting 143 Motion to Certify Class.(fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/16/2016)

HSM Portfolio LLC et al v. Elpida Memory Inc. et al

Filed: February 11, 2016 as 1:2011cv00770
Court: Delaware District Court
Defendant: Fujitsu Limited, Fujitsu America Inc., Fujitsu Semiconductor America Inc., Advanced Micro Devices Inc., Qualcomm Inc, Elpida Memory Inc., Elpida Memory (USA) Inc., Hynix Semiconductor Inc., Hynix Semiconductor America Inc., Hynix Semiconductor Manufacturing America Inc., Marvell Technology Group Ltd., Marvell Semiconductor Ltd., Micron Technology Inc., Nvidia Corporation, Freescale Semiconductor Inc., Promos Technologies Inc., Sandisk Corporation, Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Electronics Inc., Sony Computer Entertainment Inc., Sony Computer Entertainment America LLC, STMicroelectronics, N.V., STMicroelectronics Inc., Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America Inc., Toshiba America Electronic Components Inc., Cirrus Logic, Inc., ON Semiconductor Corporation, Xilinx Inc., Zoran Corporation
Plaintiff: HSM Portfolio LLC, Technology Properties Limited LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Dismissing as Moot 1091 MOTION to Strike Untimely Evidence Cited In Micron's Summary Judgment Brief, Dismissing as Moot 1125 MOTION to Strike Untimely Evidence Cited in Micron's Summary Judgment Opposition Brief , Dismissing as Moot (pertaining to the A35A Design ID)and Denying (with respect to the Flannagan and Annaratone prior art references) 995 MOTION to Preclude Untimely Prior Art Evidence from Trial, and Granting (with respect to the new…

HSM Portfolio LLC et al v. Elpida Memory Inc. et al

Filed: February 11, 2016 as 1:2011cv00770
Court: Delaware District Court
Defendant: Fujitsu Limited, Fujitsu America Inc., Fujitsu Semiconductor America Inc., Advanced Micro Devices Inc., Qualcomm Inc, Elpida Memory Inc., Elpida Memory (USA) Inc., Hynix Semiconductor Inc., Hynix Semiconductor America Inc., Hynix Semiconductor Manufacturing America Inc., Marvell Technology Group Ltd., Marvell Semiconductor Ltd., Micron Technology Inc., Nvidia Corporation, Freescale Semiconductor Inc., Promos Technologies Inc., Sandisk Corporation, Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Electronics Inc., Sony Computer Entertainment Inc., Sony Computer Entertainment America LLC, STMicroelectronics, N.V., STMicroelectronics Inc., Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America Inc., Toshiba America Electronic Components Inc., Cirrus Logic, Inc., ON Semiconductor Corporation, Xilinx Inc., Zoran Corporation
Plaintiff: HSM Portfolio LLC, Technology Properties Limited LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent

MEMORANDUM ORDER Denying 1041 MOTION to Exclude Portions of Philip Green's Damages Report, Denying 1045 MOTION to Exclude Portions of Dr. Martin Walker's Invalidity Report, and Dismissing as Moot 1050 MOTION to Exclude Portions of Dr. Martin Walker's Non-Infringement Report (see Order for further details). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 2/11/2016. (ksr, )

HSM Portfolio LLC et al v. Elpida Memory Inc. et al

Filed: February 11, 2016 as 1:2011cv00770
Court: Delaware District Court
Defendant: Fujitsu Limited, Fujitsu America Inc., Fujitsu Semiconductor America Inc., Advanced Micro Devices Inc., Qualcomm Inc, Elpida Memory Inc., Elpida Memory (USA) Inc., Hynix Semiconductor Inc., Hynix Semiconductor America Inc., Hynix Semiconductor Manufacturing America Inc., Marvell Technology Group Ltd., Marvell Semiconductor Ltd., Micron Technology Inc., Nvidia Corporation, Freescale Semiconductor Inc., Promos Technologies Inc., Sandisk Corporation, Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Electronics Inc., Sony Computer Entertainment Inc., Sony Computer Entertainment America LLC, STMicroelectronics, N.V., STMicroelectronics Inc., Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America Inc., Toshiba America Electronic Components Inc., Cirrus Logic, Inc., ON Semiconductor Corporation, Xilinx Inc., Zoran Corporation
Plaintiff: HSM Portfolio LLC, Technology Properties Limited LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent

MEMORANDUM OPINION re 1037 MOTION for Summary Judgment of Noninfringement, 1039 MOTION for Summary Judgment of Invalidity, [1040 ]MOTION for Summary Judgment of No Indirect Infringement and 1055 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment that U.S. Patent No. 5,030,853 is Not Anticipated and Not Indefinite. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 2/11/2016. (ksr, )

Richtek Technology Corporation et al v. uPI Semiconductor Corporation et al

Filed: January 22, 2016 as 3:2009cv05659
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: uPI Semiconductor Corporation, Advanced Micro Devices Inc., Sapphire Technology Limited, Diamond Multimedia inc., XFX Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff: Richtek Technology Corporation, Richtek USA, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER LIFTING STAY AND SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Discovery due by 2/18/2016. Further Case Management Conference set for 2/25/2016 11:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Alsup on 1/22/16. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2016)

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. et al v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al

Filed: January 14, 2016 as 3:2014cv01012
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: LG Electronics, Inc., LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., LG Electronics Mobilecomm U.S.A., Inc.
Plaintiff: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., ATI Technologies ULC
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER DIRECTING FILING OF JOINT STATUS REPORT (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 1/14/2016)