Apple State Court Decisions

Pepper v. Apple Inc.

Filed: January 12, 2017

State: United States
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Case Number: 14-15000

Antitrust. The panel reversed the dismissal for lack of statutory standing of an antitrust complaint alleging that Apple, Inc., monopolized and attempted to monopolize the market for iPhone apps. Plaintiffs argued that Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(g)(2) barred Apple from raising in its fourth Rule 12 motion to dismiss a statutory standing defense omitted from prior motions to dismiss. Agreeing with the Third and Tenth Circuits, the panel held that as a reviewing court, the court of appeals should…

Adkins et al v. Apple Inc et al

Filed: January 11, 2017

State: California
Court: California Northern District Court
Case Number: 3:2014cv01619

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION UNDER FRCP 56(d) AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 01/11/2017. (Redacted of confidential information.) (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2017)

VIRNETX INC. v. APPLE INC.

Filed: December 9, 2016

State: United States
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 16-1211

VIRNETX INC. v. APPLE INC.

Filed: December 9, 2016

State: United States
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 15-1934

Samsung Electronics Co. v. Apple Inc.

Filed: December 6, 2016

State: United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Case Number: 15-777

Samsung Electronics Co. v. Apple Inc.

Filed: December 6, 2016

State: United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Case Number: 15-777

EON Corp. IP Holdings, LLC v. Apple Inc.

Filed: October 28, 2016

State: California
Court: California Northern District Court
Case Number: 3:2014cv05511

ORDER DENYING 206 MOTION FOR SANCTIONS by Judge William H. Orrick. 207 , 213 Administrative Motions to File Under Seal granted. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2016)

APPLE INC. v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.

Filed: October 7, 2016

State: United States
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 15-1171

Farstone Technology, Inc. v. Apple Inc.

Filed: September 30, 2016

State: California
Court: California Central District Court
Case Number: 8:2013cv01537

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO RETAX COSTS 210 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court GRANTS Plaintiffs motion as to costs associated with the exhibit copying discussed above and DENIES Plaintiffs motion as to the remaining objections to the Clerks Bill of Costs. Accordingly, the Court orders Plaintiff to pay $40,803 less the reductions discussed above ($861.30) for a total of $39,941.70. (lc). Modified on 9/30/2016 .(lc).

Iris Connex, LLC v Apple Inc

Filed: September 2, 2016

State: Texas
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Case Number: 2:2015cv01911

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 9/2/16. (ch, )

Cellular Communications Equipment LLC v. Apple Inc. et al

Filed: August 29, 2016

State: Texas
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Case Number: 6:2014cv00251

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court adopts the claim construction as set forth in this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 08/29/16. (mll, )

FARSTONE TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. APPLE INC.

Filed: August 16, 2016

State: United States
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 16-1210

Feinberg v. Apple Inc.

Filed: August 10, 2016

State: New York
Court: New York Southern District Court
Case Number: 1:2015cv05198

OPINION & ORDER re: 36 MOTION to Dismiss / Notice of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint. filed by Apple Inc. For the foregoing reasons, the Court concludes that Feinberg lacks standing to bring this act ion against Apple and that, in any event, his SAC fails to state a claim. Because further amendment would be futile, Apple's motion to dismiss the SAC is granted with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment in favor or…

Cellular Communications Equipment LLC v. Apple Inc. et al

Filed: August 10, 2016

State: Texas
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Case Number: 6:2014cv00251

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting-in-part, denying-in-part 174 SEALED MOTION for Leave to Supplement Plaintiff's Second Supplemental Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions by Cellular Communications Equipment LLC. C CE has not shown good cause for granting leave to supplement with additional language for claims 6 and 17. However, CCE has demonstrated good cause as to why it should be granted leave to supplement its infringement contentions with source code…

Arendi S.A.R.L. v. Apple Inc..

Filed: August 10, 2016

State: United States
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 15-2073

GPNE CORP. v. APPLE INC.

Filed: August 1, 2016

State: United States
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 15-1825

WI-LAN USA, INC. v. APPLE INC.

Filed: August 1, 2016

State: United States
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 15-1256

VirnetX Inc., et al v. Apple Inc.

Filed: July 29, 2016

State: Texas
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Case Number: 6:2010cv00417

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The orders consolidating the cases (Cause No. 6:10-cv-417, Docket No. 878; Cause No. 6:12-cv-855, Docket No. 220) are hereby VACATED. The issue of willfulness in both cases is BIFURCATED. Cause No. 6:10-cv-417 will be re tried with jury selection to begin on 9-26-2016, unless the parties agree otherwise on an alternative date, and immediately followed by a second trial on the issue of willfulness. Cause No. 6:12-cv-855 will be retried after Cause No.…

Unwired Planet, LLC v. Apple Inc.

Filed: July 22, 2016

State: United States
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 15-1725

MobileMedia Ideas LLC v. Apple Inc.

Filed: July 21, 2016

State: Delaware
Court: Delaware District Court
Case Number: 1:2010cv00258

MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Sue L. Robinson on 7/21/2016. (nmfn)