Dolby Laboratories Federal Litigation Filings

Gokhale v. Dolby Laboratories Inc et al

Filed: July 6, 2017 as 3:2017cv03845
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Dolby Laboratories, Inc., Jeffrey Fehervari, Conroy Shum
Plaintiff: Sushama Gokhale
Nature of Suit: Employment

GDC Technologies Limited v. Dolby Laboratories, Inc.

Filed: April 11, 2016 as 2:2016cv02459
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: Dolby Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff: GDC Technologies Limited
Nature of Suit: Copyrights

Pantaurus, LLC v. Dolby Laboratories, Inc.

Filed: February 5, 2016 as 2:2016cv00113
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Defendant: Dolby Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff: Pantaurus, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent

United Parcel Service, Inc. et al v. Doremi Labs,Inc. et al

Filed: October 6, 2015 as 2:2015cv07840
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: Dagmar Dolby, Dolby Laboratories, Inc., Doremi Labs,Inc., Doremi Technologies, LLC, Safar Ghazal, Camille Rizko, Emil Rizko
Plaintiff: United Parcel Service France S.N.C., United Parcel Service, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Other Contract

Monster Cable Products, Inc. v. Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation This is a Justia Dockets featured case

Filed: May 18, 2012 as 4:2012cv02488
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation
Plaintiff: Monster Cable Products Inc
Nature of Suit: Trademark

Monster Cable Products, Inc. v. Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation

Filed: November 8, 2011 as 2:2011cv02975
Court: California Eastern District Court
Defendant: Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation
Plaintiff: Monster Cable Products, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Trademark

Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation v. Shenzhen Newland Electronic Industry Co., Ltd et al

Filed: January 9, 2009 as 2:2009cv00059
Court: Nevada District Court
Defendant: Albert Hu, Shenzhen Newland Electronic Industry Co., Ltd
Plaintiff: Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation
Nature of Suit: Trademark

THERASENSE V BECTON We have opinions for this case

Filed: July 21, 2008 as 08-1511
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Amicus Curiae: 1st Media, LLC, Acacia Research Corporation, Alejandro Martinez, Alexander Wilson, American Bar Association, American Intellectual Property Law Association, Amy E. Hamilton, Andrea M. Castetter, Apotex Inc., Arvie J. Anderson, Association of Citizens for Patent Protection in the Public, Averie K. Hason, Biotechnology Industry Organization, Biotechnology Law Group, Boston Patent Law Association, Brian P. Barrett, Bruce A. Lehman, Carl I. Brundidge, Christian E. Mammen, Cisco Systems, Inc., Clifford H. Kraft, Attorney at Law, Conejo Valley Bar Association, Dan L. Wood, Danica Hostettler, David C. Hricik, Dolby Laboratories, Inc., Donald L. Corneglio, Jr., ECORE International, Inc., Edward J. Prein, Eisai Co. Ltd., Eisai, Inc., Elizabeth A. McGraw and others
Defendant-Appellee: Bayer HealthCare LLC, Becton, Dickinson and Company, Nova Biomedical Corporation
Plaintiff-Appellant: Abbott Laboratories, TheraSense, Inc. (n/k/a Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc.)

LUCENT TECH V GATEWAY We have opinions for this case

Filed: July 18, 2008 as 08-1485
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Amicus Curiae: 3M Company, Apple Inc., Bank of America Corporation, Biotechnology Industry Organization, Cisco Systems, Inc., Coverity, Inc., Dolby Laboratories, Inc., E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Company, Eli Lilly & Company, Exxon Mobil Corporation, General Electric Company, Intel Corporation, InterDigital Communications, LLC, Johnson & Johnson, Micron Technology, Inc., Oracle Corporation, Palm, Inc., Qualcomm Incorporated, Regulatory DataCorp, Inc., SAP America, Inc., Symantec Corporation, Tessera Technologies, Inc., The Procter & Gamble Co., Trimble Navigation Ltd., Wyeth, Yahoo! Inc.
Defendant/Counterclaimant: Dell, Inc.
Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellant: Microsoft Corporation
Oracle Corporation:
Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant: Multimedia Patent Trust
Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Cross Appellant: Lucent Technologies, Inc.

TAFAS V KAPPOS We have opinions for this case

Filed: May 7, 2008 as 08-1352
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Amicus Curiae: AARP, AmberWave Systems Corporation, American Intellectual Property Law Association, Arthur O. Klein, Arti K. Rai, Biotechnology Industry Organization, Computer & Communications Industry Association, Consumer Watchdog, Craig Allen Nard, Dolby Laboratories, Inc. (California corporation), Elan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Essential Action, Fallbrook Technologies, Inc., General Electric Company, Initiative for Medicines, Access and Knowledge, Intellectual Property and Administrative Law Professors, Intellectual Property Owners Association, Intellectual Ventures, LLC, InterDigital Communications, LLC, John R. Thomas, Joseph Scott Miller, Katherine J. Strandburg, Mark A. Lemley, Mark P. McKenna, Marshall Leaffer, Michael Risch, Monsanto Company, Nano-Terra, Inc., New York Intellectual Property Law Association, Pax Streamline, Inc., Peter S. Menell, Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America and others
Defendant-Appellant: David J. Kappos, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Prop, United States Patent and Trademark Office
InterDigital Communications, LLC:
Plaintiff-Appellee: Glaxo Group Limited (d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline), SmithKline Beecham Corporation (dba GlaxoSmithKline), SmithKline Beecham PLC, Triantafyllos Tafas

Harthcock v. MIPS Technologies Inc et al

Filed: November 27, 2007 as 2:2007cv00515
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Defendant: Adimos Inc, Advanced Micro Devices Inc, Aeroflex Incorporated, Agilent Technologies Inc, All Defendants, Arrow Electronics Inc, Asus Computer International, Atheros Communications Inc, Avnet Inc, Best Buy Co., Inc., Broadcom Corporation, Canon U.S.A., Inc., Cavium Networks Inc, Chartered Semiconductor Manufacturing Incorporated, Circuit City Stores Inc, Cirrus Logic Inc, Cisco Systems Inc, Conexant Inc, Corelis Inc, Denso International America Inc, Dolby Laboratories Inc, Entropic Communications Inc, Epson America Inc, ESS Technology Inc, FangTek Inc, FujiFilm U.S.A. Inc, Fujitsu America Inc, GameStop Inc, Genesis Microchip (Delaware) Inc, Genesys Logic America Inc, Green Hills Software Inc, Hewlett-Packard Company and others
Plaintiff: Jerry David Harthcock
Nature of Suit: Patent

DOLBY LABS V LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES

Filed: August 24, 2006 as 06-1595
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Cross Appellant: Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation

DOLBY LABS V LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES We have opinions for this case

Filed: August 15, 2006 as 06-1583
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant: Lucent Technologies Guardian I LLC
Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellant: Lucent Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Cross Appellant: Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation, Dolby Laboratories, Inc.

Cooper Bauck Corp. v. Dolby Laboratories, Inc. et al

Filed: July 25, 2006 as 3:2006cv04523
Court: California Northern District Court
Nature of Suit: Patent

Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation v. Himage Electrical Appliance Co. Ltd.

Filed: January 6, 2006 as 2:2006cv00014
Court: Nevada District Court
Nature of Suit: Trademark

Cooper Bauck Corp. v. Dolby Laboratories, Inc. et al

Filed: December 15, 2005 as 1:2005cv07063
Court: Illinois Northern District Court
Nature of Suit: Patent

DOLBY LABS V LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES

Filed: October 18, 2005 as 06-1060
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Cross Appellant: DOLBY LABORATORIES LICENSING CORPORATION

DOLBY LABS V LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES

Filed: October 4, 2005 as 06-1053
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant: LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES GUARDIAN I LLC
Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellant: LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Cross Appellant: DOLBY LABORATORIES LICENSING CORPORATION, DOLBY LABORATORIES, INC.

Tan v. Dolby Laboratories, Inc. et al

Filed: September 30, 2005 as 3:2005cv03973
Court: California Northern District Court
Nature of Suit: Employment