Dreamworks Federal District Court Decisions

Medved v. Dreamworks Animation SKG Incorporated et al

Filed: June 9, 2017 as 2:2017cv00381
Court: Arizona District Court
Defendant: Dreamworks Animation SKG Incorporated, Arc Entertainment LLC, Sony Pictures Releasing Incorporated, Entertainment One Limited, Kandor Graphics SL, Aliwood Mediterraneo Producciones SL, Walt Disney Company, Sony Pictures Classics Incorporated, Paramount Pictures Corporation, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, Universal Studios Incorporated, Comcast Corporation, Lionsgate Entertainment Incorporated, Nintendo of America Incorporated, Game Freak Incorporated, Pokemon Company International Incorporated, Columbia Pictures Industries Incorporated, Rovio Entertainment Limited, Sony Pictures Image Works Incorporated, Sony Picture Classics Incorporated, Netflix Incorporated, Aardman Animations Limited, Focus Film Features LLC, National Football League Incorporated, Major League Baseball Properties Incorporated, National Basketball Association Incorporated, NHL Enterprises LP
Plaintiff: Justin Sloan Medved
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights

ORDER granting 2 Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs. ORDERED dismissing the Complaint (Doc. 1 ) with prejudice. ORDERED denying as moot Plaintiff's: (i) Motion to Allow Electronic Fili ng By a Party Appearing without an Attorney (Doc. 5 ); (ii) Motion to Serve Summons (Doc. 6 ); and (iii) Plaintiff's "Motion to add additional points listed in this motion to original pleadings to save costs" (Doc. 7 ).…

Nitsch v. Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc. et al

Filed: June 5, 2017 as 3:2014cv04062
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc., Pixar, Lucasfilm Ltd. LLC, The Walt Disney Company, Digital Domain 3.0, Inc., ImageMovers, ImageMovers Digital, Sony Pictures Animation, Sony Pictures Imageworks
Movant: David Wentworth
Plaintiff: Robert A. Nitsch, Jr.
Nature of Suit: Antitrust

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh Granting (388) Motion for Final Approval in case 5:14-cv-04062-LHK.Associated Cases: 5:14-cv-04062-LHK, 5:14-cv-04203-LHK, 5:14-cv-04422-LHK(lhklc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/5/2017)

Nitsch v. Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc. et al

Filed: June 5, 2017 as 3:2014cv04062
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc., Pixar, Lucasfilm Ltd. LLC, The Walt Disney Company, Digital Domain 3.0, Inc., ImageMovers, ImageMovers Digital, Sony Pictures Animation, Sony Pictures Imageworks
Movant: David Wentworth
Plaintiff: Robert A. Nitsch, Jr.
Nature of Suit: Antitrust

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh Granting in Part and Denying in Part (385) Motion for Attorney's Fees in case 5:14-cv-04062-LHK.Associated Cases: 5:14-cv-04062-LHK, 5:14-cv-04203-LHK, 5:14-cv-04422-LHK(lhklc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/5/2017)

Nitsch v. Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc. et al

Filed: November 11, 2016 as 3:2014cv04062
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc., Pixar, Lucasfilm Ltd. LLC, The Walt Disney Company, Digital Domain 3.0, Inc., ImageMovers, ImageMovers Digital, Sony Pictures Animation, Sony Pictures Imageworks
Movant: David Wentworth
Plaintiff: Robert A. Nitsch, Jr.
Nature of Suit: Antitrust

Final Judgment as to Defendants Sony Pictures Imageworks Inc., Sony Pictures Animation Inc., and Blue Sky Studios Inc. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 11/11/16. (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/11/2016)

Nitsch v. Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc. et al

Filed: November 11, 2016 as 3:2014cv04062
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc., Pixar, Lucasfilm Ltd. LLC, The Walt Disney Company, Digital Domain 3.0, Inc., ImageMovers, ImageMovers Digital, Sony Pictures Animation, Sony Pictures Imageworks
Movant: David Wentworth
Plaintiff: Robert A. Nitsch, Jr.
Nature of Suit: Antitrust

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh Granting 331 Motion for Attorney Fees.(lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/11/2016)

Nitsch v. Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc. et al

Filed: November 11, 2016 as 3:2014cv04062
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc., Pixar, Lucasfilm Ltd. LLC, The Walt Disney Company, Digital Domain 3.0, Inc., ImageMovers, ImageMovers Digital, Sony Pictures Animation, Sony Pictures Imageworks
Movant: David Wentworth
Plaintiff: Robert A. Nitsch, Jr.
Nature of Suit: Antitrust

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh Granting 336 Motion for Final Approval of Settlement with Sony Pictures Imageworks, Inc., Sony Pictures Animation Inc., and Blue Sky Studios Inc.(lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/11/2016)

Nitsch v. Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc. et al

Filed: May 6, 2016 as 3:2014cv04062
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc., Pixar, Lucasfilm Ltd. LLC, The Walt Disney Company, Digital Domain 3.0, Inc., ImageMovers, ImageMovers Digital, Sony Pictures Animation, Sony Pictures Imageworks
Movant: David Wentworth
Plaintiff: Robert A. Nitsch, Jr.
Nature of Suit: Antitrust

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on May 6, 2016. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/6/2016)

Nitsch v. Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc. et al

Filed: March 30, 2016 as 3:2014cv04062
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc., Pixar, Lucasfilm Ltd. LLC, The Walt Disney Company, Digital Domain 3.0, Inc., ImageMovers, ImageMovers Digital, Sony Pictures Animation, Sony Pictures Imageworks
Movant: David Wentworth
Plaintiff: Robert A. Nitsch, Jr.
Nature of Suit: Antitrust

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on March 30, 2016, re 213 . (psglc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2016)

Nitsch v. Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc. et al

Filed: March 28, 2016 as 3:2014cv04062
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc., Pixar, Lucasfilm Ltd. LLC, The Walt Disney Company, Digital Domain 3.0, Inc., ImageMovers, ImageMovers Digital, Sony Pictures Animation, Sony Pictures Imageworks
Movant: David Wentworth
Plaintiff: Robert A. Nitsch, Jr.
Nature of Suit: Antitrust

ORDER GRANTING-IN-PART MOTION TO SEAL by Magistrate Judge Paul Singh Grewal, granting-in-part and denying-in-part 244 . (psglc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2016)

Nitsch v. Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc. et al

Filed: March 23, 2016 as 3:2014cv04062
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc., Pixar, Lucasfilm Ltd. LLC, The Walt Disney Company, Digital Domain 3.0, Inc., ImageMovers, ImageMovers Digital, Sony Pictures Animation, Sony Pictures Imageworks
Movant: David Wentworth
Plaintiff: Robert A. Nitsch, Jr.
Nature of Suit: Antitrust

ORDER GRANTING-IN-PART MOTION TO COMPEL. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on March 23, 2016, granting-in-part and denying-in-part 213 . (psglc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/23/2016)

Nitsch v. Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc. et al

Filed: January 21, 2016 as 3:2014cv04062
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc., Pixar, Lucasfilm Ltd. LLC, The Walt Disney Company, Digital Domain 3.0, Inc., ImageMovers, ImageMovers Digital, Sony Pictures Animation, Sony Pictures Imageworks
Movant: David Wentworth
Plaintiff: Robert A. Nitsch, Jr.
Nature of Suit: Antitrust

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on January 21, 2016. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/21/2016)

Nitsch v. Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc. et al

Filed: December 9, 2015 as 3:2014cv04062
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc., Pixar, Lucasfilm Ltd. LLC, The Walt Disney Company, Digital Domain 3.0, Inc., ImageMovers, ImageMovers Digital, Sony Pictures Animation, Sony Pictures Imageworks
Movant: David Wentworth
Plaintiff: Robert A. Nitsch, Jr.
Nature of Suit: Antitrust

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on December 9, 2015. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/9/2015)

Nitsch v. Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc. et al

Filed: July 8, 2015 as 3:2014cv04062
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc., Pixar, Lucasfilm Ltd. LLC, The Walt Disney Company, Digital Domain 3.0, Inc., ImageMovers, ImageMovers Digital, Sony Pictures Animation, Sony Pictures Imageworks
Movant: David Wentworth
Plaintiff: Robert A. Nitsch, Jr.
Nature of Suit: Antitrust

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on July 8, 2015. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/8/2015)

Charles Paddock v. Dreamworks Animation SKG, Inc. et al

Filed: May 19, 2015 as 2:2014cv06053
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: Lewis W. Coleman, Dreamworks Animation SKG, Inc., Jeffrey Katzenberg
Plaintiff: Charles Paddock
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities/Exchanges

MINUTES IN CHAMBERS: FINAL JUDGMENT ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION by Judge S. James Otero. This matter came before the Court on Defendants DreamWorks Animation SKG, Inc., Lewis Coleman, and Jeffrey Katzenberg Motion to Dismiss, filed December 22, 2014 . The Court issued an Order granting dismissal of all claims, and Plaintiff Roofers Local No. 149 Pension Fund's elected not to amend its claims. In view of the Court's order of dismissal, and good cause having been shown, it is…

Charles Paddock v. Dreamworks Animation SKG, Inc. et al

Filed: April 24, 2015 as 2:2014cv06053
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: Lewis W. Coleman, Dreamworks Animation SKG, Inc., Jeffrey Katzenberg
Plaintiff: Charles Paddock
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities/Exchanges

ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge S. James Otero. The deadline to amend the Complaint has passed, and no amended complaint has been filed. Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES the case for failure to prosecute. This matter shall close Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (shb)

Nitsch v. Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc. et al

Filed: November 6, 2014 as 3:2014cv04062
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc., Pixar, Lucasfilm Ltd. LLC, The Walt Disney Company, Digital Domain 3.0, Inc., ImageMovers, ImageMovers Digital, Sony Pictures Animation, Sony Pictures Imageworks
Movant: David Wentworth
Plaintiff: Robert A. Nitsch, Jr.
Nature of Suit: Antitrust

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on November 6, 2014. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/6/2014)

Melissa J. Weiss v. Dreamworks SKG et al

Filed: September 16, 2014 as 2:2014cv02890
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: Dreamworks Television, Dreamworks SKG, Dreamworks LLC, Dreamworks Inc, Dreamworks Distribution
Plaintiff: Melissa J Weiss
Nature of Suit: Copyrights

ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE APPLICATION REQUESTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT 24 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: Amblin' Films, Inc. shall have up to 30 days from the date of entry of this Order to respond to Plaintiff Melissa Jane Weiss' operative pleading. In addition, the APPLICATION FOR CLERK TO ENTER DEFAULT AGAINST DREAMWORKS FILED BY PLAINTIFF MELISSA J.WEISS 21 is denied as moot. (lc). Modified on 9/16/2014. (lc).

Eopus Innovations LLC v. Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc

Filed: June 24, 2014 as 2:2013cv09552
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc
Plaintiff: Eopus Innovations LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent

AMENDED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Margaret A. Nagle re Protective Order 52 (ec)

Eopus Innovations LLC v. Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc

Filed: June 23, 2014 as 2:2013cv09552
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc
Plaintiff: Eopus Innovations LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent

PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Margaret A. Nagle re Stipulation for Protective Order 47 (ec)

Gordon v. DreamWorks Animation SKG, Inc. et al

Filed: November 17, 2011 as 1:2011cv10255
Court: Massachusetts District Court
Defendant: DreamWorks Animation LLC, DreamWorks Animation SKG, Inc., Paramount Pictures Corporation
Plaintiff: Jayme Gordon
Nature of Suit: Copyrights

Judge Joseph L. Tauro: ORDER entered. After considering Plaintiff's Emergency Motion for Protective Order and Sanctions 34 and Defendants' Motion to Dismiss For Failure to Appear at Deposition 36 , and conducting a Hearing on 11/17/2011 , the court hereby orders that: Emergency MOTION for Protective Order and Sanctions 34 AND Motion to Dismiss For Failure to Appear at Deposition 36 ARE DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to the issue of sanctions relating to the conduct of both…