IBM Federal District Court Decisions

Caunitz v. IBM Corporation

Filed: November 28, 2016 as 7:2015cv09281
Court: New York Southern District Court
Defendant: IBM Corporation
Plaintiff: Richard Caunitz
Nature of Suit: Employment

OPINION AND ORDER re: 6 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint. filed by IBM Corporation. The motion to dismiss is GRANTED. The Clerk is instructed to terminate the motion (Doc. #6) and close this case. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Vincent L. Briccetti on 11/28/16) (yv)

Bridgestone Americas, Inc. v. International Business Machines Corporation

Filed: September 13, 2016 as 3:2013cv01196
Court: Tennessee Middle District Court
Defendant: International Business Machines Corporation
Plaintiff: Bridgestone Americas, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud

ORDER granting 478 Motion to Seal Documents. MOTION GRANTED Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 9/13/16. (am)

Julie Stout v. International Business Machines Corporation et al

Filed: August 30, 2016 as 2:2016cv04914
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: Brian Chu, Does, International Business Machines Corporation, Mark Mullaney
Plaintiff: Julie Stout
Nature of Suit: Employment

MINUTES (In Chambers) Order Re: Motion to Remand by Judge Fernando M. Olguin: IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) Plaintiff Motion to Remand the Action to California Superior Court (Document No. 18 ) is granted. (2) Defendants Motion to Strike (Document No. [2 2]) is denied. (3) The above-captioned action shall be remanded to the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles, 111 North Hill St., Los Angeles, CA 90012, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28…

Ciolino v. Seterus, Inc.

Filed: August 16, 2016 as 1:2015cv09247
Court: Illinois Northern District Court
Defendant: Seterus, Inc.
Plaintiff: Patrick Ciolino
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 8/16/2016: For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion and Order, the Court grants defendant's motion to dismiss counts two and three of plaintiff's complaint [dkt. no. 40]. (mk)

PersonalWeb Technologies LLC et al v. International Business Machines Corporation

Filed: August 9, 2016 as 3:2016cv01266
Court: California Northern District Court
Consol Defendant: Github Inc.
Defendant: International Business Machines Corporation
Mediator: David Folsom
Miscellaneous: David Keyzer
Plaintiff: PersonalWeb Technologies LLC, Level 3 Communications LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER denying 128 Motion to Stay Pending Reexamination; denying 161 Administrative Motion for Continuance of the Hearing. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 8/9/2016. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/9/2016)

Plaintiff v. Defendant

Filed: July 14, 2016 as 2:2016cv02541
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation

MINUTES (In Chambers): Order DENYING Plaintiff's Motion to Remand 16 by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's motion to remand is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. (lom)

Plaintiff v. Defendant

Filed: July 11, 2016 as 5:2015cv00504
Court: North Carolina Eastern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974

ORDER granting 67 Motion to Seal 66 PROPOSED SEALED Reply - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 7/11/2016. (Baker, C.)

Plaintiff v. Defendant

Filed: July 11, 2016 as 5:2015cv00504
Court: North Carolina Eastern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974

ORDER granting 64 Motion to Seal 63 PROPOSED SEALED Reply - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 7/11/2016. (Baker, C.)

Shomali v. International Business Machines Corporation (IBM)

Filed: June 23, 2016 as 3:2015cv02612
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: International Business Machines Corporation (IBM)
Plaintiff: Nima Shomali
Nature of Suit: Employment

STIPULATION AND ORDER [#31] OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 6/23/16. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/23/2016)

Plaintiff v. Defendant

Filed: June 23, 2016 as 5:2015cv00504
Court: North Carolina Eastern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974

ORDER granting 59 Motion to Seal 57 PROPOSED SEALED Document and 58 PROPOSED SEALED Document - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 6/23/2016. (Baker, C.)

Plaintiff v. Defendant

Filed: June 23, 2016 as 5:2015cv00504
Court: North Carolina Eastern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974

ORDER granting 55 Motion to Seal 53 PROPOSED SEALED Response and 54 PROPOSED SEALED Document - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 6/23/2016. (Baker, C.)

Plaintiff v. Defendant

Filed: June 7, 2016 as 3:2015cv02419
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation

ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting 37 Motion for Summary Judgment. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/7/2016)

Plaintiff v. Defendant

Filed: June 7, 2016 as 3:2015cv02419
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation

JUDGMENT, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 6/7/16. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/7/2016)

International Business Machines Corporation v. Priceline Group Inc. et al

Filed: March 30, 2016 as 1:2015cv00137
Court: Delaware District Court
Defendant: Priceline Group Inc., Kayak Software Corporation, OpenTable Inc., Priceline.com LLC
Plaintiff: International Business Machines Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent

MEMORANDUM ORDER re 60 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION is ADOPTED in all respects; 18 MOTION to Dismiss is DENIED without prejudice to renew in the form of a summary judgment motion. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 3/30/16. (ntl)

Lakshminarasimha v. Duke Progress Energy et al

Filed: March 30, 2016 as 5:2015cv00259
Court: North Carolina Eastern District Court
Defendant: Duke Progress Energy, GE, EPRI, US Navy, IBM, Public Service Enterprises, Director of HR at EPRI, Harry Berazin, Sen Feinstein, Pratt and Whitney, Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc., Paul Singshinsuk, Rachel Campbell, Clerk of Court, M. P. Boyce, NC Attorney General, Helen Oliver, General Electric, HR, IBM, Airtran, Chitra Murthy, Cary Town Hall, Wake County School System, Extended Stay
Plaintiff: Arkalgud N. Lakshminarasimha
Nature of Suit: Employment

ORDER denying 161 Motion, 162 Motion and 163 Motion. Plaintiff is ENJOINED from 1. Filing any additional documents in this action other than a notice of appeal and an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal; 2. Instit uting any new civil case in this court without first obtaining leave of court. If plaintiff desires to commence a new civil case, he must file a motion for leave to file a complaint. He must attach to the motion the proposed complaint and…

Richard A Williamson v. Citrix Online LLC et al

Filed: March 9, 2016 as 2:2011cv02409
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: Adobe Systems Inc, Blackboard Inc, Cisco Systems Inc, Cisco Webex LLC, Citrix Online LLC, Citrix Systems Inc, Dimdim Inc, Elluminate USA Inc, Fuze Box Inc, International Business Machines Corporation, Microsoft Corporation, Omnovia Technologies Inc, Salesforce.com Inc, Timebridge Inc, Tokbox Inc, Viack Corp, Video Seminar LIve LLC, WYBS Inc, Webex Communications Inc, Wimba Inc
Plaintiff: Richard A Williamson
Nature of Suit: Patent

JUDGMENT by Judge S. James Otero: For the reasons set forth in the Court's February 17, 2016 Order, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that: 1. FINAL JUDGMENT is entered that claims 1, 3-6, 17-18, and 20-23 of U.S. Patent No. 6,155, 840 are invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 101. 2. FINAL JUDGMENT is entered in Defendants' favor on all of Plaintiff's claims for relief. 3. The deadline for the parties to seek recovery of costs (including filing a Notice of…

Lakshminarasimha v. Duke Progress Energy et al

Filed: March 7, 2016 as 5:2015cv00259
Court: North Carolina Eastern District Court
Defendant: Duke Progress Energy, GE, EPRI, US Navy, IBM, Public Service Enterprises, Director of HR at EPRI, Harry Berazin, Sen Feinstein, Pratt and Whitney, Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc., Paul Singshinsuk, Rachel Campbell, Clerk of Court, M. P. Boyce, NC Attorney General, Helen Oliver, General Electric, HR, IBM, Airtran, Chitra Murthy, Cary Town Hall, Wake County School System, Extended Stay
Plaintiff: Arkalgud N. Lakshminarasimha
Nature of Suit: Employment

ORDER overruling plaintiff's objections to the 150 Memorandum and Recommendation, adopting 150 Memorandum and Recommendations as its own and denying 26 Motion, 31 Motion, 34 Motion, 36 Motion, 37 Motion, 43 Motion, 46 Motion for Hearing, 47 Motion, 48 Motion, 49 Motion, 52 Motion, 54 Motion, 56 Motion, 57 Motion for Reconsideration, 65 Motion for Extension of Time, 70 Motion, 79 Motion, 80 Motion to Amend/Correct, 81 …

Lakshminarasimha v. Duke Progress Energy et al

Filed: March 7, 2016 as 5:2015cv00259
Court: North Carolina Eastern District Court
Defendant: Duke Progress Energy, GE, EPRI, US Navy, IBM, Public Service Enterprises, Director of HR at EPRI, Harry Berazin, Sen Feinstein, Pratt and Whitney, Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc., Paul Singshinsuk, Rachel Campbell, Clerk of Court, M. P. Boyce, NC Attorney General, Helen Oliver, General Electric, HR, IBM, Airtran, Chitra Murthy, Cary Town Hall, Wake County School System, Extended Stay
Plaintiff: Arkalgud N. Lakshminarasimha
Nature of Suit: Employment

JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiff's objections to the M&R are OVERRULED, and the court ADOPTS the M&R as its own. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and all pending motions are DENIED. IT IS FU RTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that within 20 days of the date of the order, plaintiff is DIRECTED to show cause why a pre-filing injunction should not be entered against him. Plaintiff is advised that with the pre-filing injunction,…

Plaintiff v. Defendant

Filed: February 11, 2016 as 4:2014cv02911
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974

JUDGMENT, ***Civil Case Terminated.. Signed by Judge Donna M. Ryu on 2/11/2016. (dmrlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2016)

Plaintiff v. Defendant

Filed: February 1, 2016 as 4:2014cv02911
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974

ORDER directing Plaintiff to submit a proposed judgment and order consistent with the court's Order on Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 60 by noon on February 5, 2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 2/1/2016. (dmrlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2016)