Integrated Device Tech Federal Litigation Filings

Vladimir Gusinsky Rev. Trust v. GigPeak, Inc. et al

Filed: March 8, 2017 as 1:2017cv00241
Court: Delaware District Court
Defendant: GigPeak, Inc., Avi Katz, Neil J. Miotto, Kimberly D.C. Trapp, Joseph J. Lazzara, John J. Mikulsky, Frank W. Schneider, Integrated Device Technology, Inc., Glider Merger Sub, Inc.
Plaintiff: Vladimir Gusinsky Rev. Trust
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities/Exchanges

North Star Innovations, Inc v. Integrated Device Technology, Inc.

Filed: November 14, 2016 as 8:2016cv02055
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: Integrated Device Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff: North Star Innovations, Inc
Nature of Suit: Patent

Logic I, Inc. v. Integrated Device Technology, Inc.

Filed: April 17, 2015 as 1:2015cv00296
Court: Texas Western District Court
Defendant: Integrated Device Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff: Logic I, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Other Contract

BALA IC, INC. v. INTEGRATED DEVICE TECHNOLOGY, INC.

Filed: November 30, 2011 as 2:2011cv07403
Court: Pennsylvania Eastern District Court
Defendant: INTEGRATED DEVICE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Plaintiff: BALA IC, INC.
Nature of Suit: Patent

Integrated Device Technology, Inc. v. Phison Electronics Corp.

Filed: November 16, 2010 as 3:2010cv05168
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Phison Electronics Corp.
Plaintiff: Integrated Device Technology, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

MARX v. INTEGRATED DEVICE TECHNOLOGY, INC.

Filed: October 22, 2010 as 3:2010cv02137
Court: Texas Northern District Court
Defendant: INTEGRATED DEVICE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Plaintiff: KEITH B MARX
Nature of Suit: Other Contract

Hariguchi v. Netlogic Microsystems, Inc. et al

Filed: May 21, 2010 as 5:2010cv02203
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Integrated Device Technology, Inc., Netlogic Microsystems, Inc.
Plaintiff: Yoichi Hariguchi
Nature of Suit: Patent

Hariguchi v. Netlogic Microsystems, Inc. et al

Filed: May 21, 2010 as 4:2010cv02203
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Integrated Device Technology, Inc., Netlogic Microsystems, Inc.
Plaintiff: Yoichi Hariguchi
Nature of Suit: Patent

LSI CORP V ITC We have opinions for this case

Filed: May 14, 2010 as 10-1352
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Appellant: Agere Systems Inc., LSI Corporation
Appellee: International Trade Commission
Intervenor: Grace Semiconductor Manufacturing Corp., Integrated Device Technology, Inc., Jazz Semiconductor, Nanya Technology Corporation, Powerchip Technology Corporation, Spansion, Inc., Tower Semiconductor, Ltd.

LSI Corporation et al v. United Microelectronics Corporation et al

Filed: April 21, 2008 as 2:2008cv00165
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Defendant: AMIC Technology Corporation, Cypress Semiconductor Corporation, Elpida Memory Inc, Freescale Semiconductor Inc, Grace Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation, Integrated Device Technology Inc, Microchip Technology Incorporated, Micronas Semiconductor Holding AG, Nanya Technology Corporation, National Semiconductor Corporation, NXP B V, ON Semiconductor Corporation, Powerchip Semiconductor Corporation, ProMOS Technnologies Inc, Spansion Inc, STMicroelectronics NV, United Microelectronics Corporation, Vanguard International Semicnductor Corporation
Plaintiff: Agere Systems Inc., LSI Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent

Fitzsimmons v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filed: April 27, 2007 as 4:2007cv02287
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Alliance Semiconductor Corporation, Cypress Semiconductor, Inc., Epson America, Inc., Epson Electronics America, Inc., Fujitsu America, Inc., Fujitsu Ltd., GSI Technology, Inc., Hitachi America Ltd, Hitachi Ltd., Hynix Semiconductor America, Inc., Hynix Semiconductor, Inc., Integrated Device Technology Inc, Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc., Micron Semiconductor Products, Inc., Micron Technology, Inc., Mitsubishi Electric & Electronics USA, Inc, Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, NEC Electronics America, Inc., Renesas Technology America, Inc., Renesas Technology Corporation, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Seiko Epson Corporation, Sharp Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corporation, Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Electronics Inc, STMicroelectronics N.V., STMicroelectronics, Inc., Toshiba America Corporation, Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Patricia Fitzsimmons
Nature of Suit: Antitrust

Austin v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filed: April 17, 2007 as 4:2007cv02137
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Alliance Semiconductor Corp., Crucial Technology, Inc., Cypress Semiconductor, Inc., Epson America Inc., Epson Electronics America, Inc., Etron Technology America, Inc., Etron Technology, Inc., Fujitsu America, Inc., Fujitsu Ltd., GSI Technology, Inc., Hitachi America, Ltd., Hitachi Ltd., Hynix Semiconductor America, Inc., Hynix Semiconductor Inc., Integrated Device Technology Inc, Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc., Micron Semiconductor Products, Inc., Micron Technology, Inc., Mitsubishi Electric & Electronics USA, Inc, Mitsubishi Electric Corp., NEC Electronics America, Inc., Renesas Technology America, Inc., Renesas Technology Corp., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Seiko Epson Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corporation, Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Electronics, Inc., STMicroelectronics N.V., STMicroelectronics, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Justin Austin, III
Nature of Suit: Antitrust

Zaas v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd et al

Filed: April 17, 2007 as 4:2007cv02136
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Alliance Semiconductor Corp., Crucial Technology, Inc., Cypress Semiconductor, Inc., Etron Technology America, Inc., Etron Technology, Inc., Fujitsu America, Inc., Fujitsu Ltd., GSI Technology, Inc., Hitachi America, Ltd., Hitachi Ltd., Hynix Semiconductor America, Inc., Hynix Semiconductor Inc., Integrated Device Technology, Inc., Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc., Micron Semiconductor Products, Inc., Micron Technology, Inc., Mitsubishi Electric and Electronics USA, Inc., Mitsubishi Electric Corp., NEC Electronics America, Inc., Renesas Technology America, Inc., Renesas Technology Corp., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd, Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Seiko Epson Corporation, Sharp Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corporation, Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Electronics Inc, STMicroelectronics N.V., STMicroelectronics, Inc., Toshiba America Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Rachael Zaas
Nature of Suit: Antitrust

Fitzsimmons v. Samsung Electronics Co., LTD et al

Filed: March 8, 2007 as 0:2007cv01459
Court: Minnesota District Court
Defendant: Alliance Semiconductor Corporation, Cypress Semiconductor, Inc., Epson America, Inc., Epson Electronics America, Inc., Fujitsu American, Inc., Fujitsu Ltd., GSI Technology, Inc., Hitachi America Ltd., Hitachi Ltd., Hynix Semiconductor America, Inc., Hynix Semiconductor, Inc., IBM Microelectronics LTD, Integrated Device Technology, Inc., International Business Machines Corporation, Micron Semiconductor Products, Inc., Micron Technology, Inc., Mitsubishi Electric And Electronics U.S.A., Inc., Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, NEC Electronics America, Inc., Renesas Technology America, Inc., Renesas Technology Corporation, Samsung Electronics Co., LTD, Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Seiko Epson Corporation, Sharp Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corporation, Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Electronics, Inc., Stmicroelectronics N.V., Stmicroelectronics, Inc., Toshiba America Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Patricia Fitzsimmons
Nature of Suit: Antitrust

Austin v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al

Filed: March 1, 2007 as 1:2007cv01851
Court: New York Southern District Court
Defendant: Alliance Semiconductor Corp., Crucial Technology, Inc., Cypress Semiconductor, Inc., Epson Electronics America, Inc., Etron Technology America, Inc., Etron Techonolgy, Inc., Fujitsu America, Inc., Fujitsu, Ltd., GSI Technology, Inc., Hitachi America, Ltd., Hitachi Ltd., Hynix Semiconductor America, Inc., Hynix Semiconductor, Inc., IBM Microelectronics, Ltd., Integrated Device Technology, Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc., International Business Machines, Inc., John Does 1-100, Micron Semiconductor Products, Inc., Micron Technology, Inc., Mitsubishi Electric & Electronics USA, Inc., Mitsubishi Electric Corp., NEC Electronics America, Inc., Renesas Technology America, Inc., Renesas Technology Corp., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Seiko Corporation, Seiko Epson Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corporation, Sony Corp. of America, Sony Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Justin Austin, III
Nature of Suit: Other Contract

Zaas v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al

Filed: March 1, 2007 as 1:2007cv01848
Court: New York Southern District Court
Defendant: Alliance Semiconductor, Inc., Crucial Technology, Inc., Cypress Semiconductor, Inc., Etron Technology America, Inc., Etron Techonolgy, Inc., Fujitsu America, Inc., Fujitsu, Ltd., GSI Technology, Inc., Hitachi America, Ltd., Hitachi, Ltd., Hynix Semiconductor America, Inc., Hynix Semiconductor, Inc., IBM Microelectronics, Ltd., Integrated Device Technology, Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc., International Business Machines, Inc., John Does 1-100, Micron Semiconductor Products, Inc., Micron Technology, Inc., Mitsubishi Electric and Electronics USA, Inc., Mitsubishi Electric Corp., NEC Electronics America, Inc., Renesas Technology America, Inc., Renesas Technology Corp., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Seiko Epson Corporation, Sharp Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corporation, Sony Corp. of America, Sony Corporation, Sony Electronics, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Rachael Zaas
Nature of Suit: Other Contract

Price v. Cypress Semiconductor Corporation

Filed: February 20, 2007 as M:2007cv01819
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Alliance Semiconductor Corporation, Crucial Technology, Inc., Cypress Semiconductor Corporation, Cypress Semiconductor, Inc., Epson America, Inc., Epson Electronics America Inc., Etron Technology America, Inc., Etron Technology, Inc., Fujitsu America, Inc., Fujitsu Limited, Inc., Fujitsu Ltd., GSI Technology Inc, Hitachi America Ltd, Hitachi Ltd., Hynix Semiconductor , Inc., Hynix Semiconductor America Inc., Integrated Device Technology, Inc., Integrated Silicon Solution Inc, Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd., Micron Semiconductor Products, Inc., Micron Technology Inc., Mitsubishi Electric & Electronics USA Inc., Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, Mosel Vitelic Corporation, Mosel Vitelic Inc., NEC Electronics America Inc., NEC Electronics Corporation, Renesas Technology America, Inc., Renesas Technology Corporation, Samsung Electronics America, Samsung Electronics Company Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor Inc. and others
Intervenor: United States Department of Justice
Plaintiff: Alec Berezin, Alexander Ma, Alfred Livingston, Allen Nassiff, Andrew Ditton, Arthur Madsen, Autotime Corporation, Bekah Zietz, Blaine Olson, Bradley Chase, Brian Kreitzer, Brittany Chung, Bruce Sullivan, Cade Oyadomori, Candace Rowlette, Carlos R. Carrillo, Catherine L. Morgan, Chad Klebs, Chip-Tech, Ltd., Christopher C. Crawford, Christopher J. Stawski, Craig Friedson, Craig Sparks, Cristi Ferguson, Dan Rempe, Daniel Price, Daniel Yohalem, Dataplex, Inc., David Loomis, David Perez, David Reedy, David Takeda and others
Nature of Suit: Antitrust

Koch v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filed: February 14, 2007 as 3:2007cv00949
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Cypress Semiconductor Corporation, Hitachi America Ltd, Hitachi Ltd., Hynix Semiconductor , Inc., Hynix Semiconductor America Inc., IBM Microelectronics Ltd, Integrated Device Technology Inc, International Business Machines Corporation, Micron Semiconductor Products Inc., Micron Technology Inc., Mitsubishi Electric and Electronics USA Inc, Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, NEC Electronics America Inc., Renesas Technology America Inc, Renesas Technology Corporation, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor Inc., Sharp Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corporation, Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Electronics Inc, Toshiba America Electronic Components Inc., Toshiba America Inc., Toshiba Corporation, Winbond Electronics Corporation, Winbond Electronics Corporation America Inc
Plaintiff: Sean Koch
Nature of Suit: Antitrust

Koch v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filed: February 14, 2007 as 4:2007cv00949
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Cypress Semiconductor Corporation, Hitachi America Ltd, Hitachi Ltd., Hynix Semiconductor , Inc., Hynix Semiconductor America Inc., Integrated Device Technology Inc, Micron Semiconductor Products Inc., Micron Technology Inc., Mitsubishi Electric and Electronics USA Inc, Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, NEC Electronics America Inc., Renesas Technology America Inc, Renesas Technology Corporation, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor Inc., Sharp Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corporation, Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Electronics Inc, Toshiba America Electronic Components Inc., Toshiba America Inc., Toshiba Corporation, Winbond Electronics Corporation, Winbond Electronics Corporation America Inc
Plaintiff: Sean Koch
Nature of Suit: Antitrust

Baranic v. Samsung Electronics Co, Ltd. et al

Filed: January 25, 2007 as 4:2007cv00509
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Cypress Semiconductor Corporation, Hitachi America Ltd, Hitachi Ltd., Hynix Semiconductor America Inc., Hynix Semiconductor Inc., Integrated Device Technology Inc., Micron Semiconductor Products Inc., Micron Technology Inc., Mitsubishi Electric and Electronics USA Inc.,, Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, NEC Electronics America Inc., Renesas Technology America Inc, Renesas Technology Corporation, Samsung Electronics Co, Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor Inc., Sharp Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corporation, Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Electronics Inc., Toshiba America Electronic Components Inc., Toshiba America Inc., Toshiba Corporation, Winbond Electronics Corporation, Winbond Electronics Corporation America Inc
Plaintiff: Michael Baranic
Nature of Suit: Antitrust