Juniper Networks Federal District Court Decisions

Glassey et al v. Microsemi Inc et al

Filed: December 11, 2014 as 3:2014cv03629
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Microsemi Inc, Symmetricom, Inc., Digital Delivery Inc, Datum, Inc., Erik Van Der Kaay, Mark Hastings, Internet Engineering Task Force, Internet Society, The, United States Government, US Department of Commerce, Peter Chen, US Department of Energy, US Department of Transportation, US Treasury, US Department of Defense, US Intelligence Community, Office of the President of the United States of America, Jerry Brown, State of California, Apple Corp., Cisco Corp., eBay, Paypal, Google, Juniper Networks, Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp., Thales Group, Netflix
Plaintiff: Todd S. Glassey, Michael E. McNeil
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 12/19/2014 at noon.. Signed by Judge Alsup on December 11, 2014. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/11/2014)

Glassey et al v. Microsemi Inc et al

Filed: November 18, 2014 as 3:2014cv03629
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Microsemi Inc, Symmetricom, Inc., Digital Delivery Inc, Datum, Inc., Erik Van Der Kaay, Mark Hastings, Internet Engineering Task Force, Internet Society, The, United States Government, US Department of Commerce, Peter Chen, US Department of Energy, US Department of Transportation, US Treasury, US Department of Defense, US Intelligence Community, Office of the President of the United States of America, Jerry Brown, State of California, Apple Corp., Cisco Corp., eBay, Paypal, Google, Juniper Networks, Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp., Thales Group, Netflix
Plaintiff: Todd S. Glassey, Michael E. McNeil
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS REQUESTS FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re 115 Request for Judicial Notice.. Signed by Judge Alsup on November 18, 2014. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2014)

Glassey et al v. Microsemi Inc et al

Filed: October 30, 2014 as 3:2014cv03629
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Microsemi Inc, Symmetricom, Inc., Digital Delivery Inc, Datum, Inc., Erik Van Der Kaay, Mark Hastings, Internet Engineering Task Force, Internet Society, The, United States Government, US Department of Commerce, Peter Chen, US Department of Energy, US Department of Transportation, US Treasury, US Department of Defense, US Intelligence Community, Office of the President of the United States of America, Jerry Brown, State of California, Apple Corp., Cisco Corp., eBay, Paypal, Google, Juniper Networks, Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp., Thales Group, Netflix
Plaintiff: Todd S. Glassey, Michael E. McNeil
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER STRIKING COMPLAINT AND VACATING HEARINGS re 63 , 73 , 90 , 104 , and 107 .. Signed by Judge Alsup on October 30, 2014. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/30/2014)

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. v. Juniper Networks, Inc.

Filed: May 28, 2014 as 5:2013cv04510
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Juniper Networks, Inc.
Plaintiff: Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER Granting 86 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong on 5/28/2014. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/28/2014)

ReefEdge Networks LLC v. Juniper Networks Inc.

Filed: March 21, 2014 as 1:2013cv00412
Court: Delaware District Court
Defendant: Juniper Networks Inc.
Plaintiff: ReefEdge Networks LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent

MEMORANDUM OPINION re 16 MOTION to Dismiss Based upon ReefEdge's Claims for Willful Infringement and Amended Claims for Indirect Infringement. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 3/21/2014. (rpg)

Juniper Networks Inc. v. Palo Alto Networks Inc.

Filed: February 6, 2014 as 1:2011cv01258
Court: Delaware District Court
Defendant: Palo Alto Networks Inc.
Plaintiff: Juniper Networks Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Sue L. Robinson on 2/6/2014. (nmfn)

Avery v. Juniper Networks, Inc. et al

Filed: January 23, 2014 as 3:2013cv03733
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Pradeep S. Sindhu, Kevin R. Johnson, Juniper Networks, Inc., Robyn M. Denholm, Gene Zamiska
Plaintiff: Warren Avery
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities/Exchanges

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. This case is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 01/23/2014. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2014)

Brixham Solutions LTD v. Juniper Networks, Inc.

Filed: January 22, 2014 as 3:2013cv00616
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Juniper Networks, Inc.
Plaintiff: Brixham Solutions LTD
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER by Judge Joseph C. Spero granting in part and denying in part 49 Motion to Dismiss with leave to amend (jcslc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2014).

Brixham Solutions LTD v. Juniper Networks, Inc.

Filed: January 7, 2014 as 3:2013cv00616
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Juniper Networks, Inc.
Plaintiff: Brixham Solutions LTD
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER GRANTING re 54 Stipulation of Dismissal of Claims, Counterclaims, and Affirmative Defenses Under U.S. Patent No. '621 filed by Brixham Solutions LTD. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 1/6/2014. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/2014)

Avery v. Juniper Networks, Inc. et al

Filed: November 22, 2013 as 3:2013cv03733
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Pradeep S. Sindhu, Kevin R. Johnson, Juniper Networks, Inc., Robyn M. Denholm, Gene Zamiska
Plaintiff: Warren Avery
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities/Exchanges

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO DISMISS re 15 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER filed by Warren Avery. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 11/22/2013. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2013)

Network Protection Sciences, LLC v. Juniper Networks, Inc. et al

Filed: October 2, 2013 as 3:2012cv01106
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Deep Nines, Inc., Fortinet, Inc., Juniper Networks, Inc., Sonicwall, Inc., Watchguard Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff: Network Protection Sciences, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SEAL (DKT. NO. 310) by Hon. William Alsup granting 310 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2013)

Network Protection Sciences, LLC v. Juniper Networks, Inc. et al

Filed: October 2, 2013 as 3:2012cv01106
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Deep Nines, Inc., Fortinet, Inc., Juniper Networks, Inc., Sonicwall, Inc., Watchguard Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff: Network Protection Sciences, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTIONS TO SEAL (DKT. NOS. 260, 291) [correcting Dkt. No. 342] by Judge Alsup granting in part and denying in part 260 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; granting in part and denying in part 291 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2013)

Network Protection Sciences, LLC v. Juniper Networks, Inc. et al

Filed: October 2, 2013 as 3:2012cv01106
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Deep Nines, Inc., Fortinet, Inc., Juniper Networks, Inc., Sonicwall, Inc., Watchguard Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff: Network Protection Sciences, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SEAL (DKT. NO. 311) by Hon. William Alsup granting 311 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2013)

Network Protection Sciences, LLC v. Juniper Networks, Inc. et al

Filed: October 1, 2013 as 3:2012cv01106
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Deep Nines, Inc., Fortinet, Inc., Juniper Networks, Inc., Sonicwall, Inc., Watchguard Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff: Network Protection Sciences, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SEAL (DKT. NO. 316) re 316 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Exhibit 40 to Declaration of Jill F Kopeikin in Support of Network Protection Sciences' Oppositions to Fortinet's Motions in Limine Nos 1-5 filed by Fortinet, Inc.. Signed by Judge Alsup on September 30, 2013.. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/1/2013)

Network Protection Sciences, LLC v. Juniper Networks, Inc. et al

Filed: September 26, 2013 as 3:2012cv01106
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Deep Nines, Inc., Fortinet, Inc., Juniper Networks, Inc., Sonicwall, Inc., Watchguard Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff: Network Protection Sciences, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL (DKT. NO. 262) by Hon. William Alsup denying 262 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/26/2013)

Network Protection Sciences, LLC v. Juniper Networks, Inc. et al

Filed: September 26, 2013 as 3:2012cv01106
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Deep Nines, Inc., Fortinet, Inc., Juniper Networks, Inc., Sonicwall, Inc., Watchguard Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff: Network Protection Sciences, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL IN SUPPORT OFFORTINET, INC.'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO STRIKE EXPERT OPINIONS OF JOHN C. JAROSZ re 276 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed by Fortinet, Inc.. Signed by Judge Alsup on September 25, 2013.. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/26/2013)

Network Protection Sciences, LLC v. Juniper Networks, Inc. et al

Filed: September 26, 2013 as 3:2012cv01106
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Deep Nines, Inc., Fortinet, Inc., Juniper Networks, Inc., Sonicwall, Inc., Watchguard Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff: Network Protection Sciences, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent

FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER by Judge Alsup finding as moot 283 Motion in Limine; finding as moot 289 Motion in Limine; deferring ruling on 292 Motion in Limine; denying 294 Motion in Limine; denying 307 Motion in Limine (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/26/2013)

Network Protection Sciences, LLC v. Juniper Networks, Inc. et al

Filed: September 26, 2013 as 3:2012cv01106
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Deep Nines, Inc., Fortinet, Inc., Juniper Networks, Inc., Sonicwall, Inc., Watchguard Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff: Network Protection Sciences, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent

FILED IN ERROR - DISREGARD - ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL (DKT. NO. 276) by Hon. William Alsup granting in part and denying in part 276 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/26/2013) Modified on 9/26/2013 (whalc1, COURT STAFF).

Network Protection Sciences, LLC v. Juniper Networks, Inc. et al

Filed: September 26, 2013 as 3:2012cv01106
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Deep Nines, Inc., Fortinet, Inc., Juniper Networks, Inc., Sonicwall, Inc., Watchguard Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff: Network Protection Sciences, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTIONS TO SEAL (DKT. NOS. 260, 291) re 260 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed by Network Protection Sciences, LLC, 326 Order on Administrative Motion to File Under Seal, 332 Exhibits filed by Fortinet, Inc., 327 Order on Administrative Motion to File Under Seal, 333 Exhibits, filed by Fortinet, Inc., 291 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed by Fortinet, Inc.. Signed by Judge Alsup on September 26, 2013..…

Network Protection Sciences, LLC v. Juniper Networks, Inc. et al

Filed: September 26, 2013 as 3:2012cv01106
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Deep Nines, Inc., Fortinet, Inc., Juniper Networks, Inc., Sonicwall, Inc., Watchguard Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff: Network Protection Sciences, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent

OMNIBUS ORDER DENYING SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE REPORT AND TESTIMONY OF DR. KEROMYTIS, AND GRANTING MOTION TO STRIKE REPORT AND TESTIMONY OF MR. JAROSZ by Judge Alsup denying 230 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 249 Motion to Strike ; granting 251 Motion to Strike (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/26/2013)