Lucasfilm Federal District Court Decisions

Disney Enterprises, Inc. et al v. Hollywood Entertainment Group LLC et al

Filed: June 20, 2017 as 2:2016cv09432
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: Craig Banaszewski, Hollywood Entertainment Group LLC
Plaintiff: Disney Enterprises, Inc., Lucasfilm Entertainment Company LLC, Lucasfilm Ltd. LLC, MVL Film Finance LLC, Marvel Characters, Inc., NBCUniversal Media, LLC, Sony Pictures Entertainment Inc., Universal City Studios LLC, Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.
Nature of Suit: Copyrights

ORDER ENTERING PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANTS AND DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Judge John F. Walter. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDICATED AND DECREED that, a permanent injunction shall be and hereby is entered against Defendants as fo llows: Defendants, and each of Defendants' respective officers, agents, servants, employees, successors and assigns, and all those acting in concert or participation with any such persons, including any company owned or controlled…

Nitsch v. Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc. et al

Filed: June 5, 2017 as 3:2014cv04062
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc., Pixar, Lucasfilm Ltd. LLC, The Walt Disney Company, Digital Domain 3.0, Inc., ImageMovers, ImageMovers Digital, Sony Pictures Animation, Sony Pictures Imageworks
Movant: David Wentworth
Plaintiff: Robert A. Nitsch, Jr.
Nature of Suit: Antitrust

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh Granting (388) Motion for Final Approval in case 5:14-cv-04062-LHK.Associated Cases: 5:14-cv-04062-LHK, 5:14-cv-04203-LHK, 5:14-cv-04422-LHK(lhklc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/5/2017)

Nitsch v. Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc. et al

Filed: June 5, 2017 as 3:2014cv04062
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc., Pixar, Lucasfilm Ltd. LLC, The Walt Disney Company, Digital Domain 3.0, Inc., ImageMovers, ImageMovers Digital, Sony Pictures Animation, Sony Pictures Imageworks
Movant: David Wentworth
Plaintiff: Robert A. Nitsch, Jr.
Nature of Suit: Antitrust

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh Granting in Part and Denying in Part (385) Motion for Attorney's Fees in case 5:14-cv-04062-LHK.Associated Cases: 5:14-cv-04062-LHK, 5:14-cv-04203-LHK, 5:14-cv-04422-LHK(lhklc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/5/2017)

Nitsch v. Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc. et al

Filed: November 11, 2016 as 3:2014cv04062
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc., Pixar, Lucasfilm Ltd. LLC, The Walt Disney Company, Digital Domain 3.0, Inc., ImageMovers, ImageMovers Digital, Sony Pictures Animation, Sony Pictures Imageworks
Movant: David Wentworth
Plaintiff: Robert A. Nitsch, Jr.
Nature of Suit: Antitrust

Final Judgment as to Defendants Sony Pictures Imageworks Inc., Sony Pictures Animation Inc., and Blue Sky Studios Inc. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 11/11/16. (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/11/2016)

Nitsch v. Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc. et al

Filed: November 11, 2016 as 3:2014cv04062
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc., Pixar, Lucasfilm Ltd. LLC, The Walt Disney Company, Digital Domain 3.0, Inc., ImageMovers, ImageMovers Digital, Sony Pictures Animation, Sony Pictures Imageworks
Movant: David Wentworth
Plaintiff: Robert A. Nitsch, Jr.
Nature of Suit: Antitrust

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh Granting 331 Motion for Attorney Fees.(lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/11/2016)

Nitsch v. Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc. et al

Filed: November 11, 2016 as 3:2014cv04062
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc., Pixar, Lucasfilm Ltd. LLC, The Walt Disney Company, Digital Domain 3.0, Inc., ImageMovers, ImageMovers Digital, Sony Pictures Animation, Sony Pictures Imageworks
Movant: David Wentworth
Plaintiff: Robert A. Nitsch, Jr.
Nature of Suit: Antitrust

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh Granting 336 Motion for Final Approval of Settlement with Sony Pictures Imageworks, Inc., Sony Pictures Animation Inc., and Blue Sky Studios Inc.(lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/11/2016)

Porter v. Lucasfilm Ltd. LLC

Filed: August 24, 2016 as 3:2015cv03961
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Lucasfilm Ltd. LLC
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Porter
Nature of Suit: Other Contract

ORDER of Dismissal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 8/24/2016. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2016)

Disney Enterprises, Inc. et al v. VidAngel Inc.

Filed: August 19, 2016 as 2:2016cv04109
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: VidAngel Inc.
Plaintiff: Disney Enterprises, Inc., Lucasfilm Ltd LLC, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, Warner Bros Entertainment Inc
Nature of Suit: Copyrights

PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams re Stipulation for Protective Order 21 (NOTE CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT) (sbu)

Disney Enterprises, Inc. et al v. VidAngel Inc.

Filed: August 18, 2016 as 2:2016cv04109
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: VidAngel Inc.
Plaintiff: Disney Enterprises, Inc., Lucasfilm Ltd LLC, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, Warner Bros Entertainment Inc
Nature of Suit: Copyrights

MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. The Court, on its own motion, orders Counter-Claimant(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before September 1, 2016, why this action sho uld not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand…

Porter v. Lucasfilm Ltd. LLC

Filed: July 1, 2016 as 3:2015cv03961
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Lucasfilm Ltd. LLC
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Porter
Nature of Suit: Other Contract

ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND REFERRING TO MAGISTRATE WESTMORE FOR SETTLEMENT.Joint Case Management Statement due by 8/25/2016. Further Case Management Conference reset for 9/1/2016 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom F, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 7/1/2016. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2016)

Disney Enterprises, Inc. et al v. Plug Your Holes, LLC et al

Filed: June 2, 2016 as 2:2015cv09572
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: Samuel A. Dean, Does, Plug Your Holes, LLC
Plaintiff: Disney Enterprises, Inc., Lucasfilm Entertainment Company Ltd. LLC, Lucasfilm Ltd. LLC
Nature of Suit: Copyrights

CONSENT DECREE AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION 252 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. Plaintiffs are the owners or exclusive U.S. licensees of all rights in and to the copyright and trademark registrations listed in Exhibits "A" through "D,&quo t; attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference ("Plaintiffs' Properties"). Defendants Samuel A. Dean, Plug Your Holes, LLC and their agents, servants, employees and all persons in active concert and …

Nitsch v. Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc. et al

Filed: May 6, 2016 as 3:2014cv04062
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc., Pixar, Lucasfilm Ltd. LLC, The Walt Disney Company, Digital Domain 3.0, Inc., ImageMovers, ImageMovers Digital, Sony Pictures Animation, Sony Pictures Imageworks
Movant: David Wentworth
Plaintiff: Robert A. Nitsch, Jr.
Nature of Suit: Antitrust

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on May 6, 2016. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/6/2016)

Porter v. Lucasfilm Ltd. LLC

Filed: May 3, 2016 as 3:2015cv03961
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Lucasfilm Ltd. LLC
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Porter
Nature of Suit: Other Contract

ORDER re 59 Notice of Settlement filed by Lucasfilm Ltd. LLC. Joint Case Management Statement due by 6/9/2016. Further Case Management Conference set for 6/16/2016 at 01:30 AM in Courtroom F, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 5/3/2016. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2016)

Nitsch v. Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc. et al

Filed: March 30, 2016 as 3:2014cv04062
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc., Pixar, Lucasfilm Ltd. LLC, The Walt Disney Company, Digital Domain 3.0, Inc., ImageMovers, ImageMovers Digital, Sony Pictures Animation, Sony Pictures Imageworks
Movant: David Wentworth
Plaintiff: Robert A. Nitsch, Jr.
Nature of Suit: Antitrust

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on March 30, 2016, re 213 . (psglc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2016)

Nitsch v. Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc. et al

Filed: March 28, 2016 as 3:2014cv04062
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc., Pixar, Lucasfilm Ltd. LLC, The Walt Disney Company, Digital Domain 3.0, Inc., ImageMovers, ImageMovers Digital, Sony Pictures Animation, Sony Pictures Imageworks
Movant: David Wentworth
Plaintiff: Robert A. Nitsch, Jr.
Nature of Suit: Antitrust

ORDER GRANTING-IN-PART MOTION TO SEAL by Magistrate Judge Paul Singh Grewal, granting-in-part and denying-in-part 244 . (psglc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2016)

Nitsch v. Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc. et al

Filed: March 23, 2016 as 3:2014cv04062
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc., Pixar, Lucasfilm Ltd. LLC, The Walt Disney Company, Digital Domain 3.0, Inc., ImageMovers, ImageMovers Digital, Sony Pictures Animation, Sony Pictures Imageworks
Movant: David Wentworth
Plaintiff: Robert A. Nitsch, Jr.
Nature of Suit: Antitrust

ORDER GRANTING-IN-PART MOTION TO COMPEL. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on March 23, 2016, granting-in-part and denying-in-part 213 . (psglc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/23/2016)

Nitsch v. Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc. et al

Filed: January 21, 2016 as 3:2014cv04062
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc., Pixar, Lucasfilm Ltd. LLC, The Walt Disney Company, Digital Domain 3.0, Inc., ImageMovers, ImageMovers Digital, Sony Pictures Animation, Sony Pictures Imageworks
Movant: David Wentworth
Plaintiff: Robert A. Nitsch, Jr.
Nature of Suit: Antitrust

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on January 21, 2016. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/21/2016)

Nitsch v. Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc. et al

Filed: December 9, 2015 as 3:2014cv04062
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc., Pixar, Lucasfilm Ltd. LLC, The Walt Disney Company, Digital Domain 3.0, Inc., ImageMovers, ImageMovers Digital, Sony Pictures Animation, Sony Pictures Imageworks
Movant: David Wentworth
Plaintiff: Robert A. Nitsch, Jr.
Nature of Suit: Antitrust

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on December 9, 2015. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/9/2015)

Sanrio, Inc. et al v. George Wilson et al

Filed: October 6, 2015 as 2:2015cv06813
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: Does, Danielle Wilson, George Wilson
Plaintiff: Disney Enterprises, Inc., Lucasfilm Entertainment Company Ltd. LLC, Lucasfilm Ltd. LLC, MVL Film Finance LLC, Marvel Characters, Inc., Sanrio, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Copyrights

IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Stephen V. Wilson: The file in this case lacks the papers that would show it is being timely prosecuted, as reflected below. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing no later than October 20, 2015 why this action should not be dismissed as to all remaining defendants for lack of prosecution. (pc)

Disney Enterprises, Inc. et al v. Sunny Welker et al

Filed: September 21, 2015 as 2:2015cv02439
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: Does, Sunny Welker
Plaintiff: Disney Enterprises, Inc., Lucasfilm Entertainment Company Ltd. LLC, Lucasfilm Ltd. LLC, Sanrio, Inc., The Muppets Studio, LLC
Nature of Suit: Copyrights

CONSENT DECREE AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION 25 by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. ORDERS that this Consent Decree shall be and is hereby entered in the within action as follows: Plaintiffs are the owners or exclusive licensees of all rights in and to the c opyright and trademark registrations listed in Exhibits "A" through "H," attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference ("Plaintiffs' Properties"). Each side shall bear its own fees and costs…