In Re NETFLIX, INC.
Filed: January 19, 2022
Court: US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case Number: 22-110
In Re NETFLIX, INC.
Filed: October 25, 2021
Court: US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case Number: 21-190
ADAPTIVE STREAMING INC. v. NETFLIX, INC.
Filed: December 14, 2020
Court: US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case Number: 20-1310
DAVID WHITEHEAD V. NETFLIX, INC.
Filed: December 10, 2020
Court: US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Case Number: 19-55905
DIGITAL MEDIA TECHNOLOGIES v. NETFLIX, INC.
Filed: November 13, 2018
Court: US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case Number: 17-2408
NETFLIX, INC. v. ROVI CORPORATION
Filed: November 7, 2016
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case Number: 15-1917
ARKANSAS TEACHER RET. SYSTEM V. NETFLIX INC.
Filed: April 11, 2016
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Case Number: 14-15315
MEGHAN MOLLETT V. NETFLIX, INC.
Filed: July 31, 2015
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Case Number: 12-17045
Video Privacy Protection Act. The panel affirmed the dismissal of claims brought under the Video Privacy Protection Act and California Civil Code § 1799.3 against Netflix, Inc., a subscription videostreaming service. The panel held that Netflix did not violate these statutes by permitting certain disclosures about subscribers’ viewing history to third parties¯specifically subscribers’ family, friends, and guests. The panel concluded that the complained-of…
DONALD CULLEN V. NETFLIX
Filed: April 1, 2015
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Case Number: 13-15092
ANDREA RESNICK V. NETFLIX, INC.
Filed: February 27, 2015
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Case Number: 11-18034
Antitrust. The panel affirmed the district court’s summary judgment and affirmed in part and reversed in part its award of costs in consolidated antitrust actions arising out of a promotion agreement whereby Walmart transferred its online DVD- rental subscribers to Netflix, and Netflix agreed to promote Walmart’s DVD sales business. The plaintiffs, individuals representing a class of Netflix subscribers, contended that this arrangement violated §§ 1 and 2 of the…
THEODORE H. FRANK V. NETFLIX, INC.
Filed: February 27, 2015
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Case Number: 12-15705
Settlement. The panel affirmed the district court’s approval of a settlement between Walmart and a class of Netflix DVD subscribers in a class action challenging as anti-competitive an agreement under which Netflix and Walmart divided up DVD-related business. In the settlement agreement, Walmart agreed to pay a total amount of $27,250,000, comprising both a “Cash Component” and a “Gift Card Component.” The panel held that the district court did not abuse its…