Spansion Federal District Court Decisions

Plaintiff v. Defendant

Filed: February 17, 2010 as 5:2008cv00696
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation

ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; VACATINGCURRENT FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE AND TRIAL DATES. Upon consideration, theCourt finds good cause to VACATE the Final Pretrial Conference and the Trial Schedule at this time, until the Court has had a chance to evaluate the merits of Defendants second Motion for Summary Judgment. Set/Reset Deadlines as to 138 Second MOTION for Summary Judgment : Motion Hearing set for 3/29/2010 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8,…

Plaintiff v. Defendant

Filed: February 5, 2010 as 5:2008cv00696
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd denying 134 plaintiff's motion re interrogatories; and denying 135 plaintiff's motion for sanctions. 2/9/2010 motion hearing is vacated. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/5/2010)

Fast Memory Erase LLC v. Spansion Inc et al

Filed: February 2, 2010 as 3:2008cv00977
Court: Texas Northern District Court
Defendant: Intel Corporation, Motorola Inc, Nokia Corporation, Nokia Inc, Numonyx BV, Numonyx Inc, Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications (USA) Inc, Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB, Spansion Inc, Spansion LLC, STMicroelectronics Inc, STMicroelectronics NV
Plaintiff: Fast Memory Erase LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent

Memorandum Opinion and Order: The jury will be instructed in accordance with the Court's construction of certain terms in the '959 patent, as set out in this Memorandum Opinion. (see order for specifics) (Ordered by Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn on 2/2/2010) (tln)

Fast Memory Erase LLC v. Spansion Inc et al

Filed: February 2, 2010 as 3:2009cv00653
Court: Texas Northern District Court
Defendant: Spansion Inc, Spansion LLC
Plaintiff: Fast Memory Erase LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent

Memorandum Opinion and Order: The jury will be instructed in accordance with the Court's construction of certain terms in the '959 patent, as set out in this Memorandum Opinion. (see order for specifics) (Ordered by Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn on 2/2/2010) (tln)

Plaintiff v. Defendant

Filed: January 11, 2010 as 5:2008cv00696
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation

ORDER Setting Motion Hearings re 134 , 135 . Motion hearings set for 2/9/2010, 10:00 AM in Courtroom 2. Briefing to proceed in accordance with Civil Local Rule 7. Court to notify parties if matter will be deemed submitted without oral argument. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 1/11/2010. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2010)

Fast Memory Erase LLC v. Spansion Inc et al

Filed: December 16, 2009 as 3:2008cv00977
Court: Texas Northern District Court
Defendant: Intel Corporation, Motorola Inc, Nokia Corporation, Nokia Inc, Numonyx BV, Numonyx Inc, Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications (USA) Inc, Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB, Spansion Inc, Spansion LLC, STMicroelectronics Inc, STMicroelectronics NV
Plaintiff: Fast Memory Erase LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent

Memorandum Order The court denies defendants' motion to compel discovery [Doc. #181]. Because defendants may not discover the SI reports and underlying data, they are not entitled to depose the SI personnel involved in the testing process. The court therefore grants plaintiffs' motion for protective order [Doc. #264] and denies defendants' request [Doc. #245] and revised request [Doc. #259] for letters rogatory. See Order (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeff Kaplan on…

Plaintiff v. Defendant

Filed: September 24, 2009 as 5:2009cv00849
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation

ORDER STAYING CASE IN LIGHT OF BANKRUPTCY; ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING CASE re 4 Notice (Other). This case is STAYED. The Clerk of Court shall administratively close the case and vacate the Case Management Conference scheduled for 9/28/2009. Within fifteen (15) days of the Bankruptcy Courts final adjudication, any party may move to re-open the case. Signed by Judge James Ware on 9/24/2009. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/24/2009)

Plaintiff v. Defendant

Filed: August 6, 2009 as 5:2009cv00842
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 8/6/09. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2009)

Plaintiff v. Defendant

Filed: July 15, 2009 as 5:2008cv00696
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation

ORDER by Judge James Ware denying 110 Motion for Summary Judgment (jwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/15/2009)

Fast Memory Erase, LLC v. Spansion, Inc.

Filed: April 23, 2009 as 3:2009mc80049
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Spansion, Inc.
Plaintiff: Fast Memory Erase, LLC

ORDER re: briefing schedule. Signed by Judge Illston on 4/21/09. (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/23/2009)

Tokyo Electron Limited v. Spansion, Inc.

Filed: February 18, 2009 as 5:2009cv00502
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Spansion, Inc.
Plaintiff: Tokyo Electron Limited
Nature of Suit: Other Contract

ORDER by Judge Whyte granting 19 Motion to Shorten Time.(rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/18/2009)

Tokyo Electron Limited v. Spansion, Inc.

Filed: February 12, 2009 as 5:2009cv00502
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Spansion, Inc.
Plaintiff: Tokyo Electron Limited
Nature of Suit: Other Contract

ORDER by Judge Whyte denying 11 Ex Parte Application ; denying 13 Ex Parte Application. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2009)

Tokyo Electron Limited v. Spansion, Inc.

Filed: February 10, 2009 as 5:2009cv00502
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Spansion, Inc.
Plaintiff: Tokyo Electron Limited
Nature of Suit: Other Contract

ORDER by Judge Whyte denying 5 Ex Parte Application ; denying 9 Ex Parte Application. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/10/2009)

Tokyo Electron Limited v. Spansion, Inc.

Filed: February 5, 2009 as 5:2009cv00502
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Spansion, Inc.
Plaintiff: Tokyo Electron Limited
Nature of Suit: Other Contract

ORDER FOR REASSIGNMENT TO A DISTRICT COURT JUDGE re 5 Ex Parte Application filed by Tokyo Electron Limited. Signed by Judge Patricia V. Trumbull on February 5, 2009. (pvtlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/5/2009)

Plaintiff v. Defendant

Filed: December 15, 2008 as 5:2008cv00696
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation

ORDER Denying 86 Motion to Strike ; Granting 89 Motion to Dismiss ; Granting 100 Motion for Leave to File. Deadline to file Second Amended Complaint on or before 1/15/2009. Signed by Judge James Ware on 12/15/2008. (jwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2008) Modified docket text on 12/17/2008 (ecg, COURT STAFF).