Thompson v. Tesla Motors Inc et al
Filed: January 9, 2024
State: Nevada
Court: Nevada District Court
Case Number: 3:2021cv00238
ORDER granting ECF No. 120 Stipulation to Extend Deadline : Dispositive Motions due by 1/23/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney on 1/9/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
Thompson v. Tesla Motors Inc et al
Filed: December 5, 2023
State: Nevada
Court: Nevada District Court
Case Number: 3:2021cv00238
PROTECTIVE ORDER granting 117 Stipulated Protective Order. Paragraph D is modified to reflect that any motion regarding filing confidential information and motions to seal shall comply with LR IA 10-5 and the requirements of Kamakana v . City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006). See also, Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC, 809 F.3d 1092, 1097 (9th Cir. 2016). Paragraph C, Section VI, is modified to reflect that although the parties may agree to be bound by…
In Re Tesla Motors, Inc. Stockholder Litigation
Filed: June 6, 2023
State: Delaware
Court: Supreme Court
Case Number: 181, 2022
Thompson v. Tesla Motors Inc et al
Filed: January 9, 2023
State: Nevada
Court: Nevada District Court
Case Number: 3:2021cv00238
ORDER granting ECF No. 86 Stipulation to Extend Time : Reply brief re ECF No. 78 Motion for leave to file due by 1/23/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney on 1/9/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
In re Tesla Motors, Inc. Stockholder Litigation
Filed: April 27, 2022
State: Delaware
Court: Court of Chancery
Case Number: C.A. No. 12711-VCS
Whitaker v. Tesla Motors, Inc.
Filed: January 25, 2021
State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Case Number: 19-56497
Americans with Disabilities Act. The panel affirmed the district court’s dismissal, for failure to state a claim, of an action under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act. The panel held that plaintiff’s allegations were not sufficient to satisfy the standards articulated by Ashcroft v. Iqbal and Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, which, taken together, require well-pleaded facts, not legal conclusions, that plausibly give rise to an entitlement to relief. The panel…
In re Tesla Motors, Inc. Stockholder Litigation
Filed: February 4, 2020
State: Delaware
Court: Court of Chancery
Case Number: C.A. No. 12711-VCS
Balan v. Tesla Motors Inc
Filed: June 27, 2019
State: Washington
Court: Washington Western District Court
Case Number: 2:2019cv00067
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendant's 17 Motion to Compel Arbitration. This matter is stayed until the conclusion of the arbitration by written decision of the arbitrator. The Parties are to notify the Court within 10 days of the decision. The Parties will also advise the Court every 180 days of the state of the arbitration. Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (PM)
In re Tesla Motors, Inc. Stockholder Litigation
Filed: March 28, 2018
State: Delaware
Court: Court of Chancery
Case Number: CA #12711-VCS
State of Missouri ex rel. Missouri Automobile Dealers Association, et al vs. Missouri Department of Revenue and its Director and Tesla Motors
Filed: December 5, 2017
State: Missouri
Court: Court of Appeals
Case Numbers: WD80331 and WD80335
Tesla Motors UT, Inc. v. Utah Tax Commission
Filed: April 3, 2017
State: Utah
Court: Supreme Court
Citation: 2017 UT 18
Case Number: 20150792
Haque v. Tesla Motors, Inc.
Filed: February 2, 2017
State: Delaware
Court: Court of Chancery
Case Number: CA 12651-VCS
KAZIM ACAR V. TESLA MOTORS, INC.
Filed: December 21, 2016
State: United States
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Case Number: 14-17501
Hidalgo v. Tesla Motors, Inc
Filed: June 29, 2016
State: California
Court: California Northern District Court
Case Number: 3:2015cv05185
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND STAY LITIGATION by Judge Beth Labson Freeman. Granting 16 Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Litigation. (blflc4, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/29/2016)
Massachusetts State Automobile Dealers Association, Inc. v. Tesla Motors MA, Inc.
Filed: September 15, 2014
Court: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Case Number: SJC-11545
Plaintiffs, two motor vehicle dealers and an organization that represents the interests of new automobile and truck franchised dealerships in the state, filed this action against Tesla Motors, Inc., an automobile manufacturer, and Tesla Motors MA, Inc., its Massachusetts subsidiary, alleging violations of Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 93B and conspiracy to violate chapter 93B. The superior court dismissed Plaintiffs’ complaint, concluding that Plaintiffs lacked standing to maintain the action…
