Amazon State Court Decisions - Company Legal Profiles

Foraker v. Amazon.com, Inc.

Filed: February 9, 2022

State: Delaware
Court: Superior Court
Case Number: N21A-07-002 JRJ

Enigwe v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al

Filed: February 3, 2022

State: Delaware
Court: Delaware District Court
Case Number: 1:2021cv00453

MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Stephanos Bibas on 2/3/2022. (nmg)

Smith v. Amazon.com Services, LLC

Filed: January 20, 2022

State: Kansas
Court: Kansas District Court
Case Number: 2:2021cv02260

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 26 Motion to Strike Defendant's Settlement Agreement and General Release; denying 27 Motion for Rescission to Defendant's Settlement Agreement and Release; denying 31 Motion to Set Aside the Settlement Agreement; granting 28 Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement. Signed by District Judge Julie A. Robinson on 1/20/2022. (hw)

Nicholas Stover v. Amazon.com, LLC

Filed: January 10, 2022

State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Case Number: 21-5421

Via Vadis, LLC et al v. Amazon.Com, Inc.

Filed: January 3, 2022

State: Texas
Court: Texas Western District Court
Case Number: 1:2014cv00813

ORDER GRANTING 197 Daubert Motion to Exclude the ImproperReasonable Royalty Analysis of Paul Benoit. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan Hightower. (jv2) Modified on 1/3/2022 to correct name of judge that signed order (jv2).

Naughton v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al

Filed: January 3, 2022

State: Illinois
Court: Illinois Northern District Court
Case Number: 1:2020cv06485

MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: This Court denies Amazon's motion to dismiss 36 . Naughton's motion for leave to file a second amended complaint to substitute named plaintiff 48 remains under advisement. The Court will not require Amazon to answer the first amended complaint until after ruling on the pending motion to substitute. Signed by the Honorable Mary M. Rowland on 1/3/2022. (See attached Order for further detail.)Mailed notice. (dm, )

Buero v. Amazon.com Services, Inc.

Filed: December 22, 2021

State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Case Number: 20-35633

Oregon Law. The panel certified to the Supreme Court of Oregon the following question: Under Oregon law, is time that employees spend on the employer’s premises waiting for and undergoing mandatory security screenings compensable?

MasterObjects, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc.

Filed: December 17, 2021

State: California
Court: California Northern District Court
Case Number: 3:2020cv08103

ORDER GRANTING IN PART 175 MOTION TO STRIKE. SIGNED BY JUDGE ALSUP. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/17/2021)

Freshub, Inc. et al v. Amazon.Com Inc. et al

Filed: December 17, 2021

State: Texas
Court: Texas Western District Court
Case Number: 6:2021cv00511

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. For the foregoing reasons, the Court DENIES Freshubs Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law and Motion for New Trial 277 It is ORDERED that every attorney who signed Freshubs Motion for New Trial shall complete thirty (30) hours of Continuing Legal Education (CLE) of legal ethics and shall certify his/her completion of the CLE hours to the Court within six months from the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (ir)

Cassandra Skaggs VS Amazon.Com, Inc., and Amazon Fulfillment, Services, Inc., and Amazon Web Services, Inc., and Amazon Services, LLC, and Talented & Gifted and Hewlett-Packard Company, and Dell, Inc. a/k/a Dell Computer Corporation a/k/a Dell USA LP, and Entergy Corporation

Filed: December 15, 2021

State: Louisiana
Court: First Circuit Court of Appeal
Case Number: 2020CA1089

Sousa v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al

Filed: December 13, 2021

State: Delaware
Court: Delaware District Court
Case Number: 1:2021cv00717

MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Stephanos Bibas on 12/13/2021. (smg)

Miller v. Amazon.com Inc et al

Filed: December 9, 2021

State: Washington
Court: Washington Western District Court
Case Number: 2:2021cv00204

ORDER denying Defendants' 40 Motion to Compel. Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein.(MW)

Shenzen Shileziyou Technologies Co. LTD et al v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al

Filed: December 9, 2021

State: California
Court: California Northern District Court
Case Number: 3:2021cv07083

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION; DENYING DEFENDANTS' REQUEST TO DISMISS; STAYING ACTION; VACATING HEARING; VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; DIRECTIONS TO PARTIES. Parties shall file, no later than May 13, 2022, and every six months thereafter, a joint report apprising the Court of the status of the arbitral proceedings. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 9, 2021. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/9/2021)

Crosby et al v. Amazon.com Inc

Filed: December 7, 2021

State: Washington
Court: Washington Western District Court
Case Number: 2:2021cv01083

ORDER denying Defendant's 21 Motion to Dismiss and to Strike Class Allegations.Signed by U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour.(SR)

De Coster et al v. Amazon.com Inc

Filed: November 30, 2021

State: Washington
Court: Washington Western District Court
Case Number: 2:2021cv00693

ORDER granting Parties' 40 Stipulated MOTION to Defer the Deadline To File a Class Certification Motion. The Court hereby vacates the 11/22/2021 deadline for Plaintiffs to file their motion for class certification. The parties shall propose a class certification briefing schedule promptly following disposition of Amazon's motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' consolidated amended complaint, should the Court deny that motion. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (SB)

Hunter v. Amazon.com Services, LLC

Filed: November 12, 2021

State: North Carolina
Court: North Carolina Western District Court
Case Number: 3:2021cv00258

ORDER granting 8 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying as moot 23 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Frank D. Whitney on 11/10/21. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(clc)

Amazon.com, Inc. v. Robojap Technologies LLC et al

Filed: November 10, 2021

State: Washington
Court: Washington Western District Court
Case Number: 2:2020cv00694

ORDER granting Plaintiff's 105 Motion for Default Judgment and Plaintiff's 104 Motion for Leave to File an Overlength Motion. The Court ENTERS DEFAULT JUDGMENT against Quatic in Amazon's favor and AWARDS $5,050,000 in statutor y damages. The Court GRANTS the Motion for Default Judgment and ENTERS a PERMANENT INJUNCTION against Quatic on the terms set forth herein. Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (SB) (cc: Quatic via international mail) Modified on 11/10/2021 to…