AQUILA INNOVATIONS INC. v. ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.
Filed: April 12, 2022
State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 21-1946
DIANA HAUCK V. ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.
Filed: May 15, 2020
State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Case Number: 19-16124
Kim v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. et al
Filed: May 23, 2019
State: California
Court: California Northern District Court
Case Number: 5:2018cv00321
Order Granting (38) Motion to Dismiss in case 5:18-cv-00321-EJD Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila. Plaintiffs may file an amended complaint within 21 days of this order.Associated Cases: 5:18-cv-00321-EJD, 5:18-cv-03575-EJD(ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/23/2019)
ZOND LLC v. ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.
Filed: January 18, 2017
State: United States
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 16-1423
ZOND LLC v. ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.
Filed: January 18, 2017
State: United States
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 16-1393
Tumlinson, et al. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Filed: November 21, 2013
State: Delaware
Court: Supreme Court
Case Number: 672, 2012
Plaintiff-Appellants asserted various tort claims against Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD). AMD moved to exclude certain expert testimony under Delaware Rule of Evidence 702, which the Superior Court granted after determining that the evidence was not relevant. Plaintiff-Appellants appealed to the Supreme Court, which remanded the case to the Superior Court for further findings related to the expert testimony’s admissibility. On remand, the Superior Court found that the expert…
Tumlinson, et al. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Filed: August 16, 2013
State: Delaware
Court: Supreme Court
Case Number: 672, 2012
A group of Texas plaintiffs alleged that a corporation exposed two employees to chemicals that caused two of the employees' children to suffer from birth defects. The Superior Court judge excluded expert testimony as irrelevant under Delaware law because it would have been insufficient as a matter of Texas law. The judge did not reach the testimony's reliability under Delaware law. Because the plaintiffs waived their argument that California or Delaware substantive law applied, the…
Tumlinson, et al. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Filed: February 21, 2012
State: Delaware
Court: Supreme Court
Case Number: 53, 2012
Tumlinson, et al. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Filed: February 6, 2012
State: Delaware
Court: Superior Court
Case Number: 08C-07-106
Tumlinson, et al. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Filed: January 6, 2012
State: Delaware
Court: Superior Court
Case Number: 08C-07-106
Paton v. Advanced Micro Devices
Filed: August 5, 2011
State: California
Court: Court of Appeal
Case Number: h034618
Tumlinson v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Filed: July 23, 2010
State: Delaware
Court: Superior Court
Case Number: 08C-07-106
Kevin King v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.--Appeal from 261st District Court of Travis County
Filed: November 1, 2001
State: Texas
Court: Third Court of Appeals
Case Number: 03-01-00429-CV
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. v. Intel Corp. (1994)
Filed: December 30, 1994
State: California
Court: Supreme Court
Citations: 36 Cal.Rptr.2d 581, 885 P.2d 994 and 9 Cal.4th 362
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. v. Great American Surplus Lines Ins. Co. (1988)
Filed: February 19, 1988
State: California
Court: Court of Appeal
Citations: 199 Cal.App.3d 791 and 245 Cal.Rptr. 44
