Jawbone Innovations, LLC v. Apple Inc.
Filed: September 20, 2022 as 6:2021cv00984
Court: Texas Western District Court
Defendant: Apple Inc.
Plaintiff: Jawbone Innovations, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER GRANTING 94 Sealed Motion to Reconsider. The Courts Transfer Order 93 is VACATED. Jawbones transfer briefing (ECF Nos. 90, 91, 92) are NO LONGER STRICKEN. The Markman hearing set for September 22, 2022 will be rescheduled for a later date. Any remaining transfer briefing is due by September 21, 2022. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (lad)
Jawbone Innovations, LLC v. Apple Inc.
Filed: September 15, 2022 as 6:2021cv00984
Court: Texas Western District Court
Defendant: Apple Inc.
Plaintiff: Jawbone Innovations, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER GRANTING 38 Apples Motion to Transfer; DENYING as moot 78 Motion to Supplement and Striking all transfer briefing filed after August 30, 2022 ( 90 , 91 , 92 ) AS UNTIMELY FILED. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (lad)
Aire Technology Limited v. Apple Inc
Filed: August 22, 2022 as 6:2021cv01101
Court: Texas Western District Court
Defendant: Apple Inc
Plaintiff: Aire Technology Limited
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER GRANTING 36 DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING ORDER Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (sv)
Miller v. Apple Inc.
Filed: August 16, 2022 as 1:2022cv00468
Court: Ohio Southern District Court
Defendant: Apple Inc., Microsoft
Plaintiff: Timothy Miller
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED THAT: (1) Plaintiff's complaint be DISMISSED with prejudice; and (2) The Court certify pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) that for the foregoing reasons an appeal of any Order adopting th is Report and Recommendation would not be taken in good faith and therefore deny plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 8/30/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 8/15/2022. (kh) (This…
Vivar v. Apple Inc.
Filed: August 8, 2022 as 1:2022cv00347
Court: New York Southern District Court
Defendant: Apple Inc.
Plaintiff: Alejandro Vivar
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
ORDER. In light of recent Second Circuit opinions, the parties are directed to advise the Court whether they consent for the Court to deem the briefing as set forth in the June 24 Order as a fully briefed motion and rule on the basis of the limit ed briefs, or whether the parties request supplemental or full briefing on Apple's motion. If the parties request supplemental or full briefing, they shall submit a proposed briefing schedule within one week of the date of this order.…
Ohanian et al v. Apple Inc. et al
Filed: April 27, 2022 as 1:2020cv05162
Court: New York Southern District Court
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that by April 29, 2022, the parties shall refile the stipulation of voluntary dismissal in accordance with the instructions of the Clerk of Court or file a joint letter with a status update. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 4/27/2022) (vfr)
Reilly v. Apple Inc.
Filed: April 25, 2022 as 5:2021cv04601
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Apple Inc.
Plaintiff: Thomas M Reilly
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen Granting 45 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/25/2022)
Ohanian et al v. Apple Inc. et al
Filed: March 18, 2022 as 1:2020cv05162
Court: New York Southern District Court
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
OPINION AND ORDER re: 130 MOTION to Dismiss the Amended Complaint. filed by T-Mobile USA, Inc.. For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Ohanian's claims against T-Mobile are dismissed. Plainti ff may seek leave to amend the Complaint no later than April 1, 2022 by filing a letter motion explaining how the deficiencies identified in this opinion can be cured and appending to the letter a proposed Second Amended Complaint marked to…
KOSS Corporation v. Apple Inc
Filed: March 18, 2022 as 6:2020cv00665
Court: Texas Western District Court
Defendant: Apple Inc
Plaintiff: KOSS Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent
DISCOVERY DISPUTE ORDER. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (lad)
Shukla v. Apple Inc. et al
Filed: March 18, 2022 as 1:2021cv03287
Court: New York Southern District Court
Defendant: Apple Inc., Deloitte Consulting LLP
Plaintiff: Ashu Shukla
Nature of Suit: Employment
ORDER: The Court has been informed that Plaintiff has sent the Court two payments which are not of a type accepted by the Court. The Court has previously advised Plaintiff of the only payment types accepted by the Court: certified check or money order made payable to "Clerk of Court, S.D.N.Y." See ECF No. 66. The Clerk of Court is directed to destroy the payments sent by Plaintiff, and to reject all future payments of a type not accepted by the Court. Separately, although…
Ocampo v. Apple Inc.
Filed: March 14, 2022 as 5:2020cv05857
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Apple Inc.
Plaintiff: Justin Ocampo
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Order granting 38 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on March 14, 2022. (ejdlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2022)
Sonrai Memory Limited v. Apple Inc.
Filed: February 23, 2022 as 6:2021cv00401
Court: Texas Western District Court
Defendant: Apple Inc.
Plaintiff: Sonrai Memory Limited
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER GRANTING 26 Motion to Stay Case. the AppleAction is stayed pending resolution of the Kioxia Action and Western Digital Action. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (lad)
Sonrai Memory Limited v. Apple Inc.
Filed: February 23, 2022 as 6:2021cv00401
Court: Texas Western District Court
Defendant: Apple Inc.
Plaintiff: Sonrai Memory Limited
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS OPPOSED MOTION TO STAY PENDING FINALRESOLUTION OF PLAINTIFFS MANUFACTURER LAWSUITS 26 Motion to Stay Case Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (sv)
Ohanian et al v. Apple Inc. et al
Filed: February 22, 2022 as 1:2020cv05162
Court: New York Southern District Court
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
ORDER with respect to 137 Letter Motion to Compel. Plaintiff Lopez shall file a response to this letter by February 24, 2022. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 2/22/2022) (mml)
Shukla v. Apple Inc. et al
Filed: February 10, 2022 as 1:2021cv03287
Court: New York Southern District Court
Defendant: Apple Inc., Deloitte Consulting LLP
Plaintiff: Ashu Shukla
Nature of Suit: Employment
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: re: 117 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 116 Order of Dismissal filed by Ashu Shukla. Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration is DENIED. In short, Plaintiff's change of heart is not a valid basis for reconsideration. Accordingly, his motion for reconsideration is DENIED as meritless and the case remains closed. As noted in the Court's February 9, 2022 endorsement, the Court retains jurisdiction to decide whether sanctions or a…
Shukla v. Apple Inc. et al
Filed: February 9, 2022 as 1:2021cv03287
Court: New York Southern District Court
Defendant: Apple Inc., Deloitte Consulting LLP
Plaintiff: Ashu Shukla
Nature of Suit: Employment
MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: 114 Letter abandoning this case, filed by Ashu Shukla. ENDORSEMENT: This case is hereby dismissed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Nevertheless, the Court retains jurisdiction to decide whether sanctions or a litiga tion bar should be imposed. See, e.g., Rice v. NBCUniversal Media, LLC, No. 19-CV-447 (JMF), 2019 WL 3000808, at *4(S.D.N.Y. July 10, 2019) ("[V]oluntary dismissal 'does not preclude the district court from considering collateral…
Smith v. Apple Inc.
Filed: February 3, 2022 as 1:2021cv03657
Court: New York Southern District Court
Defendant: Apple Inc.
Plaintiff: Antoinette Smith
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 27 Memorandum & Opinion, in favor of Apple Inc. against Antoinette Smith, Charles Tucker, Fred Santos. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated February 2, 2022, Apple's November 5 motion to stay is denied. Apple's November 5 motion to dismiss is granted. Judgment is entered for the defendant, and the case is closed. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 2/3/2022) …
One-E-Way, Inc. v. Apple Inc.
Filed: January 28, 2022 as 2:2020cv06339
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: Apple Inc.
Plaintiff: One-E-Way, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. Granting Stipulation for Protective Order 84 . (lom)
APT SYSTEMS, INC. et al v. APPLE INC.
Filed: January 26, 2022 as 5:2021cv02121
Court: Pennsylvania Eastern District Court
Defendant: APPLE INC.
Plaintiff: SNAPT GAMES, INC., APT SYSTEMS, INC.
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
MEMORANDUM OPINION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 1/26/22. 1/26/22 ENTERED AND COPIES (NOT MAILED TO COUNSEL) E-MAILED.(er)
APT SYSTEMS, INC. et al v. APPLE INC.
Filed: January 26, 2022 as 5:2021cv02121
Court: Pennsylvania Eastern District Court
Defendant: APPLE INC.
Plaintiff: SNAPT GAMES, INC., APT SYSTEMS, INC.
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
ORDER THAT THE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND (DOC. NO. 26) IS DENIED. THE DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE (DOC. NO. 23) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS FOLLOWS THE MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE IS GRANTED. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL TRANSFER THIS MATTER TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. THE MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO THE DEFENDANT REFILING IT IN THE…
