Todd, et al v. AT&T Mobility Services LLC
Filed: June 21, 2016 as 5:2016cv00082
Court: North Carolina Eastern District Court
Defendant: AT&T Mobility Services LLC
Plaintiff: Citronella Todd, Dawn Cause
CONSENT PROTECTIVE ORDER - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 6/21/2016. (Baker, C.)
Richardson v. AT&T Mobility Services LLC et al
Filed: June 20, 2016 as 2:2014cv01995
Court: South Carolina District Court
Defendant: AT&T Inc, AT&T Mobility LLC, Daniel Brechbill, Sedgwich Claims Management Services CMS
Plaintiff: Kristen Ard Richardson
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION adopting in full 44 Report and Recommendation granting 38 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Daniel Brechbill, AT&T Mobility Services LLC, Sedgwick Claims Management Services Inc; Plaintiff's objections (Entry 45) are overruled, and this matter is ended. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 6/20/2016. (sshe, )
McEnroe v. AT&T Mobility Services LLC
Filed: June 17, 2016 as 3:2015cv02190
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: AT&T Mobility Services LLC
Plaintiff: Sara McEnroe
Nature of Suit: Employment
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 77 REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF THE FACT DISCOVERY DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT LIMITED TO ISSUES STEMMING FROM CERTAIN DISCOVERY REQUESTS CONCERNING PLAINTIFF'S ALLEGED DAMAGES. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2016)
Murphy et al v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. et al
Filed: June 16, 2016 as 2:2015cv05566
Court: Louisiana Eastern District Court
Defendant: Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc., Certainteed Corporation, General Electric Company, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Eagle, Inc., McCarty Corporation, Reilly-Benton Company, Inc., Honeywell International, Inc., Occidental Chemical Corporation, Plastics Engineering Company, Rogers Corporation, Rohm & Haas Company, Special Electric Company, Inc., Cooper Industries LLC, Eaton Corporation, Siemens Corporation, Graybar Electric Company, Inc., Rockwell Automation, Inc., Ward Lumber Company, Inc., CBS Corporation, Georgia-Pacific LLC, BellSouth Telecommunications, LLC, AT&T Corp., Taylor-Seidenbach, Inc., Cytec Engineered Materials Inc., Schneider Electric USA, Inc.
Plaintiff: Carolyn Lanoue Murphy, Irvin D. Murphy, Kelly Murphy Ricks, Robin S. Murphy, Jr.
Third Party Defendant: Celotex Corporation
Third Party Plaintiff: Georgia-Pacific LLC
Nature of Suit: Asbestos Personal Injury Product Liability
ORDER and REASONS - IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Honeywell's motion to dismiss (Rec. Doc. 4) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to its right to re-file the motion following Plaintiff's amendment. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that Honeywell's foregoing motion to continue (Rec. Doc. 41) is DENIED as MOOT, as stated within document. Signed by Chief Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 6/16/2016. (cbs)
CallWave Communication LLC v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al.
Filed: June 16, 2016 as 1:2012cv01701
Court: Delaware District Court
Defendant: AT&T Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC, Google Inc.
Plaintiff: CallWave Communications LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
MEMORANDUM ORDER: Plaintiffs objections to the Report and Recommendation Relative to the Parties Motions to Strike and other Discovery issues are OVERRULED, and the Court ADOPTS the Rulings and Recommendations Relative to the Parties Motions to Stri ke and other Discovery Issues. Plaintiffs motion to strike (D.I. 427; No. 12-1702, D.I. 446; No. 12-1704, D.I. 407; No. 13-711, D.I. 241) is DENIED. Defendants motion to strike (D.I. 448; No. 12-1702, D.I. 457; No. 12-1704, D.I. 407; No.…
Rachells v. Cingular Wireless Employee Services, LLC et al
Filed: June 8, 2016 as 1:2008cv02815
Court: Ohio Northern District Court
Defendant: Cingular Wireless Employee Services, LLC, New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc., AT&T Wireless, SBC, John Doe Corporation, John Doe Individuals
Plaintiff: Anthony Rachells
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Opinion and Order. Cingular Defendants' Motion in Limine (Related doc # 49 ) is granted in part and denied in part. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 6/8/2016. (H,CM)
Murphy et al v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. et al
Filed: June 7, 2016 as 2:2015cv05566
Court: Louisiana Eastern District Court
Defendant: Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc., Certainteed Corporation, General Electric Company, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Eagle, Inc., McCarty Corporation, Reilly-Benton Company, Inc., Honeywell International, Inc., Occidental Chemical Corporation, Plastics Engineering Company, Rogers Corporation, Rohm & Haas Company, Special Electric Company, Inc., Cooper Industries LLC, Eaton Corporation, Siemens Corporation, Graybar Electric Company, Inc., Rockwell Automation, Inc., Ward Lumber Company, Inc., CBS Corporation, Georgia-Pacific LLC, BellSouth Telecommunications, LLC, AT&T Corp., Taylor-Seidenbach, Inc., Cytec Engineered Materials Inc., Schneider Electric USA, Inc.
Plaintiff: Carolyn Lanoue Murphy, Irvin D. Murphy, Kelly Murphy Ricks, Robin S. Murphy, Jr.
Third Party Defendant: Celotex Corporation
Third Party Plaintiff: Georgia-Pacific LLC
Nature of Suit: Asbestos Personal Injury Product Liability
ORDER and REASONS denying 7 Motion to Remand to State Court, as stated within document. Signed by Chief Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 6/7/2016. (cbs)
Bekkerman, et al v. California Board of Equalization, et al
Filed: June 7, 2016 as 2:2016cv00709
Court: California Eastern District Court
Defendant: California Board of Equalization, State of California, AT&T, Inc., Sprint Corporation, T-Mobile US, Inc., Verizon Communications, Inc.
Plaintiff: Alina Bekkerman, Brandon Griffith, Charles Lisser
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Property Damage
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 6/6/2016 ORDERING the Carrier Defendants' deadline to respond to the Complaint is EXTENDED from 6/6/2016 to two weeks after the Court's order on the remand motions becomes final, or 9/12/2016, whichever is later. (Reader, L)
Bekkerman, et al v. California Board of Equalization, et al
Filed: June 7, 2016 as 2:2016cv00709
Court: California Eastern District Court
Defendant: California Board of Equalization, State of California, AT&T, Inc., Sprint Corporation, T-Mobile US, Inc., Verizon Communications, Inc.
Plaintiff: Alina Bekkerman, Brandon Griffith, Charles Lisser
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Property Damage
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 6/6/2017 ORDERING that the time for the State Defendants to respond to the Complaint shall be EXTENDED from 6/6/2016 to two weeks after the Court's order on the remand motions becomes final, or 9/12/2016, whichever is later. (Reader, L)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: May 31, 2016 as 2:2016cv00701
Court: California Eastern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
ORDER of RECUSAL signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 5/27/16: Senior Judge William B. Shubb recused. Case reassigned to District Judge Troy L. Nunley for all further proceedings. The new case number is: 2:16-cv-00701 TLN KJN. (Kaminski, H)
Bekkerman, et al v. California Board of Equalization, et al
Filed: May 27, 2016 as 2:2016cv00709
Court: California Eastern District Court
Defendant: California Board of Equalization, State of California, AT&T, Inc., Sprint Corporation, T-Mobile US, Inc., Verizon Communications, Inc.
Plaintiff: Alina Bekkerman, Brandon Griffith, Charles Lisser
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Property Damage
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 5/26/16: The time for the State Defendants to respond to the Complaint shall be extended from May 23, 2016 to June 6, 2016. (Kaminski, H)
Riddick et al v. AT&T Inc.
Filed: May 26, 2016 as 2:2012cv02033
Court: California Eastern District Court
Defendant: AT&T Inc.
Plaintiff: June Riddick, Patricia Hardy, Natalie Maderos, Valerie Lynn, Lisa Vales
Nature of Suit: Employment
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/26/16 ORDERING that the Court modifies its current Scheduling Order as follows: Disclosure of Expert Witnesses due by 4/29/2016. Close of Discovery 7/29/2016. A Settlement Conf erence is SCHEDULED before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman for 8/15/2016 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 25, 8th Floor. Last date for hearing Dispositive Motions 9/23/2016. Deadline to File Joint Pretrial Statement 9/27/2016. Final Pretrial…
Ashley Graham v. AT and T Services et al
Filed: May 24, 2016 as 5:2016cv00528
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: AT and T Services, American First Finance, Barclays Bank Delaware, Best Buy, Capital One, Clarity Services, Inc., Credit One Bank, Cross River Bank, Does, Elevate Lending Street, First Premier Bank, Macys Inc., One Road Lending, Synchrony Bank
Plaintiff: Ashley Graham
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 24 AND DEEMS DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS TIMELY FILED by Judge Otis D. Wright, II . (lc) .Modified on 5/24/2016 (lc).
Barr v. One Touch Direct, LLC et al
Filed: May 18, 2016 as 8:2015cv02391
Court: Florida Middle District Court
Defendant: One Touch Direct, LLC, Joseph Mole, Christopher Reed, AT&T, DPG Leasing
Plaintiff: Alfred Barr
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Other
ORDER: Plaintiff Alfred Barr's Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. # 79 ) is denied. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 5/18/2016. (DRW)
2-Way Computing, Inc. v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al
Filed: April 28, 2016 as 2:2015cv02230
Court: Nevada District Court
Defendant: AT&T Mobility II LLC, AT&T Mobility LLC
Plaintiff: 2-Way Computing, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER Granting 45 Stipulation to Extend Deadline to File Proposed Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 4/28/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
Roberts et al v. AT&T Mobility LLC
Filed: April 27, 2016 as 4:2015cv03418
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: AT&T Mobility LLC
Plaintiff: Marcus A. Roberts, Kenneth A. Chewey, Ashley M. Chewey
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
AMENDED ORDER granting 25 Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration; and Staying Proceedings. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/27/2016. (emclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/27/2016)
Kessler v. AT&T
Filed: April 26, 2016 as 3:2013cv00207
Court: Pennsylvania Middle District Court
Defendant: AT&T
Plaintiff: Elizabeth A. Kessler
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
JUDGMENT - Decision by Court - upon consideration of Plaintiff's claim for retaliation under the Americans with Disabilities Act and after review of all of the evidence adduced at trial, JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF THE DEFENDANT, AT&T, and AGAINST THE PLAINTIFF, Elizabeth A. Kessler.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 4/26/16. (jfg)
Kessler v. AT&T
Filed: April 26, 2016 as 3:2013cv00207
Court: Pennsylvania Middle District Court
Defendant: AT&T
Plaintiff: Elizabeth A. Kessler
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
MEMORANDUM OPINION - For the foregoing reasons, the Court will enter judgment in favor of Defendant, AT&T, and against Plaintiff, Elizabeth A. Kessler, on Plaintiffs retaliation claim. Aseparate entry of Judgment follows.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 4/26/16. (jfg)
AT&T Mobility, LLC v. Yeager, et al.
Filed: April 15, 2016 as 2:2013cv00007
Court: California Eastern District Court
Defendant: Ed Bowlin, Connie Bowlin, Aviation Autographs, Bowlin & Associates, Inc., Law Offices of Joanna R. Mendoza, P.C., de la Pena & Holiday, LLP, Lesser Law Group, Charles E. Yeager
Plaintiff: AT&T Mobility, LLC
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/14/2016; The court expects the report by Mr. Houpt to be filed by late May 2016. (Zignago, K.)
Baluha v. Scott et al
Filed: April 8, 2016 as 2:2015cv00759
Court: Florida Middle District Court
Defendant: Christine Whitman, Mike Scott, Monahan, CEO Of AT & T, CEO of Best Western, Richard Scott
Plaintiff: Joseph John Baluha
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
ORDER. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mail a copy of this Order and the Court's Order dated March 22, 2016 9 to Plaintiff at the following address: Mr. Joseph John Baluha, 5886 Enterprise Parkway, Fort Myers, FL 33905. Within fourteen (14) days, Plaintiff must advise the Court, in writing, why it should not dismiss the Complaint for failure to effect service and for failure to prosecute this case. Plaintiff's failure to respond will result in dismissal of this case…
