AT&T Federal District Court Decisions

Prism Technologies v. AT&T et al

Filed: July 1, 2014 as 8:2012cv00122
Court: Nebraska District Court
Defendant: AT&T, AT&T Mobility, L.L.C.
Plaintiff: Prism Technologies
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that the motion 241 is granted; the documents as enumerated in the motions are filed as restricted pending further order of the Court. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (TCL )

Prism Technologies v. AT&T et al

Filed: July 1, 2014 as 8:2012cv00122
Court: Nebraska District Court
Defendant: AT&T, AT&T Mobility, L.L.C.
Plaintiff: Prism Technologies
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that the motions 230 234 238 are granted; the documents as enumerated in the respective motions are filed as restricted pending further order of the Court. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (TCL )

Brandywine Communications Technologies, LLC v. AT&T Corp. et al

Filed: July 1, 2014 as 3:2012cv02494
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: AT&T Corp, SBC Internet Services, Inc.
Plaintiff: Brandywine Communications Technologies, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER GRANTING 219 Stipulation of Dismissal. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 7/1/2014. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2014)

Plaintiff v. Defendant

Filed: June 27, 2014 as 3:2013cv04783
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974

ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 6/27/14. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/27/2014)

Plaintiff v. Defendant

Filed: June 23, 2014 as 2:2012cv03694
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation

PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Margaret A. Nagle re Stipulation for Protective Order 77 (ec)

Plaintiff v. Defendant

Filed: June 20, 2014 as 3:2012cv06318
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE re 58 Letter. The parties shall file cross-briefs of no more than 10 pages by June 27, 2014. The parties shall file any reply of no more than three pages by July 1, 2014. By that date, they shall each file a proposed form of judgment. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 06/20/2014. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2014)

Carpenter v. AT&T et al

Filed: June 13, 2014 as 2:2012cv02483
Court: Kansas District Court
Defendant: AT&T, Joseph Arri
Plaintiff: John E. Carpenter
Nature of Suit: Employment

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting defendants' 67 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Carlos Murguia on 06/12/2014. Mailed to pro se plaintiff John E. Carpenter by regular mail. (mg)

Plaintiff v. Defendant

Filed: June 11, 2014 as 1:2012cv14640
Court: Michigan Eastern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974

ORDER granting in part 21 Cross-Motion to Reverse Administrator; denying 22 Motion for Judgment and Remanding Case to the Plan Administrator for Further Proceedings. Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (SGam) Modified on 6/11/2014 (SGam).

AT&T Services, Inc. v. Clean Harbors Environmental Services, Inc.

Filed: June 11, 2014 as 5:2014cv00600
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Clean Harbors Environmental Services, Inc.
Plaintiff: AT&T Services, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud

Case Management Order. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 6/11/2014. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2014)

Holder v. AT&T

Filed: June 5, 2014 as 3:2011cv00076
Court: Tennessee Middle District Court
Defendant: AT&T
Plaintiff: Sabrina Holder
Nature of Suit: Employment

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: For the foregoing reasons, the undersigned recommends that the instant Motions to Dismiss for Failure to Prosecute (Docket Nos.180, 184) be GRANTED, and that this action be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Defendant AT&T also se eks sanctions in the form of reasonable expenses and attorneys fees. Docket No. 181, p. 6. In view of the recommendation set forth herein, however, the undersigned does not recommend an award of attorneys fees and expenses. Signed by…

Mayfair Wireless LLC v. Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless et al

Filed: June 3, 2014 as 1:2011cv00772
Court: Delaware District Court
Defendant: T-Mobile USA Inc., Sprint Nextel Corporation, Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, AT&T Mobility LLC
Plaintiff: Mayfair Wireless LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - 1. Magistrate Judge Fallon's Report and Recommendation (DI 40 ) is ADOPTED; 2. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Jurisdiction (DI 17 ) is GRANTED; and 3. Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File a Sur-Reply (DI 30 ) is DENIED. (CASE CLOSED). Signed by Chief Judge Gregory M. Sleet on 6/3/2014. (mdb)

Brandywine Communications Technologies, LLC v. AT&T Corp. et al

Filed: June 3, 2014 as 3:2012cv02494
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: AT&T Corp, SBC Internet Services, Inc.
Plaintiff: Brandywine Communications Technologies, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER APPROVING 216 STIPULATION TO VACATE SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING. Status Report due by 6/24/2014. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 6/3/2014. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/3/2014)

Santana v. Verizon Wireless et al

Filed: May 29, 2014 as 4:2014cv00052
Court: Oklahoma Northern District Court
Defendant: One Click Cash, Mobiloans, McCreary, Veslka, Bragg & Allen, PC, City of George West, JP Morgan Chase, Bank, IC Systems Inc, Verizon Wireless, TransUnion, Equifax, Experian, AT&T Corp/AT&T Mobility
Plaintiff: Eddie Santana
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit

OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan ; terminating party Experian Information Solutions, Inc. ; granting 32 Motion to Dismiss (Re: 5 Amended Complaint ) (RGG, Chambers)

Santana v. Verizon Wireless et al

Filed: May 27, 2014 as 4:2014cv00052
Court: Oklahoma Northern District Court
Defendant: One Click Cash, Mobiloans, McCreary, Veslka, Bragg & Allen, PC, City of George West, JP Morgan Chase, Bank, IC Systems Inc, Verizon Wireless, TransUnion, Equifax, Experian, AT&T Corp/AT&T Mobility
Plaintiff: Eddie Santana
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit

OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan that plaintiff's claims against AT&T Corp / AT&T Mobility shall be submitted to arbitration pursuant to the parties' agreement. Plaintiff's claims against AT&T Corp / AT&T Mobility only are stayed pending completion of the arbitration proceedings. The parties shall file a joint statement advising the Court of the arbitrator's decision within 15 days of the completion of the arbitration proceedings. This matter continues…

FTC Communications, LLC et al v. AT&T Mobility LLC

Filed: May 21, 2014 as 3:2012cv00620
Court: North Carolina Western District Court
Defendant: AT&T Mobility LLC
Plaintiff: Atlantic Seawinds Communications, LLC, FTC Communications, LLC, PRT Communications, LLC
Nature of Suit: Other Contract

ORDER granting 101 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Richard M. Weibley for FTC Communications, LLC. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 5/21/2014. (eef)

Santana v. Verizon Wireless et al

Filed: May 21, 2014 as 4:2014cv00052
Court: Oklahoma Northern District Court
Defendant: One Click Cash, Mobiloans, McCreary, Veslka, Bragg & Allen, PC, City of George West, JP Morgan Chase, Bank, IC Systems Inc, Verizon Wireless, TransUnion, Equifax, Experian, AT&T Corp/AT&T Mobility
Plaintiff: Eddie Santana
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit

OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan that plaintiff's claims against Verizon Wireless shall be submitted to arbitration pursuant to the parties' agreement. Plaintiff's claims against Verizon Wireless only are stayed pending completion of the arbitration proceedings. The parties shall file a joint statement advising the Court of the arbitrator's decision within 15 days of the completion of the arbitration proceedings. This matter continues as to all other…

Kaltwasser v. AT&T Mobility

Filed: May 15, 2014 as 5:2007cv00411
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: AT&T Mobility LLC
Plaintiff: Jonathan C Kaltwasser
Nature of Suit: Other Contract

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/15/14. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/15/2014)

Jevon Smith v. AT&T Mobility Services LLC et al

Filed: May 14, 2014 as 2:2014cv02646
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: Does, AT&T Mobility Services LLC
Plaintiff: Jevon Smith
Nature of Suit: Employment

ORDER REMANDING ACTION TO LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. cc: order, docket, remand letter to Los Angeles Superior Court, No. BC 536426.Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (Attachments: # 1 rmdltr). (lc). Modified on 5/14/2014 (lc).

Morris Reese v. AT&T Mobility II LLC

Filed: May 9, 2014 as 2:2013cv05198
Court: California Central District Court
Counter Claimant: AT&T Mobility II LLC
Counter Defendant: Morris Reese
Defendant: AT&T Mobility II LLC
Plaintiff: Morris Reese
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER GRANTING AT&T Mobility II LLC. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 28 . A Judgment will issue. The parties are directed to file a joint status report detailing what issues, if any, remain for this Court to decide by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. (lc). Modified on 5/9/2014. (lc).

Morris Reese v. Sprint Nextel Corporation et al

Filed: May 9, 2014 as 2:2013cv03811
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: AT and T Mobility LLC, Cellco Partnership, Sprint Nextel Corporation, T-Mobile US Inc, TracFone Wireless Inc, United States Cellular Corporation
Plaintiff: Morris Reese
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER GRANTING SPRINT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 53 . A Judgment will issue. The parties are directed to file a joint status report detailing what issues, if any, remain for this Court to resolve by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. (lc). Modified on 5/9/2014 (lc).