Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: November 5, 2013 as 3:2013cv00610
Court: South Carolina District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
OPINION AND ORDER, FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW. Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on 11/5/2013. (cbru, )
Brandywine Communications Technologies, LLC v. AT&T Corp. et al
Filed: November 5, 2013 as 3:2012cv02494
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: AT&T Corp, SBC Internet Services, Inc.
Plaintiff: Brandywine Communications Technologies, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting 99 Motion for Pro Hac Vice for Alyson Wooten. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/5/2013)
Prather v. AT&T Inc. et al
Filed: November 5, 2013 as 3:2009cv02457
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Sprint Nextel Corp., Telephone & Data Systems, Inc., Cellco Partnership, Qwest Communications International, Inc., AT&T Inc.
Miscellaneous: United States of America
Plaintiff: John C. Prather
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer granting 126 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss; granting 151 Plaintiff/Relator's Motion for Leave to File Surreply. (crblc4, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/5/2013)
Reed v. Berry Network, Inc. et al
Filed: November 4, 2013 as 3:2013cv00035
Court: Ohio Southern District Court
Defendant: AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 1, Berry Network, Inc., Hewitt Associates, LLC, Sedgwick Claim Management Services, Inc.
Plaintiff: Sharon K. Reed
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
ORDER OF DISMISSAL - This matter is before the Court on the parties' Stipulation of Dismissal. The Court, having examined said stipulation and being duly advised, now GRANTS same. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this cause is hereby dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and attorney fees. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 11/4/13. (pb1)
Prism Technologies v. AT&T et al
Filed: October 31, 2013 as 8:2012cv00122
Court: Nebraska District Court
Defendant: AT&T, AT&T Mobility, L.L.C.
Plaintiff: Prism Technologies
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER granting (151) Motion to Restrict pursuant to the E-Government Act in case 8:12-cv-00122-LES-TDT; granting (151) Motion to Restrict pursuant to the E-Government Act in case 8:12-cv-00123-LES-TDT; granting (146) Motion to Restrict pursuant to the E-Government Act in case 8:12-cv-00125-LES-TDT; granting (153) Motion to Restrict pursuant to the E-Government Act in case 8:12-cv-00126-LES-TDT Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (AOA)
Prism Technologies v. AT&T et al
Filed: October 31, 2013 as 8:2012cv00122
Court: Nebraska District Court
Defendant: AT&T, AT&T Mobility, L.L.C.
Plaintiff: Prism Technologies
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: Plaintiff's and Defendants' motions for proposed progression schedule are denied. Plaintiff's motions to compel are denied without prejudice at this time. Defendants' motions for a stay in discovery are denied. The parties shall meet and confer regarding the discovery disputes in accordance with this memorandum opinion. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (TCL )
Holder v. AT&T
Filed: October 29, 2013 as 3:2011cv00076
Court: Tennessee Middle District Court
Defendant: AT&T
Plaintiff: Sabrina Holder
Nature of Suit: Employment
ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, the instant Motion to Compel 114 is DENIED, without prejudice to being refiled in compliance with the Local Rule. The portion of the Motion that seeks to extend discovery and dispositive Motion deadlines will be addressed in a separate Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 10/29/13. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(tmw)
Holder v. AT&T
Filed: October 29, 2013 as 3:2011cv00076
Court: Tennessee Middle District Court
Defendant: AT&T
Plaintiff: Sabrina Holder
Nature of Suit: Employment
ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, the instant Motion to Compel is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff shall provide Responses to Interrogatory Nos. 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6, and to Requests for Production Nos. 5-8 within 14 days of the entry of t he instant Order. The Motion is DENIED with regard to Interrogatory No. 8 and Requests for Production 1-4. The Court advises Plaintiff that her Interrogatory Responses must be made under oath. The portion of the Motion that seeks to…
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: October 25, 2013 as 3:2008cv04058
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 409 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER STIPULATION ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR AWARD OF ATTORNEYS' FEES AND NON-TAXABLE COSTS; [PROPOSED] ORDER filed by Quiller Barnes. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/25/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2013)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: October 24, 2013 as 4:2011cv04749
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Labor/Management Relations
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting 40 Stipulation for Continuance of Case Management Conference (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/24/2013)
Ralph Ghattas v. AT and T Mobility Wireless Operations Holdings Inc et al
Filed: October 23, 2013 as 2:2013cv02271
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: AT and T Corp, AT and T Mobility Services LLC, AT and T Mobility Wireless Operations Holdings Inc, Does
Plaintiff: Ralph Ghattas
Nature of Suit: Employment
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh re Stipulation for Protective Order, 29 . (ca)
Buyerleverage Email Solutions LLC v. Microsoft Corporation . et al
Filed: October 22, 2013 as 1:2011cv00645
Court: Delaware District Court
Defendant: AT & T Inc., CISCO Systems Inc., Comcast Corporation, Knology, Inc., Microsoft Corporation, Surewest Communications Inc., Time Warner Cable Inc., Yahoo! Inc.
Plaintiff: Buyerleverage Email Solutions LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
MEMORANDUM OPINION regarding claim construction of various disputed terms. The Court requests a joint status report on these Markman issues no later than twenty-eight days from the date of this Opinion (see Opinion for further details). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 10/22/2013. (nms)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: October 18, 2013 as 3:2008cv04058
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 407 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 406 Order on Motion for Leave to File, Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, filed by Quiller Barnes. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/18/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2013)
Boykin Anchor Company, Inc. v. AT&T Corporation, et al
Filed: October 16, 2013 as 5:2010cv00591
Court: North Carolina Eastern District Court
Defendant: Larry Wong, AT&T Services, Inc.
Plaintiff: Boykin Anchor Company, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Assault, Libel, and Slander
JUDGMENT - Signed by Julie A. Richards, Clerk of Court on 10/16/2013. (Baker, C.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: October 11, 2013 as 3:2012cv00538
Court: Louisiana Middle District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 11 Motion to Compel Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr on 10/11/2013. (LLH)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: October 10, 2013 as 3:2008cv04058
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen (1) Re Attorney's Fees; (2) Granting 392 Defendant's Motion for Leave to File Motion for Reconsideration; (3) Granting 398 Defendant's Motion for Relief from ADR Local Rule 5-12; and (4) Granting 405 Defendant's Motion for Leave to File Reply Brief. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2013)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: October 9, 2013 as 1:2013cv01422
Court: Ohio Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Opinion and Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 10/9/13 denying defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings. (Related Doc. 15 ) (M,G)
Guthrie v. US Government et al
Filed: October 7, 2013 as 1:2012cv22193
Court: Florida Southern District Court
Defendant: Apple Inc., AT&T Inc., Baker Donelson, Carol Malek, City of Miami, FL, City of New York, Columbia University Medical, CVS, Dade County, FL, Directv, eHarmony.com, Facebook Inc., Federal Express Corp., IAC/InterActiveCorp, Iconbrickell Condominium No. One Association, Inc., Iconbrickell Master Association, Inc., J&J Teq III, Corp., Jonathan Jacobs, Joseph Del Pizzo, Kings Realty & Properties LLC, Lee Lott, Malek Properties, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Riverside Park Community II, LLC, Riverside Park Community, LLC, Robert Hauberg, Tara Tamang, United Parcel Service, Inc., Urban American Management, US Government, Walgreens
Plaintiff: Randolph H. Guthrie, III
Nature of Suit: Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations
ORDER denying 45 Motion for Recusal. Signed by Chief Judge Federico A. Moreno on 10/4/2013. (mmd)
Mendez v. AT&T Mobility Operations Holdings Inc.
Filed: October 2, 2013 as 1:2013cv00772
Court: California Eastern District Court
Defendant: AT&T Mobility Operations Holdings Inc.
Plaintiff: Johnny Mendez
Nature of Suit: Employment
ORDER on the parties' stipulation regarding the first amended complaint. The parties' stipulated request that Plaintiff be permitted to file a First Amended Complaint is GRANTED; Defendant shall file an answer to the complaint within 21 days from the date of this order; and the parties may file a stipulated request regarding a Second Amended Complaint and the filing of an Answer thereto as set forth in this order. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on…
Arizona Pacific Wood Preserving, Inc. v. Mississippi Mat and Tie, LLC
Filed: October 2, 2013 as 2:2013cv00139
Court: Mississippi Southern District Court
Defendant: Mississippi Mat and Tie, LLC
Plaintiff: Arizona Pacific Wood Preserving, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
ORDER denying Arizona Pacific's Motion 6 for Default Judgment; granting Mississippi Mat and Tie's Motion 11 to Set Aside Default Entry by Clerk; denying as moot Mississippi Mat and Tie's Motion 15 17 to Stay or, in the Alternative, Motion for Additional Time to Respond to Arizona Pacific's Motion for Default Judgment. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 10/02/2013 (HM)