Casaburro v. AT&T et al
Filed: May 7, 2012 as 6:2011cv02032
Court: Florida Middle District Court
Defendant: AT&T, Defendant's Unknown
Plaintiff: John E. Casaburro
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Other
ORDER adopting 12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The Amended Complaint is hereby DISMISSED. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE the file. Signed by Chief Judge Anne C. Conway on 5/7/2012. (SR)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: May 7, 2012 as 2:2011cv02310
Court: California Eastern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
ORDER of RELATED CASES and CONSOLIDATION signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 5/4/12 ORDERING case 1:12-CV-00665-LJO-DLB be RELATED and REASSIGNED to District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows. It is further ORDERED that this action is CONSOLIDATED. 2:11-cv-2310 MCE GGH is designated as the master file. The clerk is DIRECTED to add all complaints and answers filed in member cases to the master case. The Clerk of the Court is to issue an Order…
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: May 3, 2012 as 3:2011cv01673
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
STIPULATION AND ORDER ON BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Motions due by 6/1/2012. Replies due by 7/13/2012. Responses due by 6/22/2012. Motion hearing 8/10/12 at 9:30 AM. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 5/3/12. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2012)
AT&T Mobility LLC et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
Filed: May 1, 2012 as 3:2009cv04997
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: AU Optronics Corporation, Au Optronics Corporation America, Inc, Chi Mei Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., CMO Japan Co., Ltd., Nexgen Mediatech, Inc. ("Nexgen"), Nexgen Mediatech USA, Inc., Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd., Tatung Company of America, Inc., Epson Imaging Devices Corporation, Epson Electronics America, Inc., Hannstar Display Corporation, LG Display Co., Ltd., LG Display America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Samsung Electronics America, Inc.,, Sharp Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corporation, Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America Electronics Components, Inc., Toshiba Mobile Display Technology Co., Ltd., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff: AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Corp., AT&T Services, Inc., BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc., Pacific Bell Telephone Company, AT&T Operations, Inc., AT&T Datacomm, Inc., Southwestern Bell Telephone Company
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULE TO ANSWER OR RESPOND TO DEFENDANT LG DISPLAYS COUNTERCLAIMS 5548 (see order for details). Signed by Judge Illston on 4/30/12. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/1/2012) Modified on 5/1/2012 (tfS, COURT STAFF).
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: May 1, 2012 as 3:2012cv01630
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James granting 3 Motion to Continue (rmm2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/1/2012)
-RZ Bruce Max Davis v. AT&T Wireless Services Inc. et al
Filed: April 30, 2012 as 2:2011cv02674
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: AT&T Wireless Services Inc., Cellco Partnership, Does, Sprint Spectrum LP, T-Mobile, USA, TracFone Wireless Inc.
Plaintiff: Bruce Max Davis
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration 71 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. For all of these reasons, there court hereby DENIES Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration. (See Order for Details). (sch)
Kidd v. AT&T Corporation et al
Filed: April 27, 2012 as 3:2011cv01512
Court: California Southern District Court
Defendant: AT&T Corporation, DOES, Pacific Bell Telephone Company, -
Plaintiff: Lanelle Kidd
Nature of Suit: Employment
ORDER granting 19 Motion to Compel Discovery; granting 19 Motion for Sanctions. As provided herein, Plaintiff is to respond to the pending discovery requests no later than May 1, 2012. Defendants are to submit their statement of costs no later than seven (7) days from the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin on 4/27/12. (Dembin, Mitchell)
Arnold, et al. v. AT&T INC, et al.
Filed: April 26, 2012 as 4:2010cv02429
Court: Missouri Eastern District Court
Defendant: American Telephone and Telegraph Company, AT&T Corp., AT&T INC, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company
Plaintiff: Kim Arnold, Rosie Young Pruitt, William Pruitt
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
MEMORANDUM re: 20 MOTION to Dismiss Party (Defendants AT&T Missouri's and AT&T Corp.'s Motion to Dismiss) filed by Defendant Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, Defendant AT&T Corp. motion is GRANTED. Signed by Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 4/26/12. (MRS)
Medine v. Carrier IQ, Inc et al
Filed: April 24, 2012 as 5:2011cv06178
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Apple, Inc., AT&T, Inc., Carrier IQ, Inc
Plaintiff: Dao Phong, Peter Medine
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
STIPULATION AND ORDER VACATING CMC AND DEADLINES re 17 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stipulation for Continuance and (Proposed) Order filed by Carrier IQ, Inc, Motions terminated: 17 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stipulation for Continuance and (Proposed) Order filed by Carrier IQ, Inc.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/24/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/24/2012)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: April 23, 2012 as 4:2011cv04603
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
ORDER re 34 Letter filed by AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 1. Discovery Hearing set for 5/10/2012 before Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 4/23/2012. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/23/2012)
Bates v. AT&T Corporation et al
Filed: April 18, 2012 as 2:2011cv00975
Court: Louisiana Eastern District Court
Defendant: AT&T Corporation, SBC Internet Services, Inc.
Plaintiff: George J Bates
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
ORDER & REASONS granting 19 Motion to Remand to State Court. Signed by Chief Judge Sarah S. Vance on 4/18/12. (Attachments: # 1 Letter) (plh, )
AT&T Mobility LLC et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
Filed: April 12, 2012 as 3:2009cv04997
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: AU Optronics Corporation, Au Optronics Corporation America, Inc, Chi Mei Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., CMO Japan Co., Ltd., Nexgen Mediatech, Inc. ("Nexgen"), Nexgen Mediatech USA, Inc., Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd., Tatung Company of America, Inc., Epson Imaging Devices Corporation, Epson Electronics America, Inc., Hannstar Display Corporation, LG Display Co., Ltd., LG Display America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Samsung Electronics America, Inc.,, Sharp Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corporation, Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America Electronics Components, Inc., Toshiba Mobile Display Technology Co., Ltd., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff: AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Corp., AT&T Services, Inc., BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc., Pacific Bell Telephone Company, AT&T Operations, Inc., AT&T Datacomm, Inc., Southwestern Bell Telephone Company
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
ORDER by Judge Susan Illston granting (5419) Stipulation in case 3:07-md-01827-SI IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the undersigned DAPs, AGs, and LG Display, by and through their undersigned liaison counsel and subject to the concurrence of the Court, as follows:(1) The time for the undersigned DAPs and AGs served with LG Displays Motion to Amend to file their Oppositions to LG Displays Motion shall be extended to and including April 27, 2012. The DAPs shall file a single…
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: April 11, 2012 as 3:2011cv04085
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
STIPULATION AND ORDER To Extend The Deadline For Parties To Hold An Early Neutral Evaluation. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 04/10/2012. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/11/2012)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: April 11, 2012 as 3:2011cv04085
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
STIPULATION AND ORDER To Reschedule Case Management Conference. Case Management Statement due by 6/4/2012. Further Case Management Conference set for 6/11/2012 01:30 PM in Courtroom 12, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 04/10/2012. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/11/2012)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: April 9, 2012 as 3:2011cv01488
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
ORDER re 77 Granting Stipulation for Leave to file filed by Sandra Perry. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 4/6/12. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2012)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: April 5, 2012 as 5:2011cv00904
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Judge Virginia A. Phillips, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 30 . Pursuant to stipulation by and between Plaintiff Carlos Clifton and Defendant AT&T Mobility Services, LLC, through their designated counsel, the above-captioned action is dismissed in its entirety pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil procedure 41(a)(1), with prejudice. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (mrgo)
MURRY v. JACOBS TECHNOLOGY, INC., et al
Filed: April 5, 2012 as 1:2010cv00771
Court: North Carolina Middle District Court
Defendant: AT&T GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS, INC., JACOBS TECHNOLOGY INC.
Plaintiff: TYRONE D. MURRY
Nature of Suit: Employment
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE N. C. TILLEY, JR on 04/05/2012. In sum, for the reasons stated herein, Jacobs's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 32 ) will be GRANTED in entirety. AT&T's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 34 ) will be DENIED as to Counts I and VI, with respect only to Mr. Murry's claim of discriminatory discharge, and GRANTED as to all remainingclaims.(Taylor, Abby)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: March 30, 2012 as 4:2011cv04603
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 3/30/2012. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2012)
Murphy v. AT&T
Filed: March 30, 2012 as 2:2010cv02686
Court: Kansas District Court
Defendant: AT&T
Plaintiff: Shelly Rene Murphy
Nature of Suit: Employment
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 30 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Carlos Murguia on 3/30/2012. Mailed to pro se party Shelly Rene Murphy by regual and certified mail. (Certified Tracking Number: 7002 2030 0000 9348 8831) (kao)
Holder v. AT&T
Filed: March 30, 2012 as 3:2011cv00076
Court: Tennessee Middle District Court
Defendant: AT&T
Plaintiff: Sabrina Holder
Nature of Suit: Employment
ORDER: After reviewing the record thoroughly, including the R&R and the documents filed by the plaintiff in response thereto, the court is of the opinion that the Magistrate Judge's conclusion was based on incomplete information, as explained ab ove. Accordingly, the R&R is REJECTED. After reviewing the full record before the court at this time, the court finds that the plaintiff has stated a colorable, non-frivolous, non-malicious claim of employment discrimination and retaliation…
