Douglas v. Michigan Bell Telephone Company dba AT&T
Filed: September 16, 2022 as 2:2022cv10046
Court: Michigan Eastern District Court
Defendant: Michigan Bell Telephone Company dba AT&T
Plaintiff: Charles Douglas
Nature of Suit: Employment
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (AChu)
Securities and Exchange Commission v. AT&T Inc. et al
Filed: September 14, 2022 as 1:2021cv01951
Court: New York Southern District Court
Defendant: Christopher C. Womack, AT&T Inc., Michael J Black, Kent D. Evans
Interested Party: Non-Party Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.
Not Classified By Court: Wells Fargo Securities, LLC
Plaintiff: Securities and Exchange Commission
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities/Exchanges
ORDER: On September 8, 2022, the Court issued an opinion and order which, inter alia, denied the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment, and stated that an order as to next steps would follow. Dkt. 281. The Court understands that a sett lement conference with Magistrate Judge Willis is scheduled for September 26, 2022. See Dkt. 277. The Court directs that, should that conference not result in settlement, the parties thereafter meet and confer and, on October 17, 2022, submit…
Securities and Exchange Commission v. AT&T Inc. et al
Filed: September 8, 2022 as 1:2021cv01951
Court: New York Southern District Court
Defendant: Christopher C. Womack, AT&T Inc., Michael J Black, Kent D. Evans
Interested Party: Non-Party Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.
Not Classified By Court: Wells Fargo Securities, LLC
Plaintiff: Securities and Exchange Commission
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities/Exchanges
OPINION AND ORDER re: 97 MOTION in Limine (Notice of Defendants' Consolidated Daubert Motion to Exclude Expert Opinions and Testimony. filed by AT&T Inc., 90 MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Liability. filed by S ecurities and Exchange Commission, 101 MOTION for Summary Judgment . filed by Kent D. Evans, Christopher C. Womack, Michael J Black, 99 MOTION for Summary Judgment . filed by AT&T Inc., 88 MOTION in Limine to Str ike Testimony of…
Gavin v. AT&T Services Inc., et al.,
Filed: September 7, 2022 as 2:2020cv02246
Court: California Eastern District Court
Defendant: Diane Matayoshi, AT&T Services Inc.
Plaintiff: Victor Gavin
Nature of Suit: Employment
ORDER signed by Senior Judge John A. Mendez on 09/07/2022 EXTENDING the Deadlines as Follows: Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 10/28/2022; Supplemental and Rebuttal Expert Witness Disclosures due by 11/14/2022. (Rodriguez, E)
Peerless Network, Inc. et al v. AT&T Corp.
Filed: August 26, 2022 as 1:2015cv00870
Court: New York Southern District Court
Defendant: AT&T Corp.
Plaintiff: Peerless Network, Inc., Peerless Network of Arkansas, LLC, Peerless Network of Arizona, LLC, Peerless Network of California, LLC, Peerless Network of Colorado, LLC, Peerless Network of Connecticut, LLC, Peerless Network of Delaware, LLC, Peerless Network of the District of Columba, LLC, Peerless Network of Florida, LLC, Peerless Network of Georgia, LLC, Peerless Network of Illinois, LLC, Peerless Network of Indiana, LLC, Peerless Network of Kansas, LLC, Peerless Network of Kentucky, LLC, Peerless Network of Louisana, LLC, Peerless Network of Maine, LLC, Peerless Network of Massachusetts, LLC, Peerless Network of Michigan, LLC, Peerless Network of Minnesota, LLC, Peerless Network of Nevada, LLC, Peerless Network of New Hampshire, LLC, Peerless Network of New Jersey, LLC, Peerless Network of New York, LLC, Peerless Network of North Carolina, LLC, Peerless Network of Ohio, LLC, Peerless Network of Oklahoma, LLC, Peerless Network of Oregon, LLC, Peerless Network of Pennsylvania, LLC, Peerless Network of Rhode Island, LLC, Peerless Network of South Carolina, LLC, Peerless Network of Tennessee, LLC, Peerless Network of Utah, LLC
and others
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
ORDER REDACTED VERSION: For the foregoing reasons, the Defendant's letter motion to strike the Chart and Methodology in the Webber Declaration is DENIED. The parties are directed to provide the Court with a proposed schedule for the filing of Defendant's opposition to Plaintiffs' motion to enforce the settlement agreement. That schedule should account for the additional time Defendant requires to re-engage its experts and prepare its response. Lastly, Plaintiffs are…
Finesse Wireless LLC v. AT&T Mobility LLC
Filed: August 24, 2022 as 2:2021cv00316
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Consolidated Defendant: Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless
Counter Defendant: Finesse Wireless LLC
Defendant: AT&T Mobility LLC
Intervenor Defendant: Ericsson Inc., Nokia of America Corporation
Not Classified By Court: Michael D. Paul
Nature of Suit: Patent
CLAIM CONSTRUCTION MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 8/24/2022. (nkl, )
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: August 23, 2022 as 3:2021cv01367
Court: Texas Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Memorandum Opinion and Order granting, denying 21 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Imran Khan, 15 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No 3. (Ordered by Judge Karen Gren Scholer on 8/23/2022) (ykp)
Securities and Exchange Commission v. AT&T Inc. et al
Filed: August 11, 2022 as 1:2021cv01951
Court: New York Southern District Court
Defendant: Christopher C. Womack, AT&T Inc., Michael J Black, Kent D. Evans
Interested Party: Non-Party Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.
Not Classified By Court: Wells Fargo Securities, LLC
Plaintiff: Securities and Exchange Commission
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities/Exchanges
ORDER: This matter was redesignated to Judge Willis on August 8, 2022. Should the parties wish to schedule a settlement conference, the Parties are directed to contact Courtroom Deputy Christopher Davis via email at WillisNYSDChambers@nysd.uscourts.gov to provide three mutually agreeable dates in September. Any conference will be held in-person at Courtroom 228, 40 Foley Square, New York, New York. Parties must…
Wagda et al v. AT&T Corp. et al
Filed: August 11, 2022 as 2:2019cv01057
Court: California Eastern District Court
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: False Claims Act
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 08/10/22 EXTENDING deadlines re 61 Motion for Attorneys' Fees as follows: Plaintiff's Opposition due: 08/19/22 and Defendants' reply due 09/05/22. (Benson, A.)
Network Apps, LLC et al v. AT&T Inc. et al
Filed: August 9, 2022 as 1:2021cv00718
Court: New York Southern District Court
Defendant: AT&T CORP., AT&T Services, Inc., AT&T Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC
Plaintiff: KYLE SCHEI, JOHN WANTZ, NETWORK APPS, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER granting 145 Letter Motion to Seal. Application GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to file the documents at docket numbers 148 and 149 under seal, visible to the Court and parties only. As to Defendants' request that the Court ta ke judicial notice of certain documents submitted in support of the motion to dismiss, the Court will address that request at the time it resolves the motion to dismiss. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the pending motion at docket…
Atkins v. AT&T Customer Services, Inc.
Filed: May 3, 2022 as 1:2021cv04207
Court: Illinois Northern District Court
Defendant: AT&T Customer Services, Inc., AT&T Services, Inc.
Plaintiff: Mark Atkins
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: This Court grants Defendant's motion to dismiss 11 and dismisses Plaintiff's amended complaint 9 without prejudice. Plaintiff is given leave to amend his complaint to the extent he can do so consistent wit h this opinion and his Rule 11 obligations. Plaintiff's amended complaint shall be filed by May 20, 2022. Failure to amend by May 20 will result in an automatic dismissal of this case with prejudice Signed by the Honorable Mary M.…
Razo v. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
Filed: May 2, 2022 as 1:2020cv00172
Court: California Eastern District Court
Defendant: AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
Plaintiff: Luis M. Salas Razo
Nature of Suit: Employment
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 72 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Settlement signed by District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 5/2/2022. (Sant Agata, S)
Wagda et al v. AT&T Corp. et al
Filed: April 25, 2022 as 2:2019cv01057
Court: California Eastern District Court
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: False Claims Act
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 04/22/2022 GRANTING 47 Motion for leave to file a three-page Response to the Government's Statement of Interest. (Rodriguez, E)
ALISON RAY v. AT&T MOBILITY SERVICES LLC
Filed: April 22, 2022 as 2:2018cv03303
Court: Pennsylvania Eastern District Court
Defendant: AT&T, INC., AT&T MOBILITY SERVICES, LLC.
Petitioner: AARP FOUNDATION, AARP
Plaintiff: ALISON RAY
Nature of Suit: Employment
MEMORANDUM OPINION; ETC.. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE TIMOTHY R. RICE ON 4/22/22. 4/22/22 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(JL)
ALISON RAY v. AT&T MOBILITY SERVICES LLC
Filed: April 22, 2022 as 2:2018cv03303
Court: Pennsylvania Eastern District Court
Defendant: AT&T, INC., AT&T MOBILITY SERVICES, LLC.
Petitioner: AARP FOUNDATION, AARP
Plaintiff: ALISON RAY
Nature of Suit: Employment
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF ALISON RAY'S PETITION FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, AND SHALL SHALL BE AWARDED $764,825.00 IN ATTORNEY FEES AND $38,643.83 IN COSTS; ETC.. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE TIMOTHY R. RICE ON 4/22/22. 4/22/22 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(JL)
Traxcell Technologies, LLC v. AT&T, Inc. et al
Filed: March 29, 2022 as 2:2017cv00718
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Consolidated Defendant: Verizon Wireless Personal Communications, LP, T-Mobile, USA, Inc., Sprint Communications Company, LP, Sprint Spectrum, LP, Sprint Solutions, Inc.
Defendant: AT&T, Inc., AT&T Corporation, AT&T Mobility LLC
Intervenor Defendant: Telenav, Inc.
Not Yet Classified: William Joseph Cornelius, Donald E Tiller
Plaintiff: Traxcell Technologies, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 476 SEALED MOTION filed by Verizon Wireless Personal Communications, LP.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 3/29/2022. (nkl, )
Traxcell Technologies, LLC v. AT&T, Inc. et al
Filed: March 29, 2022 as 2:2017cv00718
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Consolidated Defendant: Verizon Wireless Personal Communications, LP, T-Mobile, USA, Inc., Sprint Communications Company, LP, Sprint Spectrum, LP, Sprint Solutions, Inc.
Defendant: AT&T, Inc., AT&T Corporation, AT&T Mobility LLC
Intervenor Defendant: Telenav, Inc.
Not Yet Classified: William Joseph Cornelius, Donald E Tiller
Plaintiff: Traxcell Technologies, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 475 Opposed SEALED MOTION for Attorneys' Fees filed by Sprint Communications Company, LP, Sprint Solutions, Inc., Sprint Spectrum, LP.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 3/29/2022. (nkl, )
FlexWare International LLC v. AT and T, Inc. et al
Filed: March 25, 2022 as 2:2021cv07223
Court: California Central District Court
Counter Defendant: FlexWare International LLC
Defendant: AT&T, Inc., AT&T Intellectual Property II, L.P., AT&T Intellectual Property, LLC, AT&T Services, Inc., AT and T, Inc., AT and T Intellectual Property II, L.P., AT and T Intellectual Property, LLC, AT and T Services, Inc., AT&T Corp.
Nature of Suit: Trademark
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar re Stipulation for Protective Order 45 . (see document for details) (hr)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: March 21, 2022 as 4:2021cv00057
Court: Missouri Western District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
ORDER Signed on 3/21/2022 by District Judge Roseann Ketchmark. (Skelton, Sara)
Latimer v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al
Filed: March 8, 2022 as 2:2021cv00856
Court: Washington Western District Court
Defendant: AT&T Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC, John Does 2 - 20, DIRECTV, LLC, John Doe 1, AT&T Inc, DirecTV LLC, Does 2-20
Plaintiff: Danielle Latimer
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Property Damage
ORDER for Additional Briefing on Defendants' 11 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction. Within fourteen (14) days of this order, Plaintiff shall file a sur-reply brief. Within seven (7) days of Plaintiff's sur-reply briefing, Defendant shall file a response. Signed by Judge Tana Lin. (LH)
