Razo v. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
Filed: October 27, 2021 as 1:2020cv00172
Court: California Eastern District Court
Defendant: AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
Plaintiff: Luis M. Salas Razo
Nature of Suit: Employment
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO GRANT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO APPOINT INTERIM CLASS COUNSEL signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on October 27, 2021. (Doc. Nos. 24, 42, 44)(Munoz, I)
Lopez v. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
Filed: October 25, 2021 as 1:2020cv01219
Court: California Eastern District Court
Defendant: AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
Plaintiff: Charlene Lopez
Nature of Suit: Employment
ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO EXTEND DISCOVERY DEADLINES IN SCHEDULING ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 10/25/2021. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The deadline for non-expert discovery is continued from October 29, 2021 to February 28, 202 2. The deadline for expert disclosure is continued from November 26, 2021 to March 18, 2022. The deadline for supplemental expert disclosure is continued from January 21, 2022 to April 11, 2022. The deadline for expert discovery is continued…
Razo v. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
Filed: October 15, 2021 as 1:2020cv00172
Court: California Eastern District Court
Defendant: AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
Plaintiff: Luis M. Salas Razo
Nature of Suit: Employment
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to Grant Plaintiff's 24 Motion to Appoint Interim Class Counsel, signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 10/15/2021. Objections to F&R due within SEVEN DAYS. (Marrujo, C)
Razo v. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
Filed: October 14, 2021 as 1:2020cv00172
Court: California Eastern District Court
Defendant: AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
Plaintiff: Luis M. Salas Razo
Nature of Suit: Employment
ORDER DENYING 10 Motion to Dismiss of in the Alternative to Stay, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/13/2021. Thirty Day Deadline to File Amended Complaint. (Marrujo, C)
Wehmeyer v. A T & T Corp et al
Filed: October 14, 2021 as 6:2021cv01163
Court: Louisiana Western District Court
Cross Claimant: MasTec Network Solutions L L C
Defendant: Standard Wireless Group, Verizon Wireless Services, LLC, Mastec Wireless Services, LLC, AT&T Corporation, Verizon Wireless Services L L C, Mastek Inc, A T & T Corp, Mastek Co, Mastec Wireless Services L L C, Standard Wireless Group L L C
Intervenor Plaintiff: Zurich American Insurance Co of Illinois
Plaintiff: Brandon Wehmeyer
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW FINDING This finding is preliminary and may be reconsidered sua sponte or on appropriate motion. Based on the information set forth in the parties briefing, this Court now finds that the parties are diverse in citizens hip. The court has subject-matter jurisdiction over this action, and whether the plaintiff has a valid claim against Standard Wireless must be decided later in this litigation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patrick J Hanna on 10/14/2021.…
TOT Power Control, S.L. v. AT&T, Inc. et al
Filed: October 8, 2021 as 6:2021cv00107
Court: Texas Western District Court
Counter Defendant: TOT Power Control, S.L.
Defendant: AT&T, Inc., AT&T Corporation, AT&T Mobility LLC
Petitioner: Ericsson Inc., Nokia of America Corp.
Nature of Suit: Patent
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING ERICSSONS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE [ECF No. 26]. Ericsson is ORDERED to file its Answer in Intervention within seven (7) days of the issuance of this Order. In view of this order, the Court will consider any motion to amend the scheduling order to grant Ericsson time to prepare its Markman briefing. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (jc5)
Martinez Patterson v. AT&T Services Inc
Filed: September 29, 2021 as 2:2018cv01180
Court: Washington Western District Court
Defendant: AT&T Services Inc
Plaintiff: Maria Del Carmen Martinez Patterson
Nature of Suit: Employment
ORDER denying Plaintiff's 66 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: September 28, 2021 as 2:2017cv08106
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
JUDGMENT by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. Pursuant to the Order awarding Summary Judgment in favor of Defendants AT&T Services, Inc., et al., IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the action, Julio C. Alas, et al. v. AT&T, Inc., et al., 2:17-cv-8106- VAPRAOx, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Court orders that such judgment be entered. IT IS SO ORDERED.(MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (yl)
Boddy v. AT&T uVerse et al
Filed: September 27, 2021 as 2:2021cv01765
Court: Nevada District Court
Defendant: AT&T uVerse, National Consumer Telecom & Utilities Exchange, Inc.
Plaintiff: Hope Boddy
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
ORDER Granting 7 Motion to Extend Time re Complaint re 1 Petition for Removal (First Request). AT&T uVerse answer due 10/22/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 9/27/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: September 20, 2021 as 2:2015cv01462
Court: Washington Western District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
ORDER granting Parties' 63 Stipulated Motion. Defendant Marc Sapatin is dismissed with prejudice solely with respect to the claims Plaintiff asserts against Defendant Marc Sapatin. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (SB)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: September 20, 2021 as 2:2019cv01837
Court: California Eastern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 9/17/2021 CONTINUING The hearing re 67 Motion to Compel to 10/1/2021 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DB) before Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes. The joint statement must be filed no later than 9/24/2021.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
Law Office of Shaun Setareh v. AT and T Corporation et al
Filed: September 17, 2021 as 2:2021cv00030
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: AT&T Corporation, DOES 1-50, inclusive, AT and T Corporation
Plaintiff: Law Office of Shaun Setareh
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Upon review of the parties' Stipulation for Dismissal of Action with Prejudice, and in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) 22 , the Court hereby ORDERS that the above-captioned action is dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear its own respective costs. (gk)
BETANCES v. AT&T INC. et al
Filed: September 17, 2021 as 3:2020cv02239
Court: Pennsylvania Middle District Court
Defendant: AT&T Inc. doing business as AT&T STORE WILKES BARRE, GABBY NORWOOD, OLIVER PHILPOTT, DALLAS BATTLE, TRISHA TORRES, John Does (1-10), ADRIAN KESSEL
Plaintiff: CARLOS BETANCES
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
ORDER denying 40 Motion to Deem Defendant, Dallas Battle Served by Posting Nunc Pro Tunc. Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 9/17/21 (jam)
BETANCES v. AT&T INC. et al
Filed: September 17, 2021 as 3:2020cv02239
Court: Pennsylvania Middle District Court
Defendant: AT&T Inc. doing business as AT&T STORE WILKES BARRE, GABBY NORWOOD, OLIVER PHILPOTT, DALLAS BATTLE, TRISHA TORRES, John Does (1-10), ADRIAN KESSEL
Plaintiff: CARLOS BETANCES
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
MEMORANDUM OPINION (Order to follow as separate docket entry) re 40 MOTION to deem Defendant, Dallas Battle served by posting nunc pro tunc filed by CARLOS BETANCES. Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 9/17/21. (jam)
Williams v. AT&T Mobility, LLC
Filed: September 17, 2021 as 5:2019cv00475
Court: North Carolina Eastern District Court
Defendant: AT&T Mobility, LLC
Plaintiff: Jason Williams
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
ORDER granting 84 Motion to Enter Agreed Order Regarding Discovery and Case Schedule. Counsel should read the order in its entirety for critical deadlines and information. Signed by District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 9/17/2021. (Sellers, N.)
IPCom Gmbh & Co. KG v. AT&T Inc et al
Filed: September 15, 2021 as 2:2020cv00322
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Consolidated Defendant: Verizon Services Corp, Verizon Communications Inc, Verizon Corporate Services Group Inc, Verizon Business Network Services, LLC
Counter Claimant: Verizon Enterprise Solutions, LLC, Verizon Online LLC, Verizon Business Network Services Inc, Verizon Data Services LLC, Verizon Business Global, LLC, Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, Nokia of America Corporation, Ericsson Inc.
Counter Defendant: IPCom Gmbh & Co. KG
Defendant: AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Inc, AT&T Communications, LLC, AT&T Services Inc, AT&T Mobility II LLC, AT&T Corp
Not Classified By Court: Donald E Tiller, Karl Bayer
Nature of Suit: Patent
CLAIM CONSTRUCTION MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 9/15/2021. (ch, )
AT&T Corp. v. Level 3 Communications, LLC
Filed: September 14, 2021 as 1:2018cv00112
Court: Colorado District Court
Defendant: Level 3 Communications, LLC
Plaintiff: AT&T Corp.
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDERS. AT&T's Unopposed Motion to Restrict Public Access to Their Offer of Proof (ECF No. 265 ) is GRANTED. AT&T's Unopposed Motion to Supplement the Record (ECF No. 280 ) is GRANTED. Leve l 3's Motion to Amend the Pleadings Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(b) (ECF No. 283 ) is DENIED. Level 3 is entitled to JUDGMENT in the amount of $5,152,683.74 ($4,013,308.81 for undisputed amounts plu s…
(PS)Thacker v. AT&T Mobility, LLC et al
Filed: September 14, 2021 as 2:2020cv00255
Court: California Eastern District Court
Defendant: Diversified Consultants, Inc., AT&T Corporation
Plaintiff: David C. Thacker
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/14/2021 ADOPTING IN FULL 53 , 56 Findings and Recommendations. The Court CONSTRUES the 51 Joint Stipulation of Dismissal as a Motion for Voluntary Dismissal by court order under Fe deral Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) and GRANTS that motion. The claims against AT&T Corporation and AT&T Mobility, LLC are DISMISSED with prejudice, with each party bearing its own fees and costs. Plaintiffs 55 Motion to Voluntarily…
Bennett v. AT&T Services, Inc.
Filed: September 14, 2021 as 4:2020cv03581
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: AT&T Services, Inc.
Plaintiff: Yolonda Bennett
Nature of Suit: Employment
ORDER on Joint Discovery Letter Brief. Signed by Judge Sallie Kim on September 14, 2021. (sklc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2021)
Network Apps, LLC et al v. AT&T Inc. et al
Filed: August 31, 2021 as 1:2021cv00718
Court: New York Southern District Court
Defendant: AT&T CORP., AT&T Services, Inc., AT&T Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC
Plaintiff: KYLE SCHEI, JOHN WANTZ, NETWORK APPS, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER granting 108 Letter Motion to Seal. Application GRANTED. Plaintiffs are permitted to publicly file a redacted version of the Rebuttal Declaration, and to file an unredacted version under seal. The Court cautions, however, that to the extent the Rebuttal Declaration is being employed as a means of circumventing the Court's page limits, it will not be considered by the Court. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 8/31/2021) (rro)
