AT&T State Court Decisions

Jordan v. AT&T Integrated Disability Service Center Disability Plan et al

Filed: September 25, 2019

State: West Virginia
Court: West Virginia Southern District Court
Case Number: 3:2018cv00094

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying Plaintiff's 24 MOTION to Enforce Settlement and Defendants' 35 MOTION to Strike Portions of Plaintiff's 34 SUPPLEMENTAL REPLY BRIEF. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 9/25/2019. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (jsa)

(PS)Loftus v. AT&T, Inc.

Filed: September 20, 2019

State: California
Court: California Eastern District Court
Case Number: 2:2018cv02866

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 9/19/2019 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these F & R's.(Reader, L)

Ellis v AT&T Midwest et al

Filed: September 3, 2019

State: Indiana
Court: Indiana Northern District Court
Case Number: 3:2018cv00530

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING AS MOOT 5 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(7) for Failure to Join a Necessary Party filed by Communications Workers of America District 4; DENYING 22 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Local 4900 Communications Workers of America. Signed by Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 9/3/19. (ksp)

BTC, Inc. v. AT&T Corp.

Filed: September 3, 2019

State: Iowa
Court: Iowa Northern District Court
Case Number: 3:2018cv03075

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting Defendant's 14 Motion to Dismiss Counts II and III of complaint. Signed by Chief Judge Leonard T Strand on 9/3/2019. (jjh)

County of Dorchester, South Carolina et al v. AT&T Corp et al

Filed: August 13, 2019

State: South Carolina
Court: South Carolina District Court
Case Number: 2:2018cv02890

ORDER AND OPINION Defendants' joint partial motion to dismiss the Complaint and to strike its class action allegations (Dkt. No. 14 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The partial motion to dismiss is denied and the motion to strike is granted. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 8/13/2019.(sshe, )

Iridescent Networks, Inc. v. AT&T Mobility, LLC

Filed: August 12, 2019

State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 18-1449

Gross v. AT&T Inc. et al

Filed: July 31, 2019

State: New York
Court: New York Southern District Court
Case Number: 1:2019cv02892

MEMORANDUM AND OPINION re: 70 MOTION for Leave to File A SUR-REPLY IN FURTHER OPPOSITION TO MOTION OF KBC ASSET MANAGEMENT NV FOR RECONSIDERATION . filed by Local 295 IBT Employer Group Pension Fund, Iron Workers Locals 40, 361 & 417 Union Security Funds, Iron Workers Local 580 Joint Funds, 64 MOTION for Leave to File Declaration of J. Andrew Kent . filed by Local 295 IBT Employer Group Pension Fund, Iron Workers Locals 40, 361 & 417 Union Security Funds, Iron Workers Local 580 Joint…

Fractus, S.A. v. AT&T Mobility LLC

Filed: July 19, 2019

State: Texas
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Case Number: 2:2018cv00135

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER- The parties in the consolidated cases are ORDERED to jointly appear at a status conference set for Wednesday, July 24, 2019, at 1:30 p.m. in Marshall, Texas to explore the most appropriate trial sequence in light of this Order. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 07/19/2019. (klc, )

Michael Terpin v. AT and T Inc et al

Filed: July 19, 2019

State: California
Court: California Central District Court
Case Number: 2:2018cv06975

ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, AND DENYING IN PART, DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS 14 ; AND DENYING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO STRIKE 15 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court GRANTS IN PART, and DENIES IN PART, AT&Ts Motion to Dismiss and DENIES AT&Ts Motion to Strike Mr. Terpin may amend his Complaint to address the deficiencies identified above within 21 days from the date of this Order. (lc)

North Canton Board of Education v. AT&T, Inc. et al

Filed: July 3, 2019

State: Ohio
Court: Ohio Northern District Court
Case Number: 5:2016cv01420

Memorandum Opinion and Order: For the reasons set forth herein, plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment (Doc. No. 95 ) is denied and defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 93 ) is granted. Case closed. Judge Sara Lioi on 7/3/2019. (O,K)

STEVEN MCARDLE V. AT&T MOBILITY LLC

Filed: June 28, 2019

State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Case Number: 17-17246

Hoffman v AT&T Inc.

Filed: June 21, 2019

State: New York
Court: Other Courts
Citation: 2019 NY Slip Op 31811 (U)

(PS) Bobo v. AT&T et al

Filed: June 17, 2019

State: California
Court: California Eastern District Court
Case Number: 2:2019cv00762

ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 6/17/2019 IT IS SO ORDERED that all pleading, discovery and motion practice in this action are STAYED pending resolution of these F & R's. RECOMMENDING that the action be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and plaintiff's failure to prosecute the case. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these F & R's. (Reader, L)

Kennedy v. AT&T, Inc. et al

Filed: May 28, 2019

State: Delaware
Court: Delaware District Court
Case Number: 1:2018cv01317

MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 5/24/2019. (nms)

Carnes v. AT&T Inc et al

Filed: May 28, 2019

State: Alabama
Court: Alabama Northern District Court
Case Number: 2:2018cv01639

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - Currently before the court is AT&Ts motion to compel arbitration and stay proceedings. (Doc. 10 ). Because Mr. Carness claims are subject to binding arbitration, the court GRANTS the motion. For the reasons explained above, the court GRANTS AT&Ts motion to compel arbitration and STAYS this proceeding. The court asks the Clerk to ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 5/28/2019. (KEK)

Uniloc 2017 LLC v. AT&T Services, Inc. et al

Filed: April 23, 2019

State: Texas
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Case Number: 2:2018cv00514

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER- The Court hereby GRANTS Ericssons Motion to Intervene as a Defendant. Ericsson is ORDERED to file its Answer in Intervention within fourteen (14) days of the issuance of this Order. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 04/23/2019. (klc, )

Daiquiri Hill v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company dba AT&T Texas Appeal from 269th District Court of Harris County

Filed: April 18, 2019

State: Texas
Court: First Court of Appeals
Case Number: 01-18-00836-CV

Plaintiff v. Defendant

Filed: April 17, 2019

State: Texas
Court: Texas Northern District Court
Case Number: 3:2018cv03429

<span id="jshide_2">Plaintiff v. Defendant</span><script type="text/javascript">window.jshides[2] = "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";</script>