Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: April 9, 2024 as 4:2016cv05544
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
ORDER DIRECTING SUBMISSION OF PROPOSED FORM OF JUDGMENT AGAINST NAMED PLAINTIFFS AND STAYING CASE.*This Order TERMINATES Docket No. 189 .* Status Report due by 10/6/2024. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 4/9/2024. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2024)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: March 1, 2023 as 5:2017cv01864
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
ORDER (as modified) by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 190 Stipulation re Briefing Schedule for Plaintiffs Motion for Attorneys Fees and Expenses. Motions due by 3/2/2023; Responses due by 3/23/2023; Replies due by 4/11/2023; and Motion Hearing set for 5/18/2023 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2023)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: January 30, 2023 as 4:2016cv05544
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
ORDER REOPENING CASE AND DIRECTING PARTIES TO DETERMINE AVAILABILITY FOR BENCH TRIAL. Motions (stipulation and proposed order) due by 2/6/2023. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 1/30/2023. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/30/2023)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: August 9, 2021 as 5:2017cv01864
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 159 Stipulation to Extend Deadline to File Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and to Respond to and Reply in Support of Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/9/2021)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: September 24, 2020 as 4:2016cv05544
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 141 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply Re 134 MOTION for Summary Judgment and 139 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 9/28/2020 and Replies due by 10/5/2020. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/24/2020)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: December 30, 2019 as 5:2017cv01864
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 120 Motion to Stay Execution of the Judgment Pending Appeal and to Approve Supersedeas Bond Re Docket No. 119 . (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/30/2019)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: December 26, 2019 as 5:2017cv01864
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 129 Stipulation Holding in Abeyance Further Briefing On, and Adjudication Of, Plaintiffs' 122 MOTION for Attorney Fees and Litigation Costs. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/26/2019)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: October 18, 2019 as 5:2017cv01864
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
JUDGMENT. ***Civil Case Terminated.***Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 10/18/2019. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2019)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: June 20, 2019 as 4:2016cv05544
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 111 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Leonard, Erika. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2019)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: September 21, 2018 as 5:2017cv01864
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 86 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Schmidtke, Mark. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2018)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: December 12, 2017 as 5:2017cv01864
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 27 Motion Requesting a Case Management or Status Conference. Case Management Statement due by 5:00 p.m. on 12/15/2017; Case Management Conference set for 12/19/2017 02:00 PM.(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/12/2017)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: December 12, 2017 as 4:2016cv05544
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 43 Motion Requesting a Case Management or Status Conference. Case Management Statement due by 5:00 p.m. on 12/15/2017; Case Management Conference set for 12/19/2017 02:00 PM. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/12/2017)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: May 19, 2017 as 5:2017cv01864
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 17 Stipulation Enlarging Plaintiffs Time to Respond re 9 MOTION to Dismiss. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/19/2017)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: May 9, 2017 as 4:2016cv05544
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 36 Stipulation Enlarging Plaintiff's Time to Respond to Docket No. 33 MOTION to Dismiss. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2017)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: December 6, 2016 as 4:2016cv05544
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Denying 19 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Schmidtke, Mark. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2016)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: November 30, 2016 as 4:2016cv05544
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 20 Stipulation to Extend Time for Plaintiff to Respond to 17 Motion to Dismiss. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2016)
Endeavor Meshtech, Inc. v. ATMEL Corporation
Filed: August 31, 2015 as 1:2015cv01423
Court: Colorado District Court
Defendant: ATMEL Corporation
Plaintiff: Endeavor Meshtech, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING/PLANNING CONFERENCE AND SETTING DEADLINE FOR FILING OF PILOT PROGRAM CONSENT FORM by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 8/31/15. A Scheduling Conference is set for 9/29/2015 01:30 PM in Courtroom C204 before Magistrate Judge N ina Y. Wang. The parties shall submit their proposed scheduling order, including a copy of the proposed scheduling order in a Word format sent via email to Wang_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov, seven days prior to the Scheduling Conference.…
Jaffe v. Magnachip Semiconductor Corporation
Filed: July 3, 2013 as 4:2012cv03166
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Atmel Corporation, Cyprus Semiconductor Corporation, LSI Corporation, Magnachip Semiconductor Corporation, Magnachip Semiconductor, Inc., On Semiconductor Corporation
Plaintiff: Michael Jaffe
Nature of Suit: Patent
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 238 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a) filed by Magnachip Semiconductor, Inc., Magnachip Semiconductor, Ltd, Magnachip Semiconductor S.A., Magnachip Semiconductor Corporation, Michael Jaffe. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on July 3, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/3/2013)
Jaffe v. Magnachip Semiconductor Corporation
Filed: May 20, 2013 as 4:2012cv03166
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Atmel Corporation, Cyprus Semiconductor Corporation, LSI Corporation, Magnachip Semiconductor Corporation, Magnachip Semiconductor, Inc., On Semiconductor Corporation
Plaintiff: Michael Jaffe
Nature of Suit: Patent
CORRECTED ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND CERTAIN DEADLINES by Judge Jon S. Tigar granting 230 Motion to Continue. The court will not grant any further continuances on the basis of continuing settlement discussions. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on May 20, 2013. Correction of docket 231 . (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/20/2013)
Jaffe v. LSI Corporation
Filed: January 30, 2013 as 4:2012cv03166
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Atmel Corporation, Cyprus Semiconductor Corporation, LSI Corporation, Magnachip Semiconductor Corporation, Magnachip Semiconductor, Inc., On Semiconductor Corporation
Plaintiff: Michael Jaffe
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO COMPEL (Dkt. No. 206). Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 1/30/2013. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/30/2013)
