BIAX Corporation v. Motorola Solutions, Inc. et al
Filed: August 23, 2012 as 1:2010cv03013
Court: Colorado District Court
Defendant: Brother Industries, Ltd., Brother International Corporation, Canon U.S.A., Inc., Canon, Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company, Motorola, Inc., Ricoh Americas Corporation, Ricoh Company, Ltd.
Plaintiff: BIAX Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent
MINUTE ORDER. Any parties seeking a settlement conference facilitated by the undersigned shall call Chambers on or before 8/31/2012, to schedule a settlement conference. Any settlement conference shall occur before 10/24/2012. Plaintiff shall suppl ement its infringement contentions to further explain how the accused products satisfy the shared access properties of the asserted claims of the patents-in-suit on or before 9/17/2012. Any remaining fact and expert discovery is temporarily…
BIAX Corporation v. Motorola Solutions, Inc. et al
Filed: August 17, 2012 as 1:2010cv03013
Court: Colorado District Court
Defendant: Brother Industries, Ltd., Brother International Corporation, Canon U.S.A., Inc., Canon, Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company, Motorola, Inc., Ricoh Americas Corporation, Ricoh Company, Ltd.
Plaintiff: BIAX Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent
MINUTE ORDER denying as moot 374 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave and 375 Motion to Compel. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 8/17/12.(mnfsl, )
BIAX Corporation v. Motorola Solutions, Inc. et al
Filed: August 15, 2012 as 1:2010cv03013
Court: Colorado District Court
Defendant: Brother Industries, Ltd., Brother International Corporation, Canon U.S.A., Inc., Canon, Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company, Motorola, Inc., Ricoh Americas Corporation, Ricoh Company, Ltd.
Plaintiff: BIAX Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER re: 374 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File a Motion toCompel and 375 MOTION to Compel. Plaintiff has three options: (1) to file amended Motions by no later than 8/16/2012 stating reasonable dates for the requested relief, takin g into account a fourteen-day period for the filing of Defendant's response; or (2) to withdraw the Motions; or (3) to prepare to argue against the imposition of sanctions for the filing of frivolous discovery motions. By Magistrate…
Cisco Systems, Inc. v. TiVo Inc.
Filed: August 10, 2012 as 3:2012cv02766
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: TiVo Inc.
Plaintiff: Cisco Systems, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO TRANSFER. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 8/10/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2012)
EON Corp IP Holdings LLC v. Sensus USA Inc et al
Filed: August 2, 2012 as 3:2012cv01011
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Aruba Networks Inc, Broadsoft Inc, Cicero Networks Limited, Clavister AB, IP.Access Inc, Juni America Inc, Cisco Systems Inc, Mavenir Systems Inc, Meru Networks, Inc., Sercomm Corporation, Sonus Networks Inc, Sprint Nextel Corporation, Stoke Inc, Tatara Systems Inc, HTC America Inc, United States Cellular Corporation, Kineto Wireless, Inc., Airvana, Inc., Sprint Spectrum L.P., Motorola Solutions, Inc., Motorola Mobility, Inc.
Plaintiff: EON Corp IP Holdings LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 457 MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery Third Agreed Motion to Extend the Time to Serve Stoke, Inc.'s Initial Disclosures filed by EON Corp IP Holdings LLC, Stoke Inc. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/2/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2012)
BIAX Corporation v. Motorola Solutions, Inc. et al
Filed: July 30, 2012 as 1:2010cv03013
Court: Colorado District Court
Defendant: Brother Industries, Ltd., Brother International Corporation, Canon U.S.A., Inc., Canon, Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company, Motorola, Inc., Ricoh Americas Corporation, Ricoh Company, Ltd.
Plaintiff: BIAX Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent
MINUTE ORDER granting 352 Motion to Dismiss Party, Party Brother Industries, Ltd. and Brother International Corporation terminated with prejudice by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 7/30/12.(dkals, )
TiVo Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
Filed: July 18, 2012 as 2:2012cv00311
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Defendant: Cisco Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff: TiVo Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 7/18/12. Time Warner Cable will be added as a party to this case per law clark.(bas)
Cisco v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Filed: July 11, 2012 as 2:2012cv00739
Court: West Virginia Southern District Court
Defendant: Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Plaintiff: Roger Cisco
Nature of Suit: Federal Employers Liability
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying as moot defendant's 8 MOTION to Dismiss the original complaint and for a more definite statement; granting Cisco's 21 MOTION to amend the 4/27/2012 13 amended complaint; directing that the secon d amended complaint is filed; and denying without prejudice, as being moot, defendant's 14 MOTION to Dismiss the amended complaint. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 7/11/2012. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (taq)…
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: July 9, 2012 as 4:2012cv00869
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
STIPULATION AND ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 7/9/12. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/9/2012)
Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Alberta Telecommunications Research Center et al
Filed: July 9, 2012 as 3:2012cv03293
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Alberta Telecommunications Research Center, TR Technologies, Inc
Plaintiff: Cisco Systems, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Joint Case Management Statement due by 9/27/2012. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/4/2012 02:00 PM. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 7/9/12. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/9/2012)
Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Alberta Telecommunications Research Center et al
Filed: July 5, 2012 as 3:2012cv03293
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Alberta Telecommunications Research Center, TR Technologies, Inc
Plaintiff: Cisco Systems, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER, Case reassigned to Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton. Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Executive Committee on 7/5/12. (ha, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/5/2012)
BIAX Corporation v. Motorola Solutions, Inc. et al
Filed: July 3, 2012 as 1:2010cv03013
Court: Colorado District Court
Defendant: Brother Industries, Ltd., Brother International Corporation, Canon U.S.A., Inc., Canon, Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company, Motorola, Inc., Ricoh Americas Corporation, Ricoh Company, Ltd.
Plaintiff: BIAX Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent
MINUTE ORDER granting 316 Stipulated Motion to Dismiss Cisco Systems, Inc. With Prejudice. Plaintiff's claims against defendant Cisco Systems, Inc. are dismissed in their entirety with prejudice, with each party to bear its own fees and costs. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 7/3/12.(mnfsl, )
BIAX Corporation v. Motorola Solutions, Inc. et al
Filed: July 3, 2012 as 1:2010cv03013
Court: Colorado District Court
Defendant: Brother Industries, Ltd., Brother International Corporation, Canon U.S.A., Inc., Canon, Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company, Motorola, Inc., Ricoh Americas Corporation, Ricoh Company, Ltd.
Plaintiff: BIAX Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent
MINUTE ORDER. Plaintiff BIAX Corporation's 349 Motion to Withdraw [Its] Motion to Compel Documents from Defendant Motorola Mobility, Inc. is granted. Plaintiff BIAX Corporation's 340 Motion to Compel is withdrawn. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 7/3/12.(mnfsl, )
Richard A Williamson v. Citrix Online LLC et al
Filed: June 29, 2012 as 2:2011cv02409
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: Adobe Systems Inc, Blackboard Inc, Cisco Systems Inc, Cisco Webex LLC, Citrix Online LLC, Citrix Systems Inc, Dimdim Inc, Elluminate USA Inc, Fuze Box Inc, International Business Machines Corporation, Microsoft Corporation, Omnovia Technologies Inc, Salesforce.com Inc, Timebridge Inc, Tokbox Inc, Viack Corp, Video Seminar LIve LLC, WYBS Inc, Webex Communications Inc, Wimba Inc
Plaintiff: Richard A Williamson
Nature of Suit: Patent
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz: granting 199 Motion to Dismiss Salesforce.com, Inc. and Dimdim Inc. for Misjoinder. The Court DISMISSES Salesforce.com, Inc. and Dimdim, Inc. from this action. (kbr)
EON Corp IP Holdings LLC v. Sensus USA Inc et al
Filed: June 25, 2012 as 3:2012cv01011
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Aruba Networks Inc, Broadsoft Inc, Cicero Networks Limited, Clavister AB, IP.Access Inc, Juni America Inc, Cisco Systems Inc, Mavenir Systems Inc, Meru Networks, Inc., Sercomm Corporation, Sonus Networks Inc, Sprint Nextel Corporation, Stoke Inc, Tatara Systems Inc, HTC America Inc, United States Cellular Corporation, Kineto Wireless, Inc., Airvana, Inc., Sprint Spectrum L.P., Motorola Solutions, Inc., Motorola Mobility, Inc.
Plaintiff: EON Corp IP Holdings LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 389 for Extension of Time to File ADR Documents filed by Motorola Mobility, Inc.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/22/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/25/2012)
BIAX Corporation v. Motorola Solutions, Inc. et al
Filed: June 13, 2012 as 1:2010cv03013
Court: Colorado District Court
Defendant: Brother Industries, Ltd., Brother International Corporation, Canon U.S.A., Inc., Canon, Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company, Motorola, Inc., Ricoh Americas Corporation, Ricoh Company, Ltd.
Plaintiff: BIAX Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent
CONSENTED SUPPLEMENTAL PROTECTIVE ORDER Re: Broadcom and Netlogic Source Code, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 6/13/2012. (klmcd, )
BIAX Corporation v. Motorola Solutions, Inc. et al
Filed: June 13, 2012 as 1:2010cv03013
Court: Colorado District Court
Defendant: Brother Industries, Ltd., Brother International Corporation, Canon U.S.A., Inc., Canon, Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company, Motorola, Inc., Ricoh Americas Corporation, Ricoh Company, Ltd.
Plaintiff: BIAX Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER. Plaintiff BIAX's Motion for Clarification of the Preliminary Scheduling Order Regarding its Infringement Contentions against HP and Motion to CompelRelated Discovery 282 is granted and denied without prejudice in part. Defendants' Motorola Mobility, Inc., Motorola Solutions, Inc., Hewlett-PackardCompany, Ricoh Americas Corporation, and Ricoh Company, LTD.'s Motionto Compel 298 is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff BIAX's Second Motion to Restrict Access …
EON Corp IP Holdings LLC v. Sensus USA Inc et al
Filed: June 6, 2012 as 3:2012cv01011
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Aruba Networks Inc, Broadsoft Inc, Cicero Networks Limited, Clavister AB, IP.Access Inc, Juni America Inc, Cisco Systems Inc, Mavenir Systems Inc, Meru Networks, Inc., Sercomm Corporation, Sonus Networks Inc, Sprint Nextel Corporation, Stoke Inc, Tatara Systems Inc, HTC America Inc, United States Cellular Corporation, Kineto Wireless, Inc., Airvana, Inc., Sprint Spectrum L.P., Motorola Solutions, Inc., Motorola Mobility, Inc.
Plaintiff: EON Corp IP Holdings LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE ADR CERTIFICATION AND STIPULATION TO ADR PROCESS. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/6/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/6/2012)
EON Corp IP Holdings LLC v. Sensus USA Inc et al
Filed: May 17, 2012 as 3:2012cv01011
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Aruba Networks Inc, Broadsoft Inc, Cicero Networks Limited, Clavister AB, IP.Access Inc, Juni America Inc, Cisco Systems Inc, Mavenir Systems Inc, Meru Networks, Inc., Sercomm Corporation, Sonus Networks Inc, Sprint Nextel Corporation, Stoke Inc, Tatara Systems Inc, HTC America Inc, United States Cellular Corporation, Kineto Wireless, Inc., Airvana, Inc., Sprint Spectrum L.P., Motorola Solutions, Inc., Motorola Mobility, Inc.
Plaintiff: EON Corp IP Holdings LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
STANDING ORDER. Signed by Judge EDWARD M. CHEN on 5/17/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2012)
BIAX Corporation v. Motorola Solutions, Inc. et al
Filed: May 16, 2012 as 1:2010cv03013
Court: Colorado District Court
Defendant: Brother Industries, Ltd., Brother International Corporation, Canon U.S.A., Inc., Canon, Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company, Motorola, Inc., Ricoh Americas Corporation, Ricoh Company, Ltd.
Plaintiff: BIAX Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 270 Defendants Motorola Mobility Inc.'s, Motorola Solutions, Inc.'s, and Hewlett-Packard Company's Expedited Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order, or in the Alternative for a Status Confere nce. Fact Discovery due by 6/15/2012. Initial expert reports due by the later of 7/16/2012 or 30 days after the Markman ruling, and limited to the "shared access" issue. Rebuttal expert reports due by the later of 8/15/2012 or 30…
