Cisco State Court Decisions

CENTRIPETAL NETWORKS, INC. v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.

Filed: May 11, 2021

State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 20-1768

CENTRIPETAL NETWORKS, INC. v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.

Filed: May 11, 2021

State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 20-1713

Centripetal Networks, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.

Filed: March 17, 2021

State: Virginia
Court: Virginia Eastern District Court
Case Number: 2:2018cv00094

OPINION AND ORDER: Defendant Cisco's 625 Motion for New Trial Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(a)(2), 627 Motion for Additional and Amended Findings and Amended Judgment Under Rule 52(b) are each DENIED. The Court enters FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of Centripetal, against Cisco, for the reasons and upon the terms set forth in its 10/5/20 Order as well as in this Order. Signed by District Judge Henry C. Morgan, Jr on 3/17/21. (bpet, )

Cisco Systems, Inc. et al v. Chung et al

Filed: March 16, 2021

State: California
Court: California Northern District Court
Case Number: 4:2019cv07562

ORDER DENYING [169-1] MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF SEALING ORDERS AND GRANTING 177 MOTION TO MAINTAIN SEAL ON NON-PARTY FOXCONN'S INFORMATION by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton. (pjhlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/16/2021)

CENTRIPETAL NETWORKS, INC. v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.

Filed: March 10, 2021

State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 20-2057

CENTRIPETAL NETWORKS, INC. v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.

Filed: March 10, 2021

State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 20-1635

Cisco Systems, Inc. et al v. Chung et al

Filed: February 8, 2021

State: California
Court: California Northern District Court
Case Number: 4:2019cv07562

ORDER GRANTING 134 135 MOTIONS TO COMPEL COUNTERCLAIMS TO ARBITRATION AND GRANTING MOTIONS TO STRIKE by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton. (pjhlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/8/2021)

Ramot at Tel Aviv University Ltd. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.

Filed: January 13, 2021

State: Texas
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Case Number: 2:2019cv00225

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 1/13/2021. (ch, )

Monarch Networking Solutions LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc. et al

Filed: January 5, 2021

State: Texas
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Case Number: 2:2020cv00015

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 1/5/2021. (ch, )

FINJAN, INC. v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.

Filed: December 30, 2020

State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 19-2074

Atta v. Cisco Systems Inc.

Filed: November 30, 2020

State: Georgia
Court: Georgia Northern District Court
Case Number: 1:2018cv01558

OPINION & ORDER: the Court OVERRULES Defendant's objection and ADOPTS the R&R as the decision of this Court. As set forth herein and in the R&R, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Plaintiff's Motion for Spoliation Sanctions 89 a nd GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendant Cisco Systems, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment 85 . The summary judgment motion is DENIED as to Plaintiff's ADA retaliation claim but is GRANTED as to her remaining claims. As for…

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. v. XR COMMUNICATIONS, LLC

Filed: November 25, 2020

State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 20-1105

In Re CISCO SYSTEMS INC.

Filed: October 30, 2020

State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 20-148

Centripetal Networks, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.

Filed: October 5, 2020

State: Virginia
Court: Virginia Eastern District Court
Case Number: 2:2018cv00094

OPINION AND ORDER. The Court FINDS the 856 Patent, the 176 Patent, the 193 Patent, and the 806 Patent claims valid and literally INFRINGED and the 205 Patent NOT INFRINGED. The Court FINDS the actual damages suffered by Centripetal as a result of inf ringement total $755,808,545; that the infringement was willful and egregious and shall be enhanced by a factor of 2.5x to equal $1,889,521,362.50. The Court awards pre-judgment interest of $13,717,925 applied to the actual…

Centripetal Networks, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.

Filed: October 2, 2020

State: Virginia
Court: Virginia Eastern District Court
Case Number: 2:2018cv00094

OPINION AND ORDER denying 551 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief. Signed by District Judge Henry C. Morgan, Jr., on 10/2/20. (bpet, )

Cisco Systems, Inc. et al v. Sheikh et al

Filed: October 2, 2020

State: California
Court: California Northern District Court
Case Number: 4:2018cv07602

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART THIRD PARTY DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers ;granting in part and denying in part 130 Motion for Summa ry Judgment or in Alternative Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 131 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; denying 135 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; denying 144 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. (fs, COURT STAFF)…

Cleary v. Cisco Systems, Inc. et al

Filed: September 8, 2020

State: Michigan
Court: Michigan Eastern District Court
Case Number: 2:2020cv10071

OPINION and ORDER Granting Defendants' 8 Motion to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss the Complaint. Signed by District Judge Linda V. Parker. (RLou)

EGENERA, INC. v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.

Filed: August 28, 2020

State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 19-2015

NetFuel, Inc. v. Cisco Systems Inc.

Filed: July 31, 2020

State: California
Court: California Northern District Court
Case Number: 3:2018cv02352

Order granting 309 Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on July 31, 2020.(ejdlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2020)

Finjan, Inc. v. Cisco Systems Inc.

Filed: June 18, 2020

State: California
Court: California Northern District Court
Case Number: 3:2017cv00072

REDACTED ORDER DENYING FINJAN'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE COURT'S APRIL 28, 2020 ORDER ON CISCO'S MOTION TO STRIKEre 662 Sealed Order Denying Finjan's Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's April 28, 2020 Order on Cisco's Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge Susan van Keulen on 6/18/2020. (svklc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/18/2020)