Ramot at Tel Aviv University Ltd. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
Filed: January 13, 2021
State: Texas
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Case Number: 2:2019cv00225
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 1/13/2021. (ch, )
Monarch Networking Solutions LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc. et al
Filed: January 5, 2021
State: Texas
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Case Number: 2:2020cv00015
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 1/5/2021. (ch, )
FINJAN, INC. v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
Filed: December 30, 2020
State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 19-2074
Atta v. Cisco Systems Inc.
Filed: November 30, 2020
State: Georgia
Court: Georgia Northern District Court
Case Number: 1:2018cv01558
OPINION & ORDER: the Court OVERRULES Defendant's objection and ADOPTS the R&R as the decision of this Court. As set forth herein and in the R&R, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Plaintiff's Motion for Spoliation Sanctions 89 a nd GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendant Cisco Systems, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment 85 . The summary judgment motion is DENIED as to Plaintiff's ADA retaliation claim but is GRANTED as to her remaining claims. As for…
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. v. XR COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
Filed: November 25, 2020
State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 20-1105
In Re CISCO SYSTEMS INC.
Filed: October 30, 2020
State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 20-148
Centripetal Networks, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
Filed: October 5, 2020
State: Virginia
Court: Virginia Eastern District Court
Case Number: 2:2018cv00094
OPINION AND ORDER. The Court FINDS the 856 Patent, the 176 Patent, the 193 Patent, and the 806 Patent claims valid and literally INFRINGED and the 205 Patent NOT INFRINGED. The Court FINDS the actual damages suffered by Centripetal as a result of inf ringement total $755,808,545; that the infringement was willful and egregious and shall be enhanced by a factor of 2.5x to equal $1,889,521,362.50. The Court awards pre-judgment interest of $13,717,925 applied to the actual…
Centripetal Networks, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
Filed: October 2, 2020
State: Virginia
Court: Virginia Eastern District Court
Case Number: 2:2018cv00094
OPINION AND ORDER denying 551 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief. Signed by District Judge Henry C. Morgan, Jr., on 10/2/20. (bpet, )
Cisco Systems, Inc. et al v. Sheikh et al
Filed: October 2, 2020
State: California
Court: California Northern District Court
Case Number: 4:2018cv07602
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART THIRD PARTY DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers ;granting in part and denying in part 130 Motion for Summa ry Judgment or in Alternative Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 131 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; denying 135 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; denying 144 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. (fs, COURT STAFF)…
Cleary v. Cisco Systems, Inc. et al
Filed: September 8, 2020
State: Michigan
Court: Michigan Eastern District Court
Case Number: 2:2020cv10071
OPINION and ORDER Granting Defendants' 8 Motion to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss the Complaint. Signed by District Judge Linda V. Parker. (RLou)
EGENERA, INC. v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
Filed: August 28, 2020
State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 19-2015
NetFuel, Inc. v. Cisco Systems Inc.
Filed: July 31, 2020
State: California
Court: California Northern District Court
Case Number: 3:2018cv02352
Order granting 309 Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on July 31, 2020.(ejdlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2020)
Finjan, Inc. v. Cisco Systems Inc.
Filed: June 18, 2020
State: California
Court: California Northern District Court
Case Number: 3:2017cv00072
REDACTED ORDER DENYING FINJAN'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE COURT'S APRIL 28, 2020 ORDER ON CISCO'S MOTION TO STRIKEre 662 Sealed Order Denying Finjan's Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's April 28, 2020 Order on Cisco's Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge Susan van Keulen on 6/18/2020. (svklc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/18/2020)
Ramot at Tel Aviv University Ltd. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
Filed: May 15, 2020
State: Texas
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Case Number: 2:2019cv00225
CLAIM CONSTRUCTION MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 5/15/2020. (ch, )
BUSHNELL HAWTHORNE, LLC v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
Filed: May 14, 2020
State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 19-2191
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. v. UNILOC 2017 LLC
Filed: May 13, 2020
State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 19-2048
VIRNETX INC. v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
Filed: May 13, 2020
State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 19-1671
Cisco v. McCarty
Filed: March 19, 2020
State: Kentucky
Court: Kentucky Western District Court
Case Number: 4:2020cv00037
MEMORANDUM OPINION by Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 3/19/20: The Court will dismiss this action by separate Order. cc: Plaintiff(pro se), Deft (DJT)
Cisco v. Stallone et al
Filed: March 12, 2020
State: New York
Court: New York Northern District Court
Case Number: 9:2017cv00347
DECISION AND ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 66 ) is APPROVED and ADOPTED as to the merits of Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claims but REJECTED as to exhaustion; and it is further ORDERED, that Defendants& #039; Summary Judgment Motion (Dkt. No. 50 ) is GRANTED on the basis that Plaintiff has failed to raise a triable issue of fact on the merits of his claims; and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk shall close this action; and it is further…
Cisco v. Myers et al
Filed: March 3, 2020
State: Kentucky
Court: Kentucky Western District Court
Case Number: 4:2019cv00118
MEMORANDUM OPINION by Senior Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 3/3/20: This matter is before the Court on initial review of Plaintiff William Clerence Cisco's pro se complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. For the reasons that follow, the complaint will be dismissed. cc: Plaintiff(pro se), Defts (DJT)
