Weiser v Citigroup, Inc.
Filed: April 25, 2019
State: New York
Court: Appellate Division, First Department
Citation: 2019 NY Slip Op 03147
Case Number: 9099 655851/16
JESUS E. TACORONTE vs CITIGROUP MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST INC., AS TRUSTEE
Filed: April 24, 2019
State: Florida
Court: Second District Court of Appeal
Case Number: 18-4597
LERNER v. CITIGROUP
Filed: April 12, 2019
State: New Jersey
Court: New Jersey District Court
Case Number: 2:2016cv01573
OPINION. Signed by Judge Kevin McNulty on 4/12/2019. (sm)
Citigroup Global Mkts., Inc. v Financial Indus. Regulatory Auth. (FINRA), Inc.
Filed: March 25, 2019
State: New York
Court: Other Courts
Citation: 2019 NY Slip Op 30833 (U)
Leber v. CitiGroup, Inc. et al
Filed: March 25, 2019
State: New York
Court: New York Southern District Court
Case Number: 1:2007cv09329
OPINION AND ORDER re: 304 MOTION for Pre-Arbitration Relief and Distribution of Attorneys Fees Beyond Reasonable Dispute by McTigue Law LLP. filed by Sara L Kennedy, Marya J. Leber. The Court therefore denies McTigue' s motion for pre-arbitration relief. The parties are directed to proceed with mediation and, if necessary, arbitration. The mediation shall take place on April 2, 2019, as the firms have agreed. (Bailey & Glasser' s Opp. at 7, Doc. 307; McTigue' s Reply at 2,…
Al Wininger v. U.S. Bank National Association as Trustee for the Holders of the Citigroup Mortgage Loan Trust Inc. Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates Series 2005-HE3, New Penn Financial, LLC d/b/a Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing Appeal from 380th Judicial District Court of Collin County
Filed: February 28, 2019
State: Texas
Court: Fifth Court of Appeals
Case Number: 05-18-00684-CV
Matter of Murphy v Citigroup Global Mkts., Inc.
Filed: February 28, 2019
State: New York
Court: Appellate Division, First Department
Citation: 2019 NY Slip Op 01491
Case Number: 8545 655455/17
Citigroup Global Mkts. Realty Corp. v LaGreca
Filed: December 19, 2018
State: New York
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department
Citation: 2018 NY Slip Op 08627
Case Number: 2016-07932
CITIGROUP, INC. v. USA
Filed: October 24, 2018
State: Federal Claims
Court: US Court of Federal Claims
Case Number: 1:2015cv00953
REPORTED ORDER AND OPINION denying 22 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 23 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; ( Status Report due by 11/16/2018). Signed by Senior Judge Eric G. Bruggink. (jpk1) Service on parties made.
SilverCreek Mgmnt., et al v. CitiGroup, Inc., et al
Filed: September 28, 2018
State: New York
Court: New York Southern District Court
Case Number: 1:2002cv08881
OPINION AND ORDER re: 114 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Credit Suisse First Boston LLC, Credit Suisse First Boston (USA), Inc., Pershing LLC, 121 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Deutsche Bank Alex Brown, Inc., Deutsche Bank AG, 115 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Merrill Lynch & Co. For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. All of the Defendants 9; motions for summary judgment on Plaintiffs'…
Tomeo v. Citigroup Inc.
Filed: September 27, 2018
State: Illinois
Court: Illinois Northern District Court
Case Number: 1:2013cv04046
OPINION AND ORDER Signed by the Honorable Sara L. Ellis on 9/27/2018: Denying Plaintiff's motion for class certification 123 and grants in part and denies in part Defendants motion to strike Jeffrey Hansens expert opinion and testimony 141 . Mailed notice (mw, )
PABLO GUTH, JACOB GUTH, NICHOLAS GUTH, AMANDA GUTH AND MASON GUTH Vs. CITIGROUP, INC., CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS, INC., AND LEGG MASON, INC.
Filed: September 12, 2018
State: Louisiana
Court: Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal
Case Number: 2018-CA-0172
PABLO GUTH, JACOB GUTH, NICHOLAS GUTH, AMANDA GUTH AND MASON GUTH Vs. CITIGROUP, INC., CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS, INC., AND LEGG MASON, INC.
Filed: September 12, 2018
State: Louisiana
Court: Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal
Case Number: 2018-CA-0172
Moosa Meschin v. U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee for Citigroup Mortgage Loan Trust, Inc. 2007-AHL1, Asset-Backed Pass Through Certificates Series 2007-AHL1 Appeal from 98th District Court of Travis County
Filed: August 15, 2018
State: Texas
Court: Third Court of Appeals
Case Number: 03-18-00259-CV
Citigroup Global Mkts., Inc. v Fiorilla
Filed: August 1, 2018
State: New York
Court: Other Courts
Citation: 2018 NY Slip Op 31919 (U)
State of New York ex rel. Rasmusen v Citigroup, Inc.
Filed: June 28, 2018
State: New York
Court: Appellate Division, First Department
Citation: 2018 NY Slip Op 04845
Case Number: 100175/13 7017 7016
Fiorilla v. Citigroup Global Markets , Incorporated et al
Filed: June 26, 2018
State: New York
Court: New York Southern District Court
Case Number: 1:2017cv05123
OPINION AND ORDER re: 27 MOTION to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint. filed by Edward James Mulcahy, Jr., Citigroup Global Markets, Inc.. Defendants' motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) is GRANTED. (Docket # 27.) The Clerk is directed to terminate the motion, enter judgment for defendants and close the case. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 6/25/2018) (kgo)
Weiser v Citigroup, Inc.
Filed: June 25, 2018
State: New York
Court: Other Courts
Citation: 2018 NY Slip Op 31381 (U)
Mayaguez S.A. v. Citigroup Inc. et al
Filed: March 28, 2018
State: New York
Court: New York Southern District Court
Case Number: 1:2016cv06788
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER re: 21 MOTION to Dismiss Mayaguez's First Amended Complaint. filed by Citigroup Inc., Citibank, N.A. For the reasons stated above, Defendants' motion to dismiss is granted as to the Amended Com plaint's Eleventh Cause of Action, for unconscionability, but is otherwise denied. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion (Dkt. No. 21). It is further ORDERED that there shall be a conference in this matter on April 12, 2018 at 11:15 a.m.…
7 West 57th Street Realty Company, LLC v. CitiGroup, Inc. et al
Filed: March 20, 2018
State: New York
Court: New York Southern District Court
Case Number: 1:2013cv00981
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: Defendants contend that Plaintiff's motion to amend should be denied on grounds of futility. Defendants contend that the proposed SAC does not (1) demonstrate that this Court has personal jurisdiction over the Forei gn Bank Defendants; (2) cure the deficiencies in Plaintiffs antitrust claims; and (3) cure the flaws in Plaintiff's RICO claim. (See Defs. Br. (Dkt.No. 181)). (As further set forth in this Order.) For the reasons stated above, Plaintiffs…
