Disney State Court Decisions

The Walt Disney Company V Rachael Eubanks

Filed: August 16, 2022

State: Michigan
Court: Court of Appeals Order
Case Number: 360291

Kimberly Mallett v. Disney Enterprises

Filed: April 19, 2022

State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Case Number: 22-1028

Buck G. Woodall v. The Walt Disney Company

Filed: April 13, 2022

State: California
Court: California Central District Court
Case Number: 2:2020cv03772

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick re MOTION for Protective Order. 140 The Motion is granted. Contemporaneously herewith, the Court will issue the Protective Order proposed by the Motion. (See document for details) (vmun) Modified on 4/13/2022 (vmun).

The Walt Disney Company V Rachael Eubanks

Filed: April 5, 2022

State: Michigan
Court: Court of Appeals Order
Case Number: 360291

The Walt Disney Company V Rachael Eubanks

Filed: April 5, 2022

State: Michigan
Court: Court of Appeals Order
Case Number: 360291

UNITED TRADEMARK HOLDINGS, INC v. DISNEY ENTERPRISES, INC.

Filed: February 24, 2022

State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 21-1056

Soto v. Disney Severance Pay Plan

Filed: February 16, 2022

State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Case Number: 20-4081

Mallett v. Disney Enterprises

Filed: November 24, 2021

State: Virginia
Court: Virginia Eastern District Court
Case Number: 1:2021cv00616

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND OPINION. The Court hereby APPROVES and ADOPTS the Recommendation (Dkt. 5). ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Dkt.3) is DENIED. ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel (Dkt. 4) is DENIED as MOOT. ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED (see Order for details). Signed by District Judge Rossie D. Alston, Jr on 11/24/2021. (kgall) (C/M to plaintiff)

MAGICAL CRUISE COMPANY LIMITED D/B/A DISNEY CRUISE LINE vs ANA MARIA REIS MARTINS

Filed: November 12, 2021

State: Florida
Court: Fifth District Court of Appeal
Case Number: 5D20-0379

ANA MARIA REIS MARTINS vs MAGICAL CRUISE COMPANY LIMITED, D/B/A DISNEY CRUISE LINE

Filed: November 12, 2021

State: Florida
Court: Fifth District Court of Appeal
Case Number: 5D20-1802

Magee v. The Walt Disney Company

Filed: October 13, 2021

State: New York
Court: New York Southern District Court
Case Number: 1:2019cv10274

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER re: 130 MOTION to Amend/Correct 127 Clerk's Judgment, 126 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations, filed by Quincy Magee. The Court evaluates a motion to amend a judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) under the same standard as a motion for reconsideration under Local Rule 6.3. Yelle v. Mount St. Mary Coll., No. 18-CV-10927 (PMH), 2021 WL 311213, at *2 n.1 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 29, 2021). Mr. Magee's motion to amend the judgment ra ises the…

Magee v. The Walt Disney Company

Filed: September 22, 2021

State: New York
Court: New York Southern District Court
Case Number: 1:2019cv10274

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER adopting 112 Report and Recommendation. Finding no error in the report and recommendation, the Court hereby ORDERS that the report and recommendation is adopted in full, and Mr. Magee's objections are there fore overruled. Mr. Magee's request to amend his complaint is DENIED. Dkt. No. 114. His motion for summary judgment is DENIED as moot. Dkt. Nos. 115, 117. Mr. Magee's motion for relief filed August 10, 2021, is DENIED. Dkt. No. 123 . The Court…

Kuba v. Disney Financial Services, LLC

Filed: July 30, 2021

State: Florida
Court: Florida Middle District Court
Case Number: 6:2021cv00312

ORDER denying 18 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge John Antoon II on 7/30/2021. (EK)

Gilkyson v. Disney Enterprises, Inc.

Filed: July 21, 2021

State: California
Court: Court of Appeal
Case Number: B300971

Donna May v. Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc. et al

Filed: July 20, 2021

State: California
Court: California Central District Court
Case Number: 8:2021cv00968

MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND 10 by Judge David O. Carter. Given that the well-pleaded complaint rule bars removal to federal court, the Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiffs Motion to Remand. MD JS-6. Case Terminated. (lom)

T.P., et al. v. Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc.

Filed: June 29, 2021

State: California
Court: California Central District Court
Case Number: 2:2015cv05346

FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Cormac J. Carney. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Bellwether I, II, III, IV, and V and Overlapping Plaintiffs shall have and recover nothing on their claims against Disney. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is entered in favor of Disney and against the Bellwether I, II, III, IV, and V and Overlapping Plaintiffs on the merits. Related to: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss R.C.R.'s and T.W.R.'s Claims 512 . SEE DOCUMENT FOR…

Kim v. Disney Vacation Club Hawaii Management Company, LLC

Filed: April 27, 2021

State: Hawaii
Court: Hawaii District Court
Case Number: 1:2019cv00579

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT DISNEY'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 36) - Signed by JUDGE ALAN C. KAY on 4/27/2021.For the foregoing reasons, Disney's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.There being no remaining claims in this case, the Clerk's Office is DIRECTED to enter judgment and close the case. (jni)

MICHAEL BERRY vs WALT DISNEY PARKS AND RESORTS USA, INC.

Filed: February 23, 2021

State: Florida
Court: Fifth District Court of Appeal
Case Number: 5D19-3230

Soto v. Disney Severance Pay Plan et al

Filed: November 9, 2020

State: New York
Court: New York Southern District Court
Case Number: 1:2019cv04048

OPINION AND ORDER. For the reasons stated above, Defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED. This resolves Dkt. No. 25. Additionally, Plaintiff seeks leave to amend her complaint. See Pl. Br. at 23 ("[S]hould [Disney's] Motion be granted in whole or in part, Plaintiff should be granted leave to amend."). The Court declines to afford Plaintiff a second opportunity to amend her complaint. Soto has already been provided one opportunity to amend her pleading, and given…