Finisar Corporation v. Oplink Communications Inc. et al
Filed: June 8, 2011 as 3:2010cv05617
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Oplink Communications Inc., Optical Communication Products, Inc.
Plaintiff: Finisar Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER TRANSFERRING ACTION. This matter is hereby transferred to Judge Richard Seeborg for all further proceedings. Any existing scheduling deadlines and hearing dates are vacated. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 6/8/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/8/2011)
Finisar Corporation v. Oplink Communications Inc. et al
Filed: June 6, 2011 as 5:2010cv05617
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Oplink Communications Inc., Optical Communication Products, Inc.
Plaintiff: Finisar Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent
STIPULATION AND ORDER Extending Deadline Disclosures re 41 Stipulation. The date for the parties to exchange Patent Local Rule 4-2 disclosures shall be extended to June 10, 2011. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 6/6/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/6/2011)
Finisar Corporation v. Oplink Communications Inc. et al
Filed: May 25, 2011 as 5:2010cv05617
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Oplink Communications Inc., Optical Communication Products, Inc.
Plaintiff: Finisar Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent
STIPULATION AND ORDER Granting Request for Extending Mediation Deadline re 39 Stipulation. Mediation deadline set for 10/31/2011. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 5/25/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/25/2011)
Finisar Corporation v. Agilestar.com, Inc. et al
Filed: May 10, 2011 as 5:2010cv04990
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Agilestar.com, Inc., Memorydealers.com, Inc.
Plaintiff: Finisar Corporation
Nature of Suit: Copyrights
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER re 35 (MODIFIED BY THE COURT). Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 5/10/2011. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2011)
Finisar Corporation v. Oplink Communications Inc. et al
Filed: May 6, 2011 as 5:2010cv05617
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Oplink Communications Inc., Optical Communication Products, Inc.
Plaintiff: Finisar Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent
STIPULATION AND ORDER Extending Deadline to File Joint Case Management Conference Statement re 35 Stipulation. Case Management Conference statement due 5/6/2011. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 5/6/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/6/2011)
Wilson v. Finisar Corporation et al
Filed: May 5, 2011 as 5:2011cv01278
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Eitan Gertel, Finisar Corporation, Jerry S. Rawls, Kurt Adzema
Plaintiff: Chris L. Wilson
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities/Exchanges
ORDER Granting [12 in 5:11-cv-01252-EJD] Motion to Relate Case with C-11-1278 CW, C-11-1635 PJH. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court shall immediately relate Derchi-Russo v. Finisar Corporation, et al., Case No. CV 11-1252 EJD to Wilson v. Finisar Corpor ation, et al., Case N o. CV 11-1278 CW and Wade v. Finisar Corporation, et al., Case No. CV 11-1635 PJH. The parties in all three cases shall appear for a Case Management Conference on June 15, 2011 at 9 a.m. On or before June 6, 2011, the…
Derchi-Russo v. Finisar Corporation et al
Filed: May 4, 2011 as 5:2011cv01252
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Finisar Corporation, Jerry S. Rawls, Eitan Gertel, Kurt Adzema
Plaintiff: Martin Derchi-Russo
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities/Exchanges
ORDER Granting [12 in 5:11-cv-01252-EJD] Motion to Relate Case with C-11-1278 CW, C-11-1635 PJH. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court shall immediately relate Derchi-Russo v. Finisar Corporation, et al., Case No. CV 11-1252 EJD to Wilson v. Finisar Corpor ation, et al., Case N o. CV 11-1278 CW and Wade v. Finisar Corporation, et al., Case No. CV 11-1635 PJH. The parties in all three cases shall appear for a Case Management Conference on June 15, 2011 at 9 a.m. On or before June 6, 2011, the…
Wilson v. Finisar Corporation et al
Filed: May 4, 2011 as 5:2011cv01278
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Eitan Gertel, Finisar Corporation, Jerry S. Rawls, Kurt Adzema
Plaintiff: Chris L. Wilson
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities/Exchanges
ORDER RELATING CASE; SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court shall immediately relate Derchi-Russo v. Finisar Corporation, et al., Case No. CV 11-1252 EJD to Wilson v. Finisar Corporation, et al., Case No. CV 11-1278 CW an d Wade v. Finisar Corporation, et al., Case No. CV 11-1635 PJH. The parties in all three cases shall appear for a Case Management Conference on June 15, 2011 at 9 a.m. On or before June 6, 2011, the parties shall file a Joint Case Management…
Wade v. Finisar Corporation et al
Filed: May 4, 2011 as 5:2011cv01635
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Eitan Gertel, Finisar Corporation, Jerry S. Rawls, Kurt Adzema
Plaintiff: John Wade
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities/Exchanges
ORDER RELATING CASE; SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court shall immediately relate Derchi-Russo v. Finisar Corporation, et al., Case No. CV 11-1252 EJD to Wilson v. Finisar Corporation, et al., Case No. CV 11-1278 CW an d Wade v. Finisar Corporation, et al., Case No. CV 11-1635 PJH. The parties in all three cases shall appear for a Case Management Conference on June 15, 2011 at 9 a.m. On or before June 6, 2011, the parties shall file a Joint Case Management…
Finisar Corporation v. Oplink Communications Inc. et al
Filed: March 9, 2011 as 5:2010cv05617
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Oplink Communications Inc., Optical Communication Products, Inc.
Plaintiff: Finisar Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent
PATENT SCHEDULING ORDER. Based on the parties' joint submission, it appears that a schedule for the case can be set without the necessity of an appearance at this time. Accordingly, the 3/14/2011 Case Management Conference is VACATED and the par ties are ordered to comply with the following schedule: Infringement Contentions due 4/1/2011. Invalidity Contentions due 5/6/2011. Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement due 7/6/2011. Interim Joint Case Management Statement due…
Finisar Corporation v. Oplink Communications Inc. et al
Filed: February 24, 2011 as 5:2010cv05617
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Oplink Communications Inc., Optical Communication Products, Inc.
Plaintiff: Finisar Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Private ADR re 24 Stipulation. Signed by Judge James Ware on 2/24/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2011)
Finisar Corporation v. Agilestar.com, Inc. et al
Filed: January 28, 2011 as 5:2010cv04990
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Agilestar.com, Inc., Memorydealers.com, Inc.
Plaintiff: Finisar Corporation
Nature of Suit: Copyrights
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation re 27 Stipulation. Signed by Judge James Ware on 1/28/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/28/2011)
Finisar Corporation v. Oplink Communications Inc. et al
Filed: January 11, 2011 as 5:2010cv05617
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Oplink Communications Inc., Optical Communication Products, Inc.
Plaintiff: Finisar Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT re 9 Stipulation. Response due 1/24/2011. Signed by Judge James Ware on 1/11/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2011)
Finisar Corporation v. Agilestar.com, Inc. et al
Filed: January 6, 2011 as 5:2010cv04990
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Agilestar.com, Inc., Memorydealers.com, Inc.
Plaintiff: Finisar Corporation
Nature of Suit: Copyrights
ORDER DENYING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND OTHER DEADLINESre 20 Stipulation. Upon review, the Court DENIES the parties' Stipulation as premature. Defendants chose a firm with multiple associates, capable of taking the lead to assist the Court with this case early in the litigation. With respect to the parties scheduled appearance on February 14, 2011 the Court will evaluate whether an appearance is necessary following a review of the parties' Joint…
Finisar Corporation v. Oplink Communications Inc. et al
Filed: January 4, 2011 as 5:2010cv05617
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Oplink Communications Inc., Optical Communication Products, Inc.
Plaintiff: Finisar Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER FINDING THAT CASES ARE NOT RELATED. Signed by Judge Alsup on January 4, 2011. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2011)
Finisar Corporation v. Agilestar.com, Inc. et al
Filed: December 8, 2010 as 5:2010cv04990
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Agilestar.com, Inc., Memorydealers.com, Inc.
Plaintiff: Finisar Corporation
Nature of Suit: Copyrights
STIPULATION AND ORDER Granting Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. Response due by 1/12/2011 re 14 Stipulation. Signed by Judge James Ware on 12/8/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/8/2010)
Finisar Corporation v. Agilestar.com, Inc. et al
Filed: November 17, 2010 as 3:2010cv04990
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Agilestar.com, Inc., Memorydealers.com, Inc.
Plaintiff: Finisar Corporation
Nature of Suit: Copyrights
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE CONSENT/DECLINATION. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 11/17/2010. (mejlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2010)
Finisar Corporation v. Agilestar.com, Inc. et al
Filed: November 17, 2010 as 5:2010cv04990
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Agilestar.com, Inc., Memorydealers.com, Inc.
Plaintiff: Finisar Corporation
Nature of Suit: Copyrights
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE CONSENT/DECLINATION. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 11/17/2010. (mejlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2010)
Finisar Corporation v. Source Photonics, Inc. et al
Filed: September 14, 2010 as 3:2010cv00032
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: MRV Communications,, NeoPhotonics Corporation, Oplink Communications Inc., Source Photonics, Inc.
Plaintiff: Finisar Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF ALL CLAIMS. Signed by Judge Alsup on September 13, 2010. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2010)
In Re: IPO Securities Lit., et al v. , et al
Filed: July 20, 2010 as 1:2021mc00092
Court: New York Southern District Court
Appellant: James J. Hayes
Consolidated Defendant: First Union Securities, Inc., Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC
Consolidated Plaintiff: Diane C. Collins, Eva Marie Roberto, Frederick B. Henderson, Harlan R. Getman, J. Chris Rowe, James E. Collins, Jeorges Levy, John G. Miles, Lisa Frye, Stathis Pappas
Defendant: 724 Solutions, A. Brooke Seawell, A. Michael Spence, Abbott Brown, ABN Amro Securities LLC, Abraham Kleinfield, Accelerated Networks, Inc., Aclara Biosciences, Inc., Adams, Harkness & Hill, Inc., Addison M. Fischer, Aether Systems, Inc., Aetna, Inc., Agency.com Ltd., Agile Software Corporation, Agilent Technologies, Inc., Ahmass L. Fakahany, Airnet Communications Corporation, Airspan Networks, Inc., Ajay Sabherwal, Akamai Technologies, Inc., Alain Rossman, Alamosa PCS Holdings, Inc., Alan Black, Alan Citro, Alan Hald, Alan Hansen, Alan G. Breitman, Alan J. Hirschfield, Alan P. Naumann, Albert Lee Thurburn, Albert M. Avery, IV, Albert T. Dosser
and others
Miscellaneous: James Carreker, Mauro Lusardi
Movant: A.C Agrawal, A.D. Davis, Jr., Aashka Mehta, Abdul Husrieh, Abe Naymark, Achut Chukka, Adam Paskanik, Adele Romano, Adil Dastur, Ahad Diba, Aharon Golub, Ahemd Al Issa, Ahmed K. Tariq, Aileen Haw, Ajit Gandhi, Al Monjazeb, Alan Carlson, Alan Feenstra, Alan Karahalis, Alan McKnight, Alan Peck, Alan Rosengarten, Alan Suen, Alan B. Daroff, Alan C. Kettelkamp, Alan Wuu-Cheng Ling, Albert Berger, Albert Tacornal, Albert J. Von Holt, Aldwyn Allsopp-Bey, Alejandro Ludlow, Aleksandr Ivanov
and others
Objector: D&S Parnership #2, Ernest J. Browne, James J. Mary, JKM Company, Lester Baum, Mark Merrill, Richard Paul Warren, Ronald Ady, Susan Browne, Vondell Tyler
Plaintiff: 1401 Ocean Avenue LLC, A. John Price, A. Pher Holmberg, Aaron Brody, Abraham Eisen, Abraham Garfinkel, Abraham Kassin, Abraham Neiger, Abraham Slomovics, Abraham S. Kassin, Adam Peter Stone, Adele Brody, Adrian Chin, AFA Management Partners, L.P., Al Cavallaro, Al Daughtry, Alan Shapiro, Alan J. Spitz, Albert Brody, Albert Schechter, Albert Benjamin Lewis, Alex Shainsky, Alexander Kouprievitch, Alexander Makaron, Alfonso L. Tiu, Alhan Evrim, Aliza Brody, Allen Sumner, Alo Ghosh, Aman Kermaninejad, Amita Singhal, Andrea Jones
and others
Special Master: Michael Kennedy
AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER; for the foregoing reasons, plaintiff's motion for a Rule 7 bond is granted. The Objectors are ordered to post a $25,000 bond for which all Objectors are jointly and severally liable. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this motion Docket No. 6199 in action 21MC92). (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 7/19/10) (sac)
