Ford Motor State Court Decisions

Cunningham et al v. Ford Motor Company

Filed: November 17, 2022

State: Michigan
Court: Michigan Eastern District Court
Case Number: 4:2021cv10781

ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendant's 30 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HRya)

Ryan A. Longoria v. Ford Motor Company et al

Filed: November 16, 2022

State: California
Court: California Central District Court
Case Number: 2:2022cv07560

[STRICKEN REFER TO DOCUMENT NUMBER 16] MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (Doc. 12 ) and DISCHARGING the Court's Order to Show Cause (Doc. 10 ) by Judge Josephine L. Staton. (See document for further information). (jp) Modified on 11/17/2022 (vv).

Juan Gutierrez Salazar v. Ford Motor Company

Filed: November 10, 2022

State: California
Court: California Central District Court
Case Number: 2:2021cv06756

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO REMAND 10 by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. The court finds Defendant has shown by a preponderance of the evidence that the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000, and the parties are of diverse citizenship. Jurisdiction is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. For the foregoing reasons, the court DENIES Plaintiffs Motion to Remand (Dkt. 10). IT IS SO ORDERED. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS.) (rolm)

CHRISTIAN et al v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY

Filed: November 9, 2022

State: Georgia
Court: Georgia Middle District Court
Case Number: 4:2022cv00062

ORDER denying 8 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE CLAY D LAND on 11/9/2022 (CCL)

Travion Morgan V Ford Motor Company

Filed: November 8, 2022

State: Michigan
Court: Court of Appeals Order
Case Number: 362260

Anselmo Portillo et al v. Ford Motor Company et al

Filed: October 31, 2022

State: California
Court: California Central District Court
Case Number: 2:2022cv05356

MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND. Plaintiffs Anselmo and Norma Portillo move to remand this action to state court. Defendant Ford Motor Company opposed the motion, and Plaintiffs filed a reply, The Court deems this matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. This court has subject-matter jurisdiction over this case, and removal was timely. Plaintiffs' motion to remand and request for attorney's fees is…

WALLS et al v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY et al

Filed: October 28, 2022

State: North Carolina
Court: North Carolina Middle District Court
Case Number: 1:2020cv00098

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS on 10/28/2022, that Defendant Abex's Motion to Clarify and/or Reconsider the Court's Order Regarding Abex's Experts James Crapo and Christop her Herfel, (ECF No. 543 ), is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The motion is granted for the limited purpose of correcting the clerical error in the Order; clarifying that the Court was not ruling on the admissibility at trial of the opinions di scussed in footnote 6 of…

WALLS et al v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY et al

Filed: October 25, 2022

State: North Carolina
Court: North Carolina Middle District Court
Case Number: 1:2020cv00098

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS on 10/25/2022; that Defendant Ford's Motion for Reconsideration of the Order Denying in Part Ford Motor Companys Motion for Summary Judgment, (ECF No. 512 ), is DENIED. (Carter, Alexus)

WALLS et al v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY et al

Filed: October 25, 2022

State: North Carolina
Court: North Carolina Middle District Court
Case Number: 1:2020cv00098

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS on 10/25/2022; that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Supplement the Record, (ECF No. 524 ), is DENIED. (Carter, Alexus)

Martinez v. Ford Motor Company et al

Filed: October 24, 2022

State: California
Court: California Southern District Court
Case Number: 3:2022cv01082

ORDER Granting 5 Defendant Ford Motor Company's Motion to Dismiss and Granting 6 Defendant Ethos Group Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff must file a First Amended Complaint, if any, on or before 11/18/2022. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 10/24/2022. (tcf)

Harris v. Ford Motor Company

Filed: October 13, 2022

State: Ohio
Court: Ohio Northern District Court
Case Number: 1:2022cv01279

Memorandum Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated in this Order, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 5 ) is GRANTED. Judge Pamela A. Barker on 10/13/2022. (P,K)

WALLS et al v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY et al

Filed: September 30, 2022

State: North Carolina
Court: North Carolina Middle District Court
Case Number: 1:2020cv00098

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS on 9/30/2022. Defendant Abex's Motion in Limine and to Exclude, (ECF No. 328), is GRANTED. Specifically, the Court excludes all documents or lay test imony discussing the Saranac Laboratory data related to Dr. Gardner's Experiment 774, as well as expert testimony, reliance material, or expert impeachment material regarding such data as laid out in the chart in Abex's Motion in Limine and to Exclude, (ECF No. 328…

Ford Motor Company et al v. Intermotive, Inc. et al

Filed: September 30, 2022

State: Michigan
Court: Michigan Eastern District Court
Case Number: 4:2017cv11584

OPINION and ORDER ADOPTING IN PART AND REJECTING IN PART 177 , 178 Reports and Recommendations. Signed by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (AChu)

Sanjuanita Rodriguez v. Ford Motor Company et al

Filed: September 30, 2022

State: California
Court: California Central District Court
Case Number: 5:2022cv01056

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO REMAND [Dkt. 9], by Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes: Plaintiffs Motion to Remand is DENIED. This case will remain on this Courts calendar. The hearing on this Motion and the Scheduling Conference currently set for the same date have been vacated. [Dkt. 16, 17]. The Court will issue a Scheduling Order based upon the parties Rule 26(f) Report. IT IS SO ORDERED. (shb)

Ford Motor Credit Comp, LLC d/b/a Lincoln Automotive Financial Services v. Marjori Malone et al.

Filed: September 28, 2022

State: Tennessee
Court: Court of Appeals
Case Number: M2022-01182-COA-R3-CV

Authoring Judge: Per Curiam Trial Court Judge: Judge James G. Martin, IIIThe defendants have appealed from an order entered on July 25, 2022. Because the defendants did not file their notice of appeal within thirty days after entry of the order as required by Tennessee Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a), we dismiss the appeal.

Butler v. Ford Motor Company et al

Filed: September 23, 2022

State: Illinois
Court: Illinois Northern District Court
Case Number: 1:2021cv01244

MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum Opinion and Order, Ford's partial motion to dismiss the Complaint 14 is granted. Counts I, IV, and VI are dismissed without prejudice. Butler has leave to file an amended complaint and shall file the amended pleading on or before 10/14/2022. Because the Court is granting Butler leave to file an amended complaint, the Court's briefing schedule on summary judgment, see R. 67, is temporarily stayed.…

Hughes et al v. Ford Motor Company et al

Filed: September 7, 2022

State: Arkansas
Court: Arkansas Western District Court
Case Number: 1:2022cv01020

ORDER denying 27 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on September 7, 2022. (cnn)

Kendall, W. v. Ford Motor Company

Filed: August 31, 2022

State: Pennsylvania
Court: Superior Court
Case Number: 2274 EDA 2021

In re Ford Motor Company Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1 of Nueces County

Filed: August 26, 2022

State: Texas
Court: Thirteenth Court of Appeals
Case Number: 13-22-00083-CV

McDaniel v. Ford Motor Company et al

Filed: August 22, 2022

State: California
Court: California Southern District Court
Case Number: 3:2022cv00517

ORDER granting Motion for leave to file a Second Amended Complaint and granting Motion to Remand. (Certified copy sent to State Court via US Mail Service.) Signed by Chief District Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 8/22/2022. (jpp)