Vanella v. Ford Motor Company
Filed: February 24, 2020
State: California
Court: California Northern District Court
Case Number: 3:2019cv07956
ORDER GRANTING 9 MOTION TO DISMISS by Judge William H. Orrick. Amended Complaint due by 3/16/2020. Case Management Conference continued to 6/9/2020 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 02, 17th Floor (Case Management Statement due by 6/2/2020). (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2020)
Kesse v. Ford Motor Company
Filed: February 20, 2020
State: Illinois
Court: Illinois Northern District Court
Case Number: 1:2014cv06265
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: The Court grants defendant's motion 127 to exclude the testimony of plaintiff's expert witness and grants defendant's motion 130 for summary judgment. Civil case terminated. Signed by the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 2/20/2020. Notice mailed by judge's staff (lf, )
Beaty et al v. Ford Motor Company
Filed: February 11, 2020
State: Washington
Court: Washington Western District Court
Case Number: 3:2017cv05201
ORDER GRANTING 102 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment on concealment and CPA claims and DISMISSING with prejudice; order finding as moot 68 Plaintiffs' Motion to Certify Class; finding as moot 108 Plaintiffs' Motion to Exclu de; finding as moot 114 Plaintiffs' Motion to Exclude; finding as moot 122 Defendant's Motion to Exclude; finding as moot 124 Defendant's Motion to Exclude; finding as moot 126 Defendant's Motion to Exclude; finding as moot 131…
Weidman et al v. Ford Motor Company
Filed: February 11, 2020
State: Michigan
Court: Michigan Eastern District Court
Case Number: 2:2018cv12719
OPINION and ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendant's 53 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint Signed by District Judge Gershwin A. Drain. (TMcg)
Easterling v. Ford Motor Company
Filed: February 7, 2020
State: Alabama
Court: Alabama Northern District Court
Case Number: 2:2014cv02353
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - For the foregoing reasons, the motions in limine (docs. 127 and 128 ) are each GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as detailed above. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Ott on 2/7/2020. (KEK)
Smith v. Ford Motor Company et al
Filed: February 4, 2020
State: California
Court: California Northern District Court
Case Number: 3:2019cv05170
Amended Order Granting Motion to Remand. (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/4/2020)
Zirbel v. Ford Motor Company
Filed: January 29, 2020
State: Michigan
Court: Michigan Eastern District Court
Case Number: 2:2018cv13212
OPINION and ORDER Denying 25 Motion for Judgment to Reverse the Decision of the Plan Administrator and Granting 26 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant is entitled to a judgment in the amount of $243,189.70 - Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (LBar)
Roe et al v. Ford Motor Company
Filed: January 21, 2020
State: Michigan
Court: Michigan Eastern District Court
Case Number: 2:2018cv12528
OPINION and ORDER Denying in Part Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration 34 and Holding the Remainder of the Motion in Abeyance Pending Supplemental Briefing (Response due by 2/3/2020 and Reply due by 2/10/2020) Signed by District Judge Laurie J. Michelson. (EKar)
William Logan, Individually, and on Behalf of the Wrongful Death Beneficiaries of Charlie Patsy Logan, Deceased v. Ford Motor Company, Lincoln Motor Company and Kirk Auto Company
Filed: January 21, 2020
State: Mississippi
Court: Court of Appeals
Citation: 2017-CA-01275-COA
The motion for rehearing is denied. McCarty, J., would grant. McDonald, J., not participating.
Carol Taccino v. Ford Motor Company
Filed: January 7, 2020
State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Case Number: 19-1473
JORDAN CYR V FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Filed: December 26, 2019
State: Michigan
Court: Court of Appeals Unpublished
Case Number: 345751
Clark v. Ford Motor Company et al
Filed: December 26, 2019
State: Michigan
Court: Michigan Eastern District Court
Case Number: 2:2019cv11410
OPINION and ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants' Partial MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) (ECF No. 15 ). Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (EKar)
April K. Jameson v. Ford Motor Company et al
Filed: December 16, 2019
State: California
Court: California Central District Court
Case Number: 2:2018cv01952
ORDER GRANTING IN PART, PLAINTIFF JAMESON MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES 32 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court awards $13,830.00 in attorneys fees and $4,866.21 in costs and expenses for a total award of $18,696.21. (lc)
Johnson v. Ford Motor Company
Filed: December 6, 2019
State: Michigan
Court: Michigan Eastern District Court
Case Number: 2:2019cv10167
OPINION and ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiff's re 27 MOTION for Leave to File First Amended Complaint. Signed by District Judge Gershwin A. Drain. (TMcg)
Randona Johnson v. Ford Motor Co.
Filed: December 6, 2019
State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Case Number: 19-1123
Ford Motor Company v. Storm et al
Filed: December 2, 2019
State: Michigan
Court: Michigan Eastern District Court
Case Number: 2:2019cv12425
OPINION and ORDER Granting Defendants' Counsel's 12 MOTION for Withdrawal of Attorney Schwartz Law Firm; Gensburg Calandriello Firm; and Collins Law Firm, ( Status Conference set for 1/2/2020 11:30 AM before District Judge Gershwin A. Drain) Signed by District Judge Gershwin A. Drain. (TMcg)
Ford Motor Company v. Knecht, et al.
Filed: December 2, 2019
State: Delaware
Court: Supreme Court
Case Number: 98, 2019
Hector L. Cortez v. Ford Motor Credit Company, LLC Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1 of Hidalgo County
Filed: November 26, 2019
State: Texas
Court: Thirteenth Court of Appeals
Case Number: 13-19-00061-CV
Hermila Perez v. Ford Motor Company et al
Filed: November 13, 2019
State: California
Court: California Central District Court
Case Number: 2:2019cv06866
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND 15 by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. For the reasons articulated above, the Court determines that Fremont Ford has been fraudulently joined, and that without it, the parties are completely diverse and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000, as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Therefore, Plaintiff's motion to remand is DENIED. (See document for details) (mrgo)
FORD MOTOR COMPANY (KTP) VS. BANNON (JOHN), ET AL.
Filed: November 8, 2019
State: Kentucky
Court: Court of Appeals
Case Number: 2018-CA-001086-WC
