Ford Motor State Court Decisions

Brown v. Ford Motor Company(CONSENT)

Filed: August 28, 2019

State: Alabama
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Case Number: 2:2019cv00159

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: It is ORDERED that Brown's 6 Motion to Remand is GRANTED, and this action is REMANDED to the Autauga County Circuit Court for further proceedings in that forum as further set out in the opinion and order. Signed by Honorable Judge Susan Russ Walker on 8/28/2019. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(dmn, ) Modified on 8/28/2019, copy provided to Clerk, Autauga County Circuit Court. (dmn, )

Martin Chaidez v. Ford Motor Company

Filed: August 28, 2019

State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Case Number: 18-2753

Gamboa et al v. Ford Motor Company et al

Filed: August 27, 2019

State: Michigan
Court: Michigan Eastern District Court
Case Number: 2:2018cv10106

ORDER Denying Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike 78 and Denying Defendants' Motions to Dismiss [75;76]. Signed by District Judge Denise Page Hood. (LSau)

Christopher v. Ford Motor Company Inc et al

Filed: August 22, 2019

State: Washington
Court: Washington Western District Court
Case Number: 2:2017cv00738

ORDER denying Plaintiff's 84 Motion to Compel. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(MW)

Newbern v. Ford Motor Company

Filed: August 21, 2019

State: South Carolina
Court: Court of Appeals
Case Number: 5680

Steven and Claudia Newbern sued Ford Motor Company alleging strict liability and negligence claims against Ford because of injuries Mr. Newbern suffered when the airbag in their vehicle deployed during an accident. On appeal, the Newberns argue the trial court erred in granting Ford's motion for directed verdict. Finding a lack of evidence in the record to support the Newberns' claims, we affirm.

Ford Motor Credit Company LLC vs Thomas Arwine

Filed: August 14, 2019

State: Florida
Court: First District Court of Appeal
Case Number: 18-4772

Moultrie v. Ford Motor Company et al

Filed: August 9, 2019

State: Alabama
Court: Alabama Northern District Court
Case Number: 2:2018cv01521

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 8/9/2019. (PSM)

Roe et al v. Ford Motor Company

Filed: August 6, 2019

State: Michigan
Court: Michigan Eastern District Court
Case Number: 2:2018cv12528

OPINION and ORDER Granting in Part 20 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Class Action Complaint, Signed by District Judge Laurie J. Michelson. (WBar)

Jerry W. Easterling v. Ford Motor Company

Filed: August 5, 2019

State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Case Number: 18-12914

Owens v. Ford Motor Co.

Filed: August 5, 2019

State: Ohio
Court: Ninth District Court of Appeals
Citation: 2019-Ohio-3136
Case Number: 18CA011422

SISOLAK et al v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY

Filed: July 31, 2019

State: New Jersey
Court: New Jersey District Court
Case Number: 3:2018cv11821

MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Michael A. Shipp on 07/31/2019. (FH)

Gliottone v. Ford Motor Co.

Filed: July 31, 2019

State: Massachusetts
Court: Court of Appeals
Case Number: 17-P-1204

Adam Bandemer, Respondent, vs. Ford Motor Company, Appellant, Eric Hanson, et al., Defendants

Filed: July 31, 2019

State: Minnesota
Court: Supreme Court
Case Number: A17-1182

Galo Coba v. Ford Motor Co

Filed: July 26, 2019

State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Case Number: 17-2933

Galo Coba v. Ford Motor Co

Filed: July 26, 2019

State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Case Number: 17-2933

Wickersham v. Ford Motor Co

Filed: July 24, 2019

State: South Carolina
Court: Supreme Court
Case Number: 27904

We answer two certified questions from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.

Jeremy Heuton v. Ford Motor Company

Filed: July 23, 2019

State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Case Number: 18-2130

Shepherd, Author, of Melloy and Grasz, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Missouri Human Rights Act. Under the MHRA, even if plaintiff has shown that he has a physical limitation, he must nevertheless show Ford wrongly believed that his physical impairment (here the absence of a left hand) substantially impaired a major life activity; because this case only involves the major life activity of working or employment, the broad range-of-jobs standard applied, and the district court correctly…

Edward Hocking et al v. Ford Motor Company et al

Filed: July 19, 2019

State: California
Court: California Central District Court
Case Number: 2:2019cv04374

MINUTES (In Chambers): ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO REMAND 10 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. The Motion is GRANTED. The Court REMANDS this action to the Los Angeles County Superior Court. Because this Court lacks jurisdiction, nothing in this Order should be taken as a ruling or comment on the merits of the action, or whether a demurrer should be sustained or overruled in Superior Court.Case remanded to State Court Case Remanded to 19STCV12415. MD JS-6. Case Terminated. (lom)

Weidman et al v. Ford Motor Company

Filed: July 10, 2019

State: Michigan
Court: Michigan Eastern District Court
Case Number: 2:2018cv12719

MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendant's 35 MOTION to Dismiss Consolidated Class Action Complaint Signed by District Judge Gershwin A. Drain. (TMcg)

Galo Coba v. Ford Motor Co

Filed: July 8, 2019

State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Case Number: 17-2933