Helen Kayden vs. Ford Motor Company
Filed: September 19, 2017
State: Missouri
Court: Court of Appeals
Case Number: WD80165
EAST BAY LAW V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Filed: September 14, 2017
State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Case Number: 16-15318
Heaton v. Ford Motor Co.
Filed: September 7, 2017
State: Ohio
Court: Eighth District Court of Appeals
Citation: 2017-Ohio-7479
Case Number: 104636
Ford Motor Co. v. United States
Filed: August 9, 2017
State: United States
Court: US Court of International Trade
Citation: 17-102
Case Number: 13-00291
Miller v. Ford Motor Company
Filed: August 3, 2017
State: Oregon
Court: Supreme Court
Case Number: S065010
Certified Question
Eveler, et al v. Ford Motor Company
Filed: July 19, 2017
State: Louisiana
Court: Louisiana Eastern District Court
Case Number: 2:2016cv14776
ORDER AND REASONS granting in part, deferring in part, denying in part, and dismissing as moot in part 68 and 70 Motions in Limine, as stated herein. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk on 7/19/2017. (blg)
Pennington v. U.S. Steel of: Ford Motor Co.
Filed: July 13, 2017
State: Pennsylvania
Court: Supreme Court
Case Number: 69 EM 2017
Petitpas v. Ford Motor Co.
Filed: July 5, 2017
State: California
Court: Court of Appeal
Case Number: B245037
Burcham v. Ford Motor Credit Company, LLC
Filed: June 23, 2017
State: Illinois
Court: Illinois Southern District Court
Case Number: 3:2016cv00943
ORDER granting 9 Motion to Compel. Signed by Judge David R. Herndon on 6/22/2017. (kmb2)
Eveler, et al v. Ford Motor Company
Filed: June 14, 2017
State: Louisiana
Court: Louisiana Eastern District Court
Case Number: 2:2016cv14776
ORDER AND REASONS denying 32 MOTION in Limine to Exclude Expert Opinions of Paul Semones. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk on 6/13/2017.(blg)
Eveler, et al v. Ford Motor Company
Filed: June 14, 2017
State: Louisiana
Court: Louisiana Eastern District Court
Case Number: 2:2016cv14776
ORDER AND REASONS denying without prejudice 37 MOTION in Limine to to Exclude Any Reference to or Evidence, Testimony or Argument Interpreting the State of Mind of Intentions of Ford Engineers and Executives Based on Ford Engineering Documents or Internal Memoranda. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk on 6/14/2017.(blg)
Eveler, et al v. Ford Motor Company
Filed: June 14, 2017
State: Louisiana
Court: Louisiana Eastern District Court
Case Number: 2:2016cv14776
ORDER AND REASONS granting in part and denying without prejudice in part, as stated herein, 36 MOTION in Limine to Exclude Any Reference to or Evidence, Testimony or Argument Concerning the Design and Development History of the Bronco II, The First Generation UN46 Explorer. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk on 6/13/2017.(blg)
Eveler, et al v. Ford Motor Company
Filed: June 14, 2017
State: Louisiana
Court: Louisiana Eastern District Court
Case Number: 2:2016cv14776
ORDER AND REASONS denying without prejudice 38 MOTION in Limine to Exclude Any Reference to or Evidence, Testimony or Argument Concerning Other Accidents, Incidents, Claims, Complaints and/or Lawsuits; FURTHER ORDERED that no later than 6/20/2017, plaintiffs file into the record a list setting out (1) all accidents and incidents that they claim are "substantially similar" to the accident at issue, (2) plaintiffs' contentionson an incident-by-incident basis, and suppor ted…
Wotring Towing v. Ford Motor Co. et al
Filed: May 31, 2017
State: Ohio
Court: Ohio Southern District Court
Case Number: 2:2016cv01193
OPINION AND ORDER granting 8 Defendant Cummins's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Plaintiff's claims against Cummins are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus on 05/31/2017. (dh1)
FORD MOTOR COMPANY v. USA
Filed: May 30, 2017
State: Federal Claims
Court: US Court of Federal Claims
Case Number: 1:2014cv00458
REPORTED OPINION denying 35 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 38 Defendant's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in accord with this disposition. No costs. Signed by Judge Charles F. Lettow. (MZ)
ALINE MILLER V. FORD MOTOR CO.
Filed: May 26, 2017
State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Case Number: 14-36001
Certification to Oregon Supreme Court. The panel certified the following question of state law to the Oregon Supreme Court: Oregon’s statute of repose for products liability actions (Or. Rev. Stat. § 30.905(2)) provides that a civil action “must be commenced before the later of . . . ten years . . . or . . . the expiration of any statute of repose for an equivalent civil action in the state in which the product was manufactured . . . .” If the state of manufacture…
Schoepf et al v. Ford Motor Company
Filed: May 22, 2017
State: Utah
Court: Utah District Court
Case Number: 2:2012cv00731
MEMORANDUM DECISION and ORDER finding as moot 80 Motion to Exclude Opinions of Jeff Morrill; finding as moot 81 Motion to Exclude Opinions of Tad Norris; granting 86 Renewed Motion to Dismiss for Spoliation Sanctions. Signed by Judge Dee Benson on 5/22/2017. (blh)
Arabian Motors Group W.L.L. v. Ford Motor Company
Filed: May 22, 2017
State: Michigan
Court: Michigan Eastern District Court
Case Number: 2:2016cv13655
OPINION AND ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 26 Motion for a Certificate of Appealability. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)
Jennifer Strang v. Ford Motor Co.
Filed: May 19, 2017
State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Case Number: 16-2090
Patton v. Ford Motor Company
Filed: May 18, 2017
State: New York
Court: New York Western District Court
Case Number: 1:2014cv00308
DECISION AND ORDER: For the reasons stated in the attached Decision and Order, the Court adopts the portions of the Report and Recommendation 42 to which neither party objects. The Court sustains the Defendants objections and declines to adopt thos e portions of the Report and Recommendation to which the Defendant objected. The Court therefore grants the Defendants motion for summary judgment 33 in its entirety. The Clerk of the Court shall take all steps necessary to close this case. SO…
