FORD MOTOR COMPANY v. USA
Filed: May 30, 2017
State: Federal Claims
Court: US Court of Federal Claims
Case Number: 1:2014cv00458
REPORTED OPINION denying 35 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 38 Defendant's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in accord with this disposition. No costs. Signed by Judge Charles F. Lettow. (MZ)
ALINE MILLER V. FORD MOTOR CO.
Filed: May 26, 2017
State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Case Number: 14-36001
Certification to Oregon Supreme Court. The panel certified the following question of state law to the Oregon Supreme Court: Oregon’s statute of repose for products liability actions (Or. Rev. Stat. § 30.905(2)) provides that a civil action “must be commenced before the later of . . . ten years . . . or . . . the expiration of any statute of repose for an equivalent civil action in the state in which the product was manufactured . . . .” If the state of manufacture…
Schoepf et al v. Ford Motor Company
Filed: May 22, 2017
State: Utah
Court: Utah District Court
Case Number: 2:2012cv00731
MEMORANDUM DECISION and ORDER finding as moot 80 Motion to Exclude Opinions of Jeff Morrill; finding as moot 81 Motion to Exclude Opinions of Tad Norris; granting 86 Renewed Motion to Dismiss for Spoliation Sanctions. Signed by Judge Dee Benson on 5/22/2017. (blh)
Arabian Motors Group W.L.L. v. Ford Motor Company
Filed: May 22, 2017
State: Michigan
Court: Michigan Eastern District Court
Case Number: 2:2016cv13655
OPINION AND ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 26 Motion for a Certificate of Appealability. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)
Jennifer Strang v. Ford Motor Co.
Filed: May 19, 2017
State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Case Number: 16-2090
Patton v. Ford Motor Company
Filed: May 18, 2017
State: New York
Court: New York Western District Court
Case Number: 1:2014cv00308
DECISION AND ORDER: For the reasons stated in the attached Decision and Order, the Court adopts the portions of the Report and Recommendation 42 to which neither party objects. The Court sustains the Defendants objections and declines to adopt thos e portions of the Report and Recommendation to which the Defendant objected. The Court therefore grants the Defendants motion for summary judgment 33 in its entirety. The Clerk of the Court shall take all steps necessary to close this case. SO…
Ford Motor Company v. MAD Enterprise Group, LLC et al
Filed: May 15, 2017
State: Florida
Court: Florida Middle District Court
Case Number: 6:2016cv01333
ORDER granting 65 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas B. Smith on 5/15/2017. (EC)
Joyce Stockton, et al. v. Ford Motor Company-Partial Dissent
Filed: May 12, 2017
State: Tennessee
Court: Court of Appeals
Case Number: W2016-01175-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge J. Steven StaffordTrial Court Judge: Judge Roy B. Morgan, Jr.Although I agree with the majority Opinion s discussion of the improper jury instructions given by the trial court in this case, I cannot agree with the majority s analysis with regard to the duty owed by Ford. Because Ford s duty is a threshold issue that must be determined prior to any consideration of the jury instructions given by the trial court, I therefore file this partial dissent.
Joyce Stockton, et al. v. Ford Motor Company
Filed: May 12, 2017
State: Tennessee
Court: Court of Appeals
Case Number: W2016-01175-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Kenny ArmstrongTrial Court Judge: Judge Roy B. Morgan, Jr.This is a jury case. Automobile mechanic and his wife, Appellees, filed suit against Appellant Ford Motor Company for negligence in relation to wife s diagnosis of mesothelioma. Appellees allege that Ford s brake products, which contained asbestos, were unreasonably dangerous or defective such that Ford owed a duty to warn Mr. Stockton so that he, in turn, could protect his wife from exposure to air-borne…
Joyce Stockton, et al. v. Ford Motor Company
Filed: May 12, 2017
State: Tennessee
Court: Court of Appeals
Case Number: W2016-01175-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Chief Judge D. Michael SwineyTrial Court Judge: Judge Roy B. Morgan, Jr.I concur fully in the majority Opinion. I also agree with the dissent that this Court has no authority to overrule or modify Supreme Court s opinions. Bloodworth v. Stuart, 428 S.W.2d 786, 789 (Tenn. 1968). I, however, disagree with the dissent regarding duty of care as the Trial Court was in fact cognizant of and adhered to our Supreme Court s majority opinion in Satterfield v. Breeding Insulation…
Norris v. Ford Motor Co., et al.
Filed: May 10, 2017
State: Delaware
Court: Superior Court
Case Number: N14C-06-082 ASB
Johnson et al v. Ford Motor Company
Filed: May 9, 2017
State: West Virginia
Court: West Virginia Southern District Court
Case Number: 3:2013cv06529
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying in part and granting in part 954 MOTION by Ford Motor Company for Protective Order and OBJECTIONS to Plaintiffs' Service of New Discovery; LIFTING the current stay; directing Ford to produce documents: 4, 5, 7, 8, 10, 13, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 30, 31, 33, 34, 36, 37, 38, 39, and 40 by 5/24/2017; GRANTING a protective order as to the remainder of the discovery. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 5/9/2017. (cc: attys; any…
Ford Motor Warranty Cases
Filed: May 8, 2017
State: California
Court: Court of Appeal
Case Number: B277725
Leary v. Ford Motor Company
Filed: May 5, 2017
State: Kentucky
Court: Kentucky Western District Court
Case Number: 3:2016cv00048
MEMORANDUM OPINION by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell re 14 Motion for Summary Judgment. For reasons set forth, Ford is entitled to summary judgment and Leary's case must be dismissed. A separate order and judgment shall issue. cc:counsel (JAC)
Gaillet et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
Filed: May 3, 2017
State: Michigan
Court: Michigan Eastern District Court
Case Number: 2:2016cv13789
OPINION and ORDER re 11 denying Pltfs' MOTION for partial summary judgment (Application of Mississippi Law) Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (CBet)
TENO (REGINA) VS. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL.
Filed: April 28, 2017
State: Kentucky
Court: Court of Appeals
Case Number: 2015-CA-001903-WC
McDermed et al v. Ford Motor Company
Filed: April 26, 2017
State: Kansas
Court: Kansas District Court
Case Number: 2:2014cv02430
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying Plaintiffs' 175 Motion for Reconsideration, and 175 Motion for New Trial. Signed by District Judge Carlos Murguia on 04/26/2017. (mg)
PAICE LLC v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Filed: April 21, 2017
State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 16-1411
Walls v. Ford Motor Company
Filed: April 21, 2017
State: Delaware
Court: Supreme Court
Case Number: 389, 2016
PAICE LLC v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Filed: April 21, 2017
State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 16-1746
