Ford Motor State Court Decisions

In Re: Ford Motor Company Appeal from 160th Judicial District Court of Dallas County

Filed: September 10, 2014


Court: Texas Fifth District Court of Appeals
Case Number: 05-14-00961-CV

Anderson et al v. Ford Motor Company et al

Filed: September 9, 2014


Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Utah
Case Number: 2:2006cv00741

MEMORANDUM DECISION and ORDER denying without prejudice 392 Motion in Limine; denying without prejudice 395 Motion in Limine; denying without prejudice 420 Motion in Limine; denying without prejudice 428 Motion in Limine; denying without prejudice 436 Motion in Limine. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 9/9/2014. (blh)

Anderson et al v. Ford Motor Company et al

Filed: September 9, 2014


Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Utah
Case Number: 2:2006cv00741

MEMORANDUM DECISION and ORDER granting in part 393 Motion in Limine; granting in part 397 Motion in Limine; granting in part 419 Motion in Limine; granting in part 433 Motion in Limine. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 9/9/2014. (blh)

Anderson et al v. Ford Motor Company et al

Filed: September 9, 2014


Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Utah
Case Number: 2:2006cv00741

MEMORANDUM DECISION and ORDER granting in part 406 Motion in Limine. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 9/9/2014. (blh)

Anderson et al v. Ford Motor Company et al

Filed: September 9, 2014


Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Utah
Case Number: 2:2006cv00741

MEMORANDUM DECISION and ORDER denying 400 Motion for Leave to File; denying 437 Motion for Leave to File. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 9/9/2014. (blh)

EEOC v. Ford Motor Company

Filed: August 29, 2014


Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Case Number: 12-2484

BOYLE v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY

Filed: August 29, 2014


Court: Arizona Court of Appeals, Division Two - Published Opinions
Case Number: 2 CA-CV 2014-0029

IN RE FORD MOTOR COMPANY

Filed: July 3, 2014


Court: Supreme Court of Texas
Case Number: 12-0957

At issue in this case was the Texas-resident exception to the forum non conveniens statute, which allows “plaintiffs” who are legal residents of Texas to bring a case in a Texas forum even if forum non conveniens would otherwise favor dismissal. Here an estate was sued in Texas regarding a Mexican decedent’s alleged responsibility for a car accident that occurred in Mexico. The estate in turn filed a third-party claim against Ford Motor Company. Wrongful-death beneficiaries, three…

IN RE FORD MOTOR COMPANY

Filed: July 3, 2014


Court: Supreme Court of Texas
Case Number: 12-0957

IN RE FORD MOTOR COMPANY

Filed: July 3, 2014


Court: Supreme Court of Texas
Case Number: 12-0957

Ford Motor Company v. Chicago Department of Revenue

Filed: June 27, 2014


Court: Illinois Appellate Court, First District
Citation: 2014 IL App (1st) 130597
Case Number: 1-13-0597

Ford Motor Co. v. Dept. of Treasury

Filed: June 26, 2014


Court: Michigan Supreme Court
Case Number: 146962

This case began as a dispute between the parties regarding whether plaintiff owed tax under the now-repealed Single Business Tax Act (SBTA) related to plaintiff's contributions to its Voluntary Employees' Beneficiary Association (VEBA) trust fund for 1997 through 2001. In this case, the issue for the Supreme Court to decide was what actions a taxpayer must take under MCL 205.30 of the Revenue Act to trigger the accrual of interest on a tax refund. The Court held that in order to trigger…

Caballero, et al. v. Ford Motor Co., et al.

Filed: June 24, 2014


Court: Delaware Superior Court
Case Number: 11C-09-170

FORD MOTOR COMPANY V. EZEQUIEL CASTILLO, INDIVIDUALLY, MARIA DE LOS ANGELES CASTILLO, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND FOR A.C. AND E.C., JR., AND ROSA SILVIA MARTINEZ, INDIVIDUALLY

Filed: June 20, 2014


Court: Supreme Court of Texas
Case Number: 13-0158

Plaintiffs sued Ford Motor Company for injuries they sustained in a roll-over accident. The case was submitted to a jury. After the jury began its deliberations, the parties agreed to settle the case. Ford, however, later refused to pay the settlement amount to Plaintiffs, and Plaintiffs sued for breach of contract. After hearing all of the evidence, the jury found the settlement agreement was invalid because of fraudulent inducement and mutual mistake. The court of appeals reversed the…

5 Star v. Ford Motor

Filed: June 11, 2014


Court: South Carolina Supreme Court
Case Number: 27398

Petitioner 5 Star, Inc. is a lawn maintenance and pressure washing company owned by Stan Shelby. In February 2005, 5 Star purchased a used 1996 Ford F-250 pickup truck. Several months later, Shelby parked the truck for the weekend in 5 Star's North Charleston warehouse. Two days later, Shelby returned to the warehouse and discovered that a fire had occurred. The truck was destroyed, and the warehouse was severely damaged. The Chief Fire Investigator for the North Charleston Fire…

Gerald J. Barth v. Ford Motor Company

Filed: June 4, 2014


Court: Wisconsin Court of Appeals
Case Number: 2013AP002338

Rost, R. v. Ford Motor Company

Filed: May 19, 2014


Court: Pennsylvania Superior Court
Case Number: 404 EDA 2012

Stephen A. Oliver, Et Al vs. Ford Motor Credit Company, LLC, Et Al

Filed: April 29, 2014


Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Case Numbers: WD75585 and WD75619

Scott v. Ford Motor Co.

Filed: April 23, 2014


Court: California Court of Appeal
Case Number: A137975M