Fortinet Federal District Court Decisions

Fortinet, Inc. v. Forescout Technologies, Inc.

Filed: January 11, 2024 as 3:2020cv03343
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Forescout Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff: Fortinet, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

Discovery Order re 217 Discovery Letter Brief- Joint Statement Of Discovery Disputes. The Court GRANTS Fortinet's motion to compel as to document category 4 and DENIES the remainder of the motion. The Court DENIES Forescout and Harms' motion for a protective order. Signed by Judge Thomas S. Hixson on 1/11/2024. (tshlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2024)

Netskope, Inc. v. Fortinet, Inc.

Filed: November 29, 2022 as 3:2022cv01852
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Fortinet, Inc.
Plaintiff: Netskope, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER GRANTING 53 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FORTINET, INC. TO OPPOSE NETSKOPE, INC.'S MOTION TO STAY CASE PENDING INTER PARTES REVIEW. Signed by Judge Trina L. Thompson on 11/28/2022. (vla, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/29/2022)

Fortinet, Inc. v. Forescout Technologies, Inc.

Filed: November 28, 2022 as 3:2020cv03343
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Forescout Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff: Fortinet, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER - Claim Construction Order. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/28/2022. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2022)

Fortinet, Inc. v. Fortanix, Inc.

Filed: October 20, 2022 as 3:2020cv06900
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Fortanix, Inc.
Plaintiff: Fortinet Inc., Fortinet, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Trademark

ORDER RE: REMAINING CLAIMS; DIRECTIONS TO CLERK. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 20, 2022. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/20/2022)

Fortinet, Inc. v. Forescout Technologies, Inc.

Filed: November 29, 2021 as 3:2020cv03343
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Forescout Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff: Fortinet, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen Denying 115 Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/29/2021)

British Telecommunications plc et al v. Fortinet, Inc.

Filed: August 5, 2021 as 1:2018cv01018
Court: Delaware District Court
Defendant: Fortinet, Inc.
Plaintiff: BT Americas, Inc., British Telecommunications plc
Nature of Suit: Patent

MEMORANDUM ORDER adopting-in-part and rejecting-in-part 141 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The parties shall submit for the Court's signature no later than August 23, 2021 a claim construction order consistent with this Memorandum Order, the Magistrate Judge's claim constructions that were not objected to, and the claim constructions previously agreed to by the parties. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 8/5/2021. (fms)

British Telecommunications plc et al v. Fortinet, Inc.

Filed: April 15, 2021 as 1:2018cv01018
Court: Delaware District Court
Defendant: Fortinet, Inc.
Plaintiff: BT Americas, Inc., British Telecommunications plc
Nature of Suit: Patent

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS on CLAIM CONSTRUCTION. Please note that when filing Objections pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(2), briefing consists solely of the Objections (no longer than ten (10) pages) and the Response to the Objections (no longer than ten (10) pages). No further briefing shall be permitted with respect to objections without leave of the Court. Objections to R&R due by 4/29/2021. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Mary Pat Thynge on 4/15/2021. (Taylor,…

Fortinet, Inc. v. Fortanix, Inc.

Filed: January 8, 2021 as 3:2020cv06900
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Fortanix, Inc.
Plaintiff: Fortinet Inc., Fortinet, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Trademark

PRETRIAL PREPARATION ORDER. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 1/8/2021. (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/8/2021)

Fortinet, Inc. v. Forescout Technologies, Inc.

Filed: November 2, 2020 as 3:2020cv03343
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Forescout Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff: Fortinet, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen Granting in Part and Denying in Part 24 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/2/2020)

Chrimar Systems, Inc. et al v. Fortinet, Inc.

Filed: September 30, 2020 as 5:2016cv00897
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Fortinet Inc.
Plaintiff: ChriMar Systems Inc, ChriMar Holding Company LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER OF DISMISSAL UPON SETTLEMENT. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 9/30/20. (ecS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2020)

Realtime Data LLC v. Fortinet, Inc.

Filed: October 31, 2018 as 1:2017cv01635
Court: Delaware District Court
Defendant: Fortinet, Inc.
Plaintiff: Realtime Data LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent

MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 10/31/2018. (fms)

Fortinet, Inc. v. Sophos, Inc. et al

Filed: December 1, 2015 as 5:2013cv05831
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Sophos, Inc., Michael Valentine, Jason Clark
Plaintiff: Fortinet, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER RESETTING PRETRIAL FILINGS DEADLINE AND PRETRIAL CONFERENCE re 335 Notice of Settlement filed by Fortinet, Inc. Pretrial Conference reset for 1/5/2016 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Edward M. Chen. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 12/1/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/1/2015)

Fortinet, Inc. v. Sophos, Inc. et al

Filed: November 25, 2015 as 5:2013cv05831
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Sophos, Inc., Michael Valentine, Jason Clark
Plaintiff: Fortinet, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen granting in part and denying in part 293 Plaintiff's Motion to Enforce Stipulation (emclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/25/2015)

Fortinet, Inc. v. Sophos, Inc. et al

Filed: November 9, 2015 as 5:2013cv05831
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Sophos, Inc., Michael Valentine, Jason Clark
Plaintiff: Fortinet, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen granting in part and denying in part 292 Plaintiff's Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; granting in part and denying in part 307 Defendants' Administrative Motion to File Under Seal (emclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/9/2015)

Fortinet Inc. v. FireEye Inc.

Filed: September 22, 2015 as 5:2013cv02496
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: FireEye Inc.
Plaintiff: Fortinet Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 221 Stipulation for Dismissal of State Law Claims with Prejudice and of Patent Claims without Prejudice. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/22/2015)

Fortinet Inc. v. FireEye Inc.

Filed: September 15, 2015 as 5:2013cv02496
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: FireEye Inc.
Plaintiff: Fortinet Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

***DISREGARD, SEE DOCKET NO. 216 .*** ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 212 Motion to Change Case Management Schedule.(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/15/2015) Modified on 9/15/2015 (ndrS, COURT STAFF).

Fortinet Inc. v. FireEye Inc.

Filed: September 15, 2015 as 5:2013cv02496
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: FireEye Inc.
Plaintiff: Fortinet Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER Granting 212 Motion to Change Case Management Schedule : Discovery due by 12/23/2015. Motions due by 1/22/2016. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 9/15/2015. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/15/2015)

Fortinet Inc. v. FireEye Inc.

Filed: August 31, 2015 as 5:2013cv02496
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: FireEye Inc.
Plaintiff: Fortinet Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER Granting 100 Notice. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 8/31/2015. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2015)

Fortinet Inc. v. FireEye Inc.

Filed: August 24, 2015 as 5:2013cv02496
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: FireEye Inc.
Plaintiff: Fortinet Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 166 Motion for Pro Hac Vice. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2015)

Fortinet Inc. v. FireEye Inc.

Filed: August 13, 2015 as 5:2013cv02496
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: FireEye Inc.
Plaintiff: Fortinet Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 151 Motion for Pro Hac Vice. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2015)