Kathryn Crowley vs. Clarcor/General Electric and Treasurer of the State of Missouri, Custodian of the Second Injury Fund
Filed: November 22, 2022
State: Missouri
Court: Court of Appeals
Case Number: WD85177
Portland General Electric Company et al v. NorthWestern Corporation et al
Filed: November 15, 2022
State: Montana
Court: Montana District Court
Case Number: 1:2021cv00047
FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION (this order does not close the case). Signed by Judge Susan P. Watters on 11/15/2022. (AMC)
Spectrum Dynamics Medical Limited v. General Electric Company et al
Filed: November 4, 2022
State: New York
Court: New York Southern District Court
Case Number: 1:2018cv11386
OPINION AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, Spectrum's motion for a preliminary injunction is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to file this Opinion & Order under seal so that it is viewable to only the Court and the part ies. The parties are ordered to meet and confer and, within thirty (30) days of the entry of this Opinion & Order, submit proposed redactions to this Opinion & Order so that it can be filed publicly on the docket. The Clerk of Court is…
Rahman et al v. General Electric Corporation et al
Filed: October 24, 2022
State: Connecticut
Court: Connecticut District Court
Case Number: 3:2020cv01524
ORDER granting 78 Motion to Amend/Correct, granting 79 Motion to Amend/Correct, and denying 83 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. The Clerk is directed to docket [#78-2] and [#79-2] as the operative Amended Complaints. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 10/24/2022. (Burman, A.)
Portland General Electric Company et al v. NorthWestern Corporation et al
Filed: October 19, 2022
State: Montana
Court: Montana District Court
Case Number: 1:2021cv00047
IT IS ORDERED that the proposed Findings and Recommendations entered by the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. 191) are ADOPTED IN FULL. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Regarding their First, Second, and Third Claims for Relief (Doc. 88) is GRANTED; and Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Regarding their Fourth and Fifth Claims for Relief (Doc. 102) is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Susan P. Watters on 10/19/2022. (AMC)
Haft v. General Electric Company, et al
Filed: October 13, 2022
State: New York
Court: New York Southern District Court
Case Number: 1:2021cv00506
ORDER granting 134 MOTION for Thomas A. Pacheco to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-26788883. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. filed by Asher Haft, Cheryl Jones, Robert Fisher. The motion of Thomas A. Pacheco for admission to practice Pro Hac Vice in the above-captioned action is GRANTED. As further set forth by this Order. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer E Willis on 10/13/2022) (tg)
Portland General Electric Company et al v. NorthWestern Corporation et al
Filed: September 28, 2022
State: Montana
Court: Montana District Court
Case Number: 1:2021cv00047
IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Defendant State of Montanas Motion to Stay (Doc. 116) is DENIED; and (2) Northwestern Corporations Motion to Compel Arbitration and Appoint a Magistrate Judge to Oversee Arbitration Procedure Negotiations (Doc. 120) is DENIED without prejudice. Talens motion for leave to supplement its opposition to PNW Owners summary judgment motion with this information (Doc. 153) is hereby granted. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS that: (1) Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary…
Touchstone Strategic Trust et al v. General Electric Company et al
Filed: September 28, 2022
State: New York
Court: New York Southern District Court
Case Number: 1:2019cv01876
OPINION AND ORDER: re: 23 MOTION to Dismiss the Amended Complaint filed by Keith S. Sherin, Jeffrey S. Bornstein, Jeffrey R. Immelt, General Electric Company. For the reasons stated above, Defendants' motion to dismiss must be and is GRAN TED. That leaves the question of whether Plaintiffs should be granted leave to amend. Although leave to amend should be freely given "when justice so requires," Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2), it is "within the sound discretion of the…
Haft v. General Electric Company, et al
Filed: September 20, 2022
State: New York
Court: New York Southern District Court
Case Number: 1:2021cv00506
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 123 Motion to Compel. For the foregoing reasons, the Court grants in part and denies in part Plaintiffs' Motion. If Plaintiffs require additional time for fact discovery, Plaintiffs may file a letter in accordance with the Court's Individual Practices specifying the time needed. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer E Willis on 9/20/2022) (tg)
Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy A/S v. General Electric Co. et al
Filed: September 7, 2022
State: Massachusetts
Court: Massachusetts District Court
Case Number: 1:2021cv10216
Judge William G. Young: FINAL JUDGMENT INCLUDING PERMANENT INJUNCTION (Sonnenberg, Elizabeth)
Amorosa et al v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY et al
Filed: August 19, 2022
State: New York
Court: New York Southern District Court
Case Number: 1:2021cv03137
OPINION AND ORDER re: 18 MOTION to Dismiss the Amended Complaint. filed by Jeffrey S. Bornstein, GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY. A plaintiff alleging securities fraud who opts out of a class action must, like any other plaintiff, meet the demanding pleading requirements of Rule 9(b) and the PSLRA. In re Synchrony Fin. Sec. Litig., 988 F.3d 157, 161 (2d Cir. 2021). Amorosa does not cite, and the Court has not found, any case in which a court has allowed a securities fraud claim to proceed…
Sjunde Ap-Fonden and The Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fund, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. General Electric Company, et al.
Filed: April 26, 2022
State: New York
Court: New York Southern District Court
Case Number: 1:2017cv08457
ORDER granting 318 Letter Motion to Seal. Application GRANTED. Applying the three-part test for determining whether documents may be placed under seal, in whole or in part, see Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 119-20 (2d Cir. 20 06); Olson v. Major League Baseball, 29 F.4th 59, 2022 WL 828748, at *20-25 (2d Cir. 2022), the Court concludes that the documents identified in Defendant's letter should be maintained in redacted form as indicated for substantially the…
Sjunde Ap-Fonden and The Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fund, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. General Electric Company, et al.
Filed: April 11, 2022
State: New York
Court: New York Southern District Court
Case Number: 1:2017cv08457
OPINION AND ORDER re: 218 MOTION to Certify Class . filed by Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fund, Sjunde Ap-Fonden, 278 MOTION for Leave to File a Sixth Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint . filed by Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fund, Sjunde Ap-Fonden. For the reasons stated above, Plaintiffs' motions for class certification and for leave to file an amended complaint are GRANTED. One housekeeping matter remains: The parti es filed letter-motions to seal…
In re Portland General Electric Company Securities Litigation
Filed: March 22, 2022
State: Oregon
Court: Oregon District Court
Case Number: 3:2020cv01583
Opinion and Order Approving Settlement, Attorney's Fees, and Expenses - The Court GRANTS Lead Plaintiff's unopposed Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement and Class Counsel's unopposed Motion for Award of Attorney 's Fees and Expenses (ECF 50 ). The Court awards Class Counsel $1,687,500 in attorney's fees and $86,382.59 in costs, to be paid from the Settlement Fund. This case is dismissed, but the Court retains jurisdiction over the partie…
Rahman et al v. General Electric Corporation et al
Filed: February 14, 2022
State: Connecticut
Court: Connecticut District Court
Case Number: 3:2020cv01524
ORDER granting Defendants GE Capital Aviation Services, Limited's and Celestial Aviation Trading 34 Limited's Motion to Dismiss 59 . Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 2/14/22. (Walker, M.)
Deschutes River Alliance v. Portland General Electric Company et al
Filed: January 25, 2022
State: Oregon
Court: Oregon District Court
Case Number: 3:2016cv01644
ORDER - Based on the Ninth Circuit's Opinion, the Opinion and Order and the Judgment of this Court, both dated August 3, 2018, (ECF 130 and 131 ) are VACATED. This case is dismissed for failure to join an indispensable party under Rule 19 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendants' motion (ECF 147 ) is DENIED as moot. Signed on 1/25/2022 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja)
RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
Filed: January 18, 2022
State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 21-1166
Haft v. General Electric Company, et al
Filed: January 5, 2022
State: New York
Court: New York Southern District Court
Case Number: 1:2021cv00506
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: re: 38 MOTION to Dismiss . filed by Haier US Appliance Solutions, Inc., General Electric Company. Defendants motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part. As stated above, Plaintiffs hav e not sufficiently alleged claims for breach of warranty or breach of contract and Defendant's motion to dismiss is granted as to Counts I, II, and III in the Amended Complaint. Similarly, Plaintiffs have not adequately pleaded claims under the New York…
General Electric Company v. APR Energy PLC
Filed: December 22, 2021
State: New York
Court: New York Southern District Court
Case Number: 1:2019cv03472
DECISION AND ORDER: For the reasons stated above, it is hereby ORDERED the objection from plaintiff/counterclaim defendant General Electric Company ("GE") (Dkt. Nos. 188, 190) to the order of Magistrate Judge Fox denying GE's motion to compel is OVERRULED. SO ORDERED (Signed by Judge Victor Marrero on 12/22/2021) (js)
Paroni v. General Electric UK Holdings LTD.
Filed: November 5, 2021
State: New York
Court: New York Southern District Court
Case Number: 1:2019cv01034
OPINION & ORDER re: 77 MOTION to Transfer Case, filed by Elodie Paroni. For the foregoing reasons, the Court grants Elodie's motion to transfer. The Court respectfully directs the Clerk of Court to terminate the motion pending a t Dkt. 77, and to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 11/5/2021) (va) Transmission to Office of the Clerk of Court for processing.
