General Motors State Court Decisions

ESTATE OF TRASK SIMPSON V GENERAL MOTORS LLC

Filed: January 2, 2020

State: Michigan
Court: Court of Appeals Unpublished
Case Numbers: 341961 and 342291

New York State Teachers' Retirement System v. General Motors Company et al

Filed: December 17, 2019

State: Michigan
Court: Michigan Eastern District Court
Case Number: 2:2014cv11191

OPINION and ORDER Rejecting Donald C. Marro's 173 174 176 Objections to Order Approving Distribution Plan, and Denying his 175 177 Motions. Signed by District Judge Linda V. Parker. (RLou)

In re: General Motors LLC Ignition Switch Litigation

Filed: December 12, 2019

State: New York
Court: New York Southern District Court
Case Number: 1:2014mc02543

OPINION AND ORDER re: (7055 in 1:14-md-02543-JMF) MOTION for Reconsideration re; (7019) Memorandum & Opinion, Economic Loss Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's August 6, 2019 Summary Judgment Opinion and Order or, in the A lternative, Motion for Cert filed by GM Ignition Switch MDL Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs fail to persuade the Court that it erred in its summary judgment ruling, and they certainly do not satisfy the strict standards that govern motions for…

Groman v. General Motors LLC.

Filed: December 12, 2019

State: New York
Court: New York Southern District Court
Case Number: 1:2014cv02458

OPINION AND ORDER re: (7055 in 1:14-md-02543-JMF) MOTION for Reconsideration re; (7019) Memorandum & Opinion, Economic Loss Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's August 6, 2019 Summary Judgment Opinion and Orde r or, in the Alternative, Motion for Cert filed by GM Ignition Switch MDL Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs fail to persuade the Court that it erred in its summary judgment ruling, and they certainly do not satisfy the strict standards that govern motions f or…

Cox et al v. General Motors LLC

Filed: December 10, 2019

State: Kentucky
Court: Kentucky Eastern District Court
Case Number: 0:2019cv00062

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that General Motors, LLC's 5 MOTION to Dismiss for failure to state a claim be OVERRULED. Signed by Judge Henry R. Wilhoit, Jr on 12/10/19.(KSS)cc: COR

Darlene Turner-Meadows v. General Motors, LLC

Filed: December 4, 2019

State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Case Number: 19-5228

General Motors Corp. v. Com. of PA

Filed: November 21, 2019

State: Pennsylvania
Court: Commonwealth Court
Case Number: 869 F.R. 2012

Malone v. General Motors Financial Company, Inc.

Filed: November 19, 2019

State: Texas
Court: Texas Northern District Court
Case Number: 4:2019cv00618

Memorandum Opinion and Order... The court ORDERS that defendants' amended motion to dismiss be, and is hereby, granted in part and plaintiff's claims against GMFCI be, and are hereby, dismissed. The court determines that there is no just reason for delay in, and hereby directs, entry of final judgment as to the dismissal of such claims. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 11/19/2019) (wxc)

Stephen Yagman v. General Motors Company et al

Filed: November 15, 2019

State: New York
Court: New York Southern District Court
Case Number: 1:2014cv09058

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: In short, Mr. Yagman's complaint remains dismissed. As provided in Order No. 50, should a class be certified of which he is a member, Mr. Yagman may recover as a member of that class or he may opt out of the class and re-file his complaint at that time. 14-MD-2543, ECF No. 875, at 1-2. Similarly, in the event that the Court denies class certification, Mr. Yagman may re-file his complaint. Id. In short, Mr. Yagman's complaint is dismissed without…

In re: General Motors LLC Ignition Switch Litigation

Filed: November 8, 2019

State: New York
Court: New York Southern District Court
Case Number: 1:2014mc02543

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: re: (7204 in 1:14-md-02543-JMF) MOTION for Declaratory Judgment On Assessments For State Filed and Unfiled Cases filed by ALL PLAINTIFFS. For the foregoing reasons, the Court holds that Order No. 42 applies to all settle ments resolving claims asserted by L&E's clients that were part of the master settlement agreements submitted to this Court, without regard for whether those claims were pending in state court or no court at all. Accordingly, L&E's…

Huerd v. General Motors, LLC

Filed: October 29, 2019

State: North Dakota
Court: Supreme Court
Citation: 2019 ND 249
Case Number: 20190125

Sandy Brands et al v. General Motors LLC

Filed: October 24, 2019

State: New York
Court: New York Southern District Court
Case Number: 1:2015cv02709

OPINION AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, New GM's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs' claims are DISMISSED in their entirety. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate 15-CV-2709, ECF No. 183 and 14-MD-2543, ECF No. 6231, and to close 15-CV-2709. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 10/24/2019) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:14-md-02543-JMF, 1:15-cv-02709-JMF(jca) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.

Boustani v. General Motors, LLC et al

Filed: October 9, 2019

State: Kentucky
Court: Kentucky Western District Court
Case Number: 1:2019cv00025

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers on 10/8/2019 DENYING as moot 4 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; DENYING as moot 6 Motion for Leave to; DENYING as moot 7 Motion ; and granting 8 Motion to Remand because this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over this dispute under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The Clerk shall strike this case from the active docket. cc: Counsel, Warren Circuit Court (RLJ)

Divis et al v. General Motors LLC

Filed: September 27, 2019

State: Michigan
Court: Michigan Eastern District Court
Case Number: 2:2018cv13025

ORDER Granting In Part And Denying In Part 14 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Victoria A. Roberts. (LVer)

Dowling v. General Motors, LLC et al

Filed: September 16, 2019

State: Colorado
Court: Colorado District Court
Case Number: 1:2015cv00445

ORDER denying 67 Plaintiff-Intervenor's Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.54(d), by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 9/16/19.(nmarb, )

Anderson v. General Motors LLC

Filed: September 13, 2019

State: Delaware
Court: Delaware District Court
Case Number: 1:2018cv00621

MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 9/13/2019. (nmg)

Hinton v. General Motors Corp

Filed: September 6, 2019

State: Michigan
Court: Michigan Eastern District Court
Case Number: 2:2018cv13155

OPINION AND ORDER (1) Accepting in Part 17 the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge Dated April 22, 2019, (2) Sustaining in Part and Overruling in Part Plaintiff's Objections, and (3) Granting 9 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (MacKay, K)

Keltner et al v. General Motors, LLC et al

Filed: September 3, 2019

State: Kentucky
Court: Kentucky Western District Court
Case Number: 1:2016cv00208

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by Chief Judge Greg N. Stivers on 9/3/2019. For the reasons set forth, Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (DN 96 ) is DENIED, and Defendant's Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Memorandum (DN 125 ) is GRANTED. cc: Counsel (CDF)

General Motors LLC v. Motors Liquidation Company GUC Trust Administrator et al.

Filed: August 6, 2019

State: New York
Court: New York Southern District Court
Case Number: 1:2019cv01852

OPINION AND ORDER: In the final analysis, the Court's task here is not to decide what makes sense as a matter of policy. Cf. MyFord Touch, 291 F. Supp. 3d at 971 (citing "policy reasons to afford Plaintiffs a reasonable opportunity to posit damages based on a more flexible approach to economic theory"). Nor is it even to evaluate whether Boedeker's analysis passes muster as a matter of economic theory. Instead, it is to apply the substantive law of each Bellwether…

In re: General Motors LLC Ignition Switch Litigation

Filed: August 6, 2019

State: New York
Court: New York Southern District Court
Case Number: 1:2014mc02543

OPINION AND ORDER: In the final analysis, the Court's task here is not to decide what makes sense as a matter of policy. Cf. MyFord Touch, 291 F. Supp. 3d at 971 (citing "policy reasons to afford Plaintiffs a reasonable opportunity to p osit damages based on a more flexible approach to economic theory"). Nor is it even to evaluate whether Boedeker's analysis passes muster as a matter of economic theory. Instead, it is to apply the substantive law of each Bellwether S…