Speed Track, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
Filed: August 25, 2014 as 3:2009cv04479
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Amazon.com, Inc., Costco Wholesale Corporation, 1-800-Flowers.com, Inc., Barnesandnoble.com, LLC, Barnesandnoble.com, Inc., The Home Depot, Inc., Nike, Inc., Northern Tool & Equipment Catalog Co., Inc., J&R Electronics, Inc., Dell, Inc., Best Buy Co., Best Buy.com LLC, Systemax, Inc., OfficeMax, Inc., Macy's, Inc., Macys.com, Inc., Overstock.Com, Inc., Recreational Equipment, Inc., Value Vision International, Inc., B&H Foto & Electronics Corp., Hewlett-Packard Company, Redcats USA, Inc., Retail Convergence, Inc.
Plaintiff: Speed Track, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER GRANTING 107 Substitution of Counsel. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 8/25/14. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/25/2014)
ChriMar Systems Inc. et al v. Cisco Systems Inc. et al
Filed: August 25, 2014 as 3:2013cv01300
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Cisco Systems Inc, Cisco Consumer Products LLC, Hewlett-Packard Co., 3COM Corporation, Extreme Networks, Inc., Cisco-Linksys LLC
Plaintiff: ChriMar Systems Inc, ChriMar Holding Company LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
Discovery Order re: 199 Joint Discovery Letter Brief re ChriMar Document filed by Cisco Systems Inc, Cisco Consumer Products LLC. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 8/25/2014. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/25/2014)
Discover Group, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company
Filed: August 22, 2014 as 5:2012cv04077
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Hewlett-Packard Company
Plaintiff: Discover Group, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
ORDER Continuing Deadline to File Joint Pre-Trial Statement re 53 Letter filed by Discover Group, Inc.; Continuing Final Pre-Trial Conference. Final Pretrial Conference set for 9/19/2014 02:00 PM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Beth Labson Freeman. Joint Pretrial Statement due by 9/4/2014. Signed by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman on 8/22/2014. (blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/22/2014)
Hewlett-Packard Company v. Toshiba Corporation et al
Filed: August 20, 2014 as 3:2013cv05370
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba American Information Systems Inc., Samsung Electronics Co Ltd, Samsung Electronics America Inc, Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Corporation, Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Corporation Korea, Sony Corporation, Sony Electronics Inc, NEC Corporation, Sony Optiarc Inc., Sony NEC Optiarc Inc., Sony Optiarc America Inc., Panasonic Corporation, Panasonic Corporation of North America, Teac Corporation, Teac America Inc., Quanta Storage Inc, Quanta Storage America, Inc.
Plaintiff: Hewlett-Packard Company
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING (#1383 in 3:10-md-02143-RS) and(#38 in 3:13-cv-05370-RS) BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT. Motion Hearing previously set for 11/6/14 has been Continued to 11/20/2014 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 8/20/14. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2014) Modified on 8/20/2014 (cl, COURT STAFF).
ChriMar Systems Inc. et al v. Cisco Systems Inc. et al
Filed: August 13, 2014 as 3:2013cv01300
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Cisco Systems Inc, Cisco Consumer Products LLC, Hewlett-Packard Co., 3COM Corporation, Extreme Networks, Inc., Cisco-Linksys LLC
Plaintiff: ChriMar Systems Inc, ChriMar Holding Company LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
Discovery Order re: Joint Letter, Dkt. No. 199. ChriMar is ordered to submit the disputed email for in camera review by 8/15/2014. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 8/13/2014. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2014)
NorthPeak Wireless, LLC v. 3Com Corporation et al
Filed: July 29, 2014 as 3:2009cv00602
Court: California Northern District Court
Counter-claimant: U.S. Robotics Corporation, Sony Electronics, Inc., Sony Computer Entertainment America, Inc., Belkin International, Inc., Sandisk Corporation, D-Link Systems, Inc., Dell, Inc., Epson America, Inc., SMC Networks, Inc., Iogear, Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company, ASUS Computer International Corporation, 3COM Corporation, ACER America Corporation, Gateway, Inc., Watchguard Technologies, Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., MSI Computer Corp, Rosewill, Inc., Viewsonic Corporation, Sonicwall, Inc., Fujitsu Computer Systems Corporation, Trendnet Systems, Inc., Trendware International, Inc., Zonet USA Corporation
Counter-defendant: NorthPeak Wireless, LLC
Defendant: 3COM Corporation, ACER America Corporation, ASUS Computer International Corporation, Belkin International, Inc., Buffalo Technology (USA), Inc., Dell, Inc., D-Link Systems, Inc., Epson America, Inc., Fujitsu Computer Systems Corporation, Gateway, Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company, Iogear, Inc., MSI Computer Corp, Netgear, Inc., Rosewill, Inc., Sandisk Corporation, SEH Technology, Inc., SMC Networks, Inc., Sonicwall, Inc., Sony Electronics, Inc., Sony Computer Entertainment America, Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Trendnet Systems, Inc., Trendware International, Inc., U.S. Robotics Corporation, Viewsonic Corporation, Watchguard Technologies, Inc., Zonet USA Corporation, Zyxel Communications, Inc.
Intervenor: Intel Corporation
Miscellaneous: Intel Corporation
Plaintiff: NorthPeak Wireless, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER re 489 Status Report, filed by NorthPeak Wireless, LLC Case Management Statement due by 9/23/2014.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 7/28/2014. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2014)
U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC v. Acer, Inc. et al
Filed: July 24, 2014 as 5:2010cv03724
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Acer, Inc., ACER America Corporation, Apple, Inc., Asus Computer International, Asustek Computer Inc., Dell Inc., Fujitsu Ltd., Fujitsu America, Inc., Gateway, Inc., Hewlett Packard Co., Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Electronics Inc., Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America, Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Nvidia Corporation, U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC
Intervenor: Intel Corporation, Atheros Communications, Inc., Broadcom Corporation
Intervenor Dft: Marvell Semiconductor, Inc.
Mediator: Robert Faulkner
Plaintiff: U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
Order by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler granting in part and denying in part 1186 Discovery Letter Brief.(lblc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/24/2014)
Johnson et al v. Hewlett-Packard Company
Filed: July 24, 2014 as 3:2009cv03596
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Hewlett-Packard Company
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Johnson, Jennifer Riese, Shaun Simmons
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer denying 317 Motion for Leave to File a Motion for Reconsideration; granting in part and denying in part 284 Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs. (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/24/2014).
Hewlett-Packard Company v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al
Filed: July 22, 2014 as 3:2013cv05371
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Pioneer North America, Inc, Pioneer Corporation, Philips & Lite-On Digital Solutions USA, Inc., Philips & Lite-On Digital Solutions Corporation, Benq America Corporation, Benq Corporation, Lite-On IT Corporation of Taiwan, Koninklijke Philips N.V., Hitachi-LG Data Storage, Korea, Inc., Hitachi-LG Data Storage Inc., LG Electronics U.S.A. Inc., LG ELECTRONICS INC, Pioneer Electronics (USA) Inc., Pioneer High Fidelity Taiwan Co., Ltd, Sharp Corporation, Pioneer Digital Design & Manufacturing Company, Philips BenQ Digital Storage
Plaintiff: Hewlett Packard Company
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
STIPULATION AND REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS HP'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 7/22/14. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2014)
J.C. TAYLOR ANTIQUE AUTOMOBILE AGENCY, INC. v. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY et al
Filed: July 22, 2014 as 2:2014cv03006
Court: Pennsylvania Eastern District Court
Defendant: HEWLETT-PACKARD FINANCIAL SERVICES COMPANY, HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY
Plaintiff: J.C. TAYLOR ANTIQUE AUTOMOBILE AGENCY, INC.
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY'S MOTION TO DISMISS (DOCKET NO. 5) AS PREMATURE FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH IN THE MEMORANDUM. DISCOVERY IS NOW DUE DECEMBER 19, 2014. ANY DAUBERT MOTION SHALL BE FILED ON OR BEFORE APRIL 24, 2015. ANY MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SHALL BE FILED AND SERVED ON OR BEFORE MAY 15, 2015. PLAINTIFF'S PRETRIAL MEMO IS DUE ON OR BEFORE JUN 12, 2015 AND DEFENDANT'S PRETRIAL MEMO IS DUE ON OR BEFORE JUNE 19, 2015. A FINAL…
Hewlett-Packard Company v. Toshiba Corporation et al
Filed: July 18, 2014 as 3:2013cv05370
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba American Information Systems Inc., Samsung Electronics Co Ltd, Samsung Electronics America Inc, Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Corporation, Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Corporation Korea, Sony Corporation, Sony Electronics Inc, NEC Corporation, Sony Optiarc Inc., Sony NEC Optiarc Inc., Sony Optiarc America Inc., Panasonic Corporation, Panasonic Corporation of North America, Teac Corporation, Teac America Inc., Quanta Storage Inc, Quanta Storage America, Inc.
Plaintiff: Hewlett-Packard Company
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS HP'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 7/18/14. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/18/2014)
U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC v. Acer, Inc. et al
Filed: July 10, 2014 as 5:2010cv03724
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Acer, Inc., ACER America Corporation, Apple, Inc., Asus Computer International, Asustek Computer Inc., Dell Inc., Fujitsu Ltd., Fujitsu America, Inc., Gateway, Inc., Hewlett Packard Co., Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Electronics Inc., Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America, Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Nvidia Corporation, U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC
Intervenor: Intel Corporation, Atheros Communications, Inc., Broadcom Corporation
Intervenor Dft: Marvell Semiconductor, Inc.
Mediator: Robert Faulkner
Plaintiff: U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER SETTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFING SCHEDULE in 4:10-cv-03724-CW: Responses/Cross Motions due by 7/15/2014; Replies due by 7/31/2014; Reply due by 8/7/2014. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 7/10/2014. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2014)
Hewlett-Packard Company v. Toshiba Corporation et al
Filed: July 8, 2014 as 3:2013cv05370
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba American Information Systems Inc., Samsung Electronics Co Ltd, Samsung Electronics America Inc, Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Corporation, Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Corporation Korea, Sony Corporation, Sony Electronics Inc, NEC Corporation, Sony Optiarc Inc., Sony NEC Optiarc Inc., Sony Optiarc America Inc., Panasonic Corporation, Panasonic Corporation of North America, Teac Corporation, Teac America Inc., Quanta Storage Inc, Quanta Storage America, Inc.
Plaintiff: Hewlett-Packard Company
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE A PROPOSED BRIEFING SCHEDULE REGARDING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS HP'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT. (1340 in 3:10-md-02143-RS) (34 in 3:13-cv-05370-RS). Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 7/8/14. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/8/2014)
U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC v. Acer, Inc. et al
Filed: July 3, 2014 as 5:2010cv03724
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Acer, Inc., ACER America Corporation, Apple, Inc., Asus Computer International, Asustek Computer Inc., Dell Inc., Fujitsu Ltd., Fujitsu America, Inc., Gateway, Inc., Hewlett Packard Co., Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Electronics Inc., Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America, Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Nvidia Corporation, U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC
Intervenor: Intel Corporation, Atheros Communications, Inc., Broadcom Corporation
Intervenor Dft: Marvell Semiconductor, Inc.
Mediator: Robert Faulkner
Plaintiff: U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER REGARDING SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFING SCHEDULE (cwlc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/3/2014)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: June 30, 2014 as 5:2012cv06199
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
ORDER. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 6/30/2014. (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2014).
Elias v. Hewlett-Packard Company
Filed: June 18, 2014 as 5:2012cv00421
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Hewlett-Packard Company
Plaintiff: David Elias
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO CLOSE THE FILE PURSUANT TO 67 STIPULATED DISMISSAL UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); AND VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 6/18/2014. (blflc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/18/2014)
Hewlett-Packard Company v. Toshiba Corporation et al
Filed: June 13, 2014 as 3:2013cv05370
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba American Information Systems Inc., Samsung Electronics Co Ltd, Samsung Electronics America Inc, Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Corporation, Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Corporation Korea, Sony Corporation, Sony Electronics Inc, NEC Corporation, Sony Optiarc Inc., Sony NEC Optiarc Inc., Sony Optiarc America Inc., Panasonic Corporation, Panasonic Corporation of North America, Teac Corporation, Teac America Inc., Quanta Storage Inc, Quanta Storage America, Inc.
Plaintiff: Hewlett-Packard Company
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 6/13/14. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/13/2014)
Hewlett Packard Company v. ServiceNow, Inc.
Filed: June 11, 2014 as 5:2014cv00570
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: ServiceNow, Inc.
Plaintiff: Hewlett Packard Company
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER REFERRING CASE TO ADR UNIT FOR TELEPHONE CONFERENCE (declining to approve 41 ). Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 6/11/2014. (blflc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2014)
Steinberg et al-V-Leo Apotheker et al
Filed: June 6, 2014 as 3:2014cv02287
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Margaret C. Whitman, Shane V. Robison, Ann M. Livermore, Leo Apotheker, Hewlett-Packard Company
Plaintiff: Edward Vogel, Harriet Steinberg
Nature of Suit: Stockholders Suits
STIPULATION AND ORDER Consolidating Shareholder Derivative Actions and Setting Schedule for Filing of a Consolidated Complaint and Further Proceedings. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 2/9/13. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/6/2014)
U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC v. Acer, Inc. et al
Filed: June 4, 2014 as 5:2010cv03724
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Acer, Inc., ACER America Corporation, Apple, Inc., Asus Computer International, Asustek Computer Inc., Dell Inc., Fujitsu Ltd., Fujitsu America, Inc., Gateway, Inc., Hewlett Packard Co., Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Electronics Inc., Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America, Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Nvidia Corporation, U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC
Intervenor: Intel Corporation, Atheros Communications, Inc., Broadcom Corporation
Intervenor Dft: Marvell Semiconductor, Inc.
Mediator: Robert Faulkner
Plaintiff: U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken DENYING ( 933 , 935 ) ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS TO SEAL. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/4/2014)
