Evans et al v. Hewlett Packard Company et al
Filed: November 6, 2013 as 3:2013cv02477
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Hewlett Packard Company, Palm Inc.
Plaintiff: Ernest Evans, The Last Twist Inc, The Ernest Evans Corporation
Nature of Suit: Trademark
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER SUBJECT TO STATED CONDITIONS by Hon. William Alsup granting 85 Stipulation.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/6/2013)
ChriMar Systems Inc. et al v. Cisco Systems Inc. et al
Filed: October 24, 2013 as 3:2013cv01300
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Cisco Systems Inc, Cisco Consumer Products LLC, Hewlett-Packard Co., 3COM Corporation, Extreme Networks, Inc., Cisco-Linksys LLC
Plaintiff: ChriMar Systems Inc, ChriMar Holding Company LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
DISCOVERY ORDER by Judge Maria-Elena James granting in part and denying in part 155 Discovery Letter Brief (mejlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/24/2013)
ChriMar Systems Inc. et al v. Cisco Systems Inc. et al
Filed: October 22, 2013 as 3:2013cv01300
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Cisco Systems Inc, Cisco Consumer Products LLC, Hewlett-Packard Co., 3COM Corporation, Extreme Networks, Inc., Cisco-Linksys LLC
Plaintiff: ChriMar Systems Inc, ChriMar Holding Company LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER RESERVING RULING ON MOTION TO SEAL. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 10/22/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2013)
Prystawik et al v. Hewlett-Packard Company
Filed: October 21, 2013 as 3:2013cv02831
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Hewlett-Packard Company
Plaintiff: Arnim Voelkner, Stefan M. Prystawik
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
ORDER VACATING HEARING AND REQUIRING SERVICE BY NOVEMBER 18, 2013. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 10/21/13. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2013)
Sevier v. Hewlett Packard
Filed: October 17, 2013 as 3:2013cv01099
Court: Tennessee Middle District Court
Defendant: Hewlett Packard
Plaintiff: Chris Sevier
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
ORDER: The plaintiff is GRANTED 30 days from the date of entry of this order on the docket in which to either pay the filing fee of four hundred dollars ($400.00) or submit a signed statement setting forth with specificity the sources and amoun ts of any income, benefits, or assets he used to support himself for the prior twelve month period. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 10/17/13. (xc:Pro se party via e-mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND…
Discover Group, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company
Filed: October 15, 2013 as 5:2012cv04077
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Hewlett-Packard Company
Plaintiff: Discover Group, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
PRETRIAL ORDER (JURY TRIAL). Based on the parties' Joint Preliminary Pretrial Conference Statement, the court has determined an appearance is unnecessary at this time. Accordingly, the Preliminary Pretrial Conference is VACATED and the partie s are ordered to comply with the following schedule: Hearing on Anticipated Motions for Summary Judgment (All Motions for Summary Judgment filed by either party should be noticed for this date) set for 3/7/2014 09:00 AM in Courtroom 4, 5th…
Hewlett-Packard Company v. LD Products, Inc.
Filed: October 11, 2013 as 5:2013cv00494
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: LD Products, Inc.
Plaintiff: Hewlett-Packard Company
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
ORDER GRANTING 43 Stipulation of Dismissal filed by Hewlett-Packard Company. The Clerk shall close this file. ***ALL Deadlines terminated. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 10/11/2013. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/11/2013)
U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC v. Acer, Inc. et al
Filed: October 11, 2013 as 5:2010cv03724
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Acer, Inc., ACER America Corporation, Apple, Inc., Asus Computer International, Asustek Computer Inc., Dell Inc., Fujitsu Ltd., Fujitsu America, Inc., Gateway, Inc., Hewlett Packard Co., Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Electronics Inc., Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America, Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Nvidia Corporation, U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC
Intervenor: Intel Corporation, Atheros Communications, Inc., Broadcom Corporation
Intervenor Dft: Marvell Semiconductor, Inc.
Mediator: Robert Faulkner
Plaintiff: U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken GRANTING 853 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/11/2013)
VanPoperin, et al v. Hewlett-Packard Company
Filed: October 10, 2013 as 2:2010cv11110
Court: Michigan Eastern District Court
Defendant: Hewlett-Packard Company
Plaintiff: Eugene Hargrave, Gary VanPoperin
Nature of Suit: Employment
Memorandum and Order Granting Defendant's 34 Motion for Summary Judgment and Dismissing Case. Signed by District Judge Avern Cohn. (SCha)
Evans et al v. Hewlett Packard Company et al
Filed: October 10, 2013 as 3:2013cv02477
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Hewlett Packard Company, Palm Inc.
Plaintiff: Ernest Evans, The Last Twist Inc, The Ernest Evans Corporation
Nature of Suit: Trademark
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT by Judge William Alsup [denying 71 Motion for Leave to File]. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2013)
Evans et al v. Hewlett Packard Company et al
Filed: October 1, 2013 as 3:2013cv02477
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Hewlett Packard Company, Palm Inc.
Plaintiff: Ernest Evans, The Last Twist Inc, The Ernest Evans Corporation
Nature of Suit: Trademark
ORDER GRANTING DISCOVERY STIPULATION by Hon. William Alsup granting 79 Stipulation.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/1/2013)
Waller v. Hewlett-Packard Company et al
Filed: September 29, 2013 as 3:2011cv00454
Court: California Southern District Court
Defendant: Costco Wholesale Corporation, DOES, Hewlett-Packard Company, Staples, Inc., Western Digital Corporation
Plaintiff: Robert A. Waller, Jr.
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
ORDER denying without prejudice plaintiff's motion for class certification 82 . The motion to file documents under seal 81 is granted, as is the parties' joint motion to dimiss the CLRA claim 80 . The Court will calendar the motion for summary judgment for oral argument on 11/25/2013 11:30 AM. The parties' may calculate their respective briefing deadlines based on that hearing date. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 9/29/13. (kaj)
U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC v. Acer, Inc. et al
Filed: September 25, 2013 as 5:2010cv03724
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Acer, Inc., ACER America Corporation, Apple, Inc., Asus Computer International, Asustek Computer Inc., Dell Inc., Fujitsu Ltd., Fujitsu America, Inc., Gateway, Inc., Hewlett Packard Co., Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Electronics Inc., Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America, Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Nvidia Corporation, U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC
Intervenor: Intel Corporation, Atheros Communications, Inc., Broadcom Corporation
Intervenor Dft: Marvell Semiconductor, Inc.
Mediator: Robert Faulkner
Plaintiff: U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
Order by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler granting in part and denying in part 876 Discovery Letter Brief.(lblc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/25/2013)
Prystawik et al v. Hewlett-Packard Company
Filed: September 18, 2013 as 3:2013cv02831
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Hewlett-Packard Company
Plaintiff: Arnim Voelkner, Stefan M. Prystawik
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 10/29/2013 09:00 AM.. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 9/18/13. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2013)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: September 13, 2013 as 1:2013cv02502
Court: Colorado District Court
Counter Claimant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
ORDER Granting Plaintiff's Request for Enlargement of Time to File Proof of Service. by Marla R. Prudek, District Court Judge on 06/24/2013. (dbera, )
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: September 13, 2013 as 1:2013cv02502
Court: Colorado District Court
Counter Claimant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
ORDER Granting Extension of Time to File Proof of Service. by Marla R. Prudek, District Court Judge on 08/05/2013. (dbera, )
Mediostream Inc. v. Acer Inc. et al
Filed: September 3, 2013 as 3:2010cv05762
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Asus Computer International Inc, Apple Inc., Acer America Corporation, Sonic Solutions, Hewlett-Packard Company, Sony Corporation, Acer Inc., Asustek Computer Inc., Dell Inc., Microsoft Corporation
Plaintiff: Mediostream Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 147 OF DISMISSAL AS TO SONY CORPORATION. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 9/3/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/3/2013)
U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC v. Acer, Inc. et al
Filed: August 30, 2013 as 5:2010cv03724
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Acer, Inc., ACER America Corporation, Apple, Inc., Asus Computer International, Asustek Computer Inc., Dell Inc., Fujitsu Ltd., Fujitsu America, Inc., Gateway, Inc., Hewlett Packard Co., Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Electronics Inc., Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America, Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Nvidia Corporation, U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC
Intervenor: Intel Corporation, Atheros Communications, Inc., Broadcom Corporation
Intervenor Dft: Marvell Semiconductor, Inc.
Mediator: Robert Faulkner
Plaintiff: U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting 872 Request for Judicial Assistance Letter Rogatory. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2013)
ChriMar Systems Inc. et al v. Cisco Systems Inc. et al
Filed: August 29, 2013 as 3:2013cv01300
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Cisco Systems Inc, Cisco Consumer Products LLC, Hewlett-Packard Co., 3COM Corporation, Extreme Networks, Inc., Cisco-Linksys LLC
Plaintiff: ChriMar Systems Inc, ChriMar Holding Company LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER by Judge Maria-Elena James denying 144 Discovery Letter Brief (mejlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2013)
ChriMar Systems Inc. et al v. Cisco Systems Inc. et al
Filed: August 21, 2013 as 3:2013cv01300
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Cisco Systems Inc, Cisco Consumer Products LLC, Hewlett-Packard Co., 3COM Corporation, Extreme Networks, Inc., Cisco-Linksys LLC
Plaintiff: ChriMar Systems Inc, ChriMar Holding Company LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
FURTHER ORDER OF REFERRAL. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 8/21/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2013)
