Synnex Corporation v. Wattles
Filed: August 21, 2012 as 4:2011cv01496
Court: California Northern District Court
3rd Party Defendant: Hewlett-Packard Company, New Age Electronics, Inc.
3rd Party Plaintiff: Mark J. Wattles
Defendant: Mark J. Wattles
Plaintiff: Synnex Corporation
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Order to Show Cause Hearing set for Friday, 8/31/2012 09:01 AM. Show Cause Response due by 8/24/2012.. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 8/21/12. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2012)
BIAX Corporation v. Motorola Solutions, Inc. et al
Filed: August 17, 2012 as 1:2010cv03013
Court: Colorado District Court
Defendant: Brother Industries, Ltd., Brother International Corporation, Canon U.S.A., Inc., Canon, Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company, Motorola, Inc., Ricoh Americas Corporation, Ricoh Company, Ltd.
Plaintiff: BIAX Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent
MINUTE ORDER denying as moot 374 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave and 375 Motion to Compel. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 8/17/12.(mnfsl, )
BIAX Corporation v. Motorola Solutions, Inc. et al
Filed: August 15, 2012 as 1:2010cv03013
Court: Colorado District Court
Defendant: Brother Industries, Ltd., Brother International Corporation, Canon U.S.A., Inc., Canon, Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company, Motorola, Inc., Ricoh Americas Corporation, Ricoh Company, Ltd.
Plaintiff: BIAX Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER re: 374 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File a Motion toCompel and 375 MOTION to Compel. Plaintiff has three options: (1) to file amended Motions by no later than 8/16/2012 stating reasonable dates for the requested relief, takin g into account a fourteen-day period for the filing of Defendant's response; or (2) to withdraw the Motions; or (3) to prepare to argue against the imposition of sanctions for the filing of frivolous discovery motions. By Magistrate…
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: August 2, 2012 as 3:2012cv03480
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
ORDER re 6 Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint and Stipulated Request for Continuance of Case Management Conference filed by 3COM Severance Plan for Vice Presidents, 3COM Corporation 2003 Stock Plan, 3COM Corporation Severance Benefit Plan, Hewlett-Packard Company Case Management Statement due by 10/5/2012. Case Management Conference re-set for 10/12/2012 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom G, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 8/2/12. (klhS,…
BIAX Corporation v. Motorola Solutions, Inc. et al
Filed: July 30, 2012 as 1:2010cv03013
Court: Colorado District Court
Defendant: Brother Industries, Ltd., Brother International Corporation, Canon U.S.A., Inc., Canon, Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company, Motorola, Inc., Ricoh Americas Corporation, Ricoh Company, Ltd.
Plaintiff: BIAX Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent
MINUTE ORDER granting 352 Motion to Dismiss Party, Party Brother Industries, Ltd. and Brother International Corporation terminated with prejudice by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 7/30/12.(dkals, )
James Lester David et al v. Aladdin Heating Corporation et al
Filed: July 20, 2012 as 2:2012cv06052
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: 3M Company, Aladdin Heating Corporation, Albay Construction Company, Amchem Products, Inc., Asbestos Corporation, Ltd., Baseline Sheet Metal, Inc., Bay Cities Crane: and Rigging, Inc., Bell Industries, Inc., Biggee Crane and Rigging Co., Bolton Gate Company, Ltd., Borgwarner Morse Tec, Inc., Bowe Bell and Howell, Inc., Bryant Heating and Cooling Systems, California Drywall Company, Calportland Company, Carrier Corporation, CBS Corporation, Certainteed Corporation, Coast Drywall, Inc., Collins Insulation, Inc., Consolidated Insulation, Inc., Conwed Corporation, Copeland Corporation, Cornell Dubilier Electronics, Inc., Crane Co., Crosley Radio, Crown Cork and Seal Company, Inc., CSK Auto, Inc., Cupertino Electric, Inc., Del Monte Electric Company, Inc., Devcon Constructions, Does
and others
Movant: Dana Corporation
Plaintiff: James Lester David, Rebecca Lee David
Nature of Suit: Asbestos Personal Injury Product Liability
ORDER REMANDING MATTER TO SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES by Judge Michael W Fitzgerald. GOOD CAUSE appearing, and based on the stipulation of the parties, this action is hereby immediately REMANDED to the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles, the court in which it was originally filed and from which it was removed. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (Attachments: # 1 CV-103 Letter of Transmittal - Remand to Superior Court)…
MENARD et al v. HEWLETT PACKARD COMPANY/COMPAQ COMPUTER CORPORATION et al
Filed: July 19, 2012 as 2:2012cv03570
Court: Pennsylvania Eastern District Court
Defendant: HEWLETT PACKARD COMPANY/COMPAQ COMPUTER CORPORATION, WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Plaintiff: TIMOTHY MENARD, WENDY MENARD
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury- Product Liability
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO REMAND IS GRANTED. THIS CASE IS REMANDED TO THE PHILADELPHIA COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE BERLE M. SCHILLER ON 7/19/12. 7/19/12 ENTERED & E-MAILED.[FDC]
MENARD et al v. HEWLETT PACKARD COMPANY/COMPAQ COMPUTER CORPORATION et al
Filed: July 19, 2012 as 2:2012cv03570
Court: Pennsylvania Eastern District Court
Defendant: HEWLETT PACKARD COMPANY/COMPAQ COMPUTER CORPORATION, WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Plaintiff: TIMOTHY MENARD, WENDY MENARD
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury- Product Liability
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE BERLE M. SCHILLER ON 7/19/12. 7/19/12 ENTERED & E-MAILED.[FDC]
Castagnola v. Hewlett-Packard Company et al
Filed: July 11, 2012 as 3:2011cv05772
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Hewlett-Packard Company, Regent Group, Inc.
Plaintiff: Carol Hill Castagnola
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 7/11/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/11/2012)
BIAX Corporation v. Motorola Solutions, Inc. et al
Filed: July 3, 2012 as 1:2010cv03013
Court: Colorado District Court
Defendant: Brother Industries, Ltd., Brother International Corporation, Canon U.S.A., Inc., Canon, Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company, Motorola, Inc., Ricoh Americas Corporation, Ricoh Company, Ltd.
Plaintiff: BIAX Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent
MINUTE ORDER granting 316 Stipulated Motion to Dismiss Cisco Systems, Inc. With Prejudice. Plaintiff's claims against defendant Cisco Systems, Inc. are dismissed in their entirety with prejudice, with each party to bear its own fees and costs. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 7/3/12.(mnfsl, )
BIAX Corporation v. Motorola Solutions, Inc. et al
Filed: July 3, 2012 as 1:2010cv03013
Court: Colorado District Court
Defendant: Brother Industries, Ltd., Brother International Corporation, Canon U.S.A., Inc., Canon, Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company, Motorola, Inc., Ricoh Americas Corporation, Ricoh Company, Ltd.
Plaintiff: BIAX Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent
MINUTE ORDER. Plaintiff BIAX Corporation's 349 Motion to Withdraw [Its] Motion to Compel Documents from Defendant Motorola Mobility, Inc. is granted. Plaintiff BIAX Corporation's 340 Motion to Compel is withdrawn. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 7/3/12.(mnfsl, )
Positive Technologies Inc. v. Sony Electronics Inc et al
Filed: July 3, 2012 as 3:2011cv02226
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: ACER America Corporation, Amazon.com Inc., Asus Computer International, Barnes & Noble, Inc., Dell Inc., Gateway Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company, Kobo Inc., Lenovo (United States) Inc., MSI Computer Corporation, Sony Electronics Inc, Viewsonic Corporation
Intervenor: Chunghwa Picture Tubes, LTD.
Plaintiff: Positive Technologies Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 7/3/2012)
Optimum Power Solutions LLC v. Apple Inc. et al
Filed: July 2, 2012 as 3:2011cv01509
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Apple Inc., Dell Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company, Lenovo (United States) Inc., Sony Electronics, Inc.
Mediator: Diane DeVasto
Plaintiff: Optimum Power Solutions LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 7/2/2012)
Optimum Power Solutions LLC v. Apple Inc. et al
Filed: July 2, 2012 as 3:2011cv01509
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Apple Inc., Dell Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company, Lenovo (United States) Inc., Sony Electronics, Inc.
Mediator: Diane DeVasto
Plaintiff: Optimum Power Solutions LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUR-REPLY IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM CONSTRUCTION STATEMENT 184 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 7/2/2012)
Implicit Networks, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company
Filed: June 21, 2012 as 3:2012cv00685
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Hewlett-Packard Company
Plaintiff: Implicit Networks, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER GRANTING CONTINUANCE OF 6/22/12 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE TO 7/6/12., Motions terminated: 25 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER "STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND DATE FOR CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER" filed by Implicit Networks, Inc.. Further Case Management Conference set for 7/6/2012 03:00 PM in Courtroom 10, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 7/21/12. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/21/2012)
Implicit Networks, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company
Filed: June 14, 2012 as 3:2010cv03746
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Hewlett-Packard Company
Plaintiff: Implicit Networks, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER continuing Further Case Management Conference set for 6/15/12 to 7/6/2012 03:00 PM in Courtroom 10, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 6/14/12. Motions terminated: 98 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER "STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND DATE FOR CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER" filed by Implicit Networks, Inc..(tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/14/2012)
BIAX Corporation v. Motorola Solutions, Inc. et al
Filed: June 13, 2012 as 1:2010cv03013
Court: Colorado District Court
Defendant: Brother Industries, Ltd., Brother International Corporation, Canon U.S.A., Inc., Canon, Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company, Motorola, Inc., Ricoh Americas Corporation, Ricoh Company, Ltd.
Plaintiff: BIAX Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent
CONSENTED SUPPLEMENTAL PROTECTIVE ORDER Re: Broadcom and Netlogic Source Code, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 6/13/2012. (klmcd, )
Castagnola v. Hewlett-Packard Company et al
Filed: June 13, 2012 as 3:2011cv05772
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Hewlett-Packard Company, Regent Group, Inc.
Plaintiff: Carol Hill Castagnola
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO DISMISS, WITH LEAVE TO AMEND; SCHEDULING A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 8/24/2012. Case Management Conference set for 8/31/2012 01:30 PM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 6/13/12. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix)(jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/13/2012)
Backweb Technologies, Ltd v. Hewlett-Packard Company
Filed: June 13, 2012 as 4:2010cv04311
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Hewlett-Packard Company
Plaintiff: Backweb Technologies, Ltd
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER re 101 MOTION to Compel filed by Backweb Technologies, Ltd. Order requiring parties to meet and confer and to file letter brief re discovery dispute. (njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/13/2012)
BIAX Corporation v. Motorola Solutions, Inc. et al
Filed: June 13, 2012 as 1:2010cv03013
Court: Colorado District Court
Defendant: Brother Industries, Ltd., Brother International Corporation, Canon U.S.A., Inc., Canon, Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company, Motorola, Inc., Ricoh Americas Corporation, Ricoh Company, Ltd.
Plaintiff: BIAX Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER. Plaintiff BIAX's Motion for Clarification of the Preliminary Scheduling Order Regarding its Infringement Contentions against HP and Motion to CompelRelated Discovery 282 is granted and denied without prejudice in part. Defendants' Motorola Mobility, Inc., Motorola Solutions, Inc., Hewlett-PackardCompany, Ricoh Americas Corporation, and Ricoh Company, LTD.'s Motionto Compel 298 is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff BIAX's Second Motion to Restrict Access …
