Positive Technologies Inc. v. Sony Electronics Inc et al
Filed: January 6, 2012 as 3:2011cv02226
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: ACER America Corporation, Amazon.com Inc., Asus Computer International, Barnes & Noble, Inc., Dell Inc., Gateway Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company, Kobo Inc., Lenovo (United States) Inc., MSI Computer Corporation, Sony Electronics Inc, Viewsonic Corporation
Intervenor: Chunghwa Picture Tubes, LTD.
Plaintiff: Positive Technologies Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER re: claim construction experts (as modified) (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2012)
Positive Technologies Inc. v. Sony Electronics Inc et al
Filed: January 5, 2012 as 3:2011cv02226
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: ACER America Corporation, Amazon.com Inc., Asus Computer International, Barnes & Noble, Inc., Dell Inc., Gateway Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company, Kobo Inc., Lenovo (United States) Inc., MSI Computer Corporation, Sony Electronics Inc, Viewsonic Corporation
Intervenor: Chunghwa Picture Tubes, LTD.
Plaintiff: Positive Technologies Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER of dismissal re: Acer re 240 stipulation. (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/5/2012) Modified on 1/5/2012 (ysS, COURT STAFF).
Positive Technologies Inc. v. Sony Electronics Inc et al
Filed: January 5, 2012 as 3:2011cv02226
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: ACER America Corporation, Amazon.com Inc., Asus Computer International, Barnes & Noble, Inc., Dell Inc., Gateway Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company, Kobo Inc., Lenovo (United States) Inc., MSI Computer Corporation, Sony Electronics Inc, Viewsonic Corporation
Intervenor: Chunghwa Picture Tubes, LTD.
Plaintiff: Positive Technologies Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER of dismissal re: Gateway re 241 stipulation. (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/5/2012) Modified on 1/5/2012 (ysS, COURT STAFF).
Goldblatt v. Hewlett-Packard Company
Filed: January 2, 2012 as 5:2011cv05779
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Hewlett-Packard Company
Plaintiff: David Goldblatt
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Property Damage
ORDER re 7 Stipulation filed by David Goldblatt. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 1/2/2011. (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/2/2012)
Castagnola v. Hewlett-Packard Company et al
Filed: December 27, 2011 as 3:2011cv05772
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Hewlett-Packard Company, Regent Group, Inc.
Plaintiff: Carol Hill Castagnola
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
ORDER, Case reassigned to Hon. Jeffrey S. White. Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Executive Committee on 12/27/11. (ha, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/27/2011)
Positive Technologies Inc. v. Sony Electronics Inc et al
Filed: December 27, 2011 as 3:2011cv02226
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: ACER America Corporation, Amazon.com Inc., Asus Computer International, Barnes & Noble, Inc., Dell Inc., Gateway Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company, Kobo Inc., Lenovo (United States) Inc., MSI Computer Corporation, Sony Electronics Inc, Viewsonic Corporation
Intervenor: Chunghwa Picture Tubes, LTD.
Plaintiff: Positive Technologies Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER TO EXTEND CASE DEADLINES FOR RE PLR 4-2 AND 4-3 AND FOR THE EXCHANGE OF EXPERT DECLARATIONS FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/27/2011)
Convergence Technologies (USA), LLC v. Microloops Corporation et al
Filed: December 27, 2011 as 5:2010cv02051
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Dynatron Corporation, Microloops Corporation, The Hewlett-Packard Company
Plaintiff: Convergence Technologies (USA), LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER granting 89 Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint. The Tutorial and Claims Construction hearing scheduled for 1/3/2012, is VACATED and re-scheduled to 5/3/2012, at 9:00 a.m. for one full day. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 12/27/2012. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/27/2011)
Castagnola v. Hewlett-Packard Company et al
Filed: December 22, 2011 as 3:2011cv05772
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Hewlett-Packard Company, Regent Group, Inc.
Plaintiff: Carol Hill Castagnola
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT.. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 12/22/11. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2011)
Hewlett-Packard Company et al v. Microjet Technology Co, Ltd et al
Filed: December 20, 2011 as 5:2010cv02175
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Asia Pacific Microsystems, Inc, Guangzhou, Mextec Group Inc., Microjet Technology Co, Ltd, MIPO Science and Technology Limited, MIPO Technology Limited, PTC Holdings Limited, Sinotime Technologies Inc
Plaintiff: Hewlett-Packard Company, Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case Management Statement due by 1/20/2012. Case Management Conference set for 1/30/2012 10:00 AM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge James Ware on 12/20/11. (sis, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2011)
Backweb Technologies, Ltd v. Hewlett-Packard Company
Filed: December 20, 2011 as 4:2010cv04311
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Hewlett-Packard Company
Plaintiff: Backweb Technologies, Ltd
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER CONSTRUING CLAIMS. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 12/20/2011. (pjhlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2011)
-RBB Waller v. Hewlett-Packard Company et al
Filed: December 16, 2011 as 3:2011cv00454
Court: California Southern District Court
Defendant: Costco Wholesale Corporation, DOES, Hewlett-Packard Company, Staples, Inc., Western Digital Corporation
Plaintiff: Robert A. Waller, Jr.
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
ORDER granting in part and denying in part defendants' 4 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 12/14/11. (kaj)
Flint v. Hewlett-Packard Company
Filed: December 12, 2011 as 3:2010cv00597
Court: Kentucky Western District Court
Defendant: Hewlett-Packard Company
Plaintiff: Edward H. Flint
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 12/8/2011; plaintiff's motion for recusal is DENIED.cc: Edward H. Flint, pro se, counsel (TLB)
Kelora Systems, LLC v. Target Corporation et al
Filed: December 12, 2011 as 4:2011cv01548
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: 1-800-Flowers.com, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., Briggs & Stratton Corporation, Circuitcity.Com Inc., Costco Wholesale Corporation, Dell, Inc., Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P., Mason Companies, Inc., National Business Furniture, LLC, Newegg Inc., Office Depot, Inc., OfficeMax Inc., PC Connection, Inc., Rockler Companies, Inc., Shopko Stores Operating Co., LLC, Target Corporation
Plaintiff: Kelora Systems, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER Granting 433 Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice between Plaintiff Kelora Systems, LLC, and Defendant CircuitCity.com, Inc. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 12/12/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/12/2011)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: December 12, 2011 as 1:2011cv00244
Court: Idaho District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 34 Motion to Strike; denying without prejudice 21 Motion to Certify Class. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by cjm)
Flint v. Hewlett-Packard Company
Filed: December 12, 2011 as 3:2010cv00597
Court: Kentucky Western District Court
Defendant: Hewlett-Packard Company
Plaintiff: Edward H. Flint
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
MEMORANDUM OPINION by Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 8/26/2011; complaint must be dismissed without prejudice for want of subject matter jurisdiction. A separate order will be entered this date in accordance with this opinion.cc:Edward H. Flint, pro se, counsel (TLB)
BIAX Corporation v. Motorola Solutions, Inc. et al
Filed: December 8, 2011 as 1:2010cv03013
Court: Colorado District Court
Defendant: Brother Industries, Ltd., Brother International Corporation, Canon U.S.A., Inc., Canon, Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company, Motorola, Inc., Ricoh Americas Corporation, Ricoh Company, Ltd.
Plaintiff: BIAX Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent
MINUTE ORDER granting 215 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Leave to Amend BIAX's Infringement Contentions. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 12/8/11.(mnfsl, )
-VBK Nomadix, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company et al
Filed: December 7, 2011 as 2:2009cv08441
Court: California Central District Court
ORDER by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: denying 507 Defendant Wayport, Inc.s Motion for Leave to Amend Answer and Counterclaims. (lc)
-VBK Nomadix, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company et al
Filed: December 1, 2011 as 2:2009cv08441
Court: California Central District Court
ORDER by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: The court takes for Leave to File a Sur-Reply in Opposition to Nomadix, Inc.s Motion for Summary Judgment of Noninfringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,996,073 and 7,580,376, or in the Alternative, to Strike 665 under s ubmission. The court will evaluate whether the additional briefing is appropriate following review of the parties moving papers and after hearing oral argument on the underlying Motion for Summary Judgment, scheduled for hearing on December…
Optimum Power Solutions LLC v. Apple Inc. et al
Filed: November 30, 2011 as 3:2011cv01509
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Apple Inc., Dell Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company, Lenovo (United States) Inc., Sony Electronics, Inc.
Mediator: Diane DeVasto
Plaintiff: Optimum Power Solutions LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER granting request to appear by phone. Counsel to provide court with phone number (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2011)
Flint v. Hewlett-Packard Company
Filed: November 30, 2011 as 3:2010cv00597
Court: Kentucky Western District Court
Defendant: Hewlett-Packard Company
Plaintiff: Edward H. Flint
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER signed by Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 11/29/2011. For the reasons set forth, Plaintiff's most recent motion for this Court to disqualify itself in this action is without merit and moot. The Motion must be DENIED. Clerk of Court is directed to again forward to the Plaintiff, a copy of the Memorandum Opinion and Order which were entered on 8/30/2011.cc: Plaintiff, pro se; Counsel (RLK)
