Kelora Systems, LLC v. Target Corporation et al
Filed: April 5, 2011 as 4:2011cv01548
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: 1-800-Flowers.com, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., Briggs & Stratton Corporation, Circuitcity.Com Inc., Costco Wholesale Corporation, Dell, Inc., Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P., Mason Companies, Inc., National Business Furniture, LLC, Newegg Inc., Office Depot, Inc., OfficeMax Inc., PC Connection, Inc., Rockler Companies, Inc., Shopko Stores Operating Co., LLC, Target Corporation
Plaintiff: Kelora Systems, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER TO RESPOND TO INTENT TO RELATE CASES. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 4/5/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/5/2011) *** DISREGARD, THIS IS A DUPLICATE FILING. SEE ORIGINAL ORDER, DOCKET NO. 161 ***
Kelora Systems, LLC v. Target Corporation et al
Filed: April 4, 2011 as 5:2011cv01548
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: 1-800-Flowers.com, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., Briggs & Stratton Corporation, Circuitcity.Com Inc., Costco Wholesale Corporation, Dell, Inc., Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P., Mason Companies, Inc., National Business Furniture, LLC, Newegg Inc., Office Depot, Inc., OfficeMax Inc., PC Connection, Inc., Rockler Companies, Inc., Shopko Stores Operating Co., LLC, Target Corporation
Plaintiff: Kelora Systems, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER TO RESPOND TO INTENT TO RELATE CASE. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 4/4/2011. (cwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/4/2011)
Kelora Systems, LLC v. Target Corporation et al
Filed: April 4, 2011 as 4:2011cv01548
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: 1-800-Flowers.com, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., Briggs & Stratton Corporation, Circuitcity.Com Inc., Costco Wholesale Corporation, Dell, Inc., Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P., Mason Companies, Inc., National Business Furniture, LLC, Newegg Inc., Office Depot, Inc., OfficeMax Inc., PC Connection, Inc., Rockler Companies, Inc., Shopko Stores Operating Co., LLC, Target Corporation
Plaintiff: Kelora Systems, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER TO RESPOND TO INTENT TO RELATE CASE. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 4/4/2011. (cwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/4/2011)
Hewlett-Packard Company v. Epson Imaging Devices Corporation et al
Filed: March 31, 2011 as 3:2010cv05577
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Epson Electronics America, Inc., Epson Imaging Devices Corporation
Plaintiff: Hewlett-Packard Company
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
ORDER granting request to extend deadline for Epson Imaging to respond to HP's complaint (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2011)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: March 30, 2011 as 5:2010cv03633
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
ORDER Denying 25 Plaintiff's Motion for De Novo Standard of Review; Adopting Heightened Abuse of Discretion Review. The March 31, 2011 motion hearing is vacated. The March 31, 2011 Case Management Conference remains as set. Signed by Judge Koh on 3/30/2011. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2011)
Neon Enterprise Software, LLC v. International Business Machines Corporation
Filed: March 29, 2011 as 5:2011mc80058
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: International Business Machines Corporation
Miscellaneous: Hewlett-Packard Company
Plaintiff: Neon Enterprise Software, LLC
ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh granting 9 Motion to Relate Case. (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2011)
Backweb Technologies, Ltd v. Hewlett-Packard Company
Filed: March 29, 2011 as 4:2010cv04311
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Hewlett-Packard Company
Plaintiff: Backweb Technologies, Ltd
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER by Judge Nandor J. Vadas finding as moot 49 HP's Motion for Protective Order; finding as moot 54 BackWeb's Motion to Compel; and granting 60 Joint Motion to Withdraw. The hearing set for March 30, 2011 is vacated. (njvlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2011)
Neon Enterprise Software, LLC v. International Business Machines Corporation
Filed: March 29, 2011 as 5:2011mc80058
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: International Business Machines Corporation
Miscellaneous: Hewlett-Packard Company
Plaintiff: Neon Enterprise Software, LLC
ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh granting 4 Motion for Pro Hac Vice. (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2011)
Neon Enterprise Software, LLC v. International Business Machines Corporation
Filed: March 29, 2011 as 5:2011mc80058
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: International Business Machines Corporation
Miscellaneous: Hewlett-Packard Company
Plaintiff: Neon Enterprise Software, LLC
ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh granting 6 Motion for Pro Hac Vice. (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2011)
Zwart v. Hewlett-Packard Company
Filed: March 24, 2011 as 5:2010cv03992
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Hewlett-Packard Company
Plaintiff: Benton P. Zwart
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
STIPULATION AND ORDER ENLARGING TIME AND SETTING DEADLINES re 30 . Case Management Conference set for 6/10/2011 09:00 AM, to be heard with the motion, in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose. Motion to Dismiss Hearing set for 6/10/2011 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Jeremy Fogel. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 3/23/11. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/24/2011)
WIAV Networks, LLC v. 3Com Corporation et al
Filed: March 22, 2011 as 3:2010cv03448
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: 3COM Corporation, ACER America Corporation, Acer Inc., Asus Computer International, Asustek Computer, Inc., Belkin International, Inc., Belkin, Inc., Canon Inc., Canon U.S.A., Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., D-Link Corporation, D-Link Systems, Inc., Dell Inc., Epson America, Inc., Fujitsu America, Inc., Fujitsu Ltd., Gateway, Inc., General Dynamics Itronix Corporation, Hewlett Packard Company, Huawei America, Inc., Lexmark International, Inc., Linksys Corporation, Motorola, Inc., Netgear, Inc., Nintendo Company, Ltd., Nintendo of America, Inc., Nokia Corporation, Nokia, Inc., Novatel Technology, Inc., Novatel Wireless Inc., Novatel Wireless Solutions, Inc., Option NV
and others
Plaintiff: WIAV Networks, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER CONTINUING TECHNOLOGY TUTORIAL AND MARKMAN HEARING Claims Construction Hearing set for 5/25/2011 01:30 PM. Tutorial Hearing set for 5/11/2011 01:30 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Alsup on March 22, 2011. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/22/2011)
Perron et al v. Hewlett-Packard Company
Filed: March 21, 2011 as 5:2010cv00695
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Hewlett-Packard Company
Plaintiff: G. David Hatfield, Normand Perrron
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 50 Advancing Hearing Date on Plaintiff's Motion to Stay. Motion Hearing set for 4/7/2011 01:30 PM in Courtroom 4, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Lucy H. Koh. Signed by Judge Koh on 3/21/2011. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/21/2011)
WIAV Networks, LLC v. 3Com Corporation et al
Filed: March 18, 2011 as 3:2010cv03448
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: 3COM Corporation, ACER America Corporation, Acer Inc., Asus Computer International, Asustek Computer, Inc., Belkin International, Inc., Belkin, Inc., Canon Inc., Canon U.S.A., Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., D-Link Corporation, D-Link Systems, Inc., Dell Inc., Epson America, Inc., Fujitsu America, Inc., Fujitsu Ltd., Gateway, Inc., General Dynamics Itronix Corporation, Hewlett Packard Company, Huawei America, Inc., Lexmark International, Inc., Linksys Corporation, Motorola, Inc., Netgear, Inc., Nintendo Company, Ltd., Nintendo of America, Inc., Nokia Corporation, Nokia, Inc., Novatel Technology, Inc., Novatel Wireless Inc., Novatel Wireless Solutions, Inc., Option NV
and others
Plaintiff: WIAV Networks, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER REGARDING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEFING SCHEDULE re 657 Stipulation filed by Hewlett Packard Company. Signed by Judge Alsup on March 18, 2011. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/18/2011)
WIAV Networks, LLC v. 3Com Corporation et al
Filed: March 17, 2011 as 3:2010cv03448
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: 3COM Corporation, ACER America Corporation, Acer Inc., Asus Computer International, Asustek Computer, Inc., Belkin International, Inc., Belkin, Inc., Canon Inc., Canon U.S.A., Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., D-Link Corporation, D-Link Systems, Inc., Dell Inc., Epson America, Inc., Fujitsu America, Inc., Fujitsu Ltd., Gateway, Inc., General Dynamics Itronix Corporation, Hewlett Packard Company, Huawei America, Inc., Lexmark International, Inc., Linksys Corporation, Motorola, Inc., Netgear, Inc., Nintendo Company, Ltd., Nintendo of America, Inc., Nokia Corporation, Nokia, Inc., Novatel Technology, Inc., Novatel Wireless Inc., Novatel Wireless Solutions, Inc., Option NV
and others
Plaintiff: WIAV Networks, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER REGARDING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Signed by Judge Alsup on March 17, 2011. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/17/2011)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: March 15, 2011 as 1:2010cv02684
Court: Colorado District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
ORDER ACCEPTED re 10 Report and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge.granting 7 Motion to Stay which has been construed as a motion for administrative closure; this action is administratively CLOSED pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.2. by Judge William J. Martinez on 3/15/2011.(erv, )
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: March 15, 2011 as 5:2010cv03633
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
ORDER re 29 Adopting Joint Stipulation to Remove Incorrectly Filed Documents in Docket Entry 28 . Signed by Judge Koh on 3/15/2011. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2011)
Backweb Technologies, Ltd v. Hewlett-Packard Company
Filed: March 11, 2011 as 4:2010cv04311
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Hewlett-Packard Company
Plaintiff: Backweb Technologies, Ltd
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER Granting 56 Stipulation Shortening Time for Hearing on Plaintiff's Cross-Motion to Compel Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition Topics. Hearing on Plaintiff's Cross-Motion to Compel set for 3/30/2011 at 03:00 PM in Courtroom D, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas. Signed by Judge Nandor J. Vadas on March 11, 2011. (njvlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2011)
Kent v. Hewlett-Packard Company
Filed: March 10, 2011 as 5:2009cv05341
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Hewlett-Packard Company
Plaintiff: Michael A Kent
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
STIPULATION AND ORDER SCHEDULING HEARING ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND VACATING CASE MANGEMENT CONFERENCE (approving 85 ). Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 3/10/2011. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/10/2011)
Johnson et al v. Hewlett-Packard Company
Filed: March 8, 2011 as 3:2009cv03596
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Hewlett-Packard Company
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Johnson, Jennifer Riese, Shaun Simmons
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman denying 173 Motion for Extension of Time to File (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2011)
U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC v. Acer, Inc. et al
Filed: March 7, 2011 as 5:2010cv03724
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Acer, Inc., ACER America Corporation, Apple, Inc., Asus Computer International, Asustek Computer Inc., Dell Inc., Fujitsu Ltd., Fujitsu America, Inc., Gateway, Inc., Hewlett Packard Co., Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Electronics Inc., Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America, Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Nvidia Corporation, U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC
Intervenor: Intel Corporation, Atheros Communications, Inc., Broadcom Corporation
Intervenor Dft: Marvell Semiconductor, Inc.
Mediator: Robert Faulkner
Plaintiff: U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER FOLLOWING TUTORIAL HEARING; ORDER RELATING CASES FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES. Although it is the Court's practice to not relate cases that are already assigned to it, the Court orders that C 10-5254 JW be related to C 10-3724 for the p urposes of claim construction coordination. The Court lifts the stay imposed in C 10-5254 JW so that the parties in the AT&T case can meet and confer with the Defendants in the Acer case and participate in the claim construction process.…
