Hewlett-Packard State Court Decisions

White v. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co.

Filed: January 20, 2021

State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Case Number: 19-1696

White v. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co.

Filed: January 13, 2021

State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Case Number: 19-1696

NETWORK-1 TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY

Filed: November 20, 2020

State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 18-2338

NETWORK-1 TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY

Filed: November 20, 2020

State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 18-2338

Fonseca v. Hewlett-Packard Company et al

Filed: October 21, 2020

State: California
Court: California Southern District Court
Case Number: 3:2019cv01748

ORDER Granting 47 Motion for Entry of Judgment under Rule 54(b). The Court grants Plaintiff's motion for immediate entry of judgment on counts five, six, and eight pursuant to Rule 54(b). Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 10/21/20. (dlg)

NETWORK-1 TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY

Filed: September 24, 2020

State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 18-2338

ORACLE AMERICA, INC. V. HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE CO.

Filed: August 20, 2020

State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Case Number: 19-15506

Oracle America, Inc. v. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co.

Filed: August 20, 2020

State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Case Number: 19-15506

Copyright. The panel affirmed in part and reversed in part the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co. in a copyright infringement action brought by Oracle America, Inc., and Oracle International Co. Oracle, owner of the proprietary Solaris software operating system, granted customers a limited use license and required customers to have a prepaid annual support contract to access patches for a server. Oracle alleged that HPE improperly…

Fonseca v. Hewlett-Packard Company et al

Filed: August 11, 2020

State: California
Court: California Southern District Court
Case Number: 3:2019cv01748

ORDER Granting 18 Motion to Dismiss Counts Five, Six, and Eight of the Third Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 8/11/20. (dlg)

Hewlett-Packard Company v. Toshiba Corporation

Filed: June 5, 2020

State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Case Number: 20-20235

Hewlett-Packard Company v. Toshiba Corporation

Filed: June 5, 2020

State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Case Number: 19-20799

Anne Wolf v. Hewlett Packard Company

Filed: January 9, 2020

State: California
Court: California Central District Court
Case Number: 5:2015cv01221

FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Terry J. Hatter, Jr. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: 1. This Judgment incorporates by reference the Order re: Motion for Final Approval of Class Settlement [Dkt. 1 157 ], issued by the Court on March 29, 2019. The Court approves the payment of attorneys fees to Class Counsel in the sum of $ 859,456.86 and the reimbursement of litigation expenses in the sum of $ 81,456.86. (SEE JUDGMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS) (yl)

MICHAEL ALVES V. HEWLETT-PACKARD BENEFITS PLAN

Filed: November 19, 2019

State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Case Number: 18-55819

Davidson v. Hewlett-Packard Company et al

Filed: August 15, 2019

State: California
Court: California Northern District Court
Case Number: 5:2016cv01928

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 155 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 8/15/2019. (ejdlc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/15/2019)

Wapp Tech Limited Partnership et al v. Hewlett-Packard Enterprise Company

Filed: August 14, 2019

State: Texas
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Case Number: 4:2018cv00468

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court GRANTS Defendant's Motion to Stay (Dkt. # 13 ) and STAYS this case pending the resolution of the Subsidiary Suit or any other matter requiring the stay to be lifted. Wapp Tech Ltd. P'ship v. Micro Focus Int'l PLC, 4:18-CV-469-ALM Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 8/14/2019. (rpc, )

HEWLETT-PACKARD FINANCIAL SERVICES COMPANY v. NEW TESTAMENT BAPTIST CHURCH, INCORPORATED OF MIAMI, FLORIDA

Filed: August 13, 2019

State: New Jersey
Court: New Jersey District Court
Case Number: 2:2018cv10230

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING re 25 MOTION to Transfer Case to Southern District of Florida . Signed by Magistrate Judge Steven C. Mannion on 8/13/2019. (ld, )

WHITE v. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY et al

Filed: June 11, 2019

State: Maine
Court: Maine District Court
Case Number: 2:2017cv00491

DECISION AND ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT granting 54 Motion for Summary Judgment By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (clp)

MegaFon PJSC v.Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company

Filed: June 10, 2019

State: California
Court: California Northern District Court
Case Number: 5:2018cv06463

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE AMENDED COMPLAINT. Re: Dkt. No. 53 . HPE must answer the amended complaint within 14 days. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/10/2019)

TUCKER v. (HP) HEWLETT PACKARD, INC.

Filed: March 14, 2019

State: New Jersey
Court: New Jersey District Court
Case Number: 1:2014cv04699

OPINION. Signed by Judge Robert B. Kugler on 3/14/2019. (rtm, )

Oracle America, Inc. et al v. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company

Filed: February 6, 2019

State: California
Court: California Northern District Court
Case Number: 3:2016cv01393

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT EXPERT REPORTS by Judge Jon S. Tigar; denying 741 Motion to Supplement Expert Reports. Redacted version of order filed at docket 880 . (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/6/2019).