Cumento v. SCJ, Inc. et al
Filed: March 15, 2012 as 3:2012cv00050
Court: Connecticut District Court
Defendant: American Honda Motor Co., Inc., SCJ, Inc.
Plaintiff: Roberto Cumento
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
ORDER re: settlement conference. See attached. (Constantine, A.)
Cumento v. SCJ, Inc. et al
Filed: March 7, 2012 as 3:2012cv00050
Court: Connecticut District Court
Defendant: American Honda Motor Co., Inc., SCJ, Inc.
Plaintiff: Roberto Cumento
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
ORDER : A settlement conference is scheduled for 4/11/2012 at 1:00 PM in Chambers Room 262, 450 Main St., Hartford, CT before Judge Donna F. Martinez. See attached order for instructions. (Constantine, A.)
Zakskorn et al v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. et al
Filed: February 14, 2012 as 2:2011cv02610
Court: California Eastern District Court
Defendant: American Honda Motor Co., Inc., Honda North America, Inc., Honda Motor Company, LTD
Plaintiff: Stacie Zakskorn, Jessica Melgoza, Rachelle Schreiber
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 2/13/12; It is hereby ORDERED that CIV S-11-3120 WBS DAD is reassigned from Judge Shubb to the undersigned and from Magistrate Judge Drozd to Magistrate Judge Newman. Henceforth, the caption on documents filed in the reassigned case shall be shown as:CIV S-11-3120 KJM-KJN. It is further ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court make appropriate adjustment in the assignment of civil cases to compensate for this reassignment. It is…
Hidalgo v. Honda Motor Company, LTD et al
Filed: February 14, 2012 as 2:2011cv03120
Court: California Eastern District Court
Defendant: Honda Motor Company, LTD, American Honda Motor Co., Inc., Honda North America, Inc.
Plaintiff: Javier Hidalgo
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 2/13/12; t is hereby ORDERED that CIV S-11-3120 WBS DAD is reassigned from Judge Shubb to the undersigned and from Magistrate Judge Drozd to Magistrate Judge Newman. Henceforth, the caption on documents f iled in the reassigned case shall be shown as:CIV S-11-3120 KJM-KJN. It is further ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court make appropriate adjustment in the assignment of civil cases to compensate for this reassignment. It is further ORDERED…
-JKG Cartwright v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. et al
Filed: February 14, 2012 as 9:2009cv00205
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Defendant: American Honda Motor Co., Inc., Honda Motor Company, LTD., Honda North America, Inc.
Plaintiff: Ashley Cartwright
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle Product Liability
ORDER adopting 117 Report and Recommendation. Order granting in part, denying in part 41 Motion for Summary Judgment. The motion is granted as to Plaintiff's manufacturing and marketing defect claims. Plaintiff's manufacturing and marketing defect claims are dismissed with prejudice. The motion for summary judgment is denied as to Plaintiff's design defect claim. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 2/14/2012. (bjc)
Joao Control and Monitoring Systems of California LLC v. ACTI Corporation Inc et al
Filed: February 2, 2012 as 3:2011cv06277
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: ACTI Corporation Inc, ADT Security Services Inc, American Honda Motor Company Inc, BMW of North America LLC, Byremote Inc, Honeywell International Inc, Iveda Corporation, Magtec Products Inc, Mercedes Benz USA LLC, On Net Surveillance Systems Inc, Onstar LLC, Safefreight Technology Corporation, Skyway Security LLC, Sling Media Inc, Smartvue Corporation, Toyota Motor Sales USA Inc, Tyco International US Inc, Xanboo Inc
Plaintiff: Joao Control and Monitoring Systems LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
STANDING ORDER. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/2/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/2/2012)
-MRW Milton Evans v. American Honda Finance Corporation
Filed: January 18, 2012 as 2:2011cv04004
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: American Honda Finance Corporation
Plaintiff: Milton Evans
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - Order To Show Cause Re: Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Absent a showing of good cause, an action must be dismissed without prejudice if the summons and complaint are not served on a defendant within 120 days after the complaint is filed. Generally, defendant must answer the complaint within 20 days after service. In the present case, it appears that these time periods have not been met. Accordingly, the court, on its own motion, orders…
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: December 30, 2011 as 2:2011cv00717
Court: Ohio Southern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
ORDER granting 7 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's ERISA Discrimination Claim. Signed by Judge Gregory L Frost on 12/30/11. (sem1)
Roberts v. Madoff et al
Filed: December 19, 2011 as 1:2011cv11352
Court: Massachusetts District Court
Defendant: American Honda Finance, David Madoff, Edward Perry, Jennifer L Hertz, Mark S Cirone, Marshfield Broadcasting Company, Mitchell Levine, William C. Hillman
Plaintiff: Arthur J. Roberts, Jr.
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Judge Douglas P. Woodlock: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Based on the foregoing, it is hereby Ordered that this action is DISMISSED in its entirety for the failure of Roberts to comply with the Court's directives to file a show cause response and for the reasons set forth in the prior Memorandum and Order (Docket No. 6) discussing the various legal impediments to plaintiff's claims.(PSSA, 1)
Boddicker v. Honda North America Inc et al - See #31 dismissing defendant Honda North America, Inc
Filed: December 8, 2011 as 2:2010cv01018
Court: Iowa Northern District Court
Defendant: Honda North America Inc
Plaintiff: Nancy L Boddicker
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury- Product Liability
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 45 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 46 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 60 Motion in Limine. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jon S Scoles on 12/08/2011. (Stigler, Karo)
National Institute for Strategic Technology Acquisition and Commercialization (NISTAC) v. Nissan North America, Inc. et al
Filed: December 6, 2011 as 2:2011cv11039
Court: Michigan Eastern District Court
Counter Claimant: Nissan Motor Co, Ltd., Nissan North America, Inc.
Counter Defendant: National Institute for Strategic Technology Acquisition and Commercialization (NISTAC)
Defendant: American Honda Motor Co, Inc., Fuji Heavy Industries, Ltd., Nissan Motor Co, Ltd., Nissan North America, Inc., Subaru of America, Inc., Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc., Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc.
Plaintiff: National Institute for Strategic Technology Acquisition and Commercialization (NISTAC)
Nature of Suit: Patent
AGREED ORDER regarding the declaration of Richard P. Baron. Documents 81 & 82 are held in abeyance. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh (MBea)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: December 5, 2011 as 2:2011cv00486
Court: Ohio Southern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
ORDER granting 10 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 12/05/11. (rew)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: December 5, 2011 as 2:2011cv00486
Court: Ohio Southern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
CLERK'S JUDGMENT (rew)
-PJW Jeffery Howe et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al
Filed: November 17, 2011 as 2:2011cv06992
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: American Honda Finance Corporation, Bank of America Corporation, Does, Equifax Information Services LLC, Experian Information Solutions Inc, Trans Union LLC
Plaintiff: Cheryl Howe, Jeffery Howe
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
MINUTES OF ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Percy Anderson: Based on the factual allegations in the Complaint, it does not appear that Plaintiffs' claims against Defendants Honda and Bank of America arise out of the same transaction or occurrence. T he Court therefore orders Plaintiffs to show cause in writing, no later than 12/2/2011, why one or more parties should not be dropped from this case for improper joinder. In response to this Order to Show Cause, Plaintiffs may, if they so…
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: November 17, 2011 as 3:2011cv00238
Court: Ohio Southern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
ORDER - Pursuant to the Stipulation of Dismissal with prejudice by the parties pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. R. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the Court ORDERS that this case is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice and that the case be terminated on the Courts docket. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 11/17/11. (mr1)
Shi et al v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.
Filed: November 8, 2011 as 1:2011cv02682
Court: Illinois Northern District Court
Defendant: American Honda Motor Co., Inc.
Plaintiff: Chunyun Liu, Xioafa Shi
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle Product Liability
ENTER MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Signed on 11/8/2011.Mailed notice(drw, )
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: November 1, 2011 as 8:2011cv00422
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Judge David O. Carter: Granting 27 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. (See document for details.) Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Any amended complaint must be filed by December 12, 2011 . The current Scheduling Order is hereby VACATED, as is the Final Pretrial Conference set for November 7, 2011. The new schedule is as follows: Amended Complaint: December 12, 2011; Motion Cutoff Date: April 16, 2012; Trial Date: June 12,…
Boddicker v. Honda North America Inc et al - See #31 dismissing defendant Honda North America, Inc
Filed: October 25, 2011 as 2:2010cv01018
Court: Iowa Northern District Court
Defendant: Honda North America Inc
Plaintiff: Nancy L Boddicker
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury- Product Liability
ORDER denying 32 Motion in Limine; denying 33 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jon S Scoles on 10/25/2011. (Stigler, Karo)
White et al v. Don Mealey Imports, Inc. et al
Filed: October 24, 2011 as 6:2010cv01303
Court: Florida Middle District Court
Defendant: American Honda Finance Corporation, Don Mealey Imports, Inc., Rolfe & Lobello, P.A.
Plaintiff: Molly S. White, Ralph N. White
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
ORDER granting 56 Motion for relief from stay, permitting Defendant AHFC to proceed in state court. Signed by Judge Gregory A. Presnell on 10/24/2011. (ED)
-CW California Department of Toxic Substances Control et al v. A and G German Cars et al
Filed: October 18, 2011 as 2:2011cv07051
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: A and G German Cars, A and H Plating Inc, A O Smith Corp, Advanced Coating and Chemical, Aerospace Corporation, Air Logistics Corporation, Air Products and Chemicals Inc, AK Steel Corporation, Akzo Nobel Coatings Inc, Akzo Nobel Paints LLC, ALCO Capital Group Inc, Allergan Inc, Alma Piston Co Tomadur Engince Co, Aluminum Precision Products Inc, Alyeska Pipeline Service Company, American Airlines Inc, American Honda Motor Co Inc, Ameron International Corporation, Amico West, Amsec Major, Amtrak-National Railroad Passenger Corp, Angelus Block Company Inc, Anheuser-Busch Companies Inc, Anomet Metal Finishing, AOC LLC, Archdiocese of Los Angeles, Arkema Inc, Armtec Defense Products Co, Ashland Inc, Asphalt Products Oil Corp, Associates Insectary, Astro Pak Corporation
and others
Gammaloy Ltd: Facet Energy
Plaintiff: California Department of Fish and Game, California Department of Toxic Substances Control, California Regional Water Quality Control Board
Tank/Cleaning: Chemical Transportation
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
FINAL JUDGMENT: Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 54 and 58, this Court enters final judgment in this matter. The Consent Judgment approved and entered by this Court constitutes the final judgment in this action by Judge Dean D. Pregerson 15 ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (lc)
