Gayoso v American Honda Motor Co., Inc.
Filed: July 6, 2015
State: New York
Court: Other Courts
Citation: 2015 NY Slip Op 31144 (U)
American Honda Motor Co., Inc. v. Wingard
Filed: June 2, 2015
State: Georgia
Court: Georgia Northern District Court
Case Number: 1:2014cv03522
ORDER denying 12 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr on 6/1/2015. (ss)
Alma L. Gomez and Alberto F. Gomez v. Honda Motor Co., LTD., Et al. Appeal from 365th Judicial District Court of Maverick County
Filed: April 22, 2015
State: Texas
Court: Fourth Court of Appeals
Case Number: 04-14-00398-CV
Jones v. Honda of America MFG., Inc. et al
Filed: March 9, 2015
State: Ohio
Court: Ohio Southern District Court
Case Number: 3:2013cv00167
DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING IN PART AND OVERRULING IN PART DEFENDANT HONDA OF AMERICA MFG., INC.'S, MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. # 15 ); PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM OF DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION CLAIM UNDER OHIO REVISED CODE § 4112, BASED ON A FAILURE TO ACCOMMODATE AND BECAUS EOF DISABILITY B (FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF), AND PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM OF RETALIATION UNDER THE FAMILY AND MEDICAL LEAVE ACT, 29 U.S.C. § 2615(a)(2) (THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF), REMAIN VIABLE; ALL OTHER…
WHITWORTH v. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC.
Filed: February 25, 2015
State: Arizona
Court: Court of Appeals, Division Two Unpublished
Case Number: 2 CA-CV 2014-0122
State ex rel. Honda of Am. Mfg., Inc. v. Indus. Comm. of Ohio
Filed: November 25, 2014
State: Ohio
Court: Tenth District Court of Appeals
Citation: 2014-Ohio-5245
Case Number: 14AP-82
The Allee Corporation d/b/a Rusty Wallis Honda v. Texas Department of Motor Vehicles, Motor Vehicle Division; Rockwall Imports, L.P. d/b/a Honda Cars of Rockwall; and American Honda Motor Co., Inc. Appeal from 419th District Court of Travis County
Filed: November 21, 2014
State: Texas
Court: Third Court of Appeals
Case Number: 03-13-00096-CV
Am. Calcar, Inc. v. Am. Honda Motor Co.
Filed: September 26, 2014
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case Number: 13-1061
Calcar’s patents share a common specification, are derived from a priority application filed in 1997, and describe and claim a multimedia system to access vehicle information and control vehicle functions. Calcar accused Honda’s computerized navigation systems of infringement. Calcar claimed that the accused systems included additional infringing features beyond providing travel directions. Honda sought a finding of inequitable conduct, based on the actions of Calcar’s founder,…
Vehicle Operation Technologies LLC v. American Honda Motor Co. Inc.
Filed: September 12, 2014
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware
Case Number: 1:2013cv00537
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 9/12/2014. Associated Cases: 1:13-cv-00537-RGA et al.(ksr, )
Autofair 1477, L.P. v. American Honda Motor Company, Inc.
Filed: August 22, 2014
Court: New Hampshire Supreme Court
Case Number: 2012-091
Plaintiff Autofair 1477, L.P. (d/b/a Autofair Honda) appealed a Superior Court order denying its motion for summary judgment and granting summary judgment to defendant, American Honda Motor Company, Inc. (AHM), on plaintiff's petition for attorney's fees. In November 2010, AHM performed a warranty audit at Autofair, after which it proposed $45,733.02 of chargebacks and a potential escrow reversal of $54,571.17 for claimed warranty work that deviated from AHM's policies and procedures.…
State ex rel. Honda of Am. Mfg., Inc. v. Indus. Comm.
Filed: May 7, 2014
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Citation: 2014-Ohio-1894
Case Number: 2012-1499
Robert Corlew was an employee of Honda of America Manufacturing, Inc. when he was injured while working. Honda’s long-term-disability insurance carrier eventually determined that Corlew was not eligible for ongoing disability benefits because he was capable of gainful employment outside of Honda. Corlew subsequently retired because there was no position available at Honda. One year later, Corlew underwent surgery on his wrist. The Industrial Commission awarded…
STACEY W GORMAN V AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR COMPANY INC
Filed: August 6, 2013
State: Michigan
Court: Court of Appeals Published
Case Number: 303005
Honda Downs and Robert Downs v. Peter L. Ackerman
Filed: June 20, 2013
State: Mississippi
Court: Supreme Court
Citation: 2011-CT-00089-SCT
Honda Downs sued Dr. Peter Ackerman for her injuries after Ackerman rear-ended the vehicle she was driving. Ackerman admitted liability; the case went to trial on damages. The jury awarded Downs $20,000 but denied her motion for an additur or a new trial. Downs appealed, and the Court of Appeals found the jury's verdict was biased or otherwise against the overwhelming weight of the evidence. The case was reversed and remanded for an additur or new trial on damages. Ackerman appealed.…
Jordan K. Wilson v. David W. Dossett, American Honda Motor Co., and Fox Head, Inc.
Filed: June 14, 2013
State: Tennessee
Court: Court of Appeals
Case Number: E2012-01251-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge D. Michael Swiney
State ex rel. Honda of Am. Mfg., Inc. v. Indus. Comm.
Filed: April 18, 2013
State: Ohio
Court: Tenth District Court of Appeals
Citation: 2013-Ohio-1572
Case Number: 12AP-269
Honda Downs and Robert Downs v. Peter L. Ackerman
Filed: February 28, 2013
State: Mississippi
Court: Supreme Court
Citation: 2011-CT-00089-SCT
Petition for writ of certiorari filed by Peter L. Ackerman is granted. To Grant: Waller, C.J., Dickinson and Randolph, P.JJ., Lamar, Chandler, Pierce and Coleman, JJ. To Deny: Kitchens and King, JJ. Order entered.
State ex rel. Honda of Am. Mfg., Inc. v. Indus. Comm.
Filed: January 31, 2013
State: Ohio
Court: Tenth District Court of Appeals
Citation: 2013-Ohio-286
Case Number: 12AP-268
Honda Downs and Robert Downs v. Peter L. Ackerman
Filed: November 27, 2012
State: Mississippi
Court: Court of Appeals
Citation: 2011-CA-00089-COA
The motion for rehearing is denied. Carlton, J., would grant. Order entered.
WMW, Inc v. American Honda Motor Company, Inc.
Filed: October 15, 2012
State: Georgia
Court: Supreme Court
Case Number: S11G1828
The Supreme Court granted certiorari to decide whether the appellate court correctly construed the standing requirement for a motor vehicle dealership to sue under OCGA 10-1-664 (the anti-encroachment provision of the Georgia Motor Vehicle Franchise Practices Act). "While the anti-encroachment provision could have been drafted more clearly, we believe that the Act as a whole, and particularly its definitions provision, OCGA 10-1-622, elucidate[s] the proper application of the…
State ex rel. Honda of Ame. Mfg., Inc. v. Indus. Comm.
Filed: July 24, 2012
State: Ohio
Court: Tenth District Court of Appeals
Citation: 2012-Ohio-3335
Case Number: 11AP-528
