IBM Corp. v. City of Golden
Filed: February 13, 2020
State: Colorado
Court: Court of Appeals
Citation: 2020 COA 26
Case Number: 18CA1540
Kim v. International Business Machines Corporation
Filed: February 6, 2020
State: Hawaii
Court: Court of Appeals
Case Number: CAAP-19-0000803
(Order Granting November 27, 2019 Motion to Dismiss Appeal for Lack of Appellate Jurisdiction). Labor and Industrial Relations Appeals Board
Retirement Plans Comm. of IBM v. Jander
Filed: January 14, 2020
State: United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Case Number: 18-1165
Retirement Plans Comm. of IBM v. Jander
Filed: January 14, 2020
State: United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Case Number: 18-1165
Retirement Plans Comm. of IBM v. Jander
Filed: January 14, 2020
State: United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Case Number: 18-1165
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: December 16, 2019
State: New York
Court: New York Southern District Court
Case Number: 7:2019cv09900
<span id="jshide_2">Plaintiff v. Defendant</span><script type="text/javascript">window.jshides[2] = "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";</script>
Toa Systems, Inc. v. International Business Machines Corporation
Filed: November 4, 2019
State: New York
Court: New York Southern District Court
Case Number: 7:2018cv10685
OPINION AND ORDER re: 21 MOTION to Dismiss the Amended Complaint filed by International Business Machines Corporation. The motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Plaintiff is granted leave to file a second amended complaint for breach of cont ract based on IBM's alleged failure to meet its payment obligations prior to termination. Plaintiff shall file its second amended complaint no later than November 18, 2019. The Clerk is directed to terminate the motion. (Doc. #21). SO ORDERED. (Signed…
Wang v. International Business Machines Corp.
Filed: October 28, 2019
State: New York
Court: New York Southern District Court
Case Number: 7:2011cv02992
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 106 MOTION to Reopen Case filed by Jian Wang. The motion to re-open this case and for relief from final judgment is DENIED. The Clerk is instructed to terminate the motion. (Doc. #106). The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962).…
International Business Machines Corp. v. State ex rel. Indiana Family & Social Services Administration
Filed: October 10, 2019
State: Indiana
Court: Supreme Court
Case Number: 19S-PL-19
Martignetti v. International Business Machines Corporation
Filed: September 30, 2019
State: Maryland
Court: Maryland District Court
Case Number: 1:2018cv02431
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Richard D. Bennett on 9/30/2019. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk)
CIMINO v. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
Filed: September 30, 2019
State: District of Columbia
Court: District Of Columbia District Court
Case Number: 1:2013cv00907
MEMORANDUM OPINION re: 48 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Please see the attached Memorandum Opinion for additional details. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 09/30/2019. (lcapm1)
Christopher Middleton v. International Business Machines Corporation
Filed: September 26, 2019
State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Case Number: 19-11824
Langley v. International Business Machines Corporation
Filed: September 20, 2019
State: Texas
Court: Texas Western District Court
Case Number: 1:2018cv00443
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 86 Motion to Compel. Signed by Judge Lee Yeakel. (dm)
International Business Machines Corporation and Subsidiaries, Respondents, vs. Commissioner of Revenue, Relator
Filed: July 31, 2019
State: Minnesota
Court: Supreme Court
Case Number: A18-1740
International Business Machines Corporation v. State of Indiana, acting on behalf of the Indiana Family & Social Services Administration
Filed: June 26, 2019
State: Indiana
Court: Supreme Court
Case Number: 19S-PL-19
IBM v. BOOKING HOLDINGS INC. [OPINION - NONPRECEDENTIAL]
Filed: May 22, 2019
State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 18-1574
Nuance Communications, Inc. v. International Business Machines Corporation
Filed: May 7, 2019
State: New York
Court: New York Southern District Court
Case Number: 7:2016cv05173
AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, the Court denies Nuance's Motion for Summary Judgment, and grants in part and denies in part IBM's Motion for Summary Judgment. Nuance's claim for breach of the implied covenant o f good faith and fair dealing is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the pending Motions. (See Dkt. Nos. 116, 120.) The Court will hold a Status Conference on Tuesday, June 18, 2019, at 11:30…
IBM v. IANCU
Filed: April 3, 2019
State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 18-1065
IBM v. IANCU [OPINION - NONPRECEDENTIAL]
Filed: April 1, 2019
State: United States
Court: US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 18-1065
International Business Machines Corporation v. Simon
Filed: March 27, 2019
State: New York
Court: New York Southern District Court
Case Number: 1:2018cv02257
OPINION AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, IBMs motion for judgment on the pleadings is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Specifically, IBMs motion is GRANTED insofar as IBM seeks the dismissal of Defendants counterclaims, judgment on Count On e of its complaint, and judgment on Count Two of its complaint with respect to attorneys fees and expenses incurred in defending against the state-court action filed by Defendants. However, IBMs motion is DENIED insofar as IBM seeks judgment…
