LinkedIn Federal District Court Decisions

3Taps, Inc. v. Linkedin Corporation

Filed: November 15, 2022 as 3:2018cv00855
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: LinkedIn Corporation
Plaintiff: 3Taps, Inc
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions

ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen Denying 76 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2022)

Crowder et al v. LinkedIn Corporation

Filed: April 19, 2022 as 4:2022cv00237
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: LinkedIn Corporation
Plaintiff: Todd Crowder, Kevin Schulte, Garrick Vance
Nature of Suit: Antitrust

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 21 Motion for Pro Hac Vice for Jacobs, Jon. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/19/2022)

Crowder et al v. LinkedIn Corporation

Filed: April 19, 2022 as 4:2022cv00237
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: LinkedIn Corporation
Plaintiff: Todd Crowder, Kevin Schulte, Garrick Vance
Nature of Suit: Antitrust

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 35 Stipulation Re 27 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/19/2022)

LinkedIn Corporation v. Mantheos Pte. Ltd.

Filed: March 29, 2022 as 4:2022cv00651
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Mantheos Pte. Ltd., Jeremiah Tang, Yuxi Chew, Stan Kosyakov
Plaintiff: LinkedIn Corporation
Nature of Suit: Trademark

ORDER (as modified) by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 15 Stipulation ENLARGING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND RESCHEDULING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2022)

eBuddy Technologies B.V. v. LinkedIn Corporation

Filed: March 11, 2022 as 1:2020cv01501
Court: Delaware District Court
Defendant: LinkedIn Corporation
Plaintiff: eBuddy Technologies B.V.
Nature of Suit: Patent

MEMORANDUM ORDER: The Report and Recommendation (D.I. 69 ) is ADOPTED. Defendant's objections (D.I. 74 ) are OVERRULED and Defendant's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim (D.I. 17 ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 3/11/2022. (nms)

hiQ Labs, Inc. v. Linkedin Corporation

Filed: February 24, 2022 as 3:2017cv03301
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Linkedin Corporation
Interested Party: Farella Braun + Martel LLP
Petitioner: 3Taps, Inc
Plaintiff: hiQ Labs, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Copyrights

ORDER Granting as to 233 STIPULATION AND ORDER AMENDING CASE SCHEDULE AND PROVIDING FOR CERTAIN DEPOSITION PROCEDURES. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/24/2022. (vla, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2022)

Plaintiff v. Defendant

Filed: January 12, 2022 as 5:2020cv05704
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974

Order Denying 102 Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Decisions by the Supreme Court in Hughes v. Nw. Univ. and the Ninth Circuit in Kong v. Trader Joe's Co., 103 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION to Stay the Pleading Deadlines Pending Resolution of LinkedIn's Motion to Stay Proceedings. Defendants' response to Second Amended Complaint due by 1/27/2022. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 1/12/2022. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2022)

eBuddy Technologies B.V. v. LinkedIn Corporation

Filed: November 29, 2021 as 1:2020cv01501
Court: Delaware District Court
Defendant: LinkedIn Corporation
Plaintiff: eBuddy Technologies B.V.
Nature of Suit: Patent

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS regarding D.I. 17 MOTION to Dismiss filed by LinkedIn Corporation. Please note that when filing Objections pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(2), briefing consists solely of the Objections (no longe r than ten (10) pages) and the Response to the Objections (no longer than ten (10) pages). No further briefing shall be permitted with respect to objections without leave of the Court. Objections to R&R due by 12/13/2021. Signed by Judge…

Plaintiff v. Defendant

Filed: November 16, 2021 as 5:2020cv05704
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974

Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part 44 Motion to Dismiss; Denying 46 Motion to Stay. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 11/16/2021. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2021)

In Re LinkedIn Advertising Metrics Litigation

Filed: August 4, 2021 as 5:2020cv08324
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: LinkedIn Corporation
Plaintiff: TopDevz, LLC, Noirefy, Inc
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud

Order re 81 Joint Discovery Dispute Submission. Signed by Judge Susan van Keulen on 8/4/2021. (svklc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/4/2021)

In Re LinkedIn Advertising Metrics Litigation

Filed: August 3, 2021 as 5:2020cv08324
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: LinkedIn Corporation
Plaintiff: TopDevz, LLC, Noirefy, Inc
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 65 Motion to Dismiss; denying 66 Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge Susan van Keulen on 8/3/2021. (svklc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/3/2021)

In Re LinkedIn Advertising Metrics Litigation

Filed: May 5, 2021 as 5:2020cv08324
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: LinkedIn Corporation
Plaintiff: TopDevz, LLC, Noirefy, Inc
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud

ORDER RE 70 JOINT ESI PROTOCOL DISPUTE LETTER. Signed by Judge Susan van Keulen on 5/5/2021. (svklc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/5/2021)

In Re LinkedIn Advertising Metrics Litigation

Filed: April 23, 2021 as 5:2020cv08324
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: LinkedIn Corporation
Plaintiff: TopDevz, LLC, Noirefy, Inc
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud

ORDER denying 53 Motion to Appoint Co-Lead Class Counsel. Signed by Judge Susan van Keulen on 4/23/2021. (svklc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/23/2021)

hiQ Labs, Inc. v. Linkedin Corporation

Filed: April 19, 2021 as 3:2017cv03301
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Linkedin Corporation
Interested Party: Farella Braun + Martel LLP
Petitioner: 3Taps, Inc
Plaintiff: hiQ Labs, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Copyrights

ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen Deferring in Part and Denying in Part 182 Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss and Strike Counterclaims. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/19/2021)

hiQ Labs, Inc. v. Linkedin Corporation

Filed: September 9, 2020 as 3:2017cv03301
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Linkedin Corporation
Interested Party: Farella Braun + Martel LLP
Petitioner: 3Taps, Inc
Plaintiff: hiQ Labs, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Copyrights

ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen Granting in Part and Denying in Part 137 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Amended Complaint due by 10/7/2020. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2020)

NetSoc, LLC v. LinkedIn Corporation

Filed: June 26, 2020 as 3:2020cv00483
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: LinkedIn Corporation
Plaintiff: NetSoc, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent

ORDER granting 19 MOTION to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 6/26/2020. (vclc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/26/2020)

NetSoc, LLC v. LinkedIn Corporation

Filed: January 14, 2020 as 1:2018cv12215
Court: New York Southern District Court
Defendant: LINKEDIN CORPORATION
Plaintiff: NETSOC, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER re: (35 in 1:18-cv-12215-RA) MOTION to Transfer Case . filed by LinkedIn Corporation. For the foregoing reasons, the Court concludes that LinkedIn has made "a clear and convincing showing" that t he relevant factors weigh in favor of transfer, and its motion is granted. Solar v. Annetts, 707 F. Supp. 2d 437, 441-42 (S.D.N.Y. 2010). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion pending at docket entry 35 and to…

DiStefano Patent Trust III, LLC v. LinkedIn Corporation

Filed: September 28, 2018 as 1:2017cv01798
Court: Delaware District Court
Defendant: LinkedIn Corporation
Plaintiff: DiStefano Patent Trust III, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent

MEMORANDUM OPINION re 12 motion to dismiss. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 9/28/18. (ntl)

Opperman et al v. Kong Technologies, Inc. et al

Filed: April 27, 2018 as 4:2013cv00453
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Path, Inc., Twitter, Inc., Apple Inc, Facebook Inc., Beluga, Inc., Yelp! Inc., Burbn, Inc., Instagram, Inc., Foursquare Labs, Inc., Gowalla Incorporated, Foodspotting, Inc., Hipster, Inc., Linkedin Corporation, Rovio Mobile Oy, ZeptoLab UK Limited, Chillingo Ltd., Electronic Arts Inc., Kik Interactive, Inc.
Plaintiff: Marc Opperman, Judy Long, Claire Moses, Gentry Hoffman, Steve Dean, Alicia Medlock, Alan Beueshasen, Scott Medlock, Greg Varner, Rachelle King, Guili Biondi, Jason Green, Nirali Mandaywala
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Property Damage

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 935 STIPULATION WITH [PROPOSED] ORDER Dismissing Specified Claims Against Apple Inc. with Prejudice filed by Steve Dean. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 27, 2018. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/27/2018)

Fotohaus, LLC v. LinkedIn Corporation

Filed: March 15, 2018 as 3:2017cv07339
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: LinkedIn Corporation
Plaintiff: Fotohaus, LLC
Nature of Suit: Copyrights

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 16 STIPULATION WITH [PROPOSED] ORDER re LinkedIn's Time to Respond to Complaint filed by LinkedIn Corporation. Answer due 5/15/2018. Dismissal or Statement due by 5/15/2018. Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/30/2018 at 2:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 9, 19th Floor. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on March 15, 2018. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2018)