Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: February 28, 2025 as 2:2024cv01353
Court: Washington Western District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Family and Medical Leave Act
ORDER denying Plaintiff's 28 Motion for Reconsideration. Pursuant to the prior Order on the Joint Motion to Consolidate Cases (Dkt. No. 27 ), Plaintiffs Amended Consolidated Complaint remains due by 3/14/2025. If Plaintiff corrects her name and Defendant Actalent's name in the Amended Consolidated Complaint, the Clerk is DIRECTED to adjust the case caption accordingly. Signed by Judge Tana Lin. (cc: Plaintiff via USPS)(MJV)
Idrobo v. Microsoft et al
Filed: February 28, 2025 as 1:2023cv09999
Court: New York Southern District Court
Defendant: Microsoft, Disney, ABC, Warner Bros. Discovery, CNN
Plaintiff: Louis Idrobo
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 65 MOTION to Dismiss . filed by Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc, Cable News Network, Inc, 62 MOTION to Dismiss . filed by ABC News, Inc, The Microsoft Corporation, American Broadcas ting Companies, Inc, The Walt Disney Company. For the reasons stated above, Defendants' motions to dismiss are GRANTED, and Idrobo's operative Complaint is DISMISSED in its entirety, albeit with leave to replead his claims against Micr osoft…
ThroughPuter Inc v. Microsoft Corporation
Filed: February 11, 2025 as 2:2022cv00344
Court: Washington Western District Court
Defendant: Microsoft Corporation
Plaintiff: ThroughPuter Inc
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER granting Parties' 132 Stipulated Motion to Modify Scheduling Order. Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement due 2/14/2025. Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (MJV)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: February 11, 2025 as 2:2024cv01353
Court: Washington Western District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Family and Medical Leave Act
ORDER. Plaintiff's 19 Motion for Dismissal Without Prejudice is STRICKEN as withdrawn by Plaintiff. Plaintiff's attorney of record SHALL file a motion for withdrawal, in accordance with LCR 83.2(b)(1), within seven (7) days of this Order. Signed by Judge Tana Lin. (cc: Plaintiff via USPS)(MJV)
The New York Times Company v. Microsoft Corporation et al
Filed: February 3, 2025 as 1:2023cv11195
Court: New York Southern District Court
Cross Plaintiff: Paul Tremblay, Ta-Nehisi Coates, Junot Daz, Andrew Sean Greer, David Henry Hwang, Michael Chabon, Matthew Klam, Laura Lippman, Rachel Louise Snyder, Ayelet Waldman, Jacqueline Woodson, Sarah Silverman, Christopher Golden, Richard Kadrey
Defendant: MICROSOFT CORPORATION, OpenAI, Inc., OpenAI LP, OpenAI GP, LLC, OpenAI LLC, OpenAI OpCo LLC, OpenAI Global LLC, OAI Corporation, LLC, OpenAI Holdings, LLC
Plaintiff: The New York Times Company
Nature of Suit: Copyrights
CERTIFICATION The Court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2403(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.l(b), hereby certifies the following: In Daily News LP, et al., v. Microsoft Corporation, et al., 24-cv-3285, defendant Microsoft Corporation ("Microsoft") has drawn into question the constitutionality of N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law§ 360-1 in its motion to dismiss Count VIII of the plaintiffs' complaint. (See ECF Nos. 76, 77, 105.) Because this is an action proceeding in a United States…
ThroughPuter Inc v. Microsoft Corporation
Filed: January 28, 2025 as 2:2022cv00344
Court: Washington Western District Court
Defendant: Microsoft Corporation
Plaintiff: ThroughPuter Inc
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER granting Parties' 129 Joint Motion to Modify Scheduling Order. The deadline for exchange of preliminary claim construction and extrinsic evidence is 1/31/2025. Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (MJV)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: January 28, 2025 as 2:2024cv01353
Court: Washington Western District Court
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nature of Suit: Family and Medical Leave Act
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this matter should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute (i.e., comply with the Court's Order). Plaintiff's attorney of record is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why they should not be s anctioned for failure to comply with the Court's Order. Responses to this Order SHALL be filed by 2/11/2025. The Clerk SHALL renote the pending motions (Dkt. Nos. 16 , 19 ) to 2/11/2025. Signed by Judge Tana Lin. (MJV) (cc: Plaintiff…
Sayers v. Microsoft Corporation et al
Filed: January 23, 2025 as 4:2024cv00078
Court: Georgia Southern District Court
Defendant: Rockstar Games UK Limited, Microsoft Corporation, Nintendo of America, Inc., Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc., Rockstar Games, Inc., Rockstar North Limited and DMA Design Limited, Activision Blizzard, Inc., Treyarch Corporation, Roblox Corporation, Epic Games, Inc., Epic Games International Holdings, LLC
Plaintiff: Andrew Sayers
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury- Product Liability
ORDER granting 136 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro hac vice for attorney David Fuad. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 1/23/25. (wwp)
The New York Times Company v. Microsoft Corporation et al
Filed: November 22, 2024 as 1:2023cv11195
Court: New York Southern District Court
Cross Plaintiff: Paul Tremblay, Ta-Nehisi Coates, Junot Daz, Andrew Sean Greer, David Henry Hwang, Michael Chabon, Matthew Klam, Laura Lippman, Rachel Louise Snyder, Ayelet Waldman, Jacqueline Woodson, Sarah Silverman, Christopher Golden, Richard Kadrey
Defendant: MICROSOFT CORPORATION, OpenAI, Inc., OpenAI LP, OpenAI GP, LLC, OpenAI LLC, OpenAI OpCo LLC, OpenAI Global LLC, OAI Corporation, LLC, OpenAI Holdings, LLC
Plaintiff: The New York Times Company
Nature of Suit: Copyrights
OPINION & ORDER re: 236 LETTER MOTION for Conference to Compel addressed to Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang from Elana Nightingale Dawson, Vera Ranieri, and Michelle Ybarra dated September 3, 2024. filed by OpenAI, Inc., OpenAI OpCo L LC, OpenAI Holdings, LLC, OpenAI LP, OpenAI Global LLC, OpenAI LLC, OpenAI GP, LLC, OAI Corporation, LLC. This case is about whether Defendant trained their LLMs using Plaintiff's copyrighted material, and whether that use…
ThroughPuter Inc v. Microsoft Corporation
Filed: November 12, 2024 as 2:2022cv00344
Court: Washington Western District Court
Defendant: Microsoft Corporation
Plaintiff: ThroughPuter Inc
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER granting Parties' 125 Stipulated Motion to Modify Scheduling Order. Non-infringement and invalidity contentions due 12/6/2024, Proposed Terms for Construction due 1/8/2025, Preliminary Claim Construction due 1/28/2025, Joint Claim Construction Statement due 2/11/2025, Opening Claim Construction Briefing due 3/18/2025, Responsive Claim Construction Briefing due 4/29/2025. Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (SB)
Sayers v. Microsoft Corporation et al
Filed: November 12, 2024 as 4:2024cv00078
Court: Georgia Southern District Court
Defendant: Rockstar Games UK Limited, Microsoft Corporation, Nintendo of America, Inc., Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc., Rockstar Games, Inc., Rockstar North Limited and DMA Design Limited, Activision Blizzard, Inc., Treyarch Corporation, Roblox Corporation, Epic Games, Inc., Epic Games International Holdings, LLC
Plaintiff: Andrew Sayers
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury- Product Liability
ORDER DISMISSING Defendants Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc., Rockstar Games, Inc., Rockstar Games US Limited f/k/a Rockstar North Limited f/k/a DMA Design Limited, Microsoft Corporation and Mojang AB; and terminating 73 Motion to Compel Arbitration; terminating 75 Motion to Compel Arbitration; terminating 79 Motion to Dismiss; terminating 109 Motion for Joinder; terminating 109 Motion to Compel Arbitration. Signed by Chief District Judge R. Stan Baker on 11/12/2024.…
Shankar v. Microsoft Corporation et al
Filed: November 5, 2024 as 2:2024cv00308
Court: Washington Western District Court
Defendant: Microsoft Corporation, Amy Lowen, Rohan Kumar, Scott Guthrie, Denise Westerdahl, Sonali Gururaja
Plaintiff: Raghavendran Shankar
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
MINUTE ORDER: The Court previously ordered Plaintiff to show cause why it should not find him to be a vexatious litigant (Dkt. No. 91 ). In so ordering, the Court warned Plaintiff that it "[would] not consider a response that exceeds five (5) pages in length." (Dkt. No. 91 at 2.) Plaintiff submitted a response (Dkt. No. 96 ) and a praecipe correcting the response (Dkt. No. 108 ), both of which combined totaled a little over five (5) pages. Nevertheless, the Court…
Shankar v. Microsoft Corporation et al
Filed: November 4, 2024 as 2:2024cv00308
Court: Washington Western District Court
Defendant: Microsoft Corporation, Amy Lowen, Rohan Kumar, Scott Guthrie, Denise Westerdahl, Sonali Gururaja
Plaintiff: Raghavendran Shankar
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
ORDER. This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. This Court FINDS Plaintiff to be a vexatious litigant and ORDERS as follows: The Clerk of the Court is INSTRUCTED not to automatically accept any further filings from Plaintiff, whether via counsel or himself, if they are: (1) brought against Microsoft Corporation, any of its current or former parents, subsidiaries, or affiliate companies, any of its current or former officers, directors, or employees; OR, (2) brought against any of…
Shankar v. Microsoft Corporation et al
Filed: November 4, 2024 as 2:2024cv00308
Court: Washington Western District Court
Defendant: Microsoft Corporation, Amy Lowen, Rohan Kumar, Scott Guthrie, Denise Westerdahl, Sonali Gururaja
Plaintiff: Raghavendran Shankar
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
MINUTE ORDER: This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff's motion to withdraw docket number 93 in favor of docket number 96 (Dkt. No. 99 ). Plaintiff's motion is GRANTED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to STRIKE docket number 93 . The Cle rk is further DIRECTED to STRIKE all docket entries after docket number 96 , except for docket numbers 99 , 108 , and 112 , as unresponsive to the Court's order to show cause (Dkt. No. 91 ). Signed by U.S. District Judge John C.…
Haptix Solutions LLC v. Microsoft Corporation
Filed: July 26, 2024 as 8:2024cv00428
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: Microsoft Corporation
Plaintiff: Haptix Solutions LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge John D. Early. re Stipulation for Protective Order 25 (mba)
ThroughPuter Inc v. Microsoft Corporation
Filed: May 24, 2024 as 2:2022cv00344
Court: Washington Western District Court
Defendant: Microsoft Corporation
Plaintiff: ThroughPuter Inc
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER granting Plaintiff's 104 Motion to Lift Stay. The parties shall confer and provide the Court with a joint status report and proposed revised scheduling order, due no later than 6/21/2024. Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (SB)
Proxense, LLC v. Microsoft Corporation
Filed: May 24, 2024 as 6:2023cv00319
Court: Texas Western District Court
Defendant: Microsoft Corporation
Plaintiff: Proxense, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (lad)
Sayers v. Microsoft Corporation et al
Filed: May 6, 2024 as 4:2024cv00078
Court: Georgia Southern District Court
Defendant: Rockstar Games UK Limited, Microsoft Corporation, Nintendo of America, Inc., Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc., Rockstar Games, Inc., Rockstar North Limited and DMA Design Limited, Activision Blizzard, Inc., Treyarch Corporation, Roblox Corporation, Epic Games, Inc., Epic Games International Holdings, LLC
Plaintiff: Andrew Sayers
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury- Product Liability
ORDER granting 4 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro hac vice for attorney Tina Bullock. Signed by Chief Judge R. Stan Baker on 5/6/24. (wwp)
Shankar v. Microsoft Corporation et al
Filed: April 3, 2024 as 2:2024cv00308
Court: Washington Western District Court
Defendant: Microsoft Corporation, Amy Lowen, Rohan Kumar, Scott Guthrie, Denise Westerdahl, Sonali Gururaja
Plaintiff: Raghavendran Shankar
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
ORDER denying Plaintiff's 8 Motion to Appoint Counsel; granting Plaintiff's 11 Motion to Seal. Plaintiff's motion to appoint counsel (Dkt. No. 8 ) is DENIED. The motion to seal (Dkt. No. 11 ) is GRANTED and the Clerk is DIRECTED to maintain Docket Numbers 1 , 5 , 9 , and 10 under seal. Signed by U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour. (KRA)
Language Technologies Incorporated v. Microsoft Corporation
Filed: March 29, 2024 as 4:2023cv00520
Court: Arizona District Court
Defendant: Microsoft Corporation
Plaintiff: Language Technologies Incorporated
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER granting 16 Microsoft's Motion to Dismiss. It is further ordered that LTI may file an Amended Complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. If LTI does not file an Amended Complaint before this deadline, the matter will be closed. Signed by Senior Judge Raner C Collins on 3/29/2024. (ARC)
