Potter Voice Technologies LLC, v. Apple, Inc., et al.,
Filed: March 29, 2013 as 1:2012cv01096
Court: Colorado District Court
Defendant: Apple, Inc.,, Google, Inc.,, HTC America, Inc., HTC Corporation, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.,, Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Sony Corporation, Sony Mobile Communications AB, Sony Corporation of America,, LG Electronics, Inc.,, LG Electronics Mobilecomm U.S.A., Inc.,, Motorola Solutions, Inc., Motorola Mobility, Inc., ZTE Corporation, ZTE (USA) Inc.,, Kyocera Corporation,, Sharp Corporation,, Sharp Electronics Corporation,, Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.,, Huawei America, Inc.,, Pantech Wireless, Inc., Research In Motion Limited, Research In Motion Corporation,, Microsoft Corporation,, Nokia Corporation,, Nokia, Inc.
Plaintiff: Potter Voice Technologies LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER granting 180 Motion to Transfer Case. The claims of the plaintiff, Potter Voice Technologies LLC, against defendant, Apple, Inc., as stated in the plaintiff's fourth amended complaint 271 are TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 3/29/13. (kfinn, )
Mediostream Inc. v. Acer Inc. et al
Filed: March 29, 2013 as 3:2010cv05762
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Asus Computer International Inc, Apple Inc., Acer America Corporation, Sonic Solutions, Hewlett-Packard Company, Sony Corporation, Acer Inc., Asustek Computer Inc., Dell Inc., Microsoft Corporation
Plaintiff: Mediostream Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ASUS COMPUTER INTERNATIONAL AND ASUSTEK COMPUTER, INC. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 3/29/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2013)
Potter Voice Technologies LLC, v. Apple, Inc., et al.,
Filed: March 29, 2013 as 1:2012cv01096
Court: Colorado District Court
Defendant: Apple, Inc.,, Google, Inc.,, HTC America, Inc., HTC Corporation, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.,, Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Sony Corporation, Sony Mobile Communications AB, Sony Corporation of America,, LG Electronics, Inc.,, LG Electronics Mobilecomm U.S.A., Inc.,, Motorola Solutions, Inc., Motorola Mobility, Inc., ZTE Corporation, ZTE (USA) Inc.,, Kyocera Corporation,, Sharp Corporation,, Sharp Electronics Corporation,, Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.,, Huawei America, Inc.,, Pantech Wireless, Inc., Research In Motion Limited, Research In Motion Corporation,, Microsoft Corporation,, Nokia Corporation,, Nokia, Inc.
Plaintiff: Potter Voice Technologies LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER. Defendant Apple Inc.'s Motion To Sever 179 is GRANTED; Microsoft Corporation's Motion To Sever 209 is GRANTED; Google's Motion To Sever 233 is GRANTED; LG Electronics Mobilecomm U.S.A. Inc.s Motion to Join Google's Mo tion to Sever 240 is GRANTED; Kyocera's Motion to Join Google's Motion to Sever 243 is GRANTED; Sony Mobile Communications (U.S.A.) Inc.'s Motion to Join Google's Motion to Sever 251 is GRANTED; Huawei Device USA…
Mediostream Inc. v. Acer Inc. et al
Filed: March 27, 2013 as 3:2010cv05762
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Asus Computer International Inc, Apple Inc., Acer America Corporation, Sonic Solutions, Hewlett-Packard Company, Sony Corporation, Acer Inc., Asustek Computer Inc., Dell Inc., Microsoft Corporation
Plaintiff: Mediostream Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 132 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 3/27/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2013)
Microsoft Corporation v. Simple eWaste Inc et al
Filed: March 22, 2013 as 2:2012cv03658
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: Isaac Villeneuve, Simple eWaste Inc
Plaintiff: Microsoft Corporation
Nature of Suit: Copyrights
ORDER Re Stipulated Permanent Injunction 31 by Judge John F. Walter that defendants Simple eWaste, Inc., a California corporation, and Isaac Villeneuve, an individual, along with their officers, agents, servants, employees, and all those persons acting in concert or participation with them, shall be and hereby are PERMANENTLY ENJOINED and restrained. (jp)
Microsoft Corporation v. Simple eWaste Inc et al
Filed: March 22, 2013 as 2:2012cv03658
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: Isaac Villeneuve, Simple eWaste Inc
Plaintiff: Microsoft Corporation
Nature of Suit: Copyrights
ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE by Judge John F. Walter, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 32 . Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (kbr)
MedioStream, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation et al
Filed: March 21, 2013 as 5:2011cv03095
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Apple, Inc, James Owen Taylor, Microsoft Corporation, Sonic Solutions, Inc, Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America
Plaintiff: MedioStream, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 4/26/2013 09:00 AM. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 3/21/13. (jgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/21/2013)
Global NAPs, Inc. v. Verizon New England, et al
Filed: January 28, 2013 as 1:2002cv12489
Court: Massachusetts District Court
Counter Claimant: Verizon New England, Inc.
Counter Defendant: 1120 Hancock Street, Inc., Chesapeake Investment Services, Inc., Ferrous Miner Holdings, Ltd., Frank T. Gangi, Global NAPS Networks, Inc., Global NAPs New Hampshire, Global NAPs Realty, Inc., Global NAPs, Inc.
Defendant: Verizon New England, Inc., Massachusetts Department of Telecommunications and Energy, Paul B. Vasington, James Connelly, W. Robert Keating, Deirdre K. Manning, Eugene J. Sullivan, Jr.
Movant: Air Maryland, LLC, BABP,LLC, BroadVoice, Inc, Cable Internet Access, Inc., Convergent Networks, Inc., 5 Regent Circle Realty Trust, Global NAPs South, Inc., KB Graphics Aviation, Inc., Shout Out, Inc., 1003 Donnelly Avenue, Inc., 9 Executive Park Drive Realty Trust, 9 Executive Park Drive, Inc., 959 Group of N.H.., Inc., 959 Group, Ltd., Michael Couture, William Rooney, BABP (VI), LLC.
Plaintiff: Global NAPs, Inc.
Respondent: Global Financial Services Inc.
Trustee: South Coastal Bank, Bank of America, AT&T Corporation, Qwest Communications Corporation, Microsoft, Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc., BerkshireNet, Inc., Earthlink, Inc., America Online, Inc., Webster Computing Services, Crocker Communications, Inc., Cape.Com.Inc., Stowe Telecom, LLC, Vonage America, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Judge Rya W. Zobel: ORDER entered granting 889 Motion to approve settlement ; denying; denying 906 Motion for Contempt; denying 916 Motion for Clarification (Urso, Lisa)
Oliver v. Microsoft Corporation
Filed: October 15, 2012 as 3:2012cv00943
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Microsoft Corporation
Plaintiff: K. Oliver
Nature of Suit: Employment
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 51 FILING OF THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 10/15/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/15/2012)
Zody v. Microsoft Corporation
Filed: August 27, 2012 as 4:2012cv00942
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Microsoft Corporation
Plaintiff: S. Zody
Nature of Suit: Employment
CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 8/27/12. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/27/2012)
Olympic Developments AG, LLC v. Microsoft Corporation et al
Filed: July 10, 2012 as 3:2011cv01080
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Microsoft Corporation, Nintendo of America, Inc., Sony Computer Entertainment of America, LLC, Valve Corporation
Plaintiff: Olympic Developments AG, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER GRANTING re 132 Notice of Substitution of Counsel filed by Sony Electronics Inc., Sony Computer Entertainment of America, LLC. Turner Boyd LLP substitutes in for Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 7/10/12. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2012)
Microsoft Corporation v. Motorola Inc, et al
Filed: June 6, 2012 as 2:2010cv01823
Court: Washington Western District Court
Defendant: Motorola Mobility, Inc., Motorola, Inc.
Plaintiff: Microsoft Corporation
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
ORDER - The court DENIES Microsofts motion for summary judgment for breach of contract (Dkt. ## 236 (sealed motion) & 237 (redacted motion)) without prejudice. The court also DENIES Motorolas motion for partial summary judgment regarding repudiation (Dkt. # 228 (redacted motion) & 231 (sealed motion)) with prejudice, by Judge James L. Robart.(MD)
eBay Inc. et al v. PartsRiver, Inc.
Filed: May 21, 2012 as 4:2010cv04947
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Kelora Systems, LLC, PartsRiver, Inc.
Plaintiff: eBay Inc., Microsoft Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER by Judge Claudia WilkenON CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND GRANTING (94 in case 4:10-cv-04947-CW); (361 in case 4:11-cv-01548-CW); (57 in case 4:11-cv-01398-CW) MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/21/2012)
Microsoft Corporation v. TiVo, Inc.
Filed: March 22, 2012 as 5:2010cv00240
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: TiVo, Inc.
Plaintiff: Microsoft Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent
Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 112 Stipulation.(lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/22/2012)
eBay Inc. et al v. PartsRiver, Inc.
Filed: March 2, 2012 as 4:2010cv04947
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Kelora Systems, LLC, PartsRiver, Inc.
Plaintiff: eBay Inc., Microsoft Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER RE 2/10/2012 DISCOVERY LETTER 137 . Signed by Judge Beeler on 3/2/2012. (lblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/2/2012)
Microsoft Corporation v. Motorola Inc, et al
Filed: February 27, 2012 as 2:2010cv01823
Court: Washington Western District Court
Defendant: Motorola Mobility, Inc., Motorola, Inc.
Plaintiff: Microsoft Corporation
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 77 Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment by Judge James L. Robart.(MD)
Robocast Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation
Filed: February 27, 2012 as 1:2010cv01055
Court: Delaware District Court
Defendant: Microsoft Corporation
Plaintiff: Robocast Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 2/24/2012. (ksr, )
Microsoft Corporation v. Motorola Inc, et al
Filed: February 6, 2012 as 2:2010cv01823
Court: Washington Western District Court
Defendant: Motorola Mobility, Inc., Motorola, Inc.
Plaintiff: Microsoft Corporation
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 71 Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss. Telephone Conference set for 2/13/2012 at 02:00 PM before Judge James L. Robart, by Judge James L. Robart.(MD)
AlmondNet, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation
Filed: February 1, 2012 as 3:2010cv00298
Court: Wisconsin Western District Court
Defendant: Microsoft Corporation
Plaintiff: Almondnet, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
JUDGMENT entered in favor of Microsoft Corporation as to Count II of its First Amended Answer and Counterclaims; dismissing AlmondNet, Inc.'s claims; dismissing without prejudice Counts I, III and IV of Microsoft Corporation's First Amended Answer and Counterclaims. (PAO) (arw)
eBay Inc. et al v. PartsRiver, Inc.
Filed: January 31, 2012 as 4:2010cv04947
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Kelora Systems, LLC, PartsRiver, Inc.
Plaintiff: eBay Inc., Microsoft Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken denying (129) Motion to Strike ; denying (130) Motion to Shorten Time in case 4:10-cv-04947-CW; denying (451) Motion to Strike ; denying (452) Motion to Shorten Time in case 4:11-cv-01548-CW; denying (107) Motion to Strike ; denying (108) Motion to Shorten Time in case 4:11-cv-01398-CW. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2012)
