REALD SPARK, LLC v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION
Filed: July 2, 2025
State: United States
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 25-1445
The New York Times Company v. Microsoft Corporation et al
Filed: June 20, 2025
State: New York
Court: New York Southern District Court
Case Number: 1:2023cv11195
ORDER denying (601) Motion to Intervene in case 1:23-cv-11195-SHS-OTW; denying (95) Motion to Intervene in case 1:25-md-03143-SHS-OTW For the foregoing reasons, Proposed Intervenor's motion to intervene in this case under Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(a) and 24(b) is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to issue a summons as to each Defendant. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang on 6/20/2025) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:25-md-03143-SHS-OTW, 1:23-cv-11195-SHS-OTW (rro)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: June 12, 2025
State: Washington
Court: Washington Western District Court
Case Number: 2:2022cv01113
<span id="jshide_2">Plaintiff v. Defendant</span><script type="text/javascript">window.jshides[2] = "T1JERVIgZGVueWluZyBEZWZlbmRhbnRzJiMwMzk7IDEwNyBNb3Rpb24gKDEpIFRvIEFsbG93IEFkZGl0aW9uYWwgQnJpZWZpbmcgb24gUGxhaW50aWZmIE1pY3Jvc29mdCBDb3Jwb3JhdGlvbiYjMDM5O3MgTW90aW9uIEZvciBTdW1tYXJ5IEp1ZGdtZW50OyBhbmQgKDIpIFBlcm1pdCB0aGUgRXhwZXJ0IFRlc3RpbW9ueSBvZiBIb3VtYW4gSG9tYXlvdW4gZm9yIEFsbCBQdXJwb3Nlcy4gRGVmZW5kYW50cyYjMDM5OyBSdWxlIDU2KGQpIHJlcXVlc3QgKERrdC4gMTAxIGF0IDExKSBpcyBhbHNvIERFTklFRC4gU2lnbmVkIGJ5IEp1ZGdlIFRhbmEgTGluLiAoTEgp";</script>
Brar v. Microsoft Corporation
Filed: June 6, 2025
State: California
Court: California Eastern District Court
Case Number: 1:2025cv00527
ORDER GRANTING Motion to Proceed IFP 2 ; DENYING Motion for Protection Rights 5 ; First Screening Order requiring Response from Plaintiff 1 signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher D. Baker on 6/5/2025. 21-Day Filing Deadline. (Deputy Clerk TEL)
Lemko Corporation v Microsoft Corporation et al
Filed: June 4, 2025
State: Texas
Court: Texas Northern District Court
Case Number: 3:2022cv00363
Order Accepting 90 Findings and Recommendations re: 85 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. Accordingly, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is granted in part and denied in part. The Motion to Dismiss is granted with respect to Plaintiff's contributory patent infringement claims, which are dismissed with prejudice. The Motion is otherwise denied. (Ordered by Judge Sam A. Lindsay on 6/4/2025) (chmb)
SURFCAST, INC. v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION
Filed: June 4, 2025
State: United States
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 24-1156
FTC V. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, ET AL
Filed: May 7, 2025
State: United States
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Case Number: 23-15992
Clayton Act. The panel affirmed the district court’s denial of a motion by the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) for preliminary injunctive relief against Microsoft’s acquisition of the video game developer Activision Blizzard, Inc.The merger is the subject of an administrative proceeding that remains pending before the FTC. In its administrative complaint and in seeking a preliminary injunction in the district court, the FTC asserted that the merger would likely…
Microsoft Corporation v. Dept. of Rev.
Filed: April 29, 2025
State: Oregon
Court: Tax Court Regular Division
Case Numbers: TC 2022, TC 5404, TC 5422, TC 5421, TC 5440, TC 5423, TC 5406, TC 5372, TC 5446, TC 5442, TC 5442, TC 5441, TC 5441, TC 5437, TC 2024, TC 5416, TC 5453, TC 5457, TC 5459, TC 5431, TC 5465, TC 5413, TC 5458, TC 2025 and TC 5478
Broussard v. Microsoft Corporation et al
Filed: April 10, 2025
State: Georgia
Court: Georgia Northern District Court
Case Number: 1:2024cv01697
OPINION AND ORDER. The Defendants' Apple, Inc. and Roblox Corp.'s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 118 ] is GRANTED without prejudice to refiling a Second Amended Complaint. The Plaintiff is DIRECTED to file a Second Amended Complaint within 30 da ys of the date of this Order. The Plaintiff is CAUTIONED that failure to timely file a Second Amended Complaint will result in dismissal of this action with prejudice. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 4/10/2025. (tcc) Modified on…
The New York Times Company v. Microsoft Corporation et al
Filed: April 4, 2025
State: New York
Court: New York Southern District Court
Case Number: 1:2023cv11195
OPINION re: (99 in 1:24-cv-04872-SHS-OTW) MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint. filed by OpenAI, Inc., OpenAI Global LLC, OpenAI OpCo LLC, OpenAI, LLC, OpenAI Holdings, LLC, OpenAI GP, LLC, OAI Corporation, LLC. For the for egoing reasons, the Court denies (1) OpenAI's motions to dismiss the direct infringement claims involving conduct occurring more than three years before the complaints were filed; (2) defendants' motions to dismiss the contributory copyr ight infringement…
The New York Times Company v. Microsoft Corporation et al
Filed: April 1, 2025
State: New York
Court: New York Southern District Court
Case Number: 1:2023cv11195
OPINION & ORDER re: (163 in 1:24-cv-03285-SHS-OTW) LETTER MOTION for Local Rule 37.2 Conference // Letter Motion for Protective Order addressed to Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang from Elana Nightingale Dawson, Thomas E. Gorman, and Vera R anieri dated October 18, 2024. filed by OpenAI, Inc., OpenAI, LLC, OpenAI Holdings, LLC, OpenAI LP, OpenAI OpCo, L.L.C., OpenAI Global, L.L.C., OpenAI GP, LLC, OAI Corporation, LLC. For the reasons stated above, OpenAI'Fs moti on for a protective…
Idrobo v. Microsoft et al
Filed: February 28, 2025
State: New York
Court: New York Southern District Court
Case Number: 1:2023cv09999
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 65 MOTION to Dismiss . filed by Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc, Cable News Network, Inc, 62 MOTION to Dismiss . filed by ABC News, Inc, The Microsoft Corporation, American Broadcas ting Companies, Inc, The Walt Disney Company. For the reasons stated above, Defendants' motions to dismiss are GRANTED, and Idrobo's operative Complaint is DISMISSED in its entirety, albeit with leave to replead his claims against Micr osoft if he can properly allege…
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filed: January 23, 2025
State: Washington
Court: Washington Western District Court
Case Number: 2:2022cv01113
<span id="jshide_4">Plaintiff v. Defendant</span><script type="text/javascript">window.jshides[4] = "T1JERVIgZ3JhbnRpbmcgUGxhaW50aWZmJiMwMzk7cyA2MSBNb3Rpb24gZm9yIFBhcnRpYWwgU3VtbWFyeSBKdWRnbWVudC4gU2lnbmVkIGJ5IEp1ZGdlIFRhbmEgTGluLiAoTUpWKQ==";</script>
SANDSTROM v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION
Filed: January 7, 2025
State: United States
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Case Number: 24-1040
Lee v Microsoft Corp.
Filed: December 20, 2024
State: New York
Court: Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Citation: 2024 NY Slip Op 06504
Case Number: 954 CA 24-00042
Doe v. Microsoft Corporation et al
Filed: December 13, 2024
State: Washington
Court: Washington Western District Court
Case Number: 2:2023cv00718
ORDER granting Parties' 97 Stipulated Motion. Deadline for parties to serve expert report(s) relevant for class certification 7/28/2025, Rebuttal Expert Disclosure/Reports due by 8/20/2025, Amended Pleadings due by 8/26/2025, Joinder of Parties due by 8/26/2025, Plaintiff's motion for class certification due by 10/9/2025, Response due by 11/26/2025, Reply due by 12/19/2025. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (MJV)
Moreno v. Microsoft Corporation
Filed: December 12, 2024
State: Texas
Court: Texas Southern District Court
Case Number: 4:2023cv04451
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Granting 62 MOTION for Summary Judgment (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified. (knp4)
The New York Times Company v. Microsoft Corporation et al
Filed: November 22, 2024
State: New York
Court: New York Southern District Court
Case Number: 1:2023cv11195
OPINION & ORDER re: 236 LETTER MOTION for Conference to Compel addressed to Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang from Elana Nightingale Dawson, Vera Ranieri, and Michelle Ybarra dated September 3, 2024. filed by OpenAI, Inc., OpenAI OpCo L LC, OpenAI Holdings, LLC, OpenAI LP, OpenAI Global LLC, OpenAI LLC, OpenAI GP, LLC, OAI Corporation, LLC. This case is about whether Defendant trained their LLMs using Plaintiff's copyrighted material, and whether that use constitute s copyright…
Battle v. Microsoft Corporation
Filed: October 23, 2024
State: Maryland
Court: Maryland District Court
Case Number: 1:2023cv01822
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Lydia Kay Griggsby on 10/23/2024. (c/m p 10/23/2024 bg3s, Deputy Clerk)
Microsoft Corp. v. Dept. of Rev.
Filed: August 29, 2024
State: Oregon
Court: Tax Court Regular Division
Case Numbers: TC 2022, TC 5404, TC 5422, TC 5421, TC 5440, TC 5423, TC 5406, TC 5372, TC 5446, TC 5442, TC 5442, TC 5441, TC 5441, TC 5437, TC 2024, TC 5416, TC 5453, TC 5457, TC 5459, TC 5431, TC 5465, TC 5413 and TC 5458
