Xu Zhang v. Netflix, Inc.
Filed: April 18, 2024 as 2:2023cv02200
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: Netflix, Inc.
Plaintiff: Xu Zhang
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo re Stipulation for Protective Order 63 . (see document for details) (hr)
Fairstein v. Netflix, Inc. et al
Filed: February 22, 2024 as 1:2020cv08042
Court: New York Southern District Court
Defendant: Attica Locke, Ava DuVernay, Netflix Inc.
Plaintiff: Linda Fairstein
Nature of Suit: Assault, Libel, and Slander
ORDER: The final pretrial conference originally scheduled for March 7, 2024 is adjourned to April 3, 2024 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 11D. SO ORDERED., ( Final Pretrial Conference set for 4/3/2024 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 11D, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge P. Kevin Castel.) (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 2/22/2024) (ama)
Personalized Media Communications, LLC v. Netflix, Inc.
Filed: January 23, 2024 as 1:2020cv03708
Court: New York Southern District Court
Defendant: Netflix Inc.
Plaintiff: Personalized Media Communications, LLC
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER The stipulation is approved. The entire action, including all claims, counterclaims, and defenses asserted herein by any party, is hereby dismissed. Personalized Media Communications, LLC's claims are dismissed with prejudice. Netflix, I nc.'s claims for costs, fees, or expenses incurred with respect to this action are dismissed with prejudice, and all other claims, counterclaims, and defenses of Netflix, Inc. are dismissed without prejudice. SO ORDERED. (Signed by…
Valjakka v. Netflix, Inc.
Filed: January 8, 2024 as 4:2022cv01490
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Netflix Inc
Plaintiff: Lauri Valjakka
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER by Judge Jon S. Tigar granting 162 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 244 Motion for Leave to File. (mll, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/8/2024)
Valjakka v. Netflix, Inc.
Filed: October 26, 2023 as 4:2022cv01490
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Netflix Inc
Plaintiff: Lauri Valjakka
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION OF JOSEPH J. ZITO 208 . Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on October 26, 2023. (mll, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/26/2023)
AKC Global LLC et al v. Netflix, Inc.
Filed: June 13, 2023 as 2:2022cv08847
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: Netflix, Inc.
Petitioner: Waylon Reavis
Plaintiff: AKC GLOBAL LLC, A Killer's Confession, A Killers Confession
Nature of Suit: Trademark
JUDGMENT by Judge Dale S. Fischer. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiffs take nothing, the action be dismissed with prejudice, and Defendant recover costs of suit pursuant to a bill of costs filed in accordance with 28 USC section 1920. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jp)
Broadcom Corporation et al v. Netflix, Inc.
Filed: June 12, 2023 as 3:2020cv04677
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Netflix Inc
Plaintiff: Avago Technologies International Sales PTE Limited, Broadcom Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER RE JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS. Signed by Judge James Donato on 6/12/2023. (jdlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/12/2023)
Broadcom Corporation et al v. Netflix, Inc.
Filed: June 5, 2023 as 3:2020cv04677
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Netflix Inc
Plaintiff: Avago Technologies International Sales PTE Limited, Broadcom Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER RE MOTIONS TO SEAL. Signed by Judge James Donato on 6/5/2023. (jdlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/5/2023)
Xu Zhang v. Netflix, Inc.
Filed: June 1, 2023 as 2:2023cv02200
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: Netflix, Inc.
Plaintiff: Xu Zhang
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
MINUTES (In Chambers) Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal Re: Lack of Prosecution by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 6/20/2023. *See Order for Details.* (rolm)
GovTV Streaming, LLC v. Netflix, Inc.
Filed: March 13, 2023 as 2:2022cv07556
Court: California Central District Court
Petitioner: GOTV STREAMING, LLC, Netflix, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani re Stipulation for Protective Order 66 . (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS.) (et)
Hollywood Innovations Group LLC v. Netflix Inc. et al
Filed: October 17, 2022 as 2:2021cv09423
Court: California Central District Court
Defendant: Netflix Inc., Zip Cinema Co. Ltd., Kakao Entertainment Corp., Perspective Pictures Co. Ltd., Does 1-10, inclusive
Plaintiff: Hollywood Innovations Group LLC
Nature of Suit: Copyrights
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT NETFLIX, INC. by Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish re Stipulation for Protective Order 102 . See Order for details. (es)
Whyte Monkee Productions LLC et al v. Netflix INC
Filed: September 30, 2022 as 5:2020cv00933
Court: Oklahoma Western District Court
Defendant: Netflix INC, Royal Goode Productions LLC
Plaintiff: Whyte Monkee Productions LLC, Timothy Sepi
Nature of Suit: Copyrights
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 65 Defendants' Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Chief Judge Timothy D. DeGiusti on 9/30/2022. (mb)
Broadcom Corporation et al v. Netflix, Inc.
Filed: August 8, 2022 as 3:2020cv04677
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Netflix Inc
Plaintiff: Avago Technologies International Sales PTE Limited, Broadcom Corporation
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER RE MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge James Donato on 8/8/2022. (jdlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2022)
Whyte Monkee Productions LLC et al v. Netflix INC
Filed: April 27, 2022 as 5:2020cv00933
Court: Oklahoma Western District Court
Defendant: Netflix INC, Royal Goode Productions LLC
Plaintiff: Whyte Monkee Productions LLC, Timothy Sepi
Nature of Suit: Copyrights
ORDER granting 46 Defendants Netflix, Inc. and Royal GoodeProductions LLCs Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Timothy D. DeGiusti on 4/27/2022. (mb)
Fairstein v. Netflix, Inc. et al
Filed: April 20, 2022 as 1:2020cv08042
Court: New York Southern District Court
Defendant: Attica Locke, Ava DuVernay, Netflix Inc.
Plaintiff: Linda Fairstein
Nature of Suit: Assault, Libel, and Slander
ORDER: terminating 109 Letter Motion for Discovery. Having considered the submissions of the parties (Docs 109-113), the Court rules as follows: The depositions of the individual defendants Ava DuVernay and Attica Lockeshall take place in Los An geles where they reside or do business on condition that counsel for Netflix, who maintains an office in Los Angeles, shall make the office available for the conduct of the depositions. The depositions of any individual designated by…
CA, Inc. et al v. Netflix, Inc.
Filed: March 30, 2022 as 3:2022cv00373
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Netflix Inc
Intervenor: Amazon Web Services, Inc.
Not Classified By Court: Scott Woloson
Plaintiff: CA Inc, Avago Technologies International Sales PTE Limited
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER Granting Plaintiff's Motion to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review (Docket No. 51 in C-21-3649). Status Report due by 1/31/2023. Status Conference set for 2/7/2023 02:30 PM before Judge Edward M. Chen. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/30/2022. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2022)
Netflix, Inc. v. CA, Inc. et al
Filed: March 30, 2022 as 3:2021cv03649
Court: California Northern District Court
Defendant: Avago Technologies International Sales Pte. Limited, CA, Inc.
Plaintiff: Netflix, Inc.
Nature of Suit: Patent
ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen Granting 51 Plaintiff's Motion to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review. Status Report due by 1/31/2023. Status Conference set for 2/7/2023 02:30 PM before Judge Edward M. Chen. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2022)
Whitehead v. Netflix Inc. et al
Filed: March 18, 2022 as 1:2022cv00883
Court: New York Southern District Court
Defendant: Netflix Inc., The Travelers Indemnity Company Inc., Gabrielle Bailey, Geico
Plaintiff: David Louis Whitehead
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
ORDER: Plaintiff's amended motion (ECF 8) is denied for the same reasons stated in the Court's March 8, 2022, order. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). …
Whitehead v. Netflix Inc. et al
Filed: March 8, 2022 as 1:2022cv00883
Court: New York Southern District Court
Defendant: Netflix Inc., The Travelers Indemnity Company Inc., Gabrielle Bailey, Geico
Plaintiff: David Louis Whitehead
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
ORDER: The Court denies Plaintiff's motion for recusal (ECF No. 5), but grants his second motion for an extension of time to pay the fees (ECF 4). Plaintiff must pay the fees or submit an IFP application within 30 days. No further extensions w ill be granted. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369…
Charles v. Seinfeld et al
Filed: December 21, 2021 as 1:2018cv01196
Court: New York Southern District Court
Defendant: Jerry Seinfeld, Columbus 81 Productions, Inc., Embassy Row, Comedians in Cars, LLC, Sony Pictures Television Inc., Netflix Inc.
Plaintiff: Christian Charles
Nature of Suit: Copyrights
ORDER: Plaintiff's memorandum of law and Mr. Charles's declaration filed March 12, 2021, reference tax returns and other financial documents submitted to the Court for in camera review. Dkt. No. 151. The Court is not in receipt of t hese documents nor has it received a request to maintain these documents under seal. Plaintiff is ordered to submit these documents to the Court, and make any request to seal information pursuant to the Court's Individual Rules, by …
